1 of 47

Introduction to TIA and the �Local Designation System

September 7, 2022

2 of 47

Session Materials and Recordings

Session materials posted to website 1-2 weeks after each session

All 2022-2023 TIA webinar materials in Google Drive, in chronological order

Live recordings available in Google Drive. Recordings will not display participant names or faces.

3 of 47

Objectives

  • Understand the goals and impact of TIA
  • Identify key components of a local designation system
  • Learn best practices for cohort F system development

4 of 47

Agenda

10:00 a.m. – 10:25 a.m.

Introduction and Background

10:25 a.m. – 10:40 a.m.

TIA

10:45 a.m. – 11:30 a.m.

Local Designation Systems

11:30 a.m. – 11:50 a.m.

Cohort E District Example

11:50 a.m. – 12:00 p.m.

Close and Survey

5 of 47

Our Vision

To support districts in independently building and sustaining strategic compensation systems that differentiate teacher effectiveness.  These systems will incentivize teachers to stay, support more robust recruitment, and make the profession more desirable

Recruit

Retain

Reward

6 of 47

Supporting the Teaching Profession

Challenges

  • High teacher turnover (esp. in first 5 years)
  • Disproportionate placement of beginning teachers at high needs schools
  • Perception of teaching as not rewarding teachers for effectiveness

Positive Impacts

  • Accurate teacher appraisals lead to continued development and growth
  • Recognition of teacher effectiveness leads to improving practice
  • Retention of effective teachers
  • Recruitment into the district
  • Ability to reward teachers at high-needs schools

7 of 47

TIA and Teachers

Retention

“TIA is allowing me to stay in the classroom long enough to see my daughter grow up and one day see her in my classroom”

“TIA has made teaching financially stable for me and my family”

Recognition and Growth

“I used to think that I was a role model for my students only, but with TIA, I feel like I am a role model with my team”

“It is very humbling to receive such an amazing recognition. It only increases my desire to learn new skills and assist my fellow teachers in achieving the same acknowledgement”

8 of 47

TIA and Districts

Local Designation System

Recruitment

Compensation

Placement

Professional

Development

Advancement

“The Teacher Incentive Allotment has created a great deal of curiosity and interest among our teachers. They want to know what they can do differently to achieve a designation. Teachers are also working collaboratively to improve their practice. And we all know that this is crucial to improving student outcomes.”

“Seeing their faces and how excited they were to receive their designations. You could just feel the weight being lifted and the value being added to them as educators. We talk about building currency with kids and now we are building currency for our educators. There is a lot of power in what we could create in building the pipeline.”

9 of 47

How TIA is Different

Adequate and Sustainable Funding

Inter-Rater Reliability and Multi-Measure Evaluations

Available for ALL Teachers

Encourages Professional Collaboration

Increases Recruitment and Retention Rates

10 of 47

Why TIA?

Which one of the Teacher Incentive Allotment goals resonates most with your district? Why?

Recruit

Retain

Reward

11 of 47

Participating Districts

373 Unique Districts with Approved System Applications

12 of 47

TIA Allotment

2019-2020

2020-2021

2021-2022

$40,414,926

$43,046,976

$55,437,701

13 of 47

TIA

How it Works

14 of 47

How Teachers Earn Designations

Local Designation System

  • District-created system ​
  • District system requires approval ​
  • District determines and issues teacher designations

National Board Certification

  • Individual teacher achieves National Board Certification​
  • Districts may choose to support cohorts of National Board candidates

15 of 47

National Board Certified Teachers

Can National Board Certified Teachers in my district earn a designation if we don’t have a local designation system yet?

Yes. NBCTs who qualify*earn a recognized designation automatically, even if the district doesn’t have an approved local designation system yet.

*Must meet eligibility requirements

16 of 47

Funding for Teachers

The Teacher Incentive Allotment provides extra funding, from $3,000 - $32,000 per teacher per year, with more money for high needs and rural schools

RECOGNIZED | Base Salary $3 - $9K

EXEMPLARY | Base Salary $6 - $18K

MASTER | Base Salary $12 - $32K

17 of 47

Key Points

3 Designation Levels: Recognized, Exemplary, Master

$3K-$32K annually to districts per designated teacher

Greater funding at high-needs and/or rural campuses​

At least 90% of funds go to teacher compensation (student facing instructional staff) on designated teacher’s campus​

5- year designation validity regardless of teaching assignment, campus or district

18 of 47

Designation Eligibility: Local System

Employed by the recommending district in a teacher role (087 role ID in PEIMS) for at least 90 days at 100% of the day or 180 days at 50-99% of the day.

Not currently designated by a local designation system unless being recommended for a higher designation or in the last year of a teacher designation. 

Holds a Texas Standard Teaching Certificate

19 of 47

Local Designation System

20 of 47

Local Designation System True or False #1

  1. Our district, as a cohort F can receive approval to issue designations by the end of this 2022-2023
  2. Our district’s Cohort F application must include all teaching assignments
  3. Our district only needs to submit teacher names to be designated after our district has been fully approved

21 of 47

District Approval Process: TIA Two Step

Designations are dependent upon a two-step approval process

1. Application Approval

Districts submit application, which may include narrative components to TEA

2. System Approval

Districts submit teacher effectiveness data to Texas Tech University. TEA issues final approval.

22 of 47

Cohort F Application Timeline

Pre-Application

2021-2022

  • System Development
  • Stakeholder Engagement

Year 1

2022-2023

  • System Application (posts on November 1st)
  • TIA Teacher Buy-In Survey

Year 2

2023-2024

  • Capture Data

Year 3

2024-2025

  • Data Submission
  • Full System Approval
  • Designate & Compensate
  • Expansion & Modifications
  • TIA Annual Evaluation Surveys
  • Annual Program Submission

Post-Approval

2025-2030

  • New or Higher Designations
  • Expansion and Modifications
  • Annual Program Submission
  • TIA Annual Evaluation Surveys

23 of 47

The Big Three Critical Decisions �for System Development

Who can earn a designation?

    • Eligible campuses and eligible teaching assignments
    • If not all teachers, will we expand in future years?

How will we designate?

    • Observations, student growth measures and any optional components
    • Performance standards and weighting for all components

How and when will we compensate?

    • Distribution of funds
    • Timing and mode of compensation

1

2

3

24 of 47

Eligible Teaching Assignments

What is an eligible teaching assignment?

An assignment based on content/grade level taught that will be a part of your local designation system. (Must be an 087 role)

Teachers in the same eligible teaching assignment use the same student growth measure, at the same weight.

Specific teaching assignments are eligible, not specific teachers

25 of 47

Examples of Eligible Teaching Assignments

Eligible Teaching Assignments

Teacher Observation

Student Growth

All teachers

T-TESS, 50%

SLOs 50%

Eligible Teaching Assignments

Teacher Observation

Student Growth

K Reading

T-TESS, 50%

Pre-test/Post-test 50%

mClass

1st Reading

T-TESS, 50%

Pre-test/Post-test 50%

NWEA MAP

1st Math

T-TESS, 40%

Pre-test/Post-test 60%

NWEA MAP

HS World Languages

T-TESS, 60%

SLOs, 40%

HS Visual Arts and Theater Arts

T-TESS, 40%

Portfolios, 60%

26 of 47

Eligible Teachers

Who is an eligible teacher?

A teacher of record, interventionist, inclusion teacher, or resource teacher who teaches in an 087 role in at least one eligible teaching assignment.

27 of 47

Local Designation System True or False?

  1. Our district, as a cohort F can receive approval to issue designations by the end of this 2022-2023
  2. Our district’s Cohort F application must include all teaching assignments
  3. Our district only needs to submit teacher names to be designated after our district has been fully approved

False, system approval will not be until the 2024-2025 school year

False, districts can define their eligible teaching assignments

False, districts need to submit teacher effectiveness data for all teachers in eligible teaching assignments

28 of 47

Local Designation System True or False#2

  1. Our district must use T-TESS
  2. Appraisal waivers are not allowed with TIA
  3. Our district must use STAAR
  4. Paraprofessionals are not eligible to earn TIA funds

29 of 47

District System Components 

Teacher Observation

Observation based on T-TESS or aligned rubric​. District application must show evidence of calibration and data analysis. ​

Student Growth

Student growth measured at the individual student level that can be linked to the applicable teacher. District application must show evidence of validity & reliability of development, administration, and scoring.

Spending Plan

Districts must spend at least 90% on teacher compensation for student-facing instructional roles and may reserve up to 10% for supporting the TIA system or in supporting teachers in earning a designation by 8/31 each year.

Optional Components

Districts may consider additional factors in make designations (e.g., mentoring other teachers, teacher leadership, family surveys, student surveys, etc.).

30 of 47

Technical Assistance Coming this fall!

Specific webinars/trainings

  • on various teacher observation components
  • on various student growth measures
    • SLOs on October 6th
    • Pre-test/Post-test on October 6th
    • Portfolios on October 19th
  • on the spending component on November 30th

31 of 47

District System Component 

Teacher Observation

Observation based on T-TESS or aligned rubric​. District application must show evidence of calibration and data analysis ​

  • Other pre-approved rubrics include:
    • Danielson
    • Marzano
    • NIET TAP
  • Locally developed rubrics must:
    • Include a proficiency marker
    • Align to all standards in chapter 150
    • Differentiate levels of teacher performance
  • All teachers in eligible teaching assignments must have a formal appraisal in the data-capture year aligned to TEC 21.351 or 21.352

32 of 47

Appraisal and Observation

Appraisal

  • The process by which teacher effectiveness data is collected
  • Must be aligned to TEC 21.351 or 21.352
  • Appraisal rubric must be aligned to all domains of T-TESS

Teacher Observation

  • A component of a local designation system
  • Teacher observation data is part of the data submission process
  • Includes “observable domains” only, T-TESS Domains 2 and 3 or the equivalent in an aligned rubric

33 of 47

District System Component: Student Growth 

Student Growth

Student growth measured at the individual student level that can be linked to the applicable teacher. ​  District application must show evidence of validity & reliability of development, administration, and scoring

Value-Added Measures (VAM)

  • Compares predicted to actual scores based on multiple years of past testing history
  • Based on statistical modelling and often conducted by independent researchers

Pre-Test and Post-Test

  • Option 1: Using a 3rd party assessment for both the pre-test and post-test with accompanying growth targets
  • Option 2: Using a 3rd party assessment for both the pre-test and post-test with district created growth targets
  • Option 3: Using a district-created pre-test and post-test with district created growth targets
  • Option 4: Using a district-created pre-test and a 3rd party assessment as the post-test with district created growth targets

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

  • Aligned with TexasSLO.org
  • Built around a foundational skill and assessed with a body of evidence 

Portfolios

  • Ideal for Performance-Based Courses
  • Must include a skill proficiency rubric with multiple proficiency levels and varied artifacts 

34 of 47

District System Component: Spending 

Spending Plan

Districts must spend at least 90% on teacher compensation for student-facing instructional roles and may reserve up to 10% for supporting the TIA system or in supporting teachers in earning a designation by 8/31 each year ​

At least 90% must go to student-facing instructional staff compensation on the campus where the designated teacher works. 

Up to 10% may be used to implement a local designation system or to support teachers in earning a designation.

35 of 47

Local Designation System True or False #2?

False, districts may use NIET TAP, Danielson, Marzano, or district-created rubrics

False, appraisal waivers are not allowed during the data-capture year for teachers in eligible teaching assignments

False, portfolios, SLOs, and other assessments can be utilized

False, instructional paraprofessionals can be receive part of the 90%

  1. Our district must use T-TESS
  2. Appraisal waivers are not allowed with TIA
  3. Our district must use STAAR
  4. Paraprofessionals are not eligible to earn TIA funds

36 of 47

Student Growth

37 of 47

Which Teacher is More Effective?

Teacher A

Teacher B

Student

End of Year Result

Student #1

Earned Industry Certification

Student #2

Did not earn Industry Certification

Student #3

Earned Industry Certification

Student

End of Year Result

Student #1

Did not earn Industry Certification

Student #2

Did not earn Industry Certification

Student #3

Earned Industry Certification

67% of students earned industry certifications

33% of students earned industry certifications

38 of 47

Growth vs. Achievement

Teacher A

Teacher B

Student

End of Year Result

Student #1

Student grew from being proficient on 3/10 skills to 8/10 skills, their target was 8/10 skills

Student #2

Student grew from being proficient on 6/10 skills to 7/10 skills, their target was 8/10 skills

Student #3

Student grew from being proficient on 6/10 skills to 6/10 skills, their target was 8/10 skills

Student

End of Year Result

Student #1

Student grew from being proficient on 1/10 skills to 8/10 skills, their target was 6/10 skills

Student #2

Student grew from being proficient on 3/10 skills to 4/10 skills, their target was 8/10 skills

Student #3

Student grew from being proficient on 4/10 skills to 10/10 skills, their target was 7/10 skills

33% of students met or exceeded expected growth target

67% of students met or exceeded expected growth target

39 of 47

Statewide Performance Standards

To be used as a guide in making decisions about which teachers the district will put forth for designation

Student Growth

Master

70%

Exemplary

60%

Recognized

55%

Teacher Observation

Master

4.5* (74%* of possible points)

Exemplary

3.9* (78%* of possible points)

Recognized

3.7* (90%* of possible points)

*at least proficient on all observable dimensions to be designated (for T-TESS, it is domains 2 and 3)

M

95%

E

80%

R

67%

40 of 47

TIA Statewide Performance Standards

Is a district limited to designating a maximum of 33% of their teachers?

No. This percent was used to create the statewide performance standards.

41 of 47

District Approval Process

Designations are dependent upon a two-step approval process

1. Application Approval

Districts submit application, which may include narrative components to TEA

2. System Approval

Districts submit evidence of teacher effectiveness data to Texas Tech University. TEA issues final approval.

42 of 47

2022 Data Submission and Data Validation Current Documents

On Local Designation System Page under “Step 2: Data Submission”

43 of 47

Best Practices for Planning

44 of 47

Gregory-Portland

Eligible Teaching Assignments

Teacher Observation

Student Growth

K Reading

T-TESS, 50%

Pre-test/Post-test 50%

mClass

1-8 Reading

K-8 Math

T-TESS, 50%

Pre-test/Post-test 50%

NWEA MAP

4-8 Reading, 4-8 Math, English 1, English 2, Algebra 1

T-TESS, 50%

Pre-test/Post-test 50%

STAAR Transition Tables

5, 8 Science, 8 Social Studies, Biology, US History

T-TESS, 50%

Pre-test/Post-test 50%

District-Created Pre-Test

STAAR Post-test

ESC 2

6 campuses

4,717 students

45 of 47

Gregory-Portland

Brandon Chandler

Chief Human Resources Officer

Kayla Vaughn

Human Resources Coordinator

46 of 47

Cohort F Application Timeline: Review

Pre-Application

2021-2022

  • System Development
  • Stakeholder Engagement

Year 1

2022-2023

  • System Application
  • TIA Teacher Buy-In Survey

Year 2

2023-2024

  • Capture Data

Year 3

2024-2025

  • Data Submission
  • Full System Approval
  • Designate & Compensate
  • Expansion & Modifications
  • TIA Annual Evaluation Surveys
  • Annual Program Submission

Post-Approval

2025-2030

  • New or Higher Designations
  • Expansion and Modifications
  • Annual Program Submission
  • TIA Annual Evaluation Surveys

47 of 47

Thank You

Please take our quick 5-minute survey to let us know how we can improve this presentation in the future.

Sample-survey-link.com