LCPS Strategic Plan Updates
SY 2024-25
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP 2024 | CAASPP Spring Proficiency 2024 | CAASPP Spring 2024 Scale Score Avg | CAASPP Spring Proficiency 2025 | CAASPP Spring 2025 Scale Score Avg |
3 | 2432 | 2409 | 7% | 2335 | 42% (+35%) | 2398 (+63) |
4 | 2473 | 2452 | 18% | 2390 | 6% (-12%) | 2367 (-23) |
5 | 2502 | 2490 | 36% | 2446 | 23% (-13%) | 2438 (-12) |
6 | 2531 | 2515 | 20% | 2440 | 25% (+5%) | 2464 (+24) |
7 | 2552 | 2536 | 26% | 2485 | 19% (-7%) | 2459 (-26) |
8 | 2567 | 2548 | 21% | 2487 | 21% (0%) | 2502 (+15) |
11 | 2683 | 2590 | 38% | 2540 | 48% (+10%) | 2564 (+24) |
|
UNOFFICIAL ELA Proficiency and Scale Score on CAASSP 2025 (6/4/2025)
Lighthouse
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP 2024 | CAASPP Spring 2024 | CAASPP Spring 2024 Scale Score Avg | CAASPP Spring 2025 | CAASPP Spring 2025 Scale Score Avg |
3 | 2432 | 2409 | 14% | 2345 | 16% (+2%) | 2347 (+2) |
4 | 2473 | 2452 | 15% | 2360 | 14% (-1%) | 2387 (+27) |
5 | 2502 | 2490 | 9% | 2364 | 5% (-4%) | 2378 (+14) |
6 | 2531 | 2515 | 12% | 2417 | 14% (+2%) | 2431 (+14) |
7 | 2552 | 2536 | 36% | 2501 | 27% (-9%) | 2477 (-24) |
8 | 2567 | 2548 | 18% | 2478 | 47% (+29%) | 2524 (+46) |
11 | 2683 | 2590 | 34% | 2544% | 31% (-3%) | 2532 (-12) |
|
UNOFFICIAL ELA Proficiency and Scale Score on CAASSP 2025 (6/4/2025)
Lodestar
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP 2024 | CAASPP Spring 2024 | CAASPP Spring 2024 Scale Score Avg | CAASPP Spring 2025 | CAASPP Spring 2025 Scale Score Avg |
3 | 2436 | 2422 | 7% | 2344 | 28% (+21%) | 2389 (+45) |
4 | 2485 | 2461 | 13% | 2391 | 8% (-5%) | 2390 (-1) |
5 | 2528 | 2483 | 23% | 2430 | 8% (-15%) | 2405 (-25) |
6 | 2552 | 2499 | 18% | 2444 | 18% (0%) | 2449 (+5) |
7 | 2567 | 2513 | 19% | 2471 | 13% (-6%) | 2441 (-30) |
8 | 2586 | 2524 | 6% | 2438 | 15% (+9%) | 2465 (+27) |
11 | 2628 | 2547 | 7% | 2477 | 24% (+17%) | 2518 (+41) |
|
UNOFFICIAL MATH Proficiency and Scale Score on CAASSP 2025 (6/4/2025)
Lighthouse
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP 2024 | CAASPP Spring 2024 | CAASPP Spring 2024 Scale Score Avg | CAASPP Spring 2025 | CAASPP Spring 2025 Scale Score Avg |
3 | 2432 | 2422 | 36% | 2389 | 41% (+5%) | 2401 (+12) |
4 | 2485 | 2461 | 9% | 2395 | 22% (+13%) | 2413 (+18) |
5 | 2528 | 2483 | 2% | 2387 | 10% (+8%) | 2417 (+30) |
6 | 2552 | 2499 | 16% | 2422 | 5% (-11%) | 2417 (-5) |
7 | 2567 | 2513 | 32% | 2515 | 18% (-14%) | 2462 (-53) |
8 | 2586 | 2524 | 15% | 2453 | 56% (+41%) | 2577 (+124) |
11 | 2628 | 2547 | 6% | 2494 | 13% (+7%) | 2496 (+2) |
|
UNOFFICIAL Math Proficiency and Scale Score on CAASSP 2025 (6/4/2025)
Lodestar
Academic Committee - 6/3/2024
Board of Directors- 6/4/24
Look Ahead to July
Additional Work Happening that will inform the July Board Updates
| First Semester - Board Presentations | First Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations |
July |
|
|
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Academic Committee
Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary
8
Strategic Priority #3: All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve |
On Track:
Off Track:
|
Strategic Priority #1: All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day |
On Track:
Improvements for SY25-26:
|
Student Assessment Data: AimswebPlus
54% of 2nd Grade above the 25th percentile with Lighthouse exceeding the 6% growth goal carrying Lodestar which had an annual decrease in proficiency. 46% of all tested K-2 students above the 25th percentile meeting our SY-25-26 goal
Impact Measure: 85% of 2nd grade students are in the 26th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)
Areas of Strength
Areas for Growth
Student Assessment Data: AimswebPlus
During July and Summer Planning Principals will have a chance to review the data and use the data to inform coaching and answer consider questions like
Lodestar combo class was an area of growth will be moving to self contained; Rising K will have 18 who will need remediation.
In July and August we will be updating the EL Master plan This will increase reclassification opportunities for students who have scored a 4 on the ELPAC.
Why: The EL Master plan was last updated in 2021-2022 therefore is has outdated information, and as our EL population increased and FPM regulations changed there are new sections needed to be added to the Plan such as:
This updated plan will be shared for Board Approval in August.
EL Master Plan
Ufli
(K-2 Phonics)
SummitK12
(Designated ELD K-G5)
Eureka2
(G3-G5)
Bridges and Get Ready
(Designated ELD G6-8)
IM
(G6-G11)
Curriculum Adoption
Strategic Priority #1 (Initiative 1B, 1C, and 1D) - We will focus on content specific instructional visions, ensure consistent and aligned classroom practices, and improve our leadership team’s systems of support and accountability.
12
Curriculum Adoption K-5
Strategic Priority #1 (Initiative 1B, 1C, and 1D) - We will focus on content specific instructional visions, ensure consistent and aligned classroom practices, and improve our leadership team’s systems of support and accountability.
13
Introducing the Buoy: Initiative 1D Work Plan
LCAP & Long Term Goals
Short Term Goals and Measures
Staff Objective
Coherent
Theory of Action
Reflection as you explore an example Initiative Arc of the Year
What questions do you have?
What would you change about the details in the Objective, metric for success & data?
Academic Committee Meeting Dates SY 25-26
15
Academic Committee Dates | Board Meeting Dates |
|
|
2025-26 Strategic Priority #1: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
16
| First Semester - Board Presentations | First Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations |
July |
|
|
August |
| |
September |
|
|
October |
|
|
November |
| |
December |
|
|
2025-26 Strategic Priority #1: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
17
| Second Semester - Board Presentations | Second Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations |
January |
| |
February |
|
|
March |
|
|
April |
|
|
May |
| |
June |
| |
LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25
May 7, 2025
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25
Charter Renewal for Lodestar - Analysis and Next Steps
19
Key Take-Aways: Lodestar, in the middle track for charter renewal, is getting ready to be renewed this fall! |
Analysis and Academic Focus:
Next Steps
|
Dr. Baldridge, Lodestar Head of School, and Erin Wesseldine, Senior Director of Special Edcuation and Specialized Programs, and Lodestar Parents hosting OUSD Board President Jennifer Brouhard
LODESTAR TK-12
OUSD Charter Matters Committee - April 24, 2025
Rich Harrison, CEO and Dr. Baldridge, Head of School
“I hope that he thrives in school and goes further than me. I want him to go to college, finish, and get to be what he wants to be.”
Kayla, Lodestar Parent of Julian, Class of 2031
The Lodestar Class of 2024
Lodestar offers a seamless TK-12th grade education in East Oakland that promises college and career readiness for all students
Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School
Our Mission and Values
21
Our mission is to prepare students for college and a career of their choice.
Lodestar graduates are lifelong changemakers who realize their unique vision — rooted in their identity, knowledge, and skills — to create equity in their own lives and in the community, leading to a healthier, more joyful world.
LCPS graduates low income students of color from college at 4x the national average.
TK-12 Community School Rooted in East Oakland
89% of students from East Oakland. 53% from 94603 Zip Code.
22
98%
734
17%
47%
Students enrolled TK-12
Unduplicated
Special Education
English Language Learners
12%
4%
African American Students
Unhoused Students
84%
8%
Latino/a Students
Newcomer Students
Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School
Renewal Tier and Progress Since Last Renewal
23
Charter Renewal Tier in 2020
Lodestar was in the Low Track!
OUSD Board approved 2 year renewal + 2 years of pandemic renewal relief
Charter Renewal Tier for 2025-26
Lodestar now in the Middle Track!
Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School
Investing in and Sustaining our Community Schools Model
24
Investments in East Oakland |
College and Career:
Growing our Teachers and Teacher Pipeline
Community Schools and Supports:
|
Lodestar: LCPS
Dashboard and CORE Data - Strengths
25
CCI
Math
SPED
Staff
Disability Type by Percentage (24-25)
Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School
Dashboard and CORE Data - Areas for Growth
26
ELA
ELD
Chronic Absenteeism
Grade-Level Enrollment
Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School
Strengthening Multi-Generational Opportunities
27
Lodestar Pathways:
Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School
Strengthening Multi-Generational Opportunities
28
College and Career Readiness:
Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School
A Model Community School
29
Partnerships that Drive our Community School Model in East Oakland:
Interested in where students are headed next fall?
Come to Declaration Day!
Declaration Day
May 14, 10 am
LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25
April 9, 2025
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25
Charter Renewal Tiers - Analysis and Next Steps
32
Key Take-Away #1: All of our Charters (LEAs) are in the middle track |
Analysis and Academic Focus:
|
Key Take-Away #2: LCPS should consider shifting our Charter Renewal Timelines with OUSD Office of Charter Schools and Board |
Current Timeline: We have charter renewals in the following years:
Consideration #1
Consideration #2
|
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25
Charter Renewal Tiers - Alignment to LCPS Impact and Implementation Goals
Intended Impact Category | Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028) |
Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students | In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups |
60% of Emerging Bilingual students advance at least 1 EPLI level or maintain a level 4 | |
85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline) | |
Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth | |
Strengthen multi-generational opportunities as a model community school | 95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation |
Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028. | |
Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years | |
90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually | |
Deeply invest in our educators and leaders - our greatest asset | On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders YoY with <10% variance across sites |
Maintain >75% of LCPS staff identifying as BIPOC | |
LCPS career pathways account for 30-40% of teacher, leader, and student support staff | |
Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey | |
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25
Charter Renewal Tiers - Alignment to LCPS Impact and Implementation Goals
34
Strategic Priority #1
All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day
Initiative 1B:
Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms
Priority #1 Implementation Goals
Initiative 1C:
Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices
Initiative 1D:
Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability
Initiative 1A:
Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25
Charter Renewal Tiers - High Level Explanation
35
AB 1505 Charter Renewal Data Calculation
How is charter renewal data calculated under AB 1505 for Criteria 1? And how did our three charters perform under this calculation?
Criteria 1: State Dashboard Indicators
State Dashboard Indicators
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25
Charter Renewal Tiers - Alignment to LCPS Impact and Implementation Goals
36
AB 1505 Charter Renewal Data Calculation
How is charter renewal data calculated under AB 1505 for Criteria 2a and 2b? And how did our three charters perform under this calculation?
Criteria 2a: Overall Academic performance
Criteria 2b: Subgroup Academic performance
37
Criteria 1 | Dashboard Indicators | CAASPP (ELA & Math), Suspensions, English Learning Progress Indicator, Chronic Absenteeism (K-8 only)�Graduation rate & College & Career Index (HS only) | ||||||||
School Year | English Language Arts | Math | English Learner Progress | Suspension Rate | Chronic Absenteeism | Graduation Rate | College/ Career Indicator | Criteria 1 and 2 Summary | |
2022-23 | Orange | Orange | Green | Green | Yellow | - | - | Middle | |
2023-24 | Red | Orange | Red | Orange | Yellow | G/B* | G/B* | ||
| | | | | | | | | |
Criteria 2 | Academic Performance | CAASPP (ELA & Math), English Learning Progress Indicatorollege & Career Index (HS only) | ||||||||
| 2022-23 | 2023-24 | |||||||
Student Group | English Language Arts | Math | English Learner Progress | | English Language Arts | Math | English Learner Progress | CCI | Criteria 2 Summary |
All Students | Below | Below | Above |
| Below | Below | Below | Above | Middle |
African American | Below | Below | - | Below | Below | - | | ||
Hispanic | Below | Below | - | Below | Below | - | Above | ||
SocioEconomic Disadvantaged | Below | Below | - | Below | Below | - | Above | ||
English Learners | Below | Below | Above | Below | Below | - | Above | ||
Long Term EL (LTEL) | | | | | Above | Below | Above | ||
Students with Disabilities | Below | Below | - | Below | Below | - | |
Lodestar TK-12 Data Summary - Middle Track
38
Criteria 1 | Dashboard Indicators | CAASPP (ELA & Math), Suspensions, English Learning Progress Indicator, Chronic Absenteeism (K-8 only)�Graduation rate & College & Career Index (HS only) | |||||||
School Year | English Language Arts | Math | English Learner Progress | College/Career Indicator | Chronic Absenteeism | Graduation Rate | Suspension Rate | Criteria 1 Summary |
2022-23 | Yellow | Yellow | Orange | - | Yellow | - | Green | Middle |
2023-24 | Red | Red | Orange | - | Yellow | - | Orange | |
| | | | | | | | |
Criteria 2 | Academic Performance | CAASPP (ELA & Math), English Learning Progress Indicatorollege & Career Index (HS only) | |||||||
| 2022-23 | 2023-24 | ||||||
Student Group | English Language Arts | Math | English Learner Progress | | English Language Arts | Math | English Learner Progress | Criteria 2 Summary |
All Students | Below | Below | Below | | Below | Below | Below | Middle |
African American | Below | Below | - | Below | Below | - | ||
Hispanic | Below | Below | - | Below | Below | - | ||
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | Below | Below | - | Below | Below | - | ||
English Learners | Below | Below | Below | Below | Below | - | ||
Long Term EL (LTEL) | | | | | | Above | ||
Students with Disabilities | Below | Below | - | Below | Below | - |
Lighthouse K-8 Data Summary - Middle Track
39
Criteria 1 | Dashboard Indicators | CAASPP (ELA & Math), Suspensions, English Learning Progress Indicator, Chronic Absenteeism (K-8 only)�Graduation rate & College & Career Index (HS only) | |||||||||
School Year | English Language Arts | Math | English Learner Progress | College/ Career Indicator | Chronic Absenteeism | Graduation Rate | Suspension Rate | Criteria 1 Summary | | |
2022-23 | Green | Red | Blue | Blue | - | Yellow | Orange | Middle | | |
2023-24 | Orange | Orange | Red | Green | - | Orange | Orange | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Criteria 2 | Academic Performance | CAASPP (ELA & Math), English Learning Progress Indicatorollege & Career Index (HS only) | |||||||||
| 2022-23 | 2023-24 | ||||||||
Student Group | English Language Arts | Math | English Learner Progress | College/ Career Indicator | | English Language Arts | Math | English Learner Progress | College/ Career Indicator | Criteria 2 Summary |
All Students | Above | Below | Above | Above | | Below | Below | Below | Above | Middle |
Hispanic | Above | Below | | Above | Above | Below | | Above | ||
Socioeconomically Disadvantaged | Above | Below | Above | Above | Below | Below | Below | Above | ||
African American | *A minimum sub-population of students to be counted is 30 for a tested area (HS only have state tests in 11th grade in ELA and Math). | |||||||||
English Learners | ||||||||||
Students with Disabilities |
Lighthouse 9-12 Data Summary - Middle Track
LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25
March 5, 2025
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 3.5.25
Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary
41
Strategic Priority #1: All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day | ||
Elementary Interim Assessment Reflections: Overall, trending Orange on the Dashboard. Lighthouse:
Lodestar:
| Middle & High School Interim Assessment Reflections: Overall, MS trending Orange on the Dashboard. HS Math trending Yellow; HS ELA trending Orange Lighthouse:
Lodestar:
| English Language Learner Progress and 2nd Grade Reading Assessment Reflections: ELPI Analysis: We will need to watch the progress of our ELL students given the shift in demographic over the last three years
2nd Grade Reading:
|
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 3.5.25
Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary
42
Strategic Priority #2: Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust |
Student Year to Year Retention - Intent to Return Update:
Chronic Absenteeism
|
Strategic Priority #3: All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve |
February Updates: Our Four Year Impact Goal is to have 85% Staff Retention (of staff asked back):
We will have updated data to share at our April Board Meeting |
Action Plan to Address Key Gap Areas
Weekly Collaborative Data & Action Meetings
Principals and AP’s of Instruction alongside teachers in 1 collaborative meeting per week will look at students work aligned to grade level, plan and revise teaching to address student needs.
1.
Students Data Talks: SEA Wednesday will be utilized for students to see their SBAC scores, revise ICA or complete a new practice assessment and set goals to be share with parents at March SLC’s
2.
Looking Ahead to the SY25-26
1. Utilizing March CREW, Math Walkthrough & Literacy Data to audit Teaching practices in service of adjusting Coaching, PD and other systems to support improved coherence.
2. Leveraging best teaching practices to refine Curriculum Maps to address the most essential content aligned to power standards and providing resources to high quality curricular materials
3. Aligning unit and end of unit assessments adopting Performance Matters Platform and Schoology across K-8
SBAC CRESCENDO “Game Plan”
The purpose of this document is to
March 5, 2025
Appendix:
LCPS ICA Results
February, 2025
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP | CAASPP Spring 2024 | LH IAB Scale Score Avg | LH ICA Scale Score Avg | ICAs Percent Proficient |
3 | 2432 | 2409 | 2339 | 2355* | 2378* | 27% |
4 | 2473 | 2452 | 2389 | 2382 | 2357 | 6% |
5 | 2502 | 2490 | 2456 | 2428 | 2394 | 10% |
6 | 2531 | 2515 | 2442 | 2466* | 2460* | 21% |
7 | 2552 | 2536 | 2483 | 2480 | 2458 | 17% |
8 | 2567 | 2548 | 2486 | 2507* | 2471 | 14% |
11 | 2583 | 2590 | 2539 | 2579* | 2546* | 32% |
Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points Asterix means stronger than CAASPP EOY from previous year |
ELA Scale Score Analysis
Lighthouse
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP | CAASPP Spring 2024 | LS IAB Scale Score Avg | LS ICA Scale Score Avg | ICAs Percent Proficient |
3 | 2432 | 2409 | 2346 | 2232 | 2378* | 28% |
4 | 2473 | 2452 | 2359 | 2386* | 2391* | 8% |
5 | 2502 | 2490 | 2366 | 2370* | 2394* | 8% |
6 | 2531 | 2515 | 2417 | 2443* | 2430* | 6% |
7 | 2552 | 2536 | 2501 | 2474 | 2466 | 24% |
8 | 2567 | 2548 | 2481 | 2543* | 2544* | 44% |
11 | 2583 | 2590 | 2547 | 2546 | 2532 | 28% |
Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points Asterix means stronger than CAASPP EOY from previous year |
ELA Scale Score Analysis
Lodestar
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP | CAASPP Spring 2024 | LH IAB Scale Score Avg | LH ICA Scale Score Avg | ICAs Percent Proficient |
3 | 2436 | 2422 | 2348 | 2382* | 2388* | 20% |
4 | 2485 | 2461 | 2388 | 2388 | 2386 | 7% |
5 | 2528 | 2483 | 2436 | 2411 | 2412 | 6% |
6 | 2552 | 2499 | 2443 | 2464* | 2463* | 13% |
7 | 2567 | 2513 | 2470 | 2468* | 2448 | 4% |
8 | 2586 | 2524 | 2438 | 2516* | 2471* | 10% |
11 | 2628 | 2547 | 2477 | 2589* | 2565* | 27% |
Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points Asterix means stronger than CAASPP EOY from previous year |
Math Scale Score Analysis
Lighthouse
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP | CAASPP Spring 2024 | LS IAB Scale Score Avg | LS ICA Scale Score Avg | ICAs Percent Proficient |
3 | 2432 | 2422 | 2390 | 2344 | 2392* | 28% |
4 | 2485 | 2461 | 2395 | 2389 | 2403* | 19% |
5 | 2528 | 2483 | 2388 | 2410* | 2432* | 6% |
6 | 2552 | 2499 | 2422 | 2381 | 2413 | 6% |
7 | 2567 | 2513 | 2515 | 2490 | 2478 | 14% |
8 | 2586 | 2524 | 2458 | 2548 | 2549* | 36% |
11 | 2628 | 2547 | 2495 | 2510* | 2519* | 9% |
Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points Asterix means stronger than CAASPP EOY from previous year |
Math Scale Score Analysis
Lodestar
Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025
What would the state classify our Elementary ELA based on our data?
LS G4 ELA Ch+32 DFS -82
LS G5 ELA Ch+ +28 DFS -108
LEVEL | DECLINED SIGNIFICANTLY from Prior Year (by more than 15.1 points) | DECLINED from Prior Year (by 3.0 to 15.0 points) | MAINTAINED from Prior Year (declined or increased by less than 2.9 points or fewer) | INCREASED from Prior Year (by 3.0 to 14.9 points) | INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY from Prior Year (by 15.0 points or more) |
VERY HIGH (HIGHEST STATUS) +45.0 points or more Current Year | | | | | |
HIGH +10.0 to +44.9 points in Current Year | | | | | |
MEDIUM -5.0 to +9.9 points in Current Year | | | | | |
LOW -5.1 to -70.0 points in Current Year | | | | | |
VERY LOW (LOWEST STATUS) -70.1 points or lower in Current Year | | | | | |
LH G3 ELA Ch +39; DFS -54
LS G3 ELA Ch+32 DFS -54
LH G4 ELA Ch -32; DFS -116
LH G5 ELA Ch -62; DFS -108
LS G4 ELA Ch+32 DFS -82
LS G5 ELA Ch+ +28 DFS -108
Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025
What would the state classify our school in Elementary Math based on our data?
Grade & School
LH G3 Math Ch +40; DFS -42
LH G4 Math Ch -2; DFS -99
LS G3 Math Ch +1 DFS -45
LS G4 Math Ch +8 DFS -82
LS G5 Math Ch+44 DFS -96
LH G5 ELA Ch -25; DFS -116
Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025
What would the state classify Middle School in ELA based on our data?
LEVEL | DECLINED SIGNIFICANTLY from Prior Year (by more than 15.1 points) | DECLINED from Prior Year (by 3.0 to 15.0 points) | MAINTAINED from Prior Year (declined or increased by less than 2.9 points or fewer) | INCREASED from Prior Year (by 3.0 to 14.9 points) | INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY from Prior Year (by 15.0 points or more) |
VERY HIGH (HIGHEST STATUS) +45.0 points or more Current Year | | | | | |
HIGH +10.0 to +44.9 points in Current Year | | | | | |
MEDIUM -5.0 to +9.9 points in Current Year | | | | | |
LOW -5.1 to -70.0 points in Current Year | | | | | |
VERY LOW (LOWEST STATUS) -70.1 points or lower in Current Year | | | | | |
LS 7 ELA Ch -35; DFS -81
LH 7 ELA Ch -25; DFS -94
LH 6 ELA Ch +18; DFS -71
LH 8 ELA Ch -15; DFS -96
LS 8 ELA Ch +63; DFS -37
LS 6 ELA Ch +13; DFS -139
Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025
What would the state classify Middle School in Math based on our data?
Grade & School
LS 8 Math Ch +96; DFS -37
LH 8 Math Ch +33; DFS -115
LH 6 Math Ch. +20; DFS -89
LS 6 Math Ch -9 DFS -137
LH 7 Math Ch. -22; DFS -119
LS 7 Math Ch -37; DFS -89
Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025
What would the state classify High School in ELA based on our data?
LH 11 ELA
Ch +6; DFS -37
LS 11 ELA
Ch -15; DFS -51
Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025
What would the state classify our schools High Schools in Math based on our data?
LH 11 Math
Ch +88; DFS -63
LS 11 Math
Ch +24; DFS -109
LCPS ELD Level Data
LCPS ELD Levels by Year
| Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 4 | Total # | Entered EL | Exited EL | ||||
| Level 1 % | Level 1 # | Level 2 % | Level 2 # | Level 3 % | Level 3 # | Level 4 % | Level 4 # | Total # | Entered EL | Exited EL |
21- 22 | 12.80% | 88 | 33.18% | 233 | 33.68% | 215 | 20.34% | 123 | 659 | 56 | 54 |
22- 23 | 8.34% | 65 | 26.89% | 203 | 40.41% | 268 | 24.35% | 139 | 675 | 59 | 67 |
23- 24 | 15.25% | 113 | 34.60% | 156 | 35.40% | 216 | 14.73% | 101 | 586 | 63 | 54 |
24- 25 | 24.40% | 161 | 37.70% | 249 | 31.60% | 209 | 6.40% | 42 | 661 | 63 | 27 |
Summary
LCPS ELD Levels by Year
Lodestar K-12 | |||||||||||
Level Data from CAASPP-ELPAC.ets.org/ELPAC | Level 1 % | Level 1 # | Level 2 % | Level 2 # | Level 3 % | Level 3 # | Level 4 % | Level 4 # | Total # | Exited EL | Newcomers |
2021-2022 | 17.01% | 50 | 36.73% | 108 | 30.27% | 89 | 15.99% | 47 | 294 | 14 | 13 |
2022-2023 | 11.95% | 38 | 29.87% | 95 | 38.99% | 124 | 19.18% | 61 | 318 | 33 | 18 |
2023-2024 | 20.00% | 67 | 37.01% | 124 | 27.76% | 93 | 15.22% | 51 | 335 | 25 | 32 |
2024-2025 | 29.06% | 93 | 38.44% | 123 | 25.62% | 82 | 6.88% | 22 | 320 | 8 | 57 |
Lighthouse 9-12 | |||||||||||
Level Data from CAASPP-ELPAC.ets.org/ELPAC | Level 1 % | Level 1 # | Level 2 % | Level 2 # | Level 3 % | Level 3 # | Level 4 % | Level 4 # | Total # | Exited EL | Newcomers |
2021-2022 | 11.24% | 10 | 25.84% | 23 | 37.08% | 33 | 25.84% | 23 | 89 | 22 | 2 |
2022-2023 | 4.49% | 4 | 15.73% | 14 | 42.70% | 38 | 37.08 | 33 | 89 | 12 | 5 |
2023-2024 | 10.84% | 9 | 32.53% | 27 | 43.37% | 36 | 13.25% | 11 | 83 | 6 | 5 |
2024-2025 | 7.14% | 7 | 39.80% | 39 | 43.88% | 43 | 9.18% | 9 | 98 | 0 | 8 |
Lighthouse K-8 | |||||||||||
Level Data from CAASPP-ELPAC.ets.org/ELPAC | Level 1 % | Level 1 # | Level 2 % | Level 2 # | Level 3 % | Level 3 # | Level 4 % | Level 4 # | Total # | Exited EL | Newcomers |
2021-2022 | 10.14% | 28 | 36.96% | 102 | 33.70% | 93 | 19.20% | 53 | 276 | 14 | 3 |
2022-2023 | 8.58% | 23 | 35.07% | 94 | 39.55% | 106 | 16.79% | 45 | 268 | 33 | 12 |
2023-2024 | 14.92% | 37 | 34.27% | 85 | 35.08% | 87 | 15.73% | 39 | 248 | 25 | 10 |
2024-2025 | 25.10% | 61 | 35.80% | 87 | 34.57% | 84 | 4.55% | 11 | 243 | 8 | 14 |
LCPS ELD Levels by Year
Data from CA Dashboard | LHK-8 EL Progress | LHK-8 Declined/ Improved | LHK-8 # of EL Students | LH9-12 EL Progress | LH9-12 Declined/ Improved | LH9-12 # of EL Students | LS EL Progress | LS Declined/ Improved | LS # of EL Students |
2021-2022 | 53.5% (Medium) | N/A | 200 | 61% (High) | N/A | 77 | 47.6% (Medium) | N/A | 191 |
2022-2023 | 48.1% | ↓ 5.4% | 243 | 71.1% | ↑ 10% | 83 | 50.7% | ↑ 3.1% | 288 |
2023-2024 | 44.6% | ↓ 3.6% | 231 | 29.5% | ↓ 41.6% | 78 | 37.8% | ↓ 12.9% | 296 |
The number of EL students in this graph represents students who had at least two consecutive years of data to measure for ELPAC
AimswebPlus LCPS
Winter 24-25 Data
AimswebPlus Strategic Plan Update
Impact Measure: 85% of 2nd grade students are in the 26th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)
Network K-G2 Impact Update: Progress Made, Challenges Remain
Across the network we have had a 3.7% increase although we are off track to meet our goal in service of our impact metric While Lighthouse is on track to meet this year’s growth goals. Lodestar with a long term sub this fall at in G2 a dramatic decrease was seen in students above the 25% percentile.
AimswebPlus Student Growth View
Lighthouse Strengthens Interventions; Lodestar Focuses on Tier 1 Instruction
Lighthouse Intervention is an area of focus to continue to decrease students in the 1st-10th %. While at Lodestar Tier 1 on grade level instruction continues to be an area of significant concern.
LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25
February 5, 2025
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25
Review of our 4 Year IMPACT Goals - MID YEAR LCAP Update
65
Where do we want to be in 4 years? |
Intended Impact Category | Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028) |
Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students | In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups |
60% of Emerging Bilingual students advance at least 1 EPLI level or maintain a level 4 | |
85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline) | |
Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth | |
Strengthen multi-generational opportunities as a model community school | 95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation |
Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028. | |
Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years | |
90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually | |
Deeply invest in our educators and leaders - our greatest asset | On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders YoY with <10% variance across sites |
Maintain >75% of LCPS staff identifying as BIPOC | |
LCPS career pathways account for 30-40% of teacher, leader, and student support staff | |
Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey | |
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25
Review of our Strategic Priorities - MID YEAR LCAP Update
66
Our Initiatives and Yearly Implementation Goals: |
Strategic Priority #1
All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day
Initiative 1B:
Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms
Priority #1 Implementation Goals
Initiative 1C:
Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices
Initiative 1D:
Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability
Initiative 1A:
Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25
Update on Strategic Priority 1 - MID YEAR LCAP Update
67
Strategic Priority #1: All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day |
Initiative 1B:
Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms
Initiative 1D:
Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 2
X% of students per grade are meeting/exceeding standards on CAASSP interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D); varies by grade
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 3
80% of students demonstrate scale score improvement (50 points+) on interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D)
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 4
90% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in Domain 1 and 2; 70% in Domain 3, 4, and 5 for Q1, Q2, Q4 and Q4 as measured by instructional excellence rubric (TDEF/LDEF) (1B, 1C,,1D)
Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting
Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress
Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting
KEY:
Domain 1 and 2: 75% (not meeting)
Domain 3, 4, and 5: 41% (not meeting)
Overall (as of Nov) / Update in March after Feb Interims
ELA : 55% (not meeting)
Math: 45% (not meeting)
Overall (as of Nov) / Update in March after Feb Interims
ELA : 21.5% (flat)
Math: 22% (+6%)
Strategic Priority 1A, 1B, 1C Update
68
Walkthrough Data Shows Growth in Domains 1 & 2, While Learning and Engagement Remain Key Areas for Improvement
Began Tracking for Domain 3
Began Tracking for Domain 4
71%
77%
52%
31%
TDEF Walkthrough Tracker
TDEF Domain 1 & 2
| LCPS | LS K-5 | LH K-5 | LS 6-12 | LH 6-12 |
1A: Teaches core value-based norms, routines, and procedures 1B: Employs asset-focused language when describing student actions and behavior 1C: Anticipates, prevents, and addresses student behaviors that do not match teacher expectations. | 72% | 81% | 81% | 91% | 64% |
2A: Selects instructional materials and tasks from approved curriculum that meets the grade level standards. 2C: 80%of instructional block is spent reading, writing, or speaking about grade level text or complex task. | 78% | 71% | 63% | 96% | 56% |
TDEF Walkthrough Tracker
TDEF Domain 3, 4, 5
| LCPS | LS K-5 | LH K-5 | LS 6-12 | LH 6-12 |
3A: Previews new content by activating students’ prior knowledge 3B: Skillfully enacts a lesson cycle using 4 out of 5 the following instructional routines during each lesson: 3B.1 Facilitating unpacking/referring to learning targets 3B.2 Providing models, critiques, and descriptive feedback 3B.3 Facilitating collaborative academic discourse and/or individual thinking routines 3B.4 Checking for understanding daily 3B.5 Facilitating lesson summaries | 52% | 45% | 61% | 71% | 32% |
4A Maximizes instructional time such that students experience the critical moment for most lessons. 4B Select, teach, and internalize a set of 3-5 routinized protocols for academic discourse and thinking routines. 4C Uses equitable and strategic participation techniques so that all subgroups consistently engage in academic discourse. | 31% | 19% | 33% | 53% | 20% |
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25
Review of our Strategic Priorities - MID YEAR LCAP Update
71
Our Initiatives and Yearly Implementation Goals: |
Strategic Priority #2
Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school
through shared power, voice, and trust
Initiative 2A:
Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process
Priority #2 Implementation Goals
Initiative 2B:
Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action
Initiative 2C:
Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued
Initiative 2D:
Our community partners provide services and supports, and opportunities aligned to the needs of our students and families
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25
Update on Strategic Priority 2 - MID YEAR LCAP Update
72
Strategic Priority #2: Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust |
Initiative 2A:
Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process
Initiative 2B:
Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action
Initiative 2C:
Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued
Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting
Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress
Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting
Initiative 2 :Implementation Goal 1
85% staff agree that decision-making process is done in a timely and inclusive manner as measured by a biannual staff survey (2a)
90%+ of staff participate in LCPS biannual survey and 75% agree that communication is timely and inclusive (2a, 2b)
Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 2
50 families participate in decision making groups (ELAC, SSC) per school (2c)
Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 3
90% of students return to LCPS YoY as measured by annual student retention data (2c)
KEY:
LCPS adopted the RAPID framework (Bain Consulting) as their decision making framework, and has socialized this across leaders team and staff.
LCPS has structured and strengthened its staff memos on each campus/school and from the organization, alongside in-person collective messaging and calls for action
Families: We have increased participation thru PAC, Coffee Tuesday, and Lit for Literacy (FIA)
Student opportunities have not been fully developed
Intent to Return: 97.9% (meeting)
Family Participation: met/meeting
Decision-Making: 87% (met)
Communication: 92% (met)
Participation: 82% (not met)
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25
Review of our Strategic Priorities - MID YEAR LCAP Update
73
Our Initiatives and Yearly Implementation Goals: |
Strategic Priority #3
All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve
Initiative 3A:
Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures
Priority #3 Implementation Goals
Initiative 3B:
Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team
Initiative 3C:
Our team participates in a clear and consistent org-wide coaching structure that balances coaching capacity with development needs
Initiative 3D:
Our team experiences high quality coaching through research-based coaching protocols and emerging technologies to develop and sustain educators
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25
Update on Strategic Priority 3 - MID YEAR LCAP Update
74
Strategic Priority #3: All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve |
Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting
Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress
Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting
Initiative 3A:
Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures
Initiative 3B:
Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team
Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 2
90% of staff participate in 90% of PD structures (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) (3b, 3c)
Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 3
85% of staff agree each PD structure (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) is effective and purposeful in driving academic progress as measured by biannual staff survey (3b)
KEY:
Opportunity to Grow: 80% (met)
Supportive Instructional PD: 78% (not met)
Supportive PD (other staff): 85% (not met)
Manager Check in / Progress: 90% (met)
Participation in PD structures: met
NEW Strategic Plan Priority #3 Indicator: TEACHER PD
From all-org winter survey
This question has never been administered before and is intended to provide more granular data on Strategic Priority #3 implementation goals and perceptions of PD structure efficacy for teaching staff.
Winter LCAP Update and Budget Overview for Parents - 2.5.25
76
Winter Budget Overview for Parents Update: |
|
LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25
January 15, 2025
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 1.15.24
Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary
78
Strategic Priority #1: All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day |
First Semester Reflections:
|
Strategic Priority #2: Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust |
First Semester Reflections: We created a strong foundation to launch this priority this semester.
Given the upcoming charter renewal for Lodestar, we will be increasing our student, family, community and partner/service provider’s advocacy this semester! |
Strategic Priority #3: All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve |
First Semester Reflections: There were key areas flagged for improvement for Initiative 3A and 3B on the Winter Staff Survey LCPS needs to support Leaders to better support their staff:
LCPS needs to continue defining Professional Development:
|
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 1.15.24
Update on Strategic Priority 1 - Dashboard
Strategic Priority #1
All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day
Initiative 1B:
Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms
Initiative 1C:
Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices
Initiative 1D:
Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability
Initiative 1A:
Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 2
X% of students per grade are meeting/exceeding standards on CAASSP interims for Math (1B, 1C, 1D); varies by grade
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 3
80% of students demonstrate scale score improvement (50 points+) on interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D)
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 4
90% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in Domain 1 and 2; 70% in Domain 3, 4, and 5 for Q1, Q2, Q4 and Q4 as measured by instructional excellence rubric (TDEF/LDEF) (1B, 1C,,1D)
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 1
90% of teachers effectively implement curriculum (Crew + content) with fidelity as measured by a classroom walkthrough tool (1A)
Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting
Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress
Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting
Initiative Not Yet Started per timeline; Implementation Goal Not Yet Measured
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 1.15.24
Update on Strategic Priority 2 - Dashboard
Strategic Priority #2
Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school
through shared power, voice, and trust
Initiative 2A:
Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process
Initiative 2B:
Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action
Initiative 2C:
Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued
Initiative 2D:
Our community partners provide services and supports, and opportunities aligned to the needs of our students and families
Initiative 2 :Implementation Goal 1
85% staff agree that decision-making process is done in a timely and inclusive manner as measured by a biannual staff survey (2a)
90%+ of staff participate in LCPS biannual survey and 75% agree that communication is timely and inclusive (2a, 2b)
Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 2
50 families participate in decision making groups (ELAC, SSC) per school (2c)
Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 3
90% of students return to LCPS YoY as measured by annual student retention data (2c)
Initiative 2: mplementation Goal 4
80% of students/families who have received services from community partners agree the support was effective (2d)
Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting
Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress
Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting
Initiative Not Yet Started per timeline; Implementation Goal Not Yet Measured
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 1.15.24
Update on Strategic Priority 3 - Dashboard
Strategic Priority #3
All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve
Initiative 3A:
Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures
Initiative 3B:
Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team
Initiative 3C:
Our team participates in a clear and consistent org-wide coaching structure that balances coaching capacity with development needs
Initiative 3D:
Our team experiences high quality coaching through research-based coaching protocols and emerging technologies to develop and sustain educators
Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 1
X% of teachers and instructional leaders are rated skillful or higher on the TDEF / LDEF, respectively (3a, 3b, 3c)
Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 2
90% of staff participate in 90% of PD structures (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) (3b, 3c)
Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 3
85% of staff agree each PD structure (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) is effective and purposeful in driving academic progress as measured by biannual staff survey (3b)
Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 4
80% of coaches and managers are effective as measured by a coaching rubric or the People Management domain of the Leader Effectiveness tool (3d)
Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting
Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress
Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting
Initiative Not Yet Started per timeline; Implementation Goal Not Yet Measured
82
Charter Renewal Votes: OUSD 2024
Note: Aurum Prep, Urban Montessori, and NOCCS were not renewed by ACOE (county)
LWL (D5) | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
LWP (D7) | NO | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
KIPP (D3) | YES | YES | NO | YES | YES | YES | YES |
OUHS (D6) | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
ASCEND(D5) | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
ARISE (D5) | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES | YES |
AIMS (D3) | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES |
OCHS (D5) | NO | ABSTAIN | NO | NO | NO | YES | YES |
LPS (D7) | NO | NO | NO | NO | NO | YES | YES |
There are Four Key Parts to a Successful Renewal
83
Bellwether - Phase 2:
Support Function Strategic Priorities:
Lighthouse Community Public Schools
Updated Strategic Plan (includes support functions)
Updated December 11, 2024
85
Two new non-program priorities support the three program priorities
86
Strategic Priority #1
All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day
Strategic Priority #2
Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school
through shared power, voice, and trust
Strategic Priority #3
All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve
The additional priorities focus on creating the conditions for the first priorities to be successful
NEW: Strategic Priority #4
LCPS runs a high-touch enrollment lifecycle that emphasizes clear messaging, frequent communication, targeted marketing, and top-tier customer service
NEW: Strategic Priority #5
LCPS supports budget managers with a transparent budget process, accurate forecasting, and streamlined submission of compliance info for legal and grant requirements
Priority 4 Initiatives |
4A: Refined enrollment management |
4B: Targeted recruitment strategy |
4C: Strengthened student retention |
4D: Enhanced tech integration |
Priority 5 Initiatives |
5A: Continuous improvement roadmap for financial reporting |
5B: Accessible school budget supports |
5C: Dedicated compliance calendar |
5D: Multi-year forecast and scenario planning |
4
2
3
5
1
We will fulfill our fourth priority to secure sustainable enrollment both through ensuring we have a coherent set of best enrollment practices across functions…
87
Strategic Priority #4
LCPS runs a high-touch enrollment lifecycle that emphasizes clear messaging, �frequent communication, targeted marketing, and top-tier customer service
Initiative 4B:
We will leverage local community data, events, and partnerships to grow the number and size of LCPS’ enrollment pipelines
Priority #4 Implementation Goals
Initiative 4C:
We will create role-specific training on family engagement and student retention, emphasizing regular communication throughout the year about enrollment plans
Initiative 4D:
Our team will continue to leverage technology to streamline and improve communication and tracking throughout the enrollment lifecycle (recruitment, matriculation, and retention)
Initiative 4A:
The LCPS team will define and assign an ownership role to coordinate management of enrollment lifecycle (recruitment, matriculation, and retention) roles and duties across teams
Priority #4 has significant overlap with Priority #2, and this plan recommends seeking opportunities to leverage shared planning structures and investments for the two priorities.
4
… and collaborating with partners in East Oakland to connect with the families of potential new LCPS students
88
Enlisting parents as ambassadors
Parent organizer program: Partner with local parent capacity building orgs (e.g. Oakland REACH) to host a Lighthouse Parent Leadership Academy to empower parents as effective advocates for their children at the school, share their stories at public events, help conduct school tours, and connect with prospective families
Working with existing partners
Enhance TK program and its reputation with preschool providers: Implement TK as a robust and appealing entry point to LCPS for families, and forge strong partnerships with the East Oakland Early Learning Center and other local preschools
Building coalitions to help displaced families
Collaborative canvassing: Team up with local orgs (e.g. East Oakland Collective, Black Cultural Zone, Public Library) to share information with families about their choices of schools in light of OUSD closures
Offering transportation assistance
Incubate partnerships to lower transportation barriers for families: Work with local orgs to establish chaperoned ‘walking school bus’ options for the nearest families and work alongside parent organizers to create a ‘Lighthouse Carpool Network’ where parents can connect and coordinate carpools
Expanding visibility on the ground
Lighthouse Schools resource fair: Host a resource fair alongside local partners (e.g. East Oakland Youth Development Center, Spanish Speaking Citizens’ Foundation) in a central location to showcase the schools and students’ achievements while providing fun activities for children (face painting, etc.).
By 2029, LCPS will expand from 1 to 3 TK sections across 2 sites to assess demand and how best to encourage transition to LCPS KG
Potential approaches we’ll explore include:
In light of our evolving needs, we will implement a fifth priority to build our structures and capacity for short- and long-term financial decision making
89
Strategic Priority #5
LCPS supports budget managers with a transparent budget process, accurate forecasting, �and streamlined submission of compliance info for legal and grant requirements
Priority #5 Implementation Goals
Initiative 5C:
Our team will create and follow a centralized compliance calendar that tracks requirements, deadlines, and status and offers detailed reporting instructions
Initiative 5D:
Our financial team will create a multi-year forecast model that incorporates scenario planning with adjustable inputs to inform long-term plans for enrollment and capital improvements
Initiative 5A:
Our team will align to a shared roadmap for continuous improvement in financial controls, leveraging training and technology to enhance accuracy and mitigate risk
Initiative 5B:
Budget managers will participate in regular (quarterly) budget meetings with updates on budget variances and any upcoming financial decisions with program implications
5
The new initiatives ensure that LCPS' support functions bolster its core academic priorities throughout the duration of this strategic plan plan
90
Strategic Priority #1
All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day
Strategic Priority #2
Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school
through shared power, voice, and trust
Strategic Priority #3
All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve
|
|
|
Strategic Priority #4
LCPS runs a high-touch enrollment lifecycle that emphasizes clear messaging, frequent communication, targeted marketing, and top-tier customer service
Strategic Priority #5
LCPS supports budget managers with a transparent budget process, accurate forecasting, and streamlined submission of compliance info for legal and grant requirements
January 15, 2025
Appendix:
By 2028, we will
ensure rigorous, student-centered learning
in all classrooms, for all students
92
We will exceed the CA state average in math and ELA proficiency
We will diagnose, differentiate, and accelerate academic growth through tiered supports for all scholars
We will drive consistent english language development for emerging bilingual students - especially our newcomers and earliest learners
We will provide exemplar supports for students with disabilities, especially those requiring more intensive services
1
93
To accompany this qualitative picture of success, LCPS developed a set of quantitative intended impact goals
Intended Impact Category | Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028) | |
Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students | In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups | |
60% of Emerging Bilingual students advance at least 1 EPLI level or maintain a level 4 | | |
85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline) | | |
Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth | |
In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups
94
| % proficient in ELA | % proficient in Math |
CA State Averages Spring, 2024 | 47% | 36% |
LCPS CAASSP Averages Spring, 2024 | 23% | 16% |
LCPS Interim Assessment Fall, 2024 | 22% | 22% |
LCPS Interim Assessment Winter (Feb), 2025 | ? | ? |
LCPS CAASSP Testing Spring (May), 2025 | ? | ? |
85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)
95
Current 2nd Grades Fall 2024 Baseline Previous cohort of 2nd graders, 50.1% ended the year above the 25th percentile in ORF Percent of Students at or Above 25th Percentile, Goal of 85% | ||
2nd Grade Oral Reading Fluency | Lighthouse 2nd | Lodestar 2nd |
90-99th %ile | 3.4% | 0% |
75th-89th %ile | 10.3% | 0% |
26th-74th %ile | 36.2% | 47.5% |
11-25th %ile | 22.4% | 10% |
1-10th %ile | 27.6% | 42.5% |
Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth
96
Change in CA Dashboard for SWD in 2024 (scale score) | |
CA ELA |
|
CA Math |
|
Lighthouse ELA |
|
Lighthouse Math |
|
Lodestar ELA |
|
Lodestar Math |
|
By 2028, we will
strengthen multi-generational opportunities
as a model community school
97
We will welcome all students daily to joyful, inclusive, and anti-racist spaces for learning
We will better prepare all students for an opportunity-rich future through an exemplary TK program and robust college and career readiness supports
We will amplify strong and enduring community partnerships in order to maximize access to - and enrichment of - learning
We will build enduring advocacy and investment in our community through strategic parent and alumni empowerment efforts
2
98
To accompany this qualitative picture of success, LCPS developed a set of quantitative intended impact goals
Intended Impact Category | Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028) | |
Strengthen multi-generational opportunities as a model community school | 95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation | |
Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028. | | |
Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years | | |
90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually | | |
95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation
99
| Graduation Rate | College and Career Indicator (CCI) % - Proxy for readiness - A-G Eligible + College Credits / CTE Pathway completion. |
CA Averages | 86.7% | 45% |
Lighthouse HS | 89.7% | 71.4% |
Lodestar HS | 89.5% | 75% |
Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028.
Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years
100
Chronic Absence Rate | |
LCPS 2024-25 (Current) | 23.6% |
LCPS 2023-24 | 32.9% |
Suspension Rate | |
LCPS 2024-25 (Current) | 1.3% |
LCPS 2023-24 | 4.1% |
90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually
101
By 2028, we will
deeply invest in our educators and leaders -
our greatest asset
102
We will recruit and retain educators and leaders who are committed to and reflective of our community
We will deliver the world-class professional development and coaching that our educators and leaders deserve
We will foster a collaborative and cohesive leadership team that removes barriers for, supports, and celebrates its educators
We will grow and strengthen our educator and leadership pathways
3
103
To accompany this qualitative picture of success, LCPS developed a set of quantitative intended impact goals
Intended Impact Category | Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028) | |
Deeply invest in our educators and leaders - our greatest asset | On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders year-over-year with <10% variance across sites | |
Maintain >75% of LCPS staff identifying as BIPOC | | |
LCPS career pathways account for 30-40% of teacher, leader, and student support staff | | |
Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey | | |
On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders year-over-year with <10% variance across sites.
Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey.
Overall Staff Engagement
104
Staff who are “Engaged” has increased from 44% to 60% over the last 2 years with another 11% on the cusp of being engaged (Average of 3.7+)
On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders year-over-year with <10% variance across sites.
Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey.
Top 2 Areas of Strength
Overarching Themes from Staff Responded a 4 or Higher
#1: Manager/Supervisor/Coach Support & Feeling Valued:
#2: Working as a Part of a Supportive & Collaborative Team & Staff Retention:
105
On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders year-over-year with <10% variance across sites.
Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey.
Top 3 Areas of Growth
Overarching Themes from Staff Responded a 3 or Lower
#1: Better Resources, Space, Time & Support to Do My Job:
#2: Support Leaders to Better Support Their Staff:
#3: Support My Professional Growth:
106
On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders year-over-year with <10% variance across sites.
Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey.
Intent to Return
107
LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25
December 4, 2024
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 12.4.24
Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary
109
Strategic Priority #2: Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust |
Preliminary Data from All Staff Fall Survey: The following questions grounded in the Q12 are most aligned to this priority On Track:
Improvement Needed:
More analysis on our staff engagement vs. this priority will be shared at our January meeting.
|
Strategic Priority #3: All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve |
Preliminary Data from All Staff Fall Survey: The following questions grounded in the Q12 are most aligned to this priority On Track:
Off Track/Improvement Needed:
More analysis on our staff engagement vs. this priority will be shared at our January meeting. |
Strategic Priority #1: All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day |
Data from the CA Dashboard (from last school year) lifts our organizational need to improve our Literacy and English Language Learner support this school year.
|
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 12.4.24
Update on Strategic Priority Initiatives - Executive Summary
110
Initiative 1B:
Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms
Initiative 1C:
Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices
Initiative 1D:
Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability
Initiative 1A:
Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework
Initiative 2A:
Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process
Initiative 2B:
Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action
Initiative 2C:
Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued
Initiative 2D:
Our community partners provide services and supports, and opportunities aligned to the needs of our students and families
Initiative 3A:
Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures
Initiative 3B:
Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team
Initiative 3C:
Our team participates in a clear and consistent org-wide coaching structure that balances coaching capacity with development needs
Initiative 3D:
Our team experiences high quality coaching through research-based coaching protocols and emerging technologies to develop and sustain educators
Initiative Started; Going well
Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges
Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges/Delay
Initiative Not Yet Started per timeline
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 12.4.24
Update on Strategic Priority Implementation Goals - Executive Summary
111
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 2
X% of students per grade are meeting/exceeding standards on CAASSP interims for Math (1B, 1C, 1D); varies by grade
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 3
80% of students demonstrate scale score improvement (50 points+) on interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D)
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 4
90% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in Domain 1 and 2; 70% in Domain 3, 4, and 5 for Q1, Q2, Q4 and Q4 as measured by instructional excellence rubric (TDEF/LDEF) (1B, 1C,,1D)
Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 1
90% of teachers effectively implement curriculum (Crew + content) with fidelity as measured by a classroom walkthrough tool (1A)
Initiative 2 :Implementation Goal 1
85% staff agree that decision-making process is done in a timely and inclusive manner as measured by a biannual staff survey (2a)
90%+ of staff participate in LCPS biannual survey and 75% agree that communication is timely and inclusive (2a, 2b)
Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 2
50 families participate in decision making groups (ELAC, SSC) per school (2c)
Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 3
90% of students return to LCPS YoY as measured by annual student retention data (2c)
Initiative 2: mplementation Goal 4
80% of students/families who have received services from community partners agree the support was effective (2d)
Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 1
X% of teachers and instructional leaders are rated skillful or higher on the TDEF / LDEF, respectively (3a, 3b, 3c)
Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 2
90% of staff participate in 90% of PD structures (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) (3b, 3c)
Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 3
85% of staff agree each PD structure (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) is effective and purposeful in driving academic progress as measured by biannual staff survey (3b)
Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 4
80% of coaches and managers are effective as measured by a coaching rubric or the People Management domain of the Leader Effectiveness tool (3d)
Implementation Goal Met / Meeting
Implementation Goal Progress
Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting
Implementation Goal Not Yet Measured
CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 12.6.24
Framing of Goals: Impact vs Implementation
Month | When to Expect Board Presentation Updates on Impact Goals |
December |
|
January |
|
Implementation Goals for Strategic Priority 1 | |||||
60% of Emerging Bilingual Students advance at least 1 ELPI level or maintain a level 4. | Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth. | ||||
LCPS: 37% | LHK8: 45% LH9-12: 29% LS: 38% | Growth | ELA Points from Standard | Math Points from Standard | |
LCPS SWD ELA Growth: -10 LCPS SWD Math Growth: -3 | LCPS: -155 LHK8: -136 LH9-12: -170 LS: -160 LCPS Difference to CA: -59 | LCPS: -185 LHK8: -162 LH9-12: -221 LS: -172 LCPS Difference to CA: -61 |
CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 12.6.24
What is the CA Dashboard?
LEA Dashboard Overview
LH K-8
114
LEA Dashboard Overview
LH HS
115
LEA Dashboard Overview
Lodestar K-12
116
December 4, 2024
Appendix:
| State | OUSD | LHK8 | LHHS | Lodestar | |||||
2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
Chronic Absenteeism | 24.3% | 18.6% | 60.3% | 31.2% | 34.6% | 30.8 | N/A | N/A | 39.2% | 34.5% |
Suspension (% suspended at least one day) | 3.5% | 3.2% | 4% | 4.3% | 0.7% | 3% | 2.8% | 4.4% | 3% | 3.9% |
English Learner Progress | 49% | 46% | 44% | 39% | 48% | 45% | 71% | 30% | 51% | 38% |
ELA (Points from standard) | -14 | -13 | -64 | -55 | -63 | -77 | +2 | -45 | -81 | -84 |
Math (Points from standard) | -49 | -48 | -94 | -85 | -95 | -107 | -159 | -154 | -115 | -100 |
Graduation Rate (% graduated) | 86.4% | 86.7% | 75% | 80.6% | N/A | N/A | 92.4% | 89.7% | N/A | 89.5%* |
College/ Career | 44% | 45% | 38% | 43% | N/A | N/A | Very High | 71.4% | N/A | 75%* |
CA Dashboard Official Data
Chronic Absenteeism | State | OUSD | LHK8 | LHHS | Lodestar | |||||
2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
AA | 36.4% | 31.3% | 70.5% | 45.7% | 23.3% | 37.1% | N/A | N/A | 30.6% | 31% |
Hispanic | 28.4% | 21.7% | 66.2% | 33.5% | 35.3% | 29.8% | N/A | N/A | 40.4% | 33.8% |
SWD | 33.1% | 26.3% | 68.4% | 41% | 38% | 40.2% | N/A | N/A | 50% | 46.9% |
EL | 26.3% | 20.1% | 61.8% | 32.3% | 33.1% | 28.5% | N/A | N/A | 36.1% | 29.1% |
LTEL | N/A | 23.9% | N/A | 36.6% | N/A | 24% | N/A | N/A | N/A | 25% |
SED | 29.9% | 23.4% | 65.9% | 37% | 35% | 31.5% | N/A | N/A | 39% | 34.5% |
CA Dashboard Official Data: Chronic Absenteeism
Suspension | State | OUSD | LHK8 | LHHS | Lodestar | |||||
2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
AA | 8.8% | 8.4% | 9.4% | 9.8% | 2.2% | 5.7% | 4.2% | 4.3% | 5.6% | 3.4% |
Hispanic | 3.8% | 3.4% | 2.9% | 3.3% | 0.6% | 3% | 2.5% | 2.9% | 2.2% | 4.3% |
SWD | 5.9% | 5.4% | 7% | 6.6% | 1.3% | 2.1% | 6.4% | 5.8% | 11.2% | 5.7% |
EL | 3.7% | 3.4% | 2.7% | 3.1% | 0.3% | 2.5% | 3% | 6.9% | 2.3% | 3.9% |
LTEL | N/A | 8.1% | N/A | 7.2% | N/A | 8% | N/A | 7.6% | N/A | 8.5% |
SED | 4.5% | 4% | 4.7% | 5% | 0.6% | 3% | 2.9% | 3.7% | 2.9% | 4.2% |
CA Dashboard Official Data: Suspension
ELPI | State | OUSD | LHK8 | LHHS | Lodestar | |||||
2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
% Who Progressed | 46% | 44% | 45% | 38% | 43% | 40% | 59% | 24% | 44% | 31% |
% Who Maintained Level 4 | 2% | 2% | 1% | 1% | 5% | 5% | 12% | 5% | 7% | 7% |
% Who Maintained Levels 1-3 | 33% | 35% | 38% | 42% | 28% | 29% | 15% | 27% | 26% | 29% |
% Who Decreased at Least One Level | 19% | 19% | 16% | 18% | 24% | 27% | 15% | 44% | 23% | 33% |
CA Dashboard Official Data: English Learner Progress
ELA (Distance from standard) | State | OUSD | LHK8 | LHHS | Lodestar | |||||
2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
AA | -60 | -59 | -120 | -98 | -93 | -109 | <11 Students | <11 Students | -96 | -90 |
Hispanic | -40 | -39 | -84 | -82 | -63 | -77 | +11 | -39 | -80 | -86 |
SWD | -96 | -96 | -146 | -131 | -118 | -136 | <11 Students | -170 | -158 | -160 |
EL | -68 | -68 | -93 | -98 | -78 | -94 | -22 | -118 | -97 | -110 |
LTEL | N/A | -110 | N/A | -131 | N/A | -132 | N/A | -128 | N/A | -120 |
SED | -43 | -41 | -93 | -81 | -64 | -77 | +1 | -45 | -81 | -85 |
CA Dashboard Official Data: ELA
Math (Distance from standard) | State | OUSD | LHK8 | LHHS | Lodestar | |||||
2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
AA | -105 | -102 | -155 | -138 | -133 | -114 | <11 Students | <11 Students | -135 | -119 |
Hispanic | -81 | -79 | -117 | -114 | -95 | -108 | -148 | -149 | -113 | -100 |
SWD | -127 | -124 | -173 | -155 | -166 | -162 | <11 Students | -221 | -182 | -172 |
EL | -93 | -94 | -116 | -120 | -103 | -118 | -21.9 | -197 | -124 | -120 |
LTEL | N/A | -164 | N/A | -182 | N/A | -169 | N/A | -210 | N/A | -156 |
SED | -81 | -78 | -123 | -112 | -97 | -109 | -162 | -150 | -116 | -100 |
CA Dashboard Official Data: Math
Grad Rate | State | OUSD | LHK8 | LHHS | Lodestar | |||||
2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
AA | 79% | 79% | 76% | 81% | N/A | N/A | <11 Students | <11 Students | N/A | <11 Students |
Hispanic | 84% | 85% | 69% | 77% | N/A | N/A | 92% | 91% | N/A | 90% |
SWD | 73% | 74% | 68% | 76% | N/A | N/A | <11 Students | 71% | N/A | <11 Students |
EL | 74% | 78% | 62% | 70% | N/A | N/A | 86% | 93% | N/A | 95% |
LTEL | N/A | 81% | N/A | 76% | N/A | N/A | N/A | 93% | N/A | 94% |
SED | 84% | 84% | 74% | 80% | N/A | N/A | 93% | 90% | N/A | 93% |
CA Dashboard Official Data: Graduation Rate
CCI | State | OUSD | LHK8 | LHHS | Lodestar | |||||
2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
AA | 25% | 28% | 29% | 32% | N/A | N/A | <11 Students | <11 Students | N/A | <11 Students |
Hispanic | 36% | 37% | 31% | 39% | N/A | N/A | 83% | 76% | N/A | 75% |
SWD | 12% | 14% | 18% | 24% | N/A | N/A | <11 Students | 36% | N/A | <11 Students |
EL | 15% | 17% | 19% | 24% | N/A | N/A | 77% | 59% | N/A | 74% |
LTEL | N/A | 17% | N/A | 28% | N/A | N/A | N/A | 57% | N/A | 73% |
SED | 35% | 37% | 35% | 40% | N/A | N/A | 83% | 71% | N/A | 78% |
CA Dashboard Official Data: College & Career Indicator
LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25
November 6, 2024
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 11.6.24
Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary
127
Strategic Priority #2: Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust |
On Track:
Oakland Natives Give Back: Chronic Absenteeism - state grant Youth Alive! Violence Prevention for federal school safety grant Higher Ground: After School and Restorative Justice programming - ASSETs and federal school safety grant Families in Action: Lit for Literacy parent workshops - state community Schools grant Off Track:
|
Strategic Priority #3: All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve |
On Track:
Off Track:
|
Strategic Priority #1: All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day |
On Track:
|
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 11.6.24
Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary
128
Initiative 1B:
Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms
Initiative 1C:
Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices
Initiative 1D:
Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability
Initiative 1A:
Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework
Initiative 2A:
Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process
Initiative 2B:
Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action
Initiative 2C:
Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued
Initiative 2D:
Our community partners provide services and supports, and opportunities aligned to the needs of our students and families
Initiative 3A:
Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures
Initiative 3B:
Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team
Initiative 3C:
Our team participates in a clear and consistent org-wide coaching structure that balances coaching capacity with development needs
Initiative 3D:
Our team experiences high quality coaching through research-based coaching protocols and emerging technologies to develop and sustain educators
Initiative Started; Going well
Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges
Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges/Delay
Initiative Not Yet Started per timeline
CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 11.6.24
Framing of Goals: Impact vs Implementation
Month | When to Expect Board Presentation Updates on Impact Goals |
November |
|
December |
|
Implementation Goals for Strategic Priority 1 | ||||
% of students meeting or exceeding proficiency (LCPS 3-8, 11) | % of students demonstrating 30 point scale score improvement (80% at 50 is EOY goal) | |||
LCPS ELA: 21.5% LCPS Math: 22% | LS Math: 19% LS ELA: 21% LH Math: 25% LH ELA: 22% | LCPS ELA: 55% LCPS Math: 45% | LS Math: 46% LS ELA: 57% LH Math: 44% LH ELA: 52% |
130
Strategic Priority 1: Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning
LCPS Baselines for 4-year intended impact goals
Intended Impact Category | Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028) | Baselines (from 2023-24) |
Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students | In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups | Aggregate: State vs. LCPS
Student Sub-Groups: State vs. LCPS
Please see appendix for more details |
60% of Emerging Bilingual students advance at least 1 EPLI level or maintain a level 4 | TBD: December 2024 CA State Dashboard Release | |
85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline) | AimsWeb Plus Reading Inventory
| |
Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth | TBD: December 2024 CA State Dashboard Release |
131
Strategic Priority 2: Strengthen multi-generational opportunities
LCPS Baselines for 4-year intended impact goals
Intended Impact Category | Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028) | Baselines (from 2023-24) |
Strengthen multi-generational opportunities as a model community school | 95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation | CCI Index for CA: 43.9%
|
Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028. | Chronic Absenteeism
| |
Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years | Suspensions in
| |
90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually | Baseline in 2024-25 | |
132
Strategic Priority 3: Deeply invest in our educators and leaders
LCPS Baselines for 4-year intended impact goals
Intended Impact Category | Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028) | Baselines (from 2023-24) |
Deeply invest in our educators and leaders - our greatest asset | On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders YoY with <10% variance across sites |
83% Retention of Staff;
|
Maintain >75% of LCPS staff identifying as BIPOC | Staff identifying as BIPOC: 77%
| |
LCPS career pathways account for 30-40% of teacher, leader, and student support staff | 39% of Staff on/have been on Career Pathways
| |
Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey | Staff Engagement in 2023-24 based on Q-12
| |
November 6, 2024
Appendix:
CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 11.6.24
Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning
Impact Goal: In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups
| LCPS Proficiency | CA Proficiency | Variance |
ELA | 26% | 47% | -21% |
Math | 13% | 36% | -22% |
| LCPS ELA | CA ELA | ELA Variance | LCPS Math | CA Math | Math Variance |
LH3-5 | 22% | 45% | -23% | 13% | 41% | -28% |
LH6-8, 11 | 26% | 41% | -15% | 13% | 32% | -19% |
LS3-5 | 13% | 45% | -32% | 15% | 41% | -25% |
LS6-8, 11 | 26% | 41% | -16% | 17% | 32% | -15% |
| LIGHTHOUSE ELA | CA ELA | ||||||||||
| LH | Econ D | Lx | AA | ELD | SWD | CA | Econ D | Lx | AA | ELD | SWD |
3 | 7.54% | 8.52% | 8.00% | 0% | 2.78% | No Data | 42.8% | 32.51% | 32.27% | 28.22% | 15.34% | 19.47% |
4 | 20.83% | 19.15% | 22.22% | 50% | 16.67% | No Data | 43.9% | 33.38% | 33.17% | 26.93% | 12.97% | 17.77% |
5 | 38.00% | 36.96% | 40.48% | 0% | 15.38% | No Data | 47.37% | 36.69% | 36.58% | 30.48% | 11.45% | 17.04% |
6 | 18.84% | 19.41% | 20.00% | 0% | 6.90% | No Data | 45.82% | 35.62% | 35.38% | 28.29% | 8.14% | 13.34% |
7 | 25.33% | 24.32% | 24.64% | 20% | 6.67% | 0% | 47.2% | 36.56% | 36.52% | 30.25% | 6.94% | 13.66% |
8 | 20.78% | 18.92% | 20.59% | 14% | 3.57% | 15.38% | 45.96% | 35.83% | 35.56% | 29.48% | 4.60% | 12.11% |
11 | 38.03% | 37.88% | 41.66% | 20% | 8.33% | 0% | 55.73% | 47.10% | 47.18% | 38.49% | 7.46% | 16.98% |
All | 24.19% | 23.59% | 25.37% | 14.86% | 8.61% | 5.12% | 47.04% | 36.81% | 36.78% | 30.34% | 10.29% | 15.83% |
KEY: Red is further than 5% difference, Yellow is within 5% difference, Green is exceeded |
Student Assessment Data: CAASPP Proficiency
| LODESTAR ELA | CA ELA | ||||||||||
| LS | Econ D | Lx | AA | ELD | SWD | CA | Econ D | Lx | AA | ELD | SWD |
3 | 14.54% | 15.39% | 12.50% | 33% | 2.78% | No Data | 42.8% | 32.51% | 32.27% | 28.22% | 15.34% | 19.47% |
4 | 14.55% | 13.73% | 12.82% | 20% | 3.70% | No Data | 43.9% | 33.38% | 33.17% | 26.93% | 12.97% | 17.77% |
5 | 8.89% | 7.89% | 5.71% | 22% | 7.41% | No Data | 47.37% | 36.69% | 36.58% | 30.48% | 11.45% | 17.04% |
6 | 11.69% | 12.68% | 11.48% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 45.82% | 35.62% | 35.38% | 28.29% | 8.14% | 13.34% |
7 | 36.11% | 37.31% | 31.74% | 50% | 4.17% | No Data | 47.2% | 36.56% | 36.52% | 30.25% | 6.94% | 13.66% |
8 | 18.46% | 17.55% | 18.51% | 18.18% | 7.14% | No Data | 45.96% | 35.83% | 35.56% | 29.48% | 4.60% | 12.11% |
11 | 36.00% | 34.09% | 30.96% | 57% | 0% | No Data | 55.73% | 47.10% | 47.18% | 38.49% | 7.46% | 16.98% |
All | 20.28% | 20.27% | 18.42% | 25.86% | 3.61% | 7.69% | 47.04% | 36.81% | 36.78% | 30.34% | 10.29% | 15.83% |
KEY: Red is further than 5% difference, Yellow is within 5% difference, Green is exceeded |
Student Assessment Data: CAASPP Proficiency
| LIGHTHOUSE MATH | CA MATH | ||||||||||
| LH | Econ D | Lx | AA | ELD | SWD | CA | Econ D | Lx | AA | ELD | SWD |
3 | 7.55% | 8.51% | 8.00% | 0% | 8.33% | No Data | 45.63% | 35.13% | 34.40% | 27.38% | 21.46% | 23.64% |
4 | 14.58% | 14.90% | 15.55% | 0% | 13.89% | No Data | 41.20% | 30.28% | 29.25% | 21.96% | 14.68% | 18.37% |
5 | 24.00% | 21.74% | 21.43% | 18% | 3.85% | No Data | 35.02% | 24.08% | 23.01% | 17.03% | 8.24% | 12.59% |
6 | 18.58% | 19.12% | 19.70% | 0% | 13.79% | No Data | 34.32% | 23.77% | 22.46% | 16.24% | 6.21% | 10.11% |
7 | 20.00% | 18.92% | 20.29% | 20% | 3.33% | 0% | 33.83% | 22.79% | 21.74% | 16.00% | 5.25% | 9.27% |
8 | 6.49% | 6.76% | 7.35% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 31.56% | 20.89% | 19.65% | 14.21% | 3.70% | 7.22% |
11 | 7.04% | 7.58% | 8.34% | 0% | 4.17% | 0% | 27.90% | 18.10% | 16.57% | 12.58% | 3.11% | 4.65% |
All | 14.03% | 13.93% | 14.38% | 5.43% | 6.77% | 1.72% | 35.54% | 24.98% | 23.73% | 17.75% | 10.25% | 12.54% |
KEY: Red is further than 5% difference, Yellow is within 5% difference, Green is exceeded |
Student Assessment Data: CAASPP Proficiency
| LODESTAR MATH | CA MATH | ||||||||||
| LS | Econ D | Lx | AA | ELD | SWD | CA | Econ D | Lx | AA | ELD | SWD |
3 | 34.55% | 34.62% | 31.25% | 46% | 19.44% | No Data | 45.63% | 35.13% | 34.40% | 27.38% | 21.46% | 23.64% |
4 | 9.09% | 7.84% | 7.69% | 10% | 3.70% | No Data | 41.20% | 30.28% | 29.25% | 21.96% | 14.68% | 18.37% |
5 | 2.13% | 2.50% | 0% | 10% | 0% | No Data | 35.02% | 24.08% | 23.01% | 17.03% | 8.24% | 12.59% |
6 | 15.79% | 15.71% | 16.67% | 8.33% | 8.11% | 0% | 34.32% | 23.77% | 22.46% | 16.24% | 6.21% | 10.11% |
7 | 32.40% | 33.33% | 30.65% | 34% | 12.50% | No Data | 33.83% | 22.79% | 21.74% | 16.00% | 5.25% | 9.27% |
8 | 15.38% | 14.04% | 14.82% | 18.18% | 0% | No Data | 31.56% | 20.89% | 19.65% | 14.21% | 3.70% | 7.22% |
11 | 6.00% | 4.55% | 4.76% | 0% | 0% | No Data | 27.90% | 18.10% | 16.57% | 12.58% | 3.11% | 4.65% |
All | 17.42% | 17.37% | 16.72% | 16.94% | 7.25% | 2.00% | 35.54% | 24.98% | 23.73% | 17.75% | 10.25% | 12.54% |
KEY: Red is further than 5% difference, Yellow is within 5% difference, Green is exceeded |
Student Assessment Data: CAASPP Proficiency
CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 11.6.24
Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning
Impact Goal: 85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimswebPlus (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)
| EOY Spring 2024 | BOY Fall 2024 |
LH 2nd | 47.2% | 49.9% |
LS 2nd | 53% | 47.5% |
Dashed Lines are Lighthouse, Solid Lines are Lodestar
Projected Growth Needed Over 4 Year Period
Student Assessment Data: AimswebPlus
Percent of Students at or Above 25th Percentile, Goal of 85% | ||
2nd Grade Oral Reading Fluency | Lighthouse | Lodestar |
Spring 2024 (Current 3rd) | 47.2% | 53% |
Fall 2024 (Current 2nd) | 49.9% | 47.5% |
Early Literacy Fall 2024 | Lighthouse | Lodestar |
First Grade | 12% | 23% |
Kindergarten | 41% | 31% |
Goal Date | LCPS Avg. Percent Proficient Goals (K-2) |
Spring 25 | 46% |
Spring 26 | 60% |
Spring 27 | 73% |
Spring 28 | 85% |
To make progress to impact goal, this is growth needed by grade in the 24-25 SY and subsequent years | ||
Grade | Lighthouse | Lodestar |
K | 11% | 13.5% |
1 | 18.25% | 15.5% |
2nd | 8.75% | 9.4% |
To make progress to impact goals, this is the average growth all grades must make in each year. | |
Goal Date | Avg. Percentage Growth Per Year |
Fall 2024 > Spring 25 | 11.42% |
Spring 25 > Spring 26 | 14.17% |
Spring 26 > Spring 27 | 13.33% |
Spring 27 > Spring 28 | 12% |
AimswebPlus: Average Growth Per Year
Student Assessment Data: AimswebPlus
Fall 2024 Baseline Percent of Students at or Above 25th Percentile, Goal of 85% | ||
2nd Grade Oral Reading Fluency | Lighthouse 2nd | Lodestar 2nd |
90-99th %ile | 3.4% | 0% |
75th-89th %ile | 10.3% | 0% |
26th-74th %ile | 36.2% | 47.5% |
11-25th %ile | 22.4% | 10% |
1-10th %ile | 27.6% | 42.5% |
49.9%
47.5%
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP | CAASPP Spring 2024 | LH IAB Scale Score Avg | IABs Percent Proficient | % of Students Who Gained 30+ Points from Spring |
3 | 2432 | 2409 | 2339 | 2355* | 23% | N/A |
4 | 2473 | 2452 | 2389 | 2382 | 7% | 62% |
5 | 2502 | 2490 | 2456 | 2428 | 29% | 58% |
6 | 2531 | 2515 | 2442 | 2466* | 33% | 43% |
7 | 2552 | 2536 | 2483 | 2480 | 27% | 48% |
8 | 2567 | 2548 | 2486 | 2507* | 22% | 50% |
11 | 2683 | 2590 | 2539 | 2579* | 16% | N/A |
Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points Asterix means IAB stronger than CAASPP EOY |
IABs (October) ELA Scale Score Analysis
Lighthouse
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP | CAASPP Spring 2024 | LS IAB Scale Score Avg | IABs Percent Proficient | % of Students Who Gained 30+ Points from Spring |
3 | 2432 | 2409 | 2346 | 2232 | 16% | N/A |
4 | 2473 | 2452 | 2359 | 2386* | 12% | 49% |
5 | 2502 | 2490 | 2366 | 2370* | 15% | 48% |
6 | 2531 | 2515 | 2417 | 2443* | 21% | 70% |
7 | 2552 | 2536 | 2501 | 2474 | 23% | 61% |
8 | 2567 | 2548 | 2481 | 2543* | 47% | 59% |
11 | 2683 | 2590 | 2547 | 2546 | 10% | N/A |
Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points Asterix means IAB stronger than CAASPP EOY |
IABs (October) ELA Scale Score Analysis
Lodestar
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP | CAASPP Spring 2024 | LH IAB Scale Score Avg | IABs Percent Proficient | % of Students Who Gained 30+ Points from Spring |
3 | 2436 | 2422 | 2348 | 2382* | 26% | N/A |
4 | 2485 | 2461 | 2388 | 2388 | 13% | 48% |
5 | 2528 | 2483 | 2436 | 2411 | 11% | 38% |
6 | 2552 | 2499 | 2334 | 2464* | 26% | 45% |
7 | 2567 | 2513 | 2370 | 2468* | 26% | 41% |
8 | 2586 | 2524 | 2437 | 2516* | 34% | 50% |
11 | 2628 | 2547 | 2477 | 2589* | 39% | N/A |
Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points Asterix means IAB stronger than CAASPP EOY |
IABs (October) Math Scale Score Analysis
Lighthouse
Grade | EOY Scale Score Cut Off | CA AVG CAASPP | CAASPP Spring 2024 | LS IAB Scale Score Avg | IABs Percent Proficient | % of Students Who Gained 30+ Points from Spring |
3 | 2432 | 2422 | 2390 | 2344 | 9% | N/A |
4 | 2485 | 2461 | 2395 | 2389 | 15% | 35% |
5 | 2528 | 2483 | 2388 | 2410* | 15% | 54% |
6 | 2552 | 2499 | 2422 | 2381 | 7% | 30% |
7 | 2567 | 2513 | 2515 | 2490 | 28% | 61% |
8 | 2586 | 2524 | 2453 | 2548* | 38% | 50% |
11 | 2628 | 2547 | 2495 | 2510* | 19% | N/A |
Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points Asterix means IAB stronger than CAASPP EOY |
IABs (October)Math Scale Score Analysis
Lodestar
LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25
October 9, 2024
Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.9.24
Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary
149
Strategic Priority #2: Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust |
On Track:
|
Strategic Priority #3: All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve |
On Track:
Off Track:
|
Strategic Priority #1: All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day |
On Track:
Off Track:
|
October 9, 2024
Appendix:
2024-25 Strategic Priority #1: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
151
| First Semester - Board Presentations | First Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations |
August |
|
|
September |
|
|
October |
|
|
November |
| |
December |
|
|
CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.3.24
Strategic Priority 1: Update on Initiative 1D
152
Curriculum Internalization
153
#1D - Our teachers authentically internalize high quality instructional materials daily and our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support and accountability. |
|
Actions to date:
Curriculum Internalization
154
#1D - Our teachers authentically internalize high quality instructional materials daily and our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support and accountability. |
|
CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.3.24
Strategic Priority 1: Update on Implementation Goal 4
155
Walkthrough Tracker Cycle 1 Data
156
TDEF Focus for Cycle 1 (First 6 weeks of School)
| LCPS | LS K-5 | LH K-5 | LS 6-12 | LH 6-12 |
1A: Teaches core value-based norms, routines, and procedures 1B: Employs asset-focused language when describing student actions and behavior 1C: Anticipates, prevents, and addresses student behaviors that do not match teacher expectations. | 42% (On Track) | 31% (On Track) | 75% (On Track) | 75% (On Track) | 25% (Off Track) |
2A: Selects instructional materials and tasks from approved curriculum that meets the grade level standards. 2C: 80%of instructional block is spent reading, writing, or speaking about grade level text or complex task. | 33% (On Track) | 15% (Off Track) | 50% (On Track) | 80% (On Track) | 41% (On Track) |
Next Steps
|
2024-25 Strategic Priority #2: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
157
| First Semester - Board Presentations | First Semester - Student, Family, and Community Events |
Monthly |
| |
September |
|
|
October |
| |
November |
|
|
December |
|
|
CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.3.24
Strategic Priority 2: Update on Initiative 2B and 2C
158
Update: |
2B: We have taken the following steps to improve our communications strategy:
2C: Parent Engagement in multiple forms
|
CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.3.24
Strategic Priority 2: Update on Implementation Goal #4
159
Board Update on Implementation Goal #4: Baseline
Student Retention
Goal is to retain 90% of students annually
160
Summary of Findings | Key | |
Org Wide
grade levels/sites at, near, and below 90% goal. .
retention.
By School overall
Data by Demographic Groups
| 90% or Above | |
85%- 89.9% | ||
84.9% or Below | ||
LCPS
87%
Board Update on Implementation Goal #4: Baseline Student Retention (By Grade at the Time)
Goal is to retain 90% of students annually
161
| Lodestar | Lighthouse | ||
| Number Returning | Percentage | Number Returning | Percentage |
K | 27/38 | 71.1% | 46/51 | 90.2% |
1st | 39/48 | 81.3% | 47/48 | 98% |
2nd | 47/57 | 82.5% | 48/55 | 87.3% |
3rd | 53/57 | 93% | 51/54 | 94.4% |
4th | 51/59 | 86.4% | 48/55 | 87.3% |
5th | 49/51 | 96.1% | 50/53 | 94.3% |
6th | 75/82 | 90.2% | 66/76 | 86.8% |
7th | 68/78 | 87.2% | 72/81 | 88.9% |
8th | 69/76 | 90.8% | 80/84 | 95.2% |
9th | 47/58 | 81.0% | 70/78 | 89.7% |
10th | 56/75 | 74.7% | 65/81 | 80.2% |
11th | 47/54 | 87% | 70/79 | 88.6% |
LH
89.6%
LS
85.1%
Board Update on Implementation Goal #4: Baseline Student Retention (District Summary)
Goal is to retain 90% of students annually
162
2023-2024 > 2024-2025 | |
OVERALL | 87.38% |
LH K-5 | 92.3% |
LH 6-8 | 90.5% |
LH 9-12 | 86.1% |
LS K-5 | 85.8% |
LS 6-8 | 89.4% |
LS 9-12 | 80.2% |
District Summaries | ||
Grades Green | 9 / 24 | 37.5% |
Grades Yellow | 7 / 24 | 29.1% |
Grades Red | 7 / 24 | 29.1% |
2024-25 Strategic Priority #3: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
163
| First Semester - Board Presentations | First Semester - Staff Experiences |
August | |
|
September |
|
|
October |
|
|
November |
|
|
December |
|
|
CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.3.24
Strategic Priority 3: Update on Initiative 3A and 3B
164
Professional Development and Coaching Theory of Action
Implement and lead weekly walkthroughs
Directors of Academics
Principals and Assistant Principals will develop in identifying the highest leverage instructional needs more effectively resulting in improved TDEF scores.
(Priority: 1B, 1C, 1D)
Identify highest leverage academic and culture trends
School Principals
Coaching and professional development will be aligned and improve academic performance.
(Priority: 1B, 1C, 1D)
Execute individual coaching aligned to professional development and walkthrough skills
Assistant Principals
Staff will be aligned in vision and will have practiced how to teach more effectively multiple times prior to executing with students.
(Priority: 3A, 3B, 3C)
Implement practices from Professional development and coaching
Teachers
Teachers will feel more supported and successful as a result of improve student outcomes.
(Priority: 3A, 3B, 3C)
If
then
#3A - Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures
DRAFT
Current State of Professional Development and Coaching
166
Current State
Next Steps
Data & Research
Survey Feedback Trends
LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25
August 7 2024
August 7, 2024
Appendix: ROADMAPS
Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
170
Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
171
Intended Impact Statements
Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
172
Impact Goals
Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
173
Implementation Goals
Initiatives
Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
174
Work Plan
2024-25 Strategic Priority #1: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
175
| First Semester - Board Presentations | First Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations |
August |
|
|
September |
|
|
October |
|
|
November |
| |
December |
|
|
2024-25 Strategic Priority #1: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
176
| Second Semester - Board Presentations | Second Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations |
January |
| |
February |
|
|
March |
|
|
April / May |
|
|
June |
| |
Strategic Priority #2: Multi-Generational Opportunities
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
178
By 2028, we will
enhance multi-generational opportunities
as a model community school
Strategic Priority #2: Multi-Generational Opportunities
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
179
Intended Impact Statements
We will welcome all students daily to joyful, inclusive, and anti-racist spaces for learning
We will amplify strong and enduring community partnerships in order to maximize access to - and enrichment of - learning
We will prepare all students for a opportunity-rich future through college and career readiness
We will build enduring advocacy and investment in our community through strategic parent and alumni empowerment efforts
Strategic Priority #2: Multi-Generational Opportunities
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
180
Impact Goals
Strategic Priority #2: Multi-Generational Opportunities
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
181
Implementation Goals
Initiatives
Priority #2 Implementation Goals
Strategic Priority #2: Multi-Generational Opportunities
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
182
Work Plan
2024-25 Strategic Priority #2: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
183
| First Semester - Board Presentations | First Semester - Student, Family, and Community Events |
Monthly |
| |
September |
|
|
October |
| |
November |
|
|
December |
|
|
2024-25 Strategic Priority #2: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
184
| Second Semester - Board Presentations | Second Semester - Student, Family, and Community Events |
January |
|
|
February |
|
|
March |
|
|
April / May |
|
|
June |
|
|
Strategic Priority #3: Investing in our Educators and Leaders
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
186
By 2028, we will
deeply invest in our educators and leaders -
our greatest asset
Strategic Priority #3: Investing in our Educators and Leaders
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
187
Intended Impact Statements
We will recruit and retain teachers and leaders who are committed to and reflective of our community
We will deliver the world-class professional development and coaching that our teachers and leaders deserve
We will foster a collaborative and cohesive leadership team that removes barriers for, supports, and celebrates its teachers
We will grow and strengthen our teacher and leadership pipelines
Strategic Priority #3: Investing in our Educators and Leaders
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
188
Impact Goals
Strategic Priority #3: Investing in our Educators and Leaders
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
189
Implementation Goals
Initiatives
Priority #3 Implementation Goals
Strategic Priority #3: Investing in our Educators and Leaders
Update for LCPS Board of Directors
190
Work Plan
2024-25 Strategic Priority #3: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
191
| First Semester - Board Presentations | First Semester - Staff Experiences |
August | |
|
September |
|
|
October |
|
|
November |
|
|
December |
|
|
2024-25 Strategic Priority #3: Timeline Overview
Month to Month - where we are headed!
192
| Second Semester - Board Presentations | Second Semester - Staff Experiences |
January |
|
|
February |
|
|
March |
|
|
April / May |
|
|
June |
| |
LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25
June 2024
June, 2024
Appendix: LCPS Strategic Plan
Lighthouse Community Public Schools
Strategic Planning
Updated May 16, 2024
196
197
Strategic Plan: Table of Contents
Who Are We |
|
Where Are We Now
|
Where We Are Going
|
How We Will Get There
|
Appendix |
Executive Summary
198
A committed team of LCPS leaders led the development of this strategic plan
199
Advisory Committee | |
Member | Role |
Belen Orozco | Director of Operations |
Cody Marshall | Lodestar K-5 Principal |
Dominique Hayes | Lodestar High School Assistant Principal of Culture |
Erin Wesseldine | Senior Director of Special Education & Specialized Programs |
Joshua Weintraub | Director of College and Career |
Kelly Norris | Lighthouse Middle School Assistant Principal of Instruction |
Miriam Vasquez | Director of Student Services |
Shaina Hurley | Lighthouse K-5 Principal |
Maiyanna Barron | Lighthouse Elementary School Assistant Principal of Culture |
Steering Committee | |
Member | Role |
Rich Harrison | Chief Executive Officer |
Megan Bacigalupi | Chief of Staff |
Tina Hernandez | Chief Academic Officer |
Anna Martin | Chief Operating Officer |
The Steering Committee met weekly to make key strategic planning decisions and build/review content and tools associated with the plan
The Advisory Committee - which also included members from the Steering Committee - met for two intensive working sessions to review important content, brainstorm solutions, and make recommendations to inform decision-making
200
Focus Groups
(2 student, 6 teacher, and
2 parent groups)
1:1 Stakeholder Interviews
(20 individual interviews)
LCPS Team Self-Assessment
Classroom Observations
(22 classrooms, all schools)
Student Achievement Data
Internal Data & Artifacts
The strategic planning process leveraged a variety of inputs to form an opinion on overall strengths and opportunities for growth
201
Strategic Plan: Table of Contents
Who Are We |
|
Where Are We Now
|
Where We Are Going
|
How We Will Get There
|
Appendix |
Mission:
The mission of Lighthouse Community Public Schools is to prepare a diverse K-12 student population for college and a career of their choice.
Vision:
We believe that all young people have the potential to become lifelong changemakers who realize their unique vision—rooted in their identity, knowledge, and skills—to create equity in their own lives and in the community, leading to a healthier, more joyful world. We are an innovative model for public education that puts each child at the center of their own learning. The Lighthouse community is equal parts love and rigor where children discover their unique light within.
202
For 22 years, LCPS’ has served the East Oakland community with a mission and vision rooted in equity, rigor, and love for its young people
203
LCPS currently serves 1,600+ students; over 96% are either Black or Latinx
204
LCPS aims to cultivate a unique set of knowledge, skills, habits, and mindsets through an inspiring graduate profile…
Purposeful and Self-Aware
Academically Proficient
Relationship Builder
Independent Lifelong Learner
Committed to Service & Justice
205
…that has resulted in LCPS’ students achieving a level of postsecondary success that helps redefine what’s possible in East Oakland
206
LCPS is nearing the end of a 3-year LCAP cycle focused on five organizational goals across categories of quality, culture, and impact
QUALITY All students, every day. | Priority #1: Educational Justice and Excellence: Dramatically improve the quality of our academic program, address disproportionate performance by student subgroups and achieve non-racialized outcomes of our academic program through System-Wide Tools and Processes and Teacher, Leader, and Staff Development. |
CULTURE All Belong. All take responsibility for equity. | Priority #2: Culture of Shared Responsibility for Equitable Outcomes: Create a high performing team culture grounded in equitable outcomes and develop yearly Action Plans grounded in our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Pillars and Commitments and LCPS Board Resolution to Promote Equity and Anti-Racism and combat Anti-Blackness. |
IMPACT All in. In Oakland. | Priority #3: Powerful Community Engagement: Build community, stronger relationships, and political presence in our Oakland Community, shared leadership and decision making with our students, families, and staff through effective decision making processes and formal structures, including School Site Councils (SSC/ELAC), and follow through on our material revision to serve our community’s students and families that qualify for McKinney Vento |
Priority #4: Strong and Sustainable Operational, Technology, and Financial Models: Ensure strong, sustainable support of LCPS schools, staff, and families. | |
Priority #5: College and Career Readiness: Dramatically increase the number of College and Career ready students as measured by A-G completion, 4 year college acceptance, dual credit completion, and cohort college persistence/6 yr graduation rates. |
207
Strategic Plan: Table of Contents
Who Are We |
|
Where Are We Now
|
Where We Are Going
|
How We Will Get There
|
Appendix |
208
Outcomes: academic performance, student / adult culture, talent, and leadership
Common factors considered across all components: Org Mission, Vision, Core Values, Commitment to DEI
| Academics | Network & School Culture | Talent | Leadership | Community Engagement | Governance | Operations | Finance | Strategic Planning |
C O M P O N E N T S | Program Vision & Design | Culture Vision & Expectations | Talent Philosophy | Org Roles & Responsibilities | Family �Engagement | Board Membership & Composition | Technology | Financial Planning & Forecasting | Long-Term Planning |
Curriculum | Positive Relationships | Recruitment, Hiring, & Onboarding Practices | Decision- Making Structures | Community Partnerships | Board Governance Structures | Data Systems & Processes | Budgeting Tools & Processes | Annual Planning | |
Instruction | Community Building Practices | Professional Development & Coaching | Meeting Structures | | Strategic Oversight | Physical Environment | Fundraising Capacity | | |
Data and Assessment | Non-Academic Skill Building | Staff Collaboration | Internal & External Communications | | Board Culture | Daily Building Logistics | | | |
Response to Intervention / MTSS | Restorative/ Discipline Practices | Evaluation, Retention & Promotion | Distributed Leadership | | | Student �Recruitment & Enrollment | | | |
| | Student Supports | | | | | | | |
7
5
6
8
9
LCPS assessed its current state across nine dimensions of school health and performance - with a focus on the first four
1
2
3
4
209
Relationships |
|
Talent Strategy: Recruitment |
|
Curriculum Selection |
|
The assessment elevated numerous strengths within and across LCPS schools
LCPS’ recent hiring data exemplifies how these strengths translate to concrete and meaningful outcomes
210
At LCPS, nearly 70% of teachers and 80% of all staff identify as BIPOC -
with 45% identifying as Black or Latinx
211
Curriculum Implementation & Instruction |
|
Professional Development & Coaching |
|
Decision Making & Internal Communication |
|
Several important growth areas across LCPS also emerged
212
We believe that focusing on these opportunity areas will help LCPS address gaps in current achievement results, in ELA and math
Source: CA Department of Education
In ELA, both Lighthouse and Lodestar perform below CA and OUSD averages; 11th grade at Lighthouse, however, is strong positive outlier
In math, Lighthouse and Lodestar perform mostly below CA and OUSD averages, with concerning performance in 4th, 7th, 8th, and 11th grades
213
Strategic Plan: Table of Contents
Who Are We |
|
Where Are We Now
|
Where We Are Going
|
How We Will Get There
|
Appendix |
214
LCPS engaged in the creation of a 4-yr strategic plan, beginning with a clear articulation of what impact it seeks to have by the end of the plan
Strategic Priority #1
Strategic Priority #2
Strategic Priority #3
4-Yr Intended Impact Statement & Goals
LCPS graduates are independent lifelong learners, purposeful & self-aware, academically proficient, relationship-builders, and committed to service & justice
1
2
3
VISION
MISSION
VALUES
Priority #1 Implementation Goals
Priority #2 Implementation Goals
Priority #3 Implementation Goals
5
Strategic Priorities: Major categories of work that will accelerate LCPS towards its intended impact goals
Initiatives: Smaller workstreams that break down each strategic priority into more concrete action steps
Graduate Profile: The long-term skills, habits, & mindsets LCPS seeks to instill in graduates
3
4
Priority Implementation Goals: The specific, measurable, and time-bound outcomes that define success for each priority over the four years
5
1
4-Yr Intended Impact Statement & Goals: High-level qualitative and quantitative description of the mission-aligned impact LCPS seeks to have by 2028
2
Initiative 1A
Initiative 1B
4
Initiative 1C
Initiative 1D
Initiative 2A
Initiative 2B
Initiative 2C
Initiative 2D
Initiative 3A
Initiative 3B
Initiative 3C
Initiative 3D
215
By 2028, Lighthouse Community Public Schools will be a beacon of academic excellence in East Oakland and beyond, serving as a model of community-centered educational justice
for 1700+ Black and Brown TK-12 students and families.
strengthening multi-generational opportunities as a
model community school…
…ensuring rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students…
…and deeply investing in
our educators and leaders
- our greatest asset.
We will do this by…
An intended impact statement was created to define success
By 2028, we will
ensure rigorous, student-centered learning
in all classrooms, for all students
216
We will exceed the CA state average in math and ELA proficiency
We will diagnose, differentiate, and accelerate academic growth through tiered supports for all students
We will drive consistent english language development for emerging bilingual students - especially our newcomers and earliest learners
We will provide exemplar supports for students with disabilities, especially those requiring more intensive services
By 2028, we will
strengthen multi-generational opportunities
as a model community school
217
We will welcome all students daily to joyful, inclusive, and anti-racist spaces for learning
We will better prepare all students for an opportunity-rich future through an exemplary TK program and robust college and career readiness supports
We will amplify strong and enduring community partnerships in order to maximize access to - and enrichment of - learning
We will build enduring advocacy and investment in our community through strategic parent and alumni empowerment efforts
By 2028, we will
deeply invest in our educators and leaders -
our greatest asset
218
We will recruit and retain educators and leaders who are committed to and reflective of our community
We will deliver the world-class professional development and coaching that our educators and leaders deserve
We will foster a collaborative and cohesive leadership team that removes barriers for, supports, and celebrates its educators
We will grow and strengthen our educator and leadership pathways
219
To accompany this qualitative picture of success, LCPS developed a set of quantitative intended impact goals
Intended Impact Category | Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028) |
Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students | In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups |
60% of Emerging Bilingual students advance at least 1 EPLI level or maintain a level 4 | |
85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline) | |
Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth | |
Strengthen multi-generational opportunities as a model community school | 95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation |
Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028. | |
Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years | |
90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually | |
Deeply invest in our educators and leaders - our greatest asset | On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders YoY with <10% variance across sites |
Maintain >75% of LCPS staff identifying as BIPOC | |
LCPS career pathways account for 30-40% of teacher, leader, and student support staff | |
Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey | |
Throughout this process, LCPS sought to honor and align efforts with OUSD’s strategic plan and the broader community schools movement
220
Deeply invest in our teachers and leaders - our greatest asset
Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning
in all classrooms, for all students
Enhance multi-generational opportunity pathways as a model community school
Source: Theory of Action for Community School Transformation, 2023
221
To achieve its overall intended impact and goals, LCPS articulated 3 strategic priorities and aligned initiatives to focus its work
Strategic Priority #1
Strategic Priority #2
Strategic Priority #3
4-Yr Intended Impact Statement & Goals
LCPS graduates are independent lifelong learners, purposeful & self-aware, academically proficient, relationship-builders, and committed to service & justice
1
2
3
VISION
MISSION
VALUES
Priority #1 Implementation Goals
Priority #2 Implementation Goals
Priority #3 Implementation Goals
5
Strategic Priorities: Major categories of work that will accelerate LCPS towards its intended impact goals
Initiatives: Smaller workstreams that break down each strategic priority into more concrete action steps
Graduate Profile: The long-term skills, habits, & mindsets LCPS seeks to instill in graduates
3
4
Priority Implementation Goals: The specific, measurable, and time-bound outcomes that define success for each priority over the four years
5
1
4-Yr Intended Impact Statement & Goals: High-level qualitative and quantitative description of the mission-aligned impact LCPS seeks to have by 2028
2
Initiative 1A
Initiative 1B
4
Initiative 1C
Initiative 1D
Initiative 2A
Initiative 2B
Initiative 2C
Initiative 2D
Initiative 3A
Initiative 3B
Initiative 3C
Initiative 3D
222
Here are the detailed initiatives & implementation goals for Strategic Priority #1
Strategic Priority #1
All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day
Initiative 1B:
Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms
Priority #1 Implementation Goals
Initiative 1C:
Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices
Initiative 1D:
Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability
Initiative 1A:
Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework
223
Here are the detailed initiatives & implementation goals for Strategic Priority #2
Strategic Priority #2
Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school
through shared power, voice, and trust
Initiative 2A:
Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process
Priority #2 Implementation Goals
Initiative 2B:
Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action
Initiative 2C:
Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued
Initiative 2D:
Our community partners provide services and supports, and opportunities aligned to the needs of our students and families
224
Here are the detailed initiatives & implementation goals for Strategic Priority #3
Strategic Priority #3
All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve
Initiative 3A:
Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures
Priority #3 Implementation Goals
Initiative 3B:
Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team
Initiative 3C:
Our team participates in a clear and consistent org-wide coaching structure that balances coaching capacity with development needs
Initiative 3D:
Our team experiences high quality coaching through research-based coaching protocols and emerging technologies to develop and sustain educators
225
Strategic Plan: Table of Contents
Who Are We |
|
Where Are We Now
|
Where We Are Going
|
How We Will Get There
|
Appendix |
The work to implement the strategic plan is sequenced by initiative over the next four years
226
Initiative | Initiative Shorthand | 2024-25 | 2025-26 | 2026-27 | 2027-28 | ||||||||||||
Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | ||
1A | Crew implementation | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1B | Vision for instruction | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1C | Instructional strategies | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
1D | Curriculum internalization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2A | Decision-making | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2B | Comms strategy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2C | Student & family voice | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2D | Community partners | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3A | PD Theory of Action | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3B | PD structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3C | Coaching structure | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
3D | Coaching efficacy | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Over the next 3 months, LCPS will focus on finalizing and communicating this plan
227
Finalize the Plan | Communicate the Plan |
|
|