1 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Updates

SY 2024-25

2 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

2024

CAASPP Spring Proficiency 2024

CAASPP Spring 2024 Scale Score Avg

CAASPP Spring Proficiency 2025

CAASPP Spring 2025 Scale Score Avg

3

2432

2409

7%

2335

42% (+35%)

2398 (+63)

4

2473

2452

18%

2390

6% (-12%)

2367 (-23)

5

2502

2490

36%

2446

23% (-13%)

2438 (-12)

6

2531

2515

20%

2440

25% (+5%)

2464 (+24)

7

2552

2536

26%

2485

19% (-7%)

2459 (-26)

8

2567

2548

21%

2487

21% (0%)

2502 (+15)

11

2683

2590

38%

2540

48% (+10%)

2564 (+24)

UNOFFICIAL ELA Proficiency and Scale Score on CAASSP 2025 (6/4/2025)

Lighthouse

3 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

2024

CAASPP Spring 2024

CAASPP Spring 2024 Scale Score Avg

CAASPP Spring 2025

CAASPP Spring 2025 Scale Score Avg

3

2432

2409

14%

2345

16% (+2%)

2347 (+2)

4

2473

2452

15%

2360

14% (-1%)

2387 (+27)

5

2502

2490

9%

2364

5% (-4%)

2378 (+14)

6

2531

2515

12%

2417

14% (+2%)

2431 (+14)

7

2552

2536

36%

2501

27% (-9%)

2477 (-24)

8

2567

2548

18%

2478

47% (+29%)

2524 (+46)

11

2683

2590

34%

2544%

31% (-3%)

2532 (-12)

UNOFFICIAL ELA Proficiency and Scale Score on CAASSP 2025 (6/4/2025)

Lodestar

4 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

2024

CAASPP Spring 2024

CAASPP Spring 2024 Scale Score Avg

CAASPP Spring 2025

CAASPP Spring 2025 Scale Score Avg

3

2436

2422

7%

2344

28% (+21%)

2389 (+45)

4

2485

2461

13%

2391

8% (-5%)

2390 (-1)

5

2528

2483

23%

2430

8% (-15%)

2405 (-25)

6

2552

2499

18%

2444

18% (0%)

2449 (+5)

7

2567

2513

19%

2471

13% (-6%)

2441 (-30)

8

2586

2524

6%

2438

15% (+9%)

2465 (+27)

11

2628

2547

7%

2477

24% (+17%)

2518 (+41)

UNOFFICIAL MATH Proficiency and Scale Score on CAASSP 2025 (6/4/2025)

Lighthouse

5 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

2024

CAASPP Spring 2024

CAASPP Spring 2024 Scale Score Avg

CAASPP Spring 2025

CAASPP Spring 2025 Scale Score Avg

3

2432

2422

36%

2389

41% (+5%)

2401 (+12)

4

2485

2461

9%

2395

22% (+13%)

2413 (+18)

5

2528

2483

2%

2387

10% (+8%)

2417 (+30)

6

2552

2499

16%

2422

5% (-11%)

2417 (-5)

7

2567

2513

32%

2515

18% (-14%)

2462 (-53)

8

2586

2524

15%

2453

56% (+41%)

2577 (+124)

11

2628

2547

6%

2494

13% (+7%)

2496 (+2)

UNOFFICIAL Math Proficiency and Scale Score on CAASSP 2025 (6/4/2025)

Lodestar

6 of 227

Academic Committee - 6/3/2024

Board of Directors- 6/4/24

7 of 227

Look Ahead to July

Additional Work Happening that will inform the July Board Updates

  • Academic Retreat Bellwether
  • Site Leader Retreats for Roles and Responsibilities
    • Build site K-12 team capacity
  • Arch of year - Academic operations of the SP by Season
  • Educlimber Launch

First Semester - Board Presentations

First Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations

July

  • Board Update: CAASPP Data
  • Board Overview: Strategic Priority #1
    • Board Introduction to LCPS Arc of the Year Fall
    • Board Introduction to Curriculum Internalization; Initiative 1D
  • Board Introduction to Curriculum Internalization; Initiative 3A
  • Impact Goal 2: ELPAC initial testing (new multilingual learners)

  • Impact Goal 3: Beginning of Year Dibels (replacing-Aimsweb Plus (K-5)

8 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Academic Committee

Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary

8

Strategic Priority #3:

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

On Track:

  • Annual Professional Development grounded in needs indicated by Winter Survey

Off Track:

  • Progress Monitoring PD data by grade bands
  • Coaching of Teachers is still inconsistently executed.
  • Professional Development lowest rated area in Staff Survey (3.3 / 5 in mid year survey)
  • Differentiated PD
  • Solidifying our “theory of action” for organizational learning and professional development needs work

Strategic Priority #1:

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

On Track:

  • K-2: Lighthouse Early Literacy Aimsweb data
  • 3-8: Eureka2 Curriculum Adoption & Math
  • 9-12: Illustrative Math Curriculum Adoption

Improvements for SY25-26:

  • Norming Annotation Expectations for the following curriculum
    • K-2: Eureka, Phonics
    • 3-8: Eureka2, IM, EL Education
    • 9-12: IM, Fishtank, ERWC
  • EL Master Plan Update
  • Initiative Work Plans launching for Strategic Priority 1 and 3

9 of 227

Student Assessment Data: AimswebPlus

54% of 2nd Grade above the 25th percentile with Lighthouse exceeding the 6% growth goal carrying Lodestar which had an annual decrease in proficiency. 46% of all tested K-2 students above the 25th percentile meeting our SY-25-26 goal

Impact Measure: 85% of 2nd grade students are in the 26th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)

Areas of Strength

  • Lighthouse Ufli pilot
  • Aligning Tier 1-3 curriculum

Areas for Growth

  • Lodestar Early Literacy Coaching
  • Tier 1 Core Phonics Instruction (Whole Group & Differentiated)
  • Kindergarten lowest data across the org

10 of 227

Student Assessment Data: AimswebPlus

During July and Summer Planning Principals will have a chance to review the data and use the data to inform coaching and answer consider questions like

  • Which student groups (SPED, EL, RFEP, by gender) grew the most? Or the least?
  • How can we improve instruction for those student groups?
  • What teachers will need intensive data monitoring and support throughout the first Semester?
  • How will we communicate data measures of success daily, monthly, and quarterly to teachers?

Lodestar combo class was an area of growth will be moving to self contained; Rising K will have 18 who will need remediation.

11 of 227

In July and August we will be updating the EL Master plan This will increase reclassification opportunities for students who have scored a 4 on the ELPAC.

Why: The EL Master plan was last updated in 2021-2022 therefore is has outdated information, and as our EL population increased and FPM regulations changed there are new sections needed to be added to the Plan such as:

  • NWEA scores as a reclassification criteria
  • Designated ELD curriculum and schedules
  • Newcomer Plan
  • Academic Progress Monitoring for RFEP, At risk LTEL’s and Long Term LTEL’s

This updated plan will be shared for Board Approval in August.

EL Master Plan

12 of 227

Ufli

(K-2 Phonics)

  • K-2 Phonics Vision
  • WIN Block Roles & Responsibilities

SummitK12

(Designated ELD K-G5)

  • Designated ELD Vision
  • WIN Block Roles & Responsibilities
  • WIN BLOCK FOI

Eureka2

(G3-G5)

  • Math Vision
  • Math FOI
  • Math Coaching Guide

Bridges and Get Ready

(Designated ELD G6-8)

  • Designated ELD Vision
  • ELD FOI

IM

(G6-G11)

  • Math Vision
  • Math FOI
  • Math Coaching Guide

Curriculum Adoption

Strategic Priority #1 (Initiative 1B, 1C, and 1D) - We will focus on content specific instructional visions, ensure consistent and aligned classroom practices, and improve our leadership team’s systems of support and accountability.

12

13 of 227

Curriculum Adoption K-5

Strategic Priority #1 (Initiative 1B, 1C, and 1D) - We will focus on content specific instructional visions, ensure consistent and aligned classroom practices, and improve our leadership team’s systems of support and accountability.

13

14 of 227

Introducing the Buoy: Initiative 1D Work Plan

LCAP & Long Term Goals

Short Term Goals and Measures

Staff Objective

Coherent

Theory of Action

Reflection as you explore an example Initiative Arc of the Year

What questions do you have?

What would you change about the details in the Objective, metric for success & data?

15 of 227

Academic Committee Meeting Dates SY 25-26

15

Academic Committee Dates

Board Meeting Dates

  • June 27, 2025
  • July 25, 2025
  • Aug, 29, 2025
  • Sept 26, 2025
  • Oct 24, 2025
  • Nov 21, 2025
  • Dec 19, 2025
  • Jan 30, 2026
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Mar 27, 2026
  • April 24, 2026
  • May 22, 2026
  • July 9, 2025
  • Aug 6, 2025
  • Sept 3, 2025
  • Oct 1, 2025
  • Nov 5, 2025
  • Dec 3, 2025
  • Jan 14, 2026
  • Feb 4, 2026
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • April 15, 2026
  • May 6, 2026
  • June 10, 2026

16 of 227

2025-26 Strategic Priority #1: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

16

First Semester - Board Presentations

First Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations

July

  • Board Update: CAASPP Data
  • Board Overview: Strategic Priority #1
    • Board Introduction to LCPS Arc of the Year Fall
    • Board Introduction to Curriculum Internalization; Initiative 1D
  • Board Introduction to Curriculum Internalization; Initiative 3A
  • Impact Goal 2: ELPAC initial testing (new multilingual learners)

  • Impact Goal 3: Beginning of Year Dibels (replacing-Aimsweb Plus (K-5)

August

  • Board Overview: Strategic Priority #3
    • Board update on Initiative 3A
    • Board Introduction to 3B, 3C& 3D
  • Board Introduction to Curriculum Internalization; Initiative 1D
  • Board update about ASP/ ELOP

September

  • Board Introduction to LCPS Arc of the Year Revisions for Winter- Spring
  • Board update on Initiative 1A
  • Board update on Attendance
  • Implementation Goal 4: Initial Teacher Observations
  • Implementation goal 2 and 3: NWEA MAP Testing Data K-11

October

  • Board Introduction to Curriculum Internalization; Initiative 1D
  • Board Update on Implementation Goal 4
  • Board Introduction to LASW Plans
  • Implementation goal 2 and 3: SBAC Interim Testing aligned to CAASSP (grades 3-11)

November

  • Board Update on Interim Testing (from October)
  • Board Update on Initiatives 1B and 1D

December

  • Board Report on CORE Districts and CDE School Dashboards (from 2023-24 SY) Baseline Measures Impact Goals 1, and 3
  • Impact Goal 3: Dibels (replacing-Aimsweb Plus (K-5)

17 of 227

2025-26 Strategic Priority #1: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

17

Second Semester - Board Presentations

Second Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations

January

  • Board Mid Year Update: Strategic Priority #1

February

  • Board Introduction to Crew: Initiative 1A
  • Implementation goal 2 and 3: SBAC Interim Testing aligned to CAASSP (grades 3-11)

  • Impact Goal 2: ELPAC summative testing (all multilingual learners)

March

  • Board Update on Interim Testing (from February)
  • Board Update on Implementation Goal 4 (Teacher Observation)

  • Implementation Goal 4: Initial Teacher Observations

April

  • Board Update on EOY Testing Plan (May)
  • Impact Goal 3:Impact Goal 1, 2, and 4: Summative CAASSP
  • Impact Goal 3: End of Year Dibels (K-5)

May

  • Board End of Year Update: Strategic Priority #1
  • Board Update on Impact Goal 1 (if available)

June

  • Introduction to Strategic Planning for Following SY

18 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25

May 7, 2025

  • Charter Renewal Preparation: Lodestar Spotlight Presentation for OUSD Charter Matters Committee

19 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25

Charter Renewal for Lodestar - Analysis and Next Steps

19

Key Take-Aways:

Lodestar, in the middle track for charter renewal, is getting ready to be renewed this fall!

Analysis and Academic Focus:

  • We have worked hard to move from “low track” in 2020 to “middle track” - We have improved performance in key areas (math), variable performance in ELA and ELPI, and strong College Career Indicators with our first two cohorts of Oakland’s newest high school. .

  • We have strong diversity in our student groups - Our Lodestar campus has increased their percentage of unhoused, special education, and ELL / Newcomers.

  • Student and Parent Engagement Strategy is active and strong! Our students and parents prepared with Families in Action (FIA), conducted tours for our OUSD school board members, presented in public comment opportunities at the OUSD board meeting and at the Charter Matters committee meetings.

Next Steps

  • Preparing our Submission Bundle -for board approval in July
  • Setting up a couple more visits or accepted invitations to our end of year events (Declaration Day, Graduation) from OUSD Board Members
  • Strong Finish to the School year with our End of Year Assessments!

Dr. Baldridge, Lodestar Head of School, and Erin Wesseldine, Senior Director of Special Edcuation and Specialized Programs, and Lodestar Parents hosting OUSD Board President Jennifer Brouhard

20 of 227

LODESTAR TK-12

OUSD Charter Matters Committee - April 24, 2025

Rich Harrison, CEO and Dr. Baldridge, Head of School

“I hope that he thrives in school and goes further than me. I want him to go to college, finish, and get to be what he wants to be.”

Kayla, Lodestar Parent of Julian, Class of 2031

The Lodestar Class of 2024

Lodestar offers a seamless TK-12th grade education in East Oakland that promises college and career readiness for all students

21 of 227

Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School

Our Mission and Values

21

Our mission is to prepare students for college and a career of their choice.

Lodestar graduates are lifelong changemakers who realize their unique vision — rooted in their identity, knowledge, and skills — to create equity in their own lives and in the community, leading to a healthier, more joyful world.

LCPS graduates low income students of color from college at 4x the national average.

22 of 227

TK-12 Community School Rooted in East Oakland

89% of students from East Oakland. 53% from 94603 Zip Code.

22

98%

734

17%

47%

Students enrolled TK-12

Unduplicated

Special Education

English Language Learners

12%

4%

African American Students

Unhoused Students

84%

8%

Latino/a Students

Newcomer Students

23 of 227

Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School

Renewal Tier and Progress Since Last Renewal

23

Charter Renewal Tier in 2020

Lodestar was in the Low Track!

OUSD Board approved 2 year renewal + 2 years of pandemic renewal relief

Charter Renewal Tier for 2025-26

Lodestar now in the Middle Track!

24 of 227

Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School

Investing in and Sustaining our Community Schools Model

24

Investments in East Oakland

College and Career:

  • Measure N/H
  • Career Technical Education Incentive Grant
  • K-12 Strong Workforce Grant Program
  • CCAP Dual Enrollment Opportunities Grant
  • Golden State Pathways Program Grant

Growing our Teachers and Teacher Pipeline

  • CTC Classified School Employee Credentialing Program
  • CTC Teacher Residency Program

Community Schools and Supports:

  • OCAP Community Services Block Grant
  • California Community Schools Partnership Program
  • Learning Communities for School Success Program
  • Federal Bi-Partisan Safer Communities School Safety Grant
  • ASES and ASSETs After School Education and Enrichment
  • California Treasury and California School Finance Authority

25 of 227

Lodestar: LCPS

Dashboard and CORE Data - Strengths

25

CCI

Math

  • Orange Indicator on State Dashboard
  • Overall consistent growth on CORE Dashboard
  • Alignment of A-G, Workforce Grants, Dual Credit and Career Pathways.
  • 75% College and Career Ready on State Dashboard

SPED

Staff

  • 93% Staff retention
  • 60% staff “engaged” which is 2x national average K-12 employees
  • Significant Growth - 107 students with disabilities (289 total at LCPS) including a 2x increase in mod-severe enhanced inclusion
  • 51 new students enrolled with IEP across LCPS this year; 10 with extensive support needs

Disability Type by Percentage (24-25)

26 of 227

Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School

Dashboard and CORE Data - Areas for Growth

26

ELA

ELD

  • Inconsistent on ELPI Indicator on State Dashboard - Green in 2023; Red in 2024
  • RFEP rates and LTEL performance is strong; Increase in newcomers joining our program
  • Investment in early literacy with TK launch this year!
  • Uneven growth in Elementary, Middle, and High school on CORE Dashboard

Chronic Absenteeism

Grade-Level Enrollment

  • Enrollment Growth - 653 students in 2020; 734 today; 773 projected in 2025-26
  • Pockets of lower enrollment in K-2, 6th, 10th, and 12th grade
  • Yellow indicators in 2023 and 2024; Slight improvement this year; Partnership with ONGB

27 of 227

Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School

Strengthening Multi-Generational Opportunities

27

Lodestar Pathways:

  • Currently, 100% of students are enrolled in our Media Arts Pathway;
  • 84% of the Class of 2024 were CTE Pathway completers .

  • Four year sequence -
    • Intro to Media Arts (9th)
    • Film/Video Production (10th)
    • Documentary Filmmaking (11)
    • Advanced Media Arts (12)

  • New in 2025-26 and beyond - Health Pathway funded by Golden State Pathway Program and Strong Workforce grants

28 of 227

Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School

Strengthening Multi-Generational Opportunities

28

College and Career Readiness:

  • A-G rate for our Seniors is 94%; and 84% were accepted into a 4-year college

  • 50% of our Seniors will graduate with college credit; 52% of our Juniors have already earned college credit.

  • Dual Credit pass rates are 95%+

29 of 227

Lodestar: A Lighthouse Community Public School

A Model Community School

29

Partnerships that Drive our Community School Model in East Oakland:

  • Multi-Tiered Systems of Support for Students
    • Integrated, proactive, and equitable frameworks that meet the diverse needs of all learners
  • Family Engagement in Partnership + Student Voice, Agency, and Enrichment

30 of 227

Interested in where students are headed next fall?

Come to Declaration Day!

Declaration Day

May 14, 10 am

31 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25

April 9, 2025

  • Charter Renewal Tiers: analysis and next steps for three LCPS LEAs

32 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25

Charter Renewal Tiers - Analysis and Next Steps

32

Key Take-Away #1:

All of our Charters (LEAs) are in the middle track

Analysis and Academic Focus:

  • We have the right Impact and Implementation goals in our multi-year strategic plan to manage to the Charter Renewal criteria - This year, our instructional leadership and core teachers have been focused on the data and next steps vs. the data after each interim assessment window.

  • We have continued work to do to close the CA gap and student sub-group gap in ELA and Math - Our strategic plan focus (strategic prioity 1 and 3) are the right focus areas to continue driving stronger ELA and Math results

  • Two key areas were driving factors - English Language Progress Indicator (ELPI) and College Career Index (CCI):
    • Our ELPI data - especially with the state’s move to measure Long Term English Learners (LTELs) - shaped our outcomes this year; given the high number of Newcomers in our schools and exited students, we will need to improve language acquisition for our ELL students.
    • CCI data - Our high school model, with strong A-G rates, Career Technology Education (CTE) completion rates, and Dual Credit completion rates, will continue to maintain strong results vs. Charter renewal criteria

Key Take-Away #2:

LCPS should consider shifting our Charter Renewal Timelines with OUSD Office of Charter Schools and Board

Current Timeline: We have charter renewals in the following years:

  • Lodestar in the fall of 2025
  • Lighthouse TK-8 in the fall of 2026
  • Lighthouse 9-12 in the fall of 2027

Consideration #1

  • Asking OUSD Board to Renew all of our charters in the fall of 2025 as we are a consolidated organization:
    • It is a significant lift to prepare each LEA for a charter renewal, and includes a lot of staff time in the spring, summer, and fall - and takes away time/effort from our Strategic Plan implementation work
    • Given our charters are all middle track, there is an consideration to put all our charters on one 5 year renewal timeline.

Consideration #2

  • Consolidating our Lighthouse Charters (TK-8 and the 9-12) into one charter:
    • These two charters were separated to leverage new school startup funding when LCPS launched the high school.
    • From a contextual, budgetary, and performance/dashboard perspective, it makes sense to consider consolidating these two charters into one through a future material revision.

33 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25

Charter Renewal Tiers - Alignment to LCPS Impact and Implementation Goals

Intended Impact Category

Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028)

Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students

In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups

60% of Emerging Bilingual students advance at least 1 EPLI level or maintain a level 4

85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)

Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth

Strengthen multi-generational opportunities as a model community school

95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation

Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028.

Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years

90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually

Deeply invest in our educators and leaders

- our greatest asset

On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders YoY with <10% variance across sites

Maintain >75% of LCPS staff identifying as BIPOC

LCPS career pathways account for 30-40% of teacher, leader, and student support staff

Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey

34 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25

Charter Renewal Tiers - Alignment to LCPS Impact and Implementation Goals

34

Strategic Priority #1

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

Initiative 1B:

Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms

Priority #1 Implementation Goals

  • 90% of teachers effectively implement curriculum (Crew + content) with fidelity as measured by a classroom walkthrough tool (1A)
  • X% of students per grade are meeting/exceeding standards on CAASSP interims for Math (1B, 1C, 1D); varies by grade
  • 80% of students demonstrate scale score improvement (50 points+) on interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D)
  • 90% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in Domain 1 and 2; 70% in Domain 3, 4, and 5 for Q1, Q2, Q4 and Q4 as measured by instructional excellence rubric (TDEF/LDEF) (1B, 1C, 1D)

Initiative 1C:

Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices

Initiative 1D:

Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability

Initiative 1A:

Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework

35 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25

Charter Renewal Tiers - High Level Explanation

35

AB 1505 Charter Renewal Data Calculation

How is charter renewal data calculated under AB 1505 for Criteria 1? And how did our three charters perform under this calculation?

Criteria 1: State Dashboard Indicators

  • The CA School Dashboard indicators for the past two years are analyzed
    • If all indicators that year are green/blue - “high” rating
    • If all indicators that year are orange/red - “low” rating
    • Otherwise, the charter receives a “middle” rating and evaluates Criteria 2a and 2b
  • If the charter has two “high” ratings, they are classified as a “high” ranking charter
  • If the charter has two “low” ratings, they are classified as a “low” ranking charter
  • All three LCPS charters received a “Middle” rating due to their CA Dashboard Indicators.

State Dashboard Indicators

  • CAASPP �English Language Arts�
  • CAASPP �Math�
  • Suspensions�
  • English Learning Progress�
  • Chronic Absenteeism �(K-8 only)

  • Graduation rate �(HS only)

  • College & Career Index �(HS only)

36 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 4.9.25

Charter Renewal Tiers - Alignment to LCPS Impact and Implementation Goals

36

AB 1505 Charter Renewal Data Calculation

How is charter renewal data calculated under AB 1505 for Criteria 2a and 2b? And how did our three charters perform under this calculation?

Criteria 2a: Overall Academic performance

Criteria 2b: Subgroup Academic performance

  • CAASPP (SBAC), EL progress (ELPAC), and CCI data (College and Career Indicators) is analyzed for the past two years
    • 2a: If all of the overall academic indicators are above state averages, the school receives a “high” rating (same for “low”, any other combination = “middle”)
    • 2b: If the majority of subgroup academic indicators for each indicator (ELA, Math, EL, CCI) are above state averages, the school receives a “high” rating (same for low)
      • Any combination of “high” and “low” indicator ratings is a “middle” rating
      • If a school receives “high” ratings on 2a and 2b for both years, the school receives a “high” rating - same for low ratings
    • Any combination of “high” and “low” is a “middle” rating
    • All three LCPS charters received a “Middle” rating due to their CA Dashboard Indicators.

37 of 227

37

Criteria 1 | Dashboard Indicators

CAASPP (ELA & Math), Suspensions, English Learning Progress Indicator, Chronic Absenteeism (K-8 only)�Graduation rate & College & Career Index (HS only)

School Year

English Language Arts

Math

English Learner Progress

Suspension Rate

Chronic Absenteeism

Graduation Rate

College/ Career Indicator

Criteria 1 and 2

Summary

2022-23

Orange

Orange

Green

Green

Yellow

-

-

Middle

2023-24

Red

Orange

Red

Orange

Yellow

G/B*

G/B*

Criteria 2 | Academic Performance

CAASPP (ELA & Math), English Learning Progress Indicatorollege & Career Index (HS only)

2022-23

2023-24

Student Group

English Language Arts

Math

English Learner Progress

English Language Arts

Math

English Learner Progress

CCI

Criteria 2

Summary

All Students

Below

Below

Above

Below

Below

Below

Above

Middle

African American

Below

Below

-

Below

Below

-

Hispanic

Below

Below

-

Below

Below

-

Above

SocioEconomic Disadvantaged

Below

Below

-

Below

Below

-

Above

English Learners

Below

Below

Above

Below

Below

-

Above

Long Term EL (LTEL)

Above

Below

Above

Students with Disabilities

Below

Below

-

Below

Below

-

Lodestar TK-12 Data Summary - Middle Track

38 of 227

38

Criteria 1 | Dashboard Indicators

CAASPP (ELA & Math), Suspensions, English Learning Progress Indicator, Chronic Absenteeism (K-8 only)�Graduation rate & College & Career Index (HS only)

School Year

English Language Arts

Math

English Learner Progress

College/Career Indicator

Chronic Absenteeism

Graduation Rate

Suspension Rate

Criteria 1

Summary

2022-23

Yellow

Yellow

Orange

-

Yellow

-

Green

Middle

2023-24

Red

Red

Orange

-

Yellow

-

Orange

Criteria 2 | Academic Performance

CAASPP (ELA & Math), English Learning Progress Indicatorollege & Career Index (HS only)

2022-23

2023-24

Student Group

English Language Arts

Math

English Learner Progress

English Language Arts

Math

English Learner Progress

Criteria 2

Summary

All Students

Below

Below

Below

Below

Below

Below

Middle

African American

Below

Below

-

Below

Below

-

Hispanic

Below

Below

-

Below

Below

-

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

Below

Below

-

Below

Below

-

English Learners

Below

Below

Below

Below

Below

-

Long Term EL (LTEL)

Above

Students with Disabilities

Below

Below

-

Below

Below

-

Lighthouse K-8 Data Summary - Middle Track

39 of 227

39

Criteria 1 | Dashboard Indicators

CAASPP (ELA & Math), Suspensions, English Learning Progress Indicator, Chronic Absenteeism (K-8 only)�Graduation rate & College & Career Index (HS only)

School Year

English Language Arts

Math

English Learner Progress

College/ Career Indicator

Chronic Absenteeism

Graduation Rate

Suspension Rate

Criteria 1

Summary

2022-23

Green

Red

Blue

Blue

-

Yellow

Orange

Middle

2023-24

Orange

Orange

Red

Green

-

Orange

Orange

Criteria 2 | Academic Performance

CAASPP (ELA & Math), English Learning Progress Indicatorollege & Career Index (HS only)

2022-23

2023-24

Student Group

English Language Arts

Math

English Learner Progress

College/ Career Indicator

English Language Arts

Math

English Learner Progress

College/ Career Indicator

Criteria 2

Summary

All Students

Above

Below

Above

Above

Below

Below

Below

Above

Middle

Hispanic

Above

Below

Above

Above

Below

Above

Socioeconomically Disadvantaged

Above

Below

Above

Above

Below

Below

Below

Above

African American

*A minimum sub-population of students to be counted is 30 for a tested area (HS only have state tests in 11th grade in ELA and Math).

English Learners

Students with Disabilities

Lighthouse 9-12 Data Summary - Middle Track

40 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25

March 5, 2025

  • Interim Assessment (ICA) and CAASSP Readiness
  • AimsWeb Plus (K-2 Reading) Update
  • Identified Trends in ELD students / ELPI Indicator

41 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 3.5.25

Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary

41

Strategic Priority #1:

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

Elementary Interim Assessment Reflections:

Overall, trending Orange on the Dashboard.

Lighthouse:

  • Strengths - 3rd grade in both Reading and Math (trending yellow on 5x5; )
  • Areas to Address - 4th and 5th grade will need strong attention over the next two months (trending red)

Lodestar:

  • Strengths - 3rd and 4th grade performance in both Reading and Math (trending yellow in ELA; yellow/orange in Math)
  • Areas to Address - 5th grade a strong 2 months would move them up a performance level on the 5x5

Middle & High School Interim Assessment Reflections:

Overall, MS trending Orange on the Dashboard. HS Math trending Yellow; HS ELA trending Orange

Lighthouse:

  • Strengths - 6th performance in both Reading and Math (trending yellow in ELA on 5x5; )
  • Areas to Address - 7th and 8th grade ELA and 7th grade math will need strong attention over the next two months (trending red)
  • Overall strong High School performance (trending yellow in ELA and Math on 5x5; )

Lodestar:

  • Strengths - 6th grade and 8th grade ELA performance (trending yellow/orange 5x5; )
  • Strong HS performance in Math (yellow on 5x5)
  • Areas to Address - 6th and 7th grade Math, and 7th grade ELA will need strong attention over the next two months (trending orange)
    • These two cohorts had historically low data due to instructional consistency in previous years.
  • Areas to Address - 11th grade ELA (trending red); they will need a strong plan to move up performance levels.

English Language Learner Progress and 2nd Grade Reading Assessment Reflections:

ELPI Analysis: We will need to watch the progress of our ELL students given the shift in demographic over the last three years

  • The number of “Level 1” / Newcomer students have doubled over the last three years - 161 students are in this designation; 10% of our students. .
  • We have less “Level 4” students (42 students total) - Largely because we have exited / reclassified 202 students over the last three years.

2nd Grade Reading:

  • Our focus on foundational practices and Science of Reading over the last few years is evident in our 3rd grade ICA Interim assessment scores.
  • Areas in need of Improvement
    • Support of 1st and 2nd grade teachers and students.
    • We are not meeting our goal targets as of mid-year

42 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 3.5.25

Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary

42

Strategic Priority #2:

Students, families, community

partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust

Student Year to Year Retention - Intent to Return Update:

  • 96% projected vs. our Implementation goal of 90% Student Retention Year to year: We are making strong progress toward our student retention goals with Lodestar Elementary and Middle school at 94-95%, and all other schools between 97-98%.

Chronic Absenteeism

  • 28.5% vs. our Four Year Impact Goal of <15% Chronically Absent: While we are trending less than where we ended for the 2023-24 School Year (32.8%), we found high absentee rates in January and February from a spike in cold / flu.

  • We are launching a year one study with Oakland Natives Gives Back as part of our Learning Communities for School Success Program 3 year grant (LCSSP) that will do a deep study of our chrnoically absent students and families by grade levels, as well as our systems and practices to support them.

Strategic Priority #3:

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

February Updates:

Our Four Year Impact Goal is to have 85% Staff Retention (of staff asked back):

  • Group 1 -February 20: Certificated General Education & Special Education Teachers and Other 10-month Certificated Clinical Staff (Counseling, Psych, SLP/A, Behavior Interventionist)

  • Group 2 - Week of March 3: Leadership staff and other non-certificated salaried exempt and nonexempt employees that are not grant or one-time fund dependent (other non-certificated instructional staff, operations, administrators, and Shared Services staff)

  • Group 3 - Mid/End of March: Grant-funded roles (Teachers in Training and other roles) that are grant funded and grant dependent)

We will have updated data to share at our April Board Meeting

43 of 227

Action Plan to Address Key Gap Areas

Weekly Collaborative Data & Action Meetings

Principals and AP’s of Instruction alongside teachers in 1 collaborative meeting per week will look at students work aligned to grade level, plan and revise teaching to address student needs.

1.

Students Data Talks: SEA Wednesday will be utilized for students to see their SBAC scores, revise ICA or complete a new practice assessment and set goals to be share with parents at March SLC’s

2.

Looking Ahead to the SY25-26

1. Utilizing March CREW, Math Walkthrough & Literacy Data to audit Teaching practices in service of adjusting Coaching, PD and other systems to support improved coherence.

2. Leveraging best teaching practices to refine Curriculum Maps to address the most essential content aligned to power standards and providing resources to high quality curricular materials

3. Aligning unit and end of unit assessments adopting Performance Matters Platform and Schoology across K-8

44 of 227

SBAC CRESCENDO “Game Plan”

The purpose of this document is to

  • ensure all Leaders develop aligned plans for preparing staff and students for SBAC in cycle 6.
  • clarify leader expectations, actions, and mindsets, fostering clear communication and alignment within teams. The goal is to establish a culture that prioritizes and reflects a strong commitment to SBAC testing success.

45 of 227

March 5, 2025

Appendix:

  • From All Org Presentation on January 6 to kick of 2nd Semester

46 of 227

LCPS ICA Results

February, 2025

47 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

CAASPP Spring 2024

LH IAB Scale Score Avg

LH ICA Scale Score Avg

ICAs

Percent Proficient

3

2432

2409

2339

2355*

2378*

27%

4

2473

2452

2389

2382

2357

6%

5

2502

2490

2456

2428

2394

10%

6

2531

2515

2442

2466*

2460*

21%

7

2552

2536

2483

2480

2458

17%

8

2567

2548

2486

2507*

2471

14%

11

2583

2590

2539

2579*

2546*

32%

Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP

Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points

Asterix means stronger than CAASPP EOY from previous year

ELA Scale Score Analysis

Lighthouse

48 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

CAASPP Spring 2024

LS IAB Scale Score Avg

LS ICA Scale Score Avg

ICAs

Percent Proficient

3

2432

2409

2346

2232

2378*

28%

4

2473

2452

2359

2386*

2391*

8%

5

2502

2490

2366

2370*

2394*

8%

6

2531

2515

2417

2443*

2430*

6%

7

2552

2536

2501

2474

2466

24%

8

2567

2548

2481

2543*

2544*

44%

11

2583

2590

2547

2546

2532

28%

Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP

Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points

Asterix means stronger than CAASPP EOY from previous year

ELA Scale Score Analysis

Lodestar

49 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

CAASPP Spring 2024

LH IAB Scale Score Avg

LH ICA Scale Score Avg

ICAs

Percent Proficient

3

2436

2422

2348

2382*

2388*

20%

4

2485

2461

2388

2388

2386

7%

5

2528

2483

2436

2411

2412

6%

6

2552

2499

2443

2464*

2463*

13%

7

2567

2513

2470

2468*

2448

4%

8

2586

2524

2438

2516*

2471*

10%

11

2628

2547

2477

2589*

2565*

27%

Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP

Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points

Asterix means stronger than CAASPP EOY from previous year

Math Scale Score Analysis

Lighthouse

50 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

CAASPP Spring 2024

LS IAB Scale Score Avg

LS ICA Scale Score Avg

ICAs

Percent Proficient

3

2432

2422

2390

2344

2392*

28%

4

2485

2461

2395

2389

2403*

19%

5

2528

2483

2388

2410*

2432*

6%

6

2552

2499

2422

2381

2413

6%

7

2567

2513

2515

2490

2478

14%

8

2586

2524

2458

2548

2549*

36%

11

2628

2547

2495

2510*

2519*

9%

Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP

Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points

Asterix means stronger than CAASPP EOY from previous year

Math Scale Score Analysis

Lodestar

51 of 227

Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025

What would the state classify our Elementary ELA based on our data?

LS G4 ELA Ch+32 DFS -82

LS G5 ELA Ch+ +28 DFS -108

LEVEL

DECLINED SIGNIFICANTLY

from Prior Year (by more than 15.1 points)

DECLINED

from Prior Year (by 3.0 to 15.0 points)

MAINTAINED

from Prior Year (declined or increased by less than 2.9 points or fewer)

INCREASED

from Prior Year (by 3.0 to 14.9 points)

INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY

from Prior Year (by 15.0 points or more)

VERY HIGH (HIGHEST STATUS)

+45.0 points or more Current Year

HIGH

+10.0 to +44.9 points in Current Year

MEDIUM

-5.0 to +9.9 points in Current Year

LOW

-5.1 to -70.0 points in Current Year

VERY LOW (LOWEST STATUS)

-70.1 points or lower in Current Year

LH G3 ELA Ch +39; DFS -54

LS G3 ELA Ch+32 DFS -54

LH G4 ELA Ch -32; DFS -116

LH G5 ELA Ch -62; DFS -108

LS G4 ELA Ch+32 DFS -82

LS G5 ELA Ch+ +28 DFS -108

52 of 227

Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025

What would the state classify our school in Elementary Math based on our data?

Grade & School

LH G3 Math Ch +40; DFS -42

LH G4 Math Ch -2; DFS -99

LS G3 Math Ch +1 DFS -45

LS G4 Math Ch +8 DFS -82

LS G5 Math Ch+44 DFS -96

LH G5 ELA Ch -25; DFS -116

53 of 227

Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025

What would the state classify Middle School in ELA based on our data?

LEVEL

DECLINED SIGNIFICANTLY

from Prior Year (by more than 15.1 points)

DECLINED

from Prior Year (by 3.0 to 15.0 points)

MAINTAINED

from Prior Year (declined or increased by less than 2.9 points or fewer)

INCREASED

from Prior Year (by 3.0 to 14.9 points)

INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY

from Prior Year (by 15.0 points or more)

VERY HIGH (HIGHEST STATUS)

+45.0 points or more Current Year

HIGH

+10.0 to +44.9 points in Current Year

MEDIUM

-5.0 to +9.9 points in Current Year

LOW

-5.1 to -70.0 points in Current Year

VERY LOW (LOWEST STATUS)

-70.1 points or lower in Current Year

LS 7 ELA Ch -35; DFS -81

LH 7 ELA Ch -25; DFS -94

LH 6 ELA Ch +18; DFS -71

LH 8 ELA Ch -15; DFS -96

LS 8 ELA Ch +63; DFS -37

LS 6 ELA Ch +13; DFS -139

54 of 227

Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025

What would the state classify Middle School in Math based on our data?

Grade & School

LS 8 Math Ch +96; DFS -37

LH 8 Math Ch +33; DFS -115

LH 6 Math Ch. +20; DFS -89

LS 6 Math Ch -9 DFS -137

LH 7 Math Ch. -22; DFS -119

LS 7 Math Ch -37; DFS -89

55 of 227

Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025

What would the state classify High School in ELA based on our data?

LH 11 ELA

Ch +6; DFS -37

LS 11 ELA

Ch -15; DFS -51

56 of 227

Grade Level Scale Score Growth from Spring 2024 to Winter 2025

What would the state classify our schools High Schools in Math based on our data?

LH 11 Math

Ch +88; DFS -63

LS 11 Math

Ch +24; DFS -109

57 of 227

LCPS ELD Level Data

58 of 227

LCPS ELD Levels by Year

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Level 4

Total #

Entered EL

Exited EL

Level 1 %

Level 1 #

Level 2 %

Level 2 #

Level 3 %

Level 3 #

Level 4 %

Level 4 #

Total #

Entered EL

Exited EL

21-

22

12.80%

88

33.18%

233

33.68%

215

20.34%

123

659

56

54

22-

23

8.34%

65

26.89%

203

40.41%

268

24.35%

139

675

59

67

23-

24

15.25%

113

34.60%

156

35.40%

216

14.73%

101

586

63

54

24-

25

24.40%

161

37.70%

249

31.60%

209

6.40%

42

661

63

27

Summary

  • Level 1 students have doubled since 21-22

  • Reclassified 202 students since 2021

  • Less level 4s eligible for reclassification

59 of 227

LCPS ELD Levels by Year

Lodestar K-12

Level 1 %

Level 1 #

Level 2 %

Level 2 #

Level 3 %

Level 3 #

Level 4 %

Level 4 #

Total #

Exited EL

Newcomers

2021-2022

17.01%

50

36.73%

108

30.27%

89

15.99%

47

294

14

13

2022-2023

11.95%

38

29.87%

95

38.99%

124

19.18%

61

318

33

18

2023-2024

20.00%

67

37.01%

124

27.76%

93

15.22%

51

335

25

32

2024-2025

29.06%

93

38.44%

123

25.62%

82

6.88%

22

320

8

57

Lighthouse 9-12

Level 1 %

Level 1 #

Level 2 %

Level 2 #

Level 3 %

Level 3 #

Level 4 %

Level 4 #

Total #

Exited EL

Newcomers

2021-2022

11.24%

10

25.84%

23

37.08%

33

25.84%

23

89

22

2

2022-2023

4.49%

4

15.73%

14

42.70%

38

37.08

33

89

12

5

2023-2024

10.84%

9

32.53%

27

43.37%

36

13.25%

11

83

6

5

2024-2025

7.14%

7

39.80%

39

43.88%

43

9.18%

9

98

0

8

Lighthouse K-8

Level 1 %

Level 1 #

Level 2 %

Level 2 #

Level 3 %

Level 3 #

Level 4 %

Level 4 #

Total #

Exited EL

Newcomers

2021-2022

10.14%

28

36.96%

102

33.70%

93

19.20%

53

276

14

3

2022-2023

8.58%

23

35.07%

94

39.55%

106

16.79%

45

268

33

12

2023-2024

14.92%

37

34.27%

85

35.08%

87

15.73%

39

248

25

10

2024-2025

25.10%

61

35.80%

87

34.57%

84

4.55%

11

243

8

14

60 of 227

LCPS ELD Levels by Year

Data from CA Dashboard

LHK-8 EL Progress

LHK-8

Declined/

Improved

LHK-8 # of EL Students

LH9-12 EL Progress

LH9-12

Declined/

Improved

LH9-12 # of EL Students

LS EL

Progress

LS

Declined/

Improved

LS # of EL Students

2021-2022

53.5% (Medium)

N/A

200

61% (High)

N/A

77

47.6% (Medium)

N/A

191

2022-2023

48.1%

↓ 5.4%

243

71.1%

↑ 10%

83

50.7%

↑ 3.1%

288

2023-2024

44.6%

↓ 3.6%

231

29.5%

↓ 41.6%

78

37.8%

↓ 12.9%

296

The number of EL students in this graph represents students who had at least two consecutive years of data to measure for ELPAC

61 of 227

AimswebPlus LCPS

Winter 24-25 Data

62 of 227

AimswebPlus Strategic Plan Update

Impact Measure: 85% of 2nd grade students are in the 26th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)

Network K-G2 Impact Update: Progress Made, Challenges Remain

Across the network we have had a 3.7% increase although we are off track to meet our goal in service of our impact metric While Lighthouse is on track to meet this year’s growth goals. Lodestar with a long term sub this fall at in G2 a dramatic decrease was seen in students above the 25% percentile.

63 of 227

AimswebPlus Student Growth View

Lighthouse Strengthens Interventions; Lodestar Focuses on Tier 1 Instruction

Lighthouse Intervention is an area of focus to continue to decrease students in the 1st-10th %. While at Lodestar Tier 1 on grade level instruction continues to be an area of significant concern.

64 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25

February 5, 2025

  • Mid-Year LCAP and Budget Review for Parents
  • Bellwether Phase 2 Strategic Plan

65 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25

Review of our 4 Year IMPACT Goals - MID YEAR LCAP Update

65

Where do we want to be in 4 years?

Intended Impact Category

Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028)

Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students

In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups

60% of Emerging Bilingual students advance at least 1 EPLI level or maintain a level 4

85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)

Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth

Strengthen multi-generational opportunities as a model community school

95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation

Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028.

Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years

90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually

Deeply invest in our educators and leaders

- our greatest asset

On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders YoY with <10% variance across sites

Maintain >75% of LCPS staff identifying as BIPOC

LCPS career pathways account for 30-40% of teacher, leader, and student support staff

Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey

66 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25

Review of our Strategic Priorities - MID YEAR LCAP Update

66

Our Initiatives and Yearly Implementation Goals:

Strategic Priority #1

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

Initiative 1B:

Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms

Priority #1 Implementation Goals

  • 90% of teachers effectively implement curriculum (Crew + content) with fidelity as measured by a classroom walkthrough tool (1A)
  • X% of students per grade are meeting/exceeding standards on CAASSP interims for Math (1B, 1C, 1D); varies by grade
  • 80% of students demonstrate scale score improvement (50 points+) on interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D)
  • 90% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in Domain 1 and 2; 70% in Domain 3, 4, and 5 for Q1, Q2, Q4 and Q4 as measured by instructional excellence rubric (TDEF/LDEF) (1B, 1C, 1D)

Initiative 1C:

Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices

Initiative 1D:

Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability

Initiative 1A:

Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework

67 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25

Update on Strategic Priority 1 - MID YEAR LCAP Update

67

Strategic Priority #1:

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

Initiative 1B:

Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms

Initiative 1D:

Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 2

X% of students per grade are meeting/exceeding standards on CAASSP interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D); varies by grade

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 3

80% of students demonstrate scale score improvement (50 points+) on interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D)

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 4

90% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in Domain 1 and 2; 70% in Domain 3, 4, and 5 for Q1, Q2, Q4 and Q4 as measured by instructional excellence rubric (TDEF/LDEF) (1B, 1C,,1D)

Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting

Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress

Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting

KEY:

Domain 1 and 2: 75% (not meeting)

Domain 3, 4, and 5: 41% (not meeting)

Overall (as of Nov) / Update in March after Feb Interims

ELA : 55% (not meeting)

Math: 45% (not meeting)

Overall (as of Nov) / Update in March after Feb Interims

ELA : 21.5% (flat)

Math: 22% (+6%)

  • Shared walkthroughs, regular feedback grounded in our TDEF, and data protocols help align instructional vision and expectations.
  • Need to improve frequent common aligned assessments and grading practices, with stronger communication with parents.
  • K-8 ELA EL Education (curriculum) Modules Internalization PD series began this cycle
  • Need more content & curriculum specific support for teachers and leaders.

68 of 227

Strategic Priority 1A, 1B, 1C Update

68

Walkthrough Data Shows Growth in Domains 1 & 2, While Learning and Engagement Remain Key Areas for Improvement

Began Tracking for Domain 3

Began Tracking for Domain 4

71%

77%

52%

31%

69 of 227

TDEF Walkthrough Tracker

TDEF Domain 1 & 2

  • Inative Metric: 90% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in Domain 1 and 2

LCPS

LS K-5

LH K-5

LS 6-12

LH 6-12

1A: Teaches core value-based norms, routines, and procedures

1B: Employs asset-focused language when describing student actions and behavior

1C: Anticipates, prevents, and addresses student behaviors that do not match teacher expectations.

72%

81%

81%

91%

64%

2A: Selects instructional materials and tasks from approved curriculum that meets the grade level standards.

2C: 80%of instructional block is spent reading, writing, or speaking about grade level text or complex task.

78%

71%

63%

96%

56%

70 of 227

TDEF Walkthrough Tracker

TDEF Domain 3, 4, 5

  • Initiative Metric: 70% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in in Domain 3, 4, and 5

LCPS

LS K-5

LH K-5

LS 6-12

LH 6-12

3A: Previews new content by activating students’ prior knowledge

3B: Skillfully enacts a lesson cycle using 4 out of 5 the following instructional routines during each lesson:

3B.1 Facilitating unpacking/referring to learning targets

3B.2 Providing models, critiques, and descriptive feedback

3B.3 Facilitating collaborative academic discourse and/or individual thinking routines

3B.4 Checking for understanding daily

3B.5 Facilitating lesson summaries

52%

45%

61%

71%

32%

4A Maximizes instructional time such that students experience the critical moment for most lessons.

4B Select, teach, and internalize a set of 3-5 routinized protocols for academic discourse and thinking routines.

4C Uses equitable and strategic participation techniques so that all subgroups consistently engage in academic discourse.

31%

19%

33%

53%

20%

71 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25

Review of our Strategic Priorities - MID YEAR LCAP Update

71

Our Initiatives and Yearly Implementation Goals:

Strategic Priority #2

Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school

through shared power, voice, and trust

Initiative 2A:

Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process

Priority #2 Implementation Goals

  • 85% staff agree that decision-making process is done in a timely and inclusive manner as measured by a biannual staff survey (2a)
  • 90%+ of staff participate in LCPS biannual survey and 75% agree that communication is timely and inclusive (2a, 2b)
  • 50 families participate in decision making groups (ELAC, SSC) per school (2c)
  • 90% of students return to LCPS YoY as measured by annual student retention data (2c)
  • 80% of students/families who have received services from community partners agree the support was effective (2d)

Initiative 2B:

Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action

Initiative 2C:

Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued

Initiative 2D:

Our community partners provide services and supports, and opportunities aligned to the needs of our students and families

72 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25

Update on Strategic Priority 2 - MID YEAR LCAP Update

72

Strategic Priority #2:

Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust

Initiative 2A:

Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process

Initiative 2B:

Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action

Initiative 2C:

Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued

Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting

Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress

Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting

Initiative 2 :Implementation Goal 1

85% staff agree that decision-making process is done in a timely and inclusive manner as measured by a biannual staff survey (2a)

90%+ of staff participate in LCPS biannual survey and 75% agree that communication is timely and inclusive (2a, 2b)

Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 2

50 families participate in decision making groups (ELAC, SSC) per school (2c)

Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 3

90% of students return to LCPS YoY as measured by annual student retention data (2c)

KEY:

LCPS adopted the RAPID framework (Bain Consulting) as their decision making framework, and has socialized this across leaders team and staff.

LCPS has structured and strengthened its staff memos on each campus/school and from the organization, alongside in-person collective messaging and calls for action

Families: We have increased participation thru PAC, Coffee Tuesday, and Lit for Literacy (FIA)

Student opportunities have not been fully developed

Intent to Return: 97.9% (meeting)

Family Participation: met/meeting

Decision-Making: 87% (met)

Communication: 92% (met)

Participation: 82% (not met)

73 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25

Review of our Strategic Priorities - MID YEAR LCAP Update

73

Our Initiatives and Yearly Implementation Goals:

Strategic Priority #3

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

Initiative 3A:

Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures

Priority #3 Implementation Goals

  • X% of teachers and instructional leaders are rated skillful or higher on the TDEF / LDEF, respectively (3a, 3b, 3c)
  • 90% of staff participate in 90% of PD structures (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) (3b, 3c)
  • 85% of staff agree each PD structure (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) is effective and purposeful in driving academic progress as measured by biannual staff survey (3b)
  • 80% of coaches and managers are effective as measured by a coaching rubric or the People Management domain of the Leader Effectiveness tool (3d)

Initiative 3B:

Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team

Initiative 3C:

Our team participates in a clear and consistent org-wide coaching structure that balances coaching capacity with development needs

Initiative 3D:

Our team experiences high quality coaching through research-based coaching protocols and emerging technologies to develop and sustain educators

74 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 2.5.25

Update on Strategic Priority 3 - MID YEAR LCAP Update

74

Strategic Priority #3:

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting

Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress

Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting

Initiative 3A:

Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures

Initiative 3B:

Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team

Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 2

90% of staff participate in 90% of PD structures (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) (3b, 3c)

Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 3

85% of staff agree each PD structure (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) is effective and purposeful in driving academic progress as measured by biannual staff survey (3b)

KEY:

Opportunity to Grow: 80% (met)

Supportive Instructional PD: 78% (not met)

Supportive PD (other staff): 85% (not met)

Manager Check in / Progress: 90% (met)

Participation in PD structures: met

  • Not yet articulated an org-wide theory of action for PD and leaders lacked clarity around who leads this initiative.
  • Accountable/responsible now identified and poised to build out Theory of Action..
  • Team collaborations (grade level, department, Starlight) are viewed as effective..
  • Wednesday whole staff PD was viewed by some staff as not meeting diverse needs.

75 of 227

NEW Strategic Plan Priority #3 Indicator: TEACHER PD

From all-org winter survey

This question has never been administered before and is intended to provide more granular data on Strategic Priority #3 implementation goals and perceptions of PD structure efficacy for teaching staff.

76 of 227

Winter LCAP Update and Budget Overview for Parents - 2.5.25

76

Winter Budget Overview for Parents Update:

  • Revenues and Expenses from our June LCAP and 23-24 Budget adoption are on track after the first 6 months of the school year.

  • Enrollment and Attendance have been gaps across all three LEAs

  • LCPS was able to secure additional funding through grants:

    • Golden State Pathways Program Grant ($230K) to support LCAP Strategic Priority 2

    • Learning Communities for School Success Program Grant ($240K over three years) to support LCAP Strategic Priority 2

    • Increase in local grant funding (~$75K) to support LCAP Strategic Priority 1 and 3

77 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25

January 15, 2025

78 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 1.15.24

Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary

78

Strategic Priority #1:

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

First Semester Reflections:

  • Initiative 1B and 1D - Overall, staff and leadership survey responses reflects our intentional push to increase our academic outcomes this year.

  • Early Literacy data TK - 2nd grade for AIMSWeb+ assessment will be shared at our February meeting

  • Focus on Interim Assessment rounds in February: We will have data available to share at our March Meeting.

  • Areas in need of Improvement
    • Lighthouse K-8 overall as this is the last data year for charter renewal
    • The overall efficacy of our academic interventions vs. our growing student subgroups (ELLs, SPED in particular), particularly in reading

Strategic Priority #2:

Students, families, community

partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust

First Semester Reflections: We created a strong foundation to launch this priority this semester.

  • Initiative 2A: On the staff survey - How strongly do you agree with the statement "At work, my opinions seem to count"? was rated a 3.8; We will be stamping our RAPIDs decision making framework and our RACI project management framework vs. our strategic Plan with clear owners by the end of January.

  • Initiative 2B: On the staff survey - How effective (timely) & supportive (inclusive) have our communications been this fall (e.g. transparency, clarity, responsive, etc)? Was rated a 4.0 - and increase of +0.4 from last year!

Given the upcoming charter renewal for Lodestar, we will be increasing our student, family, community and partner/service provider’s advocacy this semester!

Strategic Priority #3:

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

First Semester Reflections: There were key areas flagged for improvement for Initiative 3A and 3B on the Winter Staff Survey

LCPS needs to support Leaders to better support their staff:

  • Some staff reported that their managers were too “top down”, had inconsistent communication,, or needed to grow facilitation and management.
  • Support for collaboration during PD time between our Principals, APs, and Special Education leaders was also noted

LCPS needs to continue defining Professional Development:

  • Staff expressed wanting more opportunities to grow skills and leadership, access to skilled coaches, and targeted and differentiated PD based on role and experience

79 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 1.15.24

Update on Strategic Priority 1 - Dashboard

Strategic Priority #1

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

Initiative 1B:

Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms

Initiative 1C:

Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices

Initiative 1D:

Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability

Initiative 1A:

Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 2

X% of students per grade are meeting/exceeding standards on CAASSP interims for Math (1B, 1C, 1D); varies by grade

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 3

80% of students demonstrate scale score improvement (50 points+) on interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D)

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 4

90% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in Domain 1 and 2; 70% in Domain 3, 4, and 5 for Q1, Q2, Q4 and Q4 as measured by instructional excellence rubric (TDEF/LDEF) (1B, 1C,,1D)

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 1

90% of teachers effectively implement curriculum (Crew + content) with fidelity as measured by a classroom walkthrough tool (1A)

Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting

Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress

Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting

Initiative Not Yet Started per timeline; Implementation Goal Not Yet Measured

80 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 1.15.24

Update on Strategic Priority 2 - Dashboard

Strategic Priority #2

Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school

through shared power, voice, and trust

Initiative 2A:

Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process

Initiative 2B:

Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action

Initiative 2C:

Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued

Initiative 2D:

Our community partners provide services and supports, and opportunities aligned to the needs of our students and families

Initiative 2 :Implementation Goal 1

85% staff agree that decision-making process is done in a timely and inclusive manner as measured by a biannual staff survey (2a)

90%+ of staff participate in LCPS biannual survey and 75% agree that communication is timely and inclusive (2a, 2b)

Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 2

50 families participate in decision making groups (ELAC, SSC) per school (2c)

Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 3

90% of students return to LCPS YoY as measured by annual student retention data (2c)

Initiative 2: mplementation Goal 4

80% of students/families who have received services from community partners agree the support was effective (2d)

Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting

Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress

Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting

Initiative Not Yet Started per timeline; Implementation Goal Not Yet Measured

81 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 1.15.24

Update on Strategic Priority 3 - Dashboard

Strategic Priority #3

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

Initiative 3A:

Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures

Initiative 3B:

Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team

Initiative 3C:

Our team participates in a clear and consistent org-wide coaching structure that balances coaching capacity with development needs

Initiative 3D:

Our team experiences high quality coaching through research-based coaching protocols and emerging technologies to develop and sustain educators

Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 1

X% of teachers and instructional leaders are rated skillful or higher on the TDEF / LDEF, respectively (3a, 3b, 3c)

Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 2

90% of staff participate in 90% of PD structures (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) (3b, 3c)

Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 3

85% of staff agree each PD structure (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) is effective and purposeful in driving academic progress as measured by biannual staff survey (3b)

Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 4

80% of coaches and managers are effective as measured by a coaching rubric or the People Management domain of the Leader Effectiveness tool (3d)

Initiative Started; Going well: Implementation Goal Met / Meeting

Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges; Implementation Goal Progress

Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges / Delay; Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting

Initiative Not Yet Started per timeline; Implementation Goal Not Yet Measured

82 of 227

82

Charter Renewal Votes: OUSD 2024

Note: Aurum Prep, Urban Montessori, and NOCCS were not renewed by ACOE (county)

LWL (D5)

YES

YES

NO

YES

YES

YES

YES

LWP (D7)

NO

YES

NO

YES

YES

YES

YES

KIPP (D3)

YES

YES

NO

YES

YES

YES

YES

OUHS (D6)

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

ASCEND(D5)

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

ARISE (D5)

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

YES

AIMS (D3)

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

YES

OCHS (D5)

NO

ABSTAIN

NO

NO

NO

YES

YES

LPS (D7)

NO

NO

NO

NO

NO

YES

YES

  • Charters that were renewed were in the “middle track” per AB 1505 and had positive recommendations from the OUSD Office of Charter Schools.

  • Demographics, Special Education, Back office functions, and “serving all students” were highly scrutinized.

  • Of the three OUSD authorized charters that were not renewed - the concerns reported by the Office of Charter Schools were:
    • serving all students” and backoffice/governance issues;
    • backoffice/governance issues and misuse of public funds;
    • Academic Performance/Low Track and staff turnover

  • Davis and Lerma did not run this fall; Latta and Berry will represent D1 and D5.

83 of 227

There are Four Key Parts to a Successful Renewal

  1. Technical Submission - The actual documentation that will be submitted in July
  2. This includes the updated charter petition, legal updates, budget and board documents, etc. This will be 1000+ pages…
  3. Lead: Megan Bacigalupi, Chief of Staff

  • The Multi Year Performance Report, Verified Data Analysis (MAP and AIMsWeb and IAs), and Answers to Anticipated Questions -
  • Lead: Kathleen Liljeberg, Director of Assessment and Performance Management

  • Public Relations and Engagement
  • This includes the engagement of our Staff, Students and Families, Community Leaders, and Building/Sharing of narratives through media collateral, including videos. Sharing bite-sized narratives between now and September at OUSD Board meetings.
  • Lead: Karen Fee, Director of Development, and Dr. Latora Baldridge, Lodestar Lead Principal;

  • Getting to 4+ votes on the OUSD Board -
  • Over the next few months, we will be inviting elected officials to our schools!
  • Lead: Megan Bacigalupi, Chief of Staff, and Dr. Latora Baldridge, Lodestar Lead Principal;

83

84 of 227

Bellwether - Phase 2:

Support Function Strategic Priorities:

  • Strategic Priority #4:
    • LCPS runs a high-touch enrollment lifecycle that emphasizes clear messaging, frequent communication, targeted marketing, and top-tier customer service
  • Strategic Priority #5:
    • LCPS supports budget managers with a transparent budget process, accurate forecasting, and streamlined submission of compliance info for legal and grant requirements

85 of 227

Lighthouse Community Public Schools

Updated Strategic Plan (includes support functions)

Updated December 11, 2024

85

86 of 227

Two new non-program priorities support the three program priorities

86

Strategic Priority #1

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

Strategic Priority #2

Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school

through shared power, voice, and trust

Strategic Priority #3

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

The additional priorities focus on creating the conditions for the first priorities to be successful

NEW: Strategic Priority #4

LCPS runs a high-touch enrollment lifecycle that emphasizes clear messaging, frequent communication, targeted marketing, and top-tier customer service

NEW: Strategic Priority #5

LCPS supports budget managers with a transparent budget process, accurate forecasting, and streamlined submission of compliance info for legal and grant requirements

Priority 4 Initiatives

4A: Refined enrollment management

4B: Targeted recruitment strategy

4C: Strengthened student retention

4D: Enhanced tech integration

Priority 5 Initiatives

5A: Continuous improvement roadmap for financial reporting

5B: Accessible school budget supports

5C: Dedicated compliance calendar

5D: Multi-year forecast and scenario planning

4

2

3

5

1

87 of 227

We will fulfill our fourth priority to secure sustainable enrollment both through ensuring we have a coherent set of best enrollment practices across functions…

87

Strategic Priority #4

LCPS runs a high-touch enrollment lifecycle that emphasizes clear messaging, �frequent communication, targeted marketing, and top-tier customer service

Initiative 4B:

We will leverage local community data, events, and partnerships to grow the number and size of LCPS’ enrollment pipelines

Priority #4 Implementation Goals

  • Maintain enrollment of at least X students across both schools (4a, 4b, 4c, 4d)
  • Increase annual student applications by Y% (4a, 4b)
  • Increase yield from enrollment applications to enrolled students to Z% (4c, 4d)
  • 90% of students return to LCPS YoY as measured by annual student retention data (4a, 4c; also 2c)
  • W% of families report satisfaction with the enrollment and re-enrollment processes (4c, 4d)

Initiative 4C:

We will create role-specific training on family engagement and student retention, emphasizing regular communication throughout the year about enrollment plans

Initiative 4D:

Our team will continue to leverage technology to streamline and improve communication and tracking throughout the enrollment lifecycle (recruitment, matriculation, and retention)

Initiative 4A:

The LCPS team will define and assign an ownership role to coordinate management of enrollment lifecycle (recruitment, matriculation, and retention) roles and duties across teams

Priority #4 has significant overlap with Priority #2, and this plan recommends seeking opportunities to leverage shared planning structures and investments for the two priorities.

4

88 of 227

… and collaborating with partners in East Oakland to connect with the families of potential new LCPS students

88

Enlisting parents as ambassadors

Parent organizer program: Partner with local parent capacity building orgs (e.g. Oakland REACH) to host a Lighthouse Parent Leadership Academy to empower parents as effective advocates for their children at the school, share their stories at public events, help conduct school tours, and connect with prospective families

Working with existing partners

Enhance TK program and its reputation with preschool providers: Implement TK as a robust and appealing entry point to LCPS for families, and forge strong partnerships with the East Oakland Early Learning Center and other local preschools

Building coalitions to help displaced families

Collaborative canvassing: Team up with local orgs (e.g. East Oakland Collective, Black Cultural Zone, Public Library) to share information with families about their choices of schools in light of OUSD closures

Offering transportation assistance

Incubate partnerships to lower transportation barriers for families: Work with local orgs to establish chaperoned ‘walking school bus’ options for the nearest families and work alongside parent organizers to create a ‘Lighthouse Carpool Network’ where parents can connect and coordinate carpools

Expanding visibility on the ground

Lighthouse Schools resource fair: Host a resource fair alongside local partners (e.g. East Oakland Youth Development Center, Spanish Speaking Citizens’ Foundation) in a central location to showcase the schools and students’ achievements while providing fun activities for children (face painting, etc.).

By 2029, LCPS will expand from 1 to 3 TK sections across 2 sites to assess demand and how best to encourage transition to LCPS KG

Potential approaches we’ll explore include:

89 of 227

In light of our evolving needs, we will implement a fifth priority to build our structures and capacity for short- and long-term financial decision making

89

Strategic Priority #5

LCPS supports budget managers with a transparent budget process, accurate forecasting, �and streamlined submission of compliance info for legal and grant requirements

Priority #5 Implementation Goals

  • Achieve <X% variance in annual 3 year cash flow projections compared to actuals, that keeps LCPS above a minimum cash reserve of 60 days of operating expenses unless otherwise approved by the board (5a)
  • Achieve <Y% variance in annual budget projections compared to actuals (5a, also 4a-4d)
  • Submit 100% of annual compliance reports accurately and on time, with no significant violations or findings (5c, 5d)
  • Increase principal and network budget owner satisfaction with budget transparency and accessibility by Z% based a biannual staff survey (5b, 5d)

Initiative 5C:

Our team will create and follow a centralized compliance calendar that tracks requirements, deadlines, and status and offers detailed reporting instructions

Initiative 5D:

Our financial team will create a multi-year forecast model that incorporates scenario planning with adjustable inputs to inform long-term plans for enrollment and capital improvements

Initiative 5A:

Our team will align to a shared roadmap for continuous improvement in financial controls, leveraging training and technology to enhance accuracy and mitigate risk

Initiative 5B:

Budget managers will participate in regular (quarterly) budget meetings with updates on budget variances and any upcoming financial decisions with program implications

5

90 of 227

The new initiatives ensure that LCPS' support functions bolster its core academic priorities throughout the duration of this strategic plan plan

90

Strategic Priority #1

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

Strategic Priority #2

Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school

through shared power, voice, and trust

Strategic Priority #3

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

  • Additional support for principals and instructional budget to plan how to purchase and use high quality instructional materials
  • Streamlined enrollment ownership aligned with clarified network model and meeting structures
  • Strong family engagement in support of inclusive communications and parent voice
  • Role-specific training as part of delivering world-class professional development to meet nonacademic team members’ development needs

Strategic Priority #4

LCPS runs a high-touch enrollment lifecycle that emphasizes clear messaging, frequent communication, targeted marketing, and top-tier customer service

Strategic Priority #5

LCPS supports budget managers with a transparent budget process, accurate forecasting, and streamlined submission of compliance info for legal and grant requirements

91 of 227

January 15, 2025

Appendix:

  • From All Org Presentation on January 6 to kick of 2nd Semester

92 of 227

By 2028, we will

ensure rigorous, student-centered learning

in all classrooms, for all students

92

We will exceed the CA state average in math and ELA proficiency

We will diagnose, differentiate, and accelerate academic growth through tiered supports for all scholars

We will drive consistent english language development for emerging bilingual students - especially our newcomers and earliest learners

We will provide exemplar supports for students with disabilities, especially those requiring more intensive services

1

93 of 227

93

To accompany this qualitative picture of success, LCPS developed a set of quantitative intended impact goals

Intended Impact Category

Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028)

Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students

In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups

60% of Emerging Bilingual students advance at least 1 EPLI level or maintain a level 4

85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)

Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth

94 of 227

In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups

94

% proficient in ELA

% proficient in Math

CA State Averages

Spring, 2024

47%

36%

LCPS CAASSP Averages

Spring, 2024

23%

16%

LCPS Interim Assessment

Fall, 2024

22%

22%

LCPS Interim Assessment Winter (Feb), 2025

?

?

LCPS CAASSP Testing

Spring (May), 2025

?

?

95 of 227

85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)

95

Current 2nd Grades Fall 2024 Baseline

Previous cohort of 2nd graders, 50.1% ended the year above the 25th percentile in ORF

Percent of Students at or Above 25th Percentile, Goal of 85%

2nd Grade Oral Reading Fluency

Lighthouse 2nd

Lodestar 2nd

90-99th %ile

3.4%

0%

75th-89th %ile

10.3%

0%

26th-74th %ile

36.2%

47.5%

11-25th %ile

22.4%

10%

1-10th %ile

27.6%

42.5%

96 of 227

Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth

96

Change in CA Dashboard for SWD in 2024

(scale score)

CA ELA

  • 0.7

CA Math

  • 2.9

Lighthouse ELA

  • 18.4

Lighthouse Math

  • 4.1

Lodestar ELA

  • 1.3

Lodestar Math

  • 9.1

97 of 227

By 2028, we will

strengthen multi-generational opportunities

as a model community school

97

We will welcome all students daily to joyful, inclusive, and anti-racist spaces for learning

We will better prepare all students for an opportunity-rich future through an exemplary TK program and robust college and career readiness supports

We will amplify strong and enduring community partnerships in order to maximize access to - and enrichment of - learning

We will build enduring advocacy and investment in our community through strategic parent and alumni empowerment efforts

2

98 of 227

98

To accompany this qualitative picture of success, LCPS developed a set of quantitative intended impact goals

Intended Impact Category

Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028)

Strengthen multi-generational opportunities as a model community school

95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation

Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028.

Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years

90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually

99 of 227

95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation

99

Graduation Rate

College and Career Indicator (CCI) % - Proxy for readiness - A-G Eligible + College Credits / CTE Pathway completion.

CA Averages

86.7%

45%

Lighthouse HS

89.7%

71.4%

Lodestar HS

89.5%

75%

100 of 227

Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028.

Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years

100

Chronic Absence Rate

LCPS 2024-25 (Current)

23.6%

LCPS 2023-24

32.9%

Suspension Rate

LCPS 2024-25 (Current)

1.3%

LCPS 2023-24

4.1%

101 of 227

90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually

101

102 of 227

By 2028, we will

deeply invest in our educators and leaders -

our greatest asset

102

We will recruit and retain educators and leaders who are committed to and reflective of our community

We will deliver the world-class professional development and coaching that our educators and leaders deserve

We will foster a collaborative and cohesive leadership team that removes barriers for, supports, and celebrates its educators

We will grow and strengthen our educator and leadership pathways

3

103 of 227

103

To accompany this qualitative picture of success, LCPS developed a set of quantitative intended impact goals

Intended Impact Category

Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028)

Deeply invest in our educators and leaders

- our greatest asset

On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders year-over-year with <10% variance across sites

Maintain >75% of LCPS staff identifying as BIPOC

LCPS career pathways account for 30-40% of teacher, leader, and student support staff

Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey

104 of 227

On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders year-over-year with <10% variance across sites.

Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey.

Overall Staff Engagement

104

Staff who are “Engaged” has increased from 44% to 60% over the last 2 years with another 11% on the cusp of being engaged (Average of 3.7+)

  • Less than 10% of Staff are Below a 3

  • LCPS engagement is 2x the National Average for K-12

  • Staff participation increased from 74% to 82%!

105 of 227

On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders year-over-year with <10% variance across sites.

Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey.

Top 2 Areas of Strength

Overarching Themes from Staff Responded a 4 or Higher

#1: Manager/Supervisor/Coach Support & Feeling Valued:

  • Receiving regular and consistent support by my supervisor and/or site leadership team
  • Having a sense of trust and being pushed to learn and grow by my manager or coach
  • I feel valued, appreciated, seen, supported and that my voice & opinions matter at work

#2: Working as a Part of a Supportive & Collaborative Team & Staff Retention:

  • Feel surrounded by excellent people and supported by by colleagues/team
  • Relationships with mentors and colleagues support me to learn and grow
  • “Retention of staff has done wonders”

105

106 of 227

On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders year-over-year with <10% variance across sites.

Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey.

Top 3 Areas of Growth

Overarching Themes from Staff Responded a 3 or Lower

#1: Better Resources, Space, Time & Support to Do My Job:

  • Not enough budget for materials & resources (especially for science classes & intervention)
  • More support for managing students with challenging behaviors and for students with IEPs
  • More time to prep and a more manageable workload

#2: Support Leaders to Better Support Their Staff:

  • A subset of staff reported that their managers/admin team were too “top down” and had inconsistent or lack of clear communication
  • A subset of staff did not feel they were recognized, appreciated or valued by their leadership team or the org as a whole
  • Support for collaboration between leaders (SPED & Site Admin, e.g.) was also noted

#3: Support My Professional Growth:

  • More opportunities to grow my skills and leadership
  • More access to skilled coaches for teachers and high-quality PD with well-planned agendas \
  • More targeted and differentiated PD based on teaching/staff role and experience

106

107 of 227

On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders year-over-year with <10% variance across sites.

Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey.

Intent to Return

107

  • Nearly 71% of staff who responded to the survey are likely to return next year

  • Another 19% are undecided

  • Let’s increase retention by addressing the concerns and challenges!

108 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25

December 4, 2024

109 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 12.4.24

Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary

109

Strategic Priority #2:

Students, families, community

partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust

Preliminary Data from All Staff Fall Survey:

The following questions grounded in the Q12 are most aligned to this priority

On Track:

  • How effective (timely) & supportive (inclusive) have our communications (from LCPS, from your manager, Monday memo, staff and team meetings) been this fall (e.g. transparency, clarity, responsive, etc)? 4.0

Improvement Needed:

  • How strongly do you agree with the statement "At work, my opinions seem to count"? 3.8

More analysis on our staff engagement vs. this priority will be shared at our January meeting.

Strategic Priority #3:

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

Preliminary Data from All Staff Fall Survey: The following questions grounded in the Q12 are most aligned to this priority

On Track:

  • How strongly do you agree with the statement "This last year, I have had opportunities at work to learn and grow"? 3.9
  • How frequently and consistently have you met with your manager or coach this year to check in and discuss your progress and concerns? 4.0

Off Track/Improvement Needed:

  • Overall, how supportive (effective & purposeful) has our professional development (PD, coaching, PLCs, collaboration, etc) been this year in your work?
    • Instructional staff: 3.3
    • Non Instructional staff: 3.6

More analysis on our staff engagement vs. this priority will be shared at our January meeting.

Strategic Priority #1:

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

Data from the CA Dashboard (from last school year) lifts our organizational need to improve our Literacy and English Language Learner support this school year.

  • 2023-24 Baselines from the CADashboard Release.
  • Strengths:
    • Improvement in Math at Lodestar and Lighthouse HS LEAs
    • Strong graduation rate and CCI indicator
  • Areas in need of Improvement
    • ELA and English Language Learner progress
    • Lighthouse K-8 overall, especially in our Middle School
    • The overall efficacy of our academic interventions vs. our growing student subgroups (ELLs, SPED in particular)

110 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 12.4.24

Update on Strategic Priority Initiatives - Executive Summary

110

Initiative 1B:

Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms

Initiative 1C:

Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices

Initiative 1D:

Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability

Initiative 1A:

Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework

Initiative 2A:

Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process

Initiative 2B:

Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action

Initiative 2C:

Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued

Initiative 2D:

Our community partners provide services and supports, and opportunities aligned to the needs of our students and families

Initiative 3A:

Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures

Initiative 3B:

Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team

Initiative 3C:

Our team participates in a clear and consistent org-wide coaching structure that balances coaching capacity with development needs

Initiative 3D:

Our team experiences high quality coaching through research-based coaching protocols and emerging technologies to develop and sustain educators

Initiative Started; Going well

Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges

Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges/Delay

Initiative Not Yet Started per timeline

111 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 12.4.24

Update on Strategic Priority Implementation Goals - Executive Summary

111

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 2

X% of students per grade are meeting/exceeding standards on CAASSP interims for Math (1B, 1C, 1D); varies by grade

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 3

80% of students demonstrate scale score improvement (50 points+) on interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D)

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 4

90% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in Domain 1 and 2; 70% in Domain 3, 4, and 5 for Q1, Q2, Q4 and Q4 as measured by instructional excellence rubric (TDEF/LDEF) (1B, 1C,,1D)

Initiative 1: Implementation Goal 1

90% of teachers effectively implement curriculum (Crew + content) with fidelity as measured by a classroom walkthrough tool (1A)

Initiative 2 :Implementation Goal 1

85% staff agree that decision-making process is done in a timely and inclusive manner as measured by a biannual staff survey (2a)

90%+ of staff participate in LCPS biannual survey and 75% agree that communication is timely and inclusive (2a, 2b)

Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 2

50 families participate in decision making groups (ELAC, SSC) per school (2c)

Initiative 2: Implementation Goal 3

90% of students return to LCPS YoY as measured by annual student retention data (2c)

Initiative 2: mplementation Goal 4

80% of students/families who have received services from community partners agree the support was effective (2d)

Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 1

X% of teachers and instructional leaders are rated skillful or higher on the TDEF / LDEF, respectively (3a, 3b, 3c)

Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 2

90% of staff participate in 90% of PD structures (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) (3b, 3c)

Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 3

85% of staff agree each PD structure (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) is effective and purposeful in driving academic progress as measured by biannual staff survey (3b)

Initiative 3: Implementation Goal 4

80% of coaches and managers are effective as measured by a coaching rubric or the People Management domain of the Leader Effectiveness tool (3d)

Implementation Goal Met / Meeting

Implementation Goal Progress

Implementation Goal Not Met / Not Meeting

Implementation Goal Not Yet Measured

112 of 227

CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 12.6.24

Framing of Goals: Impact vs Implementation

Month

When to Expect Board Presentation Updates on Impact Goals

December

  • ELPI Levels from State Dashboard
  • SWD exceeding on avg. compared to CA
  • SWD avg scale score growth

January

  • Charter Renewal Criteria

Implementation Goals for Strategic Priority 1

60% of Emerging Bilingual Students advance at least 1 ELPI level or maintain a level 4.

Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth.

LCPS: 37%

LHK8: 45%

LH9-12: 29%

LS: 38%

Growth

ELA Points from Standard

Math Points from Standard

LCPS SWD ELA Growth: -10

LCPS SWD Math Growth: -3

LCPS: -155

LHK8: -136

LH9-12: -170

LS: -160

LCPS Difference to CA: -59

LCPS: -185

LHK8: -162

LH9-12: -221

LS: -172

LCPS Difference to CA: -61

113 of 227

CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 12.6.24

What is the CA Dashboard?

  • CA School Dashboard reports how districts, schools, and student groups are performing across state and local measures

  • Based on current year results and whether results improved from the prior year

  • Groups require a minimum number of 30 students in both the prior and current year

114 of 227

LEA Dashboard Overview

LH K-8

114

115 of 227

LEA Dashboard Overview

LH HS

115

116 of 227

LEA Dashboard Overview

Lodestar K-12

116

117 of 227

December 4, 2024

Appendix:

  • CA Dashboard vs. OUSD and LCPS 3 LEAs by Indicator and Subgroup

118 of 227

State

OUSD

LHK8

LHHS

Lodestar

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

Chronic Absenteeism

24.3%

18.6%

60.3%

31.2%

34.6%

30.8

N/A

N/A

39.2%

34.5%

Suspension

(% suspended at least one day)

3.5%

3.2%

4%

4.3%

0.7%

3%

2.8%

4.4%

3%

3.9%

English Learner Progress

49%

46%

44%

39%

48%

45%

71%

30%

51%

38%

ELA

(Points from standard)

-14

-13

-64

-55

-63

-77

+2

-45

-81

-84

Math

(Points from standard)

-49

-48

-94

-85

-95

-107

-159

-154

-115

-100

Graduation Rate

(% graduated)

86.4%

86.7%

75%

80.6%

N/A

N/A

92.4%

89.7%

N/A

89.5%*

College/

Career

44%

45%

38%

43%

N/A

N/A

Very High

71.4%

N/A

75%*

CA Dashboard Official Data

119 of 227

Chronic Absenteeism

State

OUSD

LHK8

LHHS

Lodestar

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

AA

36.4%

31.3%

70.5%

45.7%

23.3%

37.1%

N/A

N/A

30.6%

31%

Hispanic

28.4%

21.7%

66.2%

33.5%

35.3%

29.8%

N/A

N/A

40.4%

33.8%

SWD

33.1%

26.3%

68.4%

41%

38%

40.2%

N/A

N/A

50%

46.9%

EL

26.3%

20.1%

61.8%

32.3%

33.1%

28.5%

N/A

N/A

36.1%

29.1%

LTEL

N/A

23.9%

N/A

36.6%

N/A

24%

N/A

N/A

N/A

25%

SED

29.9%

23.4%

65.9%

37%

35%

31.5%

N/A

N/A

39%

34.5%

CA Dashboard Official Data: Chronic Absenteeism

120 of 227

Suspension

State

OUSD

LHK8

LHHS

Lodestar

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

AA

8.8%

8.4%

9.4%

9.8%

2.2%

5.7%

4.2%

4.3%

5.6%

3.4%

Hispanic

3.8%

3.4%

2.9%

3.3%

0.6%

3%

2.5%

2.9%

2.2%

4.3%

SWD

5.9%

5.4%

7%

6.6%

1.3%

2.1%

6.4%

5.8%

11.2%

5.7%

EL

3.7%

3.4%

2.7%

3.1%

0.3%

2.5%

3%

6.9%

2.3%

3.9%

LTEL

N/A

8.1%

N/A

7.2%

N/A

8%

N/A

7.6%

N/A

8.5%

SED

4.5%

4%

4.7%

5%

0.6%

3%

2.9%

3.7%

2.9%

4.2%

CA Dashboard Official Data: Suspension

121 of 227

ELPI

State

OUSD

LHK8

LHHS

Lodestar

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

% Who Progressed

46%

44%

45%

38%

43%

40%

59%

24%

44%

31%

% Who Maintained Level 4

2%

2%

1%

1%

5%

5%

12%

5%

7%

7%

% Who Maintained Levels 1-3

33%

35%

38%

42%

28%

29%

15%

27%

26%

29%

% Who Decreased at Least One Level

19%

19%

16%

18%

24%

27%

15%

44%

23%

33%

CA Dashboard Official Data: English Learner Progress

122 of 227

ELA

(Distance from standard)

State

OUSD

LHK8

LHHS

Lodestar

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

AA

-60

-59

-120

-98

-93

-109

<11 Students

<11 Students

-96

-90

Hispanic

-40

-39

-84

-82

-63

-77

+11

-39

-80

-86

SWD

-96

-96

-146

-131

-118

-136

<11 Students

-170

-158

-160

EL

-68

-68

-93

-98

-78

-94

-22

-118

-97

-110

LTEL

N/A

-110

N/A

-131

N/A

-132

N/A

-128

N/A

-120

SED

-43

-41

-93

-81

-64

-77

+1

-45

-81

-85

CA Dashboard Official Data: ELA

123 of 227

Math

(Distance from standard)

State

OUSD

LHK8

LHHS

Lodestar

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

AA

-105

-102

-155

-138

-133

-114

<11 Students

<11 Students

-135

-119

Hispanic

-81

-79

-117

-114

-95

-108

-148

-149

-113

-100

SWD

-127

-124

-173

-155

-166

-162

<11 Students

-221

-182

-172

EL

-93

-94

-116

-120

-103

-118

-21.9

-197

-124

-120

LTEL

N/A

-164

N/A

-182

N/A

-169

N/A

-210

N/A

-156

SED

-81

-78

-123

-112

-97

-109

-162

-150

-116

-100

CA Dashboard Official Data: Math

124 of 227

Grad Rate

State

OUSD

LHK8

LHHS

Lodestar

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

AA

79%

79%

76%

81%

N/A

N/A

<11 Students

<11 Students

N/A

<11 Students

Hispanic

84%

85%

69%

77%

N/A

N/A

92%

91%

N/A

90%

SWD

73%

74%

68%

76%

N/A

N/A

<11 Students

71%

N/A

<11 Students

EL

74%

78%

62%

70%

N/A

N/A

86%

93%

N/A

95%

LTEL

N/A

81%

N/A

76%

N/A

N/A

N/A

93%

N/A

94%

SED

84%

84%

74%

80%

N/A

N/A

93%

90%

N/A

93%

CA Dashboard Official Data: Graduation Rate

125 of 227

CCI

State

OUSD

LHK8

LHHS

Lodestar

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

2023

2024

AA

25%

28%

29%

32%

N/A

N/A

<11 Students

<11 Students

N/A

<11 Students

Hispanic

36%

37%

31%

39%

N/A

N/A

83%

76%

N/A

75%

SWD

12%

14%

18%

24%

N/A

N/A

<11 Students

36%

N/A

<11 Students

EL

15%

17%

19%

24%

N/A

N/A

77%

59%

N/A

74%

LTEL

N/A

17%

N/A

28%

N/A

N/A

N/A

57%

N/A

73%

SED

35%

37%

35%

40%

N/A

N/A

83%

71%

N/A

78%

CA Dashboard Official Data: College & Career Indicator

126 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25

November 6, 2024

127 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 11.6.24

Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary

127

Strategic Priority #2:

Students, families, community

partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust

On Track:

  • 2023-24 Baselines have been set.
  • 85% of Families attending Student Led Conferences September; ~45 families confirmed for Lit for Literacy.
  • Community Partnerships (2D):

Oakland Natives Give Back: Chronic Absenteeism - state grant

Youth Alive! Violence Prevention for federal school safety grant

Higher Ground: After School and Restorative Justice programming - ASSETs and federal school safety grant

Families in Action: Lit for Literacy parent workshops - state community Schools grant

Off Track:

  • Our Launch to solidifying our “decision making framework” needs input from leadership teams, Parent Advisory Council, and teacher leadership over November/December.

Strategic Priority #3:

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

On Track:

  • 2023-24 Baselines have been set.
  • Fall Staff Survey: We have launched our survey aligned to our strategic priorities and implementation goals, and hope to have the data ready for our leadership teams by mid/end of December and for our board meeting in January.

Off Track:

  • Our Launch to solidifying our “theory of action” for organizational learning and professional development needs work, and the timeline for this may be extended past first semester.

Strategic Priority #1:

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

On Track:

  • 2023-24 Baselines have been set for 2 of the 4 Impact goals. We are waiting for the CA Dashboard Release coming in November/December. .
  • Interim Assessments (IABs) - please see below for progress vs. our two implementation goals:
    • 22% of students proficient in ELA (vs. 23% EOY 2024)
    • 22% of students proficient in Math (vs. 16% EOY 2024)
    • 55% of students meeting 30pt scale score gains in ELA
    • 45% of students meeting 30pt scale score gains in Math
      • (goal by EOY 2025 is 50 pts)

128 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 11.6.24

Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary

128

Initiative 1B:

Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms

Initiative 1C:

Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices

Initiative 1D:

Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability

Initiative 1A:

Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework

Initiative 2A:

Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process

Initiative 2B:

Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action

Initiative 2C:

Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued

Initiative 2D:

Our community partners provide services and supports, and opportunities aligned to the needs of our students and families

Initiative 3A:

Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures

Initiative 3B:

Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team

Initiative 3C:

Our team participates in a clear and consistent org-wide coaching structure that balances coaching capacity with development needs

Initiative 3D:

Our team experiences high quality coaching through research-based coaching protocols and emerging technologies to develop and sustain educators

Initiative Started; Going well

Initiative Started; Going OK; Minor Challenges

Initiative Started; Behind Schedule; Challenges/Delay

Initiative Not Yet Started per timeline

129 of 227

CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 11.6.24

Framing of Goals: Impact vs Implementation

Month

When to Expect Board Presentation Updates on Impact Goals

November

  • Baselines from 23-24 SY (Proficiency)
  • AimswebPlus (85% 2nd on ORF)

December

  • ELPI Levels from State Dashboard
  • SWD exceeding on avg. compared to CA
  • SWD avg scale score growth

Implementation Goals for Strategic Priority 1

% of students meeting or exceeding proficiency

(LCPS 3-8, 11)

% of students demonstrating 30 point scale score improvement (80% at 50 is EOY goal)

LCPS ELA: 21.5%

LCPS Math: 22%

LS Math: 19%

LS ELA: 21%

LH Math: 25%

LH ELA: 22%

LCPS ELA: 55%

LCPS Math: 45%

LS Math: 46%

LS ELA: 57%

LH Math: 44%

LH ELA: 52%

130 of 227

130

Strategic Priority 1: Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning

LCPS Baselines for 4-year intended impact goals

Intended Impact Category

Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028)

Baselines (from 2023-24)

Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students

In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups

Aggregate: State vs. LCPS

  • ELA: 47% vs 23% / Math: 36% vs. 16%

Student Sub-Groups: State vs. LCPS

  • Lx: 37% vs 23% / Math: 24% vs. 17%
  • AA: 30% vs 22% / Math: 18% vs. 13%
  • Econ D: 37% vs 23% / Math: 25% vs. 16%
  • ELL: 10% vs 5% / Math: 10% vs. 5%
  • SWD: 16% vs 7% / Math: 13% vs. 3%

Please see appendix for more details

60% of Emerging Bilingual students advance at least 1 EPLI level or maintain a level 4

TBD: December 2024 CA State Dashboard Release

85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)

AimsWeb Plus Reading Inventory

  • 50.1% of 2nd graders above 25th percentile in Spring 2024

Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth

TBD: December 2024 CA State Dashboard Release

131 of 227

131

Strategic Priority 2: Strengthen multi-generational opportunities

LCPS Baselines for 4-year intended impact goals

Intended Impact Category

Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028)

Baselines (from 2023-24)

Strengthen multi-generational opportunities as a model community school

95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation

CCI Index for CA: 43.9%

  • Lodestar: 80.4%
  • Lighthouse: 82.3%

Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028.

Chronic Absenteeism

  • CA: 24.3%
  • LCPS: 32.8%

Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years

Suspensions in

  • CA: 3.5%
  • LCPS: 4%

90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually

Baseline in 2024-25

132 of 227

132

Strategic Priority 3: Deeply invest in our educators and leaders

LCPS Baselines for 4-year intended impact goals

Intended Impact Category

Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028)

Baselines (from 2023-24)

Deeply invest in our educators and leaders

- our greatest asset

On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders YoY with <10% variance across sites

83% Retention of Staff;

  • 78% Retention of teachers and leaders.

Maintain >75% of LCPS staff identifying as BIPOC

Staff identifying as BIPOC: 77%

  • 80% of Leadership
  • 66% of Teachers

LCPS career pathways account for 30-40% of teacher, leader, and student support staff

39% of Staff on/have been on Career Pathways

  • 69% of Teachers on/have been on Career / Credentialing pathway

Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey

Staff Engagement in 2023-24 based on Q-12

  • 55%

133 of 227

November 6, 2024

Appendix:

  • Strategic Priority 1: CA CAASPP Release (Baseline), AimsWeb Plus (Baseline), and IAB (Oct Interim Assessments)
  • Strategic Priority 2:
  • Strategic Priority 3:

134 of 227

CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 11.6.24

Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning

Impact Goal: In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups

LCPS Proficiency

CA Proficiency

Variance

ELA

26%

47%

-21%

Math

13%

36%

-22%

LCPS ELA

CA ELA

ELA Variance

LCPS Math

CA Math

Math Variance

LH3-5

22%

45%

-23%

13%

41%

-28%

LH6-8, 11

26%

41%

-15%

13%

32%

-19%

LS3-5

13%

45%

-32%

15%

41%

-25%

LS6-8, 11

26%

41%

-16%

17%

32%

-15%

135 of 227

LIGHTHOUSE ELA

CA ELA

LH

Econ D

Lx

AA

ELD

SWD

CA

Econ D

Lx

AA

ELD

SWD

3

7.54%

8.52%

8.00%

0%

2.78%

No Data

42.8%

32.51%

32.27%

28.22%

15.34%

19.47%

4

20.83%

19.15%

22.22%

50%

16.67%

No Data

43.9%

33.38%

33.17%

26.93%

12.97%

17.77%

5

38.00%

36.96%

40.48%

0%

15.38%

No Data

47.37%

36.69%

36.58%

30.48%

11.45%

17.04%

6

18.84%

19.41%

20.00%

0%

6.90%

No Data

45.82%

35.62%

35.38%

28.29%

8.14%

13.34%

7

25.33%

24.32%

24.64%

20%

6.67%

0%

47.2%

36.56%

36.52%

30.25%

6.94%

13.66%

8

20.78%

18.92%

20.59%

14%

3.57%

15.38%

45.96%

35.83%

35.56%

29.48%

4.60%

12.11%

11

38.03%

37.88%

41.66%

20%

8.33%

0%

55.73%

47.10%

47.18%

38.49%

7.46%

16.98%

All

24.19%

23.59%

25.37%

14.86%

8.61%

5.12%

47.04%

36.81%

36.78%

30.34%

10.29%

15.83%

KEY: Red is further than 5% difference, Yellow is within 5% difference, Green is exceeded

Student Assessment Data: CAASPP Proficiency

136 of 227

LODESTAR ELA

CA ELA

LS

Econ D

Lx

AA

ELD

SWD

CA

Econ D

Lx

AA

ELD

SWD

3

14.54%

15.39%

12.50%

33%

2.78%

No Data

42.8%

32.51%

32.27%

28.22%

15.34%

19.47%

4

14.55%

13.73%

12.82%

20%

3.70%

No Data

43.9%

33.38%

33.17%

26.93%

12.97%

17.77%

5

8.89%

7.89%

5.71%

22%

7.41%

No Data

47.37%

36.69%

36.58%

30.48%

11.45%

17.04%

6

11.69%

12.68%

11.48%

0%

0%

0%

45.82%

35.62%

35.38%

28.29%

8.14%

13.34%

7

36.11%

37.31%

31.74%

50%

4.17%

No Data

47.2%

36.56%

36.52%

30.25%

6.94%

13.66%

8

18.46%

17.55%

18.51%

18.18%

7.14%

No Data

45.96%

35.83%

35.56%

29.48%

4.60%

12.11%

11

36.00%

34.09%

30.96%

57%

0%

No Data

55.73%

47.10%

47.18%

38.49%

7.46%

16.98%

All

20.28%

20.27%

18.42%

25.86%

3.61%

7.69%

47.04%

36.81%

36.78%

30.34%

10.29%

15.83%

KEY: Red is further than 5% difference, Yellow is within 5% difference, Green is exceeded

Student Assessment Data: CAASPP Proficiency

137 of 227

LIGHTHOUSE MATH

CA MATH

LH

Econ D

Lx

AA

ELD

SWD

CA

Econ D

Lx

AA

ELD

SWD

3

7.55%

8.51%

8.00%

0%

8.33%

No Data

45.63%

35.13%

34.40%

27.38%

21.46%

23.64%

4

14.58%

14.90%

15.55%

0%

13.89%

No Data

41.20%

30.28%

29.25%

21.96%

14.68%

18.37%

5

24.00%

21.74%

21.43%

18%

3.85%

No Data

35.02%

24.08%

23.01%

17.03%

8.24%

12.59%

6

18.58%

19.12%

19.70%

0%

13.79%

No Data

34.32%

23.77%

22.46%

16.24%

6.21%

10.11%

7

20.00%

18.92%

20.29%

20%

3.33%

0%

33.83%

22.79%

21.74%

16.00%

5.25%

9.27%

8

6.49%

6.76%

7.35%

0%

0%

0%

31.56%

20.89%

19.65%

14.21%

3.70%

7.22%

11

7.04%

7.58%

8.34%

0%

4.17%

0%

27.90%

18.10%

16.57%

12.58%

3.11%

4.65%

All

14.03%

13.93%

14.38%

5.43%

6.77%

1.72%

35.54%

24.98%

23.73%

17.75%

10.25%

12.54%

KEY: Red is further than 5% difference, Yellow is within 5% difference, Green is exceeded

Student Assessment Data: CAASPP Proficiency

138 of 227

LODESTAR MATH

CA MATH

LS

Econ D

Lx

AA

ELD

SWD

CA

Econ D

Lx

AA

ELD

SWD

3

34.55%

34.62%

31.25%

46%

19.44%

No Data

45.63%

35.13%

34.40%

27.38%

21.46%

23.64%

4

9.09%

7.84%

7.69%

10%

3.70%

No Data

41.20%

30.28%

29.25%

21.96%

14.68%

18.37%

5

2.13%

2.50%

0%

10%

0%

No Data

35.02%

24.08%

23.01%

17.03%

8.24%

12.59%

6

15.79%

15.71%

16.67%

8.33%

8.11%

0%

34.32%

23.77%

22.46%

16.24%

6.21%

10.11%

7

32.40%

33.33%

30.65%

34%

12.50%

No Data

33.83%

22.79%

21.74%

16.00%

5.25%

9.27%

8

15.38%

14.04%

14.82%

18.18%

0%

No Data

31.56%

20.89%

19.65%

14.21%

3.70%

7.22%

11

6.00%

4.55%

4.76%

0%

0%

No Data

27.90%

18.10%

16.57%

12.58%

3.11%

4.65%

All

17.42%

17.37%

16.72%

16.94%

7.25%

2.00%

35.54%

24.98%

23.73%

17.75%

10.25%

12.54%

KEY: Red is further than 5% difference, Yellow is within 5% difference, Green is exceeded

Student Assessment Data: CAASPP Proficiency

139 of 227

CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 11.6.24

Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning

Impact Goal: 85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimswebPlus (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)

EOY Spring 2024

BOY Fall 2024

LH 2nd

47.2%

49.9%

LS 2nd

53%

47.5%

140 of 227

Dashed Lines are Lighthouse, Solid Lines are Lodestar

Projected Growth Needed Over 4 Year Period

141 of 227

Student Assessment Data: AimswebPlus

Percent of Students at or Above 25th Percentile, Goal of 85%

2nd Grade Oral Reading Fluency

Lighthouse

Lodestar

Spring 2024

(Current 3rd)

47.2%

53%

Fall 2024

(Current 2nd)

49.9%

47.5%

Early Literacy

Fall 2024

Lighthouse

Lodestar

First Grade

12%

23%

Kindergarten

41%

31%

Goal Date

LCPS Avg. Percent Proficient Goals (K-2)

Spring 25

46%

Spring 26

60%

Spring 27

73%

Spring 28

85%

142 of 227

To make progress to impact goal, this is growth needed by grade in the 24-25 SY and subsequent years

Grade

Lighthouse

Lodestar

K

11%

13.5%

1

18.25%

15.5%

2nd

8.75%

9.4%

To make progress to impact goals, this is the average growth all grades must make in each year.

Goal Date

Avg. Percentage Growth Per Year

Fall 2024 >

Spring 25

11.42%

Spring 25 > Spring 26

14.17%

Spring 26 > Spring 27

13.33%

Spring 27 > Spring 28

12%

AimswebPlus: Average Growth Per Year

143 of 227

Student Assessment Data: AimswebPlus

Fall 2024 Baseline

Percent of Students at or Above 25th Percentile, Goal of 85%

2nd Grade Oral Reading Fluency

Lighthouse 2nd

Lodestar 2nd

90-99th %ile

3.4%

0%

75th-89th %ile

10.3%

0%

26th-74th %ile

36.2%

47.5%

11-25th %ile

22.4%

10%

1-10th %ile

27.6%

42.5%

49.9%

47.5%

144 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

CAASPP Spring 2024

LH IAB Scale Score Avg

IABs

Percent Proficient

% of Students Who Gained 30+ Points from Spring

3

2432

2409

2339

2355*

23%

N/A

4

2473

2452

2389

2382

7%

62%

5

2502

2490

2456

2428

29%

58%

6

2531

2515

2442

2466*

33%

43%

7

2552

2536

2483

2480

27%

48%

8

2567

2548

2486

2507*

22%

50%

11

2683

2590

2539

2579*

16%

N/A

Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP

Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points

Asterix means IAB stronger than CAASPP EOY

IABs (October) ELA Scale Score Analysis

Lighthouse

145 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

CAASPP Spring 2024

LS IAB Scale Score Avg

IABs

Percent Proficient

% of Students Who Gained 30+ Points from Spring

3

2432

2409

2346

2232

16%

N/A

4

2473

2452

2359

2386*

12%

49%

5

2502

2490

2366

2370*

15%

48%

6

2531

2515

2417

2443*

21%

70%

7

2552

2536

2501

2474

23%

61%

8

2567

2548

2481

2543*

47%

59%

11

2683

2590

2547

2546

10%

N/A

Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP

Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points

Asterix means IAB stronger than CAASPP EOY

IABs (October) ELA Scale Score Analysis

Lodestar

146 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

CAASPP Spring 2024

LH IAB Scale Score Avg

IABs

Percent Proficient

% of Students Who Gained 30+ Points from Spring

3

2436

2422

2348

2382*

26%

N/A

4

2485

2461

2388

2388

13%

48%

5

2528

2483

2436

2411

11%

38%

6

2552

2499

2334

2464*

26%

45%

7

2567

2513

2370

2468*

26%

41%

8

2586

2524

2437

2516*

34%

50%

11

2628

2547

2477

2589*

39%

N/A

Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP

Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points

Asterix means IAB stronger than CAASPP EOY

IABs (October) Math Scale Score Analysis

Lighthouse

147 of 227

Grade

EOY Scale Score Cut Off

CA AVG CAASPP

CAASPP Spring 2024

LS IAB Scale Score Avg

IABs

Percent Proficient

% of Students Who Gained 30+ Points from Spring

3

2432

2422

2390

2344

9%

N/A

4

2485

2461

2395

2389

15%

35%

5

2528

2483

2388

2410*

15%

54%

6

2552

2499

2422

2381

7%

30%

7

2567

2513

2515

2490

28%

61%

8

2586

2524

2453

2548*

38%

50%

11

2628

2547

2495

2510*

19%

N/A

Key: Comparison to CA AVG CAASPP

Green: Greater than CA, Yellow: Within 30 points, Red: 30+ Points

Asterix means IAB stronger than CAASPP EOY

IABs (October)Math Scale Score Analysis

Lodestar

148 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25

October 9, 2024

149 of 227

Strategic Plan Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.9.24

Update on Strategic Priorities - Executive Summary

149

Strategic Priority #2:

Students, families, community

partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust

On Track:

  • Decision Making Structures - we are leaning toward adopting Bain Consulting RAPIDs framework. We will be getting input from our Instructional and Culture Leadership teams (our teacher leaders) as well as to our Parent Advisory Council (PACs) over the next two months.

  • Our Family Engagement is off to a great start:
    • Using Social Media - 25,000 impressions last month
    • Strong attendance at Coffee Tuesday and PACs
    • Strong family and community events!

Strategic Priority #3:

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

On Track:

  • Intentional efforts to improve our Wednesday professional development

Off Track:

  • Coaching of Teachers is still inconsistently executed.
  • Our Launch to solidifying our “theory of action” for organizational learning and professional development needs work, and the timeline for this may be extended past first semester.

Strategic Priority #1:

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

On Track:

  • Regularly scheduled classroom walkthroughs and teacher observations, scoring/norming of instructional criteria with Leadership Teams
  • Readiness for first round of interim assessments.

Off Track:

  • Curriculum / Lesson internalization is inconsistently executed, is an area for improvement.
  • Support for new teachers.

150 of 227

October 9, 2024

Appendix:

  • Strategic Priority 1:
  • Strategic Priority 2:
  • Strategic Priority 3:

151 of 227

2024-25 Strategic Priority #1: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

151

First Semester - Board Presentations

First Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations

August

  • Board Overview: Strategic Priority #1

  • Impact Goal 2: ELPAC initial testing (new multilingual learners)

  • Impact Goal 3: Beginning of Year Aimsweb Plus (K-5)

September

  • Implementation Goal 4: Initial Teacher Observations

October

  • Board Introduction to Curriculum Internalization; Initiative 1D
  • Board Update on Implementation Goal 4

  • Implementation goal 2 and 3: SBAC Interim Testing aligned to CAASSP (grades 3-11)

November

  • Board Update on Interim Testing (from October)
  • Board Update on Initiatives 1B and 1D

December

  • Board Report on CORE Districts and CDE School Dashboards (from 2023-24 SY) Baseline Measures Impact Goals 1, 2, and 4
  • Impact Goal 3: Mid Year Aimsweb Plus (K-5)

152 of 227

CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.3.24

Strategic Priority 1: Update on Initiative 1D

152

153 of 227

Curriculum Internalization

153

#1D - Our teachers authentically internalize high quality instructional materials daily and our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support and accountability.

Actions to date:

  • LCPS utilizes high-quality curriculum across content areas to ensure consistent, rigorous and standards aligned instruction.
  • Effective curriculum implementation requires specific skills. Teachers prepare by internalizing curriculum lessons and enhancing them to address the needs of all students, specifically our English Language Learners and Students with Disabilities.

  • During New Staff Orientation (NSO) and Cycle 1 site-based Professional Development (first six weeks of the school year), sessions focused on curriculum internalization and planning. Additional support and accountability are provided through individual coaching with Assistant Principals and Principals and content-team Professional Learning Communities (PLCs).

154 of 227

Curriculum Internalization

154

#1D - Our teachers authentically internalize high quality instructional materials daily and our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support and accountability.

  • All teachers are expected to submit evidence of lesson internalization weekly, through TeachBoost.

  • Expectations are differentiated based on skill or experience.

  • Principals and Assistant Principals provide feedback on submitted lesson plans and follow up with those who have not submitted them.

  • Leaders hold additional mandatory planning sessions for teachers who need more support and/or accountability.

155 of 227

CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.3.24

Strategic Priority 1: Update on Implementation Goal 4

155

156 of 227

Walkthrough Tracker Cycle 1 Data

156

TDEF Focus for Cycle 1 (First 6 weeks of School)

  • ON TRACK for BOY= 25% or higher

LCPS

LS K-5

LH K-5

LS 6-12

LH 6-12

1A: Teaches core value-based norms, routines, and procedures

1B: Employs asset-focused language when describing student actions and behavior

1C: Anticipates, prevents, and addresses student behaviors that do not match teacher expectations.

42%

(On Track)

31%

(On Track)

75%

(On Track)

75%

(On Track)

25%

(Off Track)

2A: Selects instructional materials and tasks from approved curriculum that meets the grade level standards.

2C: 80%of instructional block is spent reading, writing, or speaking about grade level text or complex task.

33%

(On Track)

15%

(Off Track)

50%

(On Track)

80%

(On Track)

41%

(On Track)

Next Steps

  • Our cycle 2 focus on TDEF Domain 3 (instructional strategies) will also strengthen our data for 2C by doing intensive coaching at Lodestar K-5 and LH 6-12
  • Differentiated, focussed support on Domain 1 & 2 with some school sites, teams and teachers.
  • Continue to align Professional Development for teachers and leaders to discrete skills that are observable in the classroom and in student work.

157 of 227

2024-25 Strategic Priority #2: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

157

First Semester - Board Presentations

First Semester - Student, Family, and Community Events

Monthly

  • Note: CEO Monthly Updates will have data progress on Impact Goals 2 and 3 (Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rates)

September

  • Board Overview: Strategic Priority #1

  • Initiative 2A and 2B: LCPS Leadership Meeting (1 of 6)
  • Impact Goal 4: Student Led Conferences (1 of 3)
  • Initiative 2C: Parent Advisory Committee Meeting (SSC/ELAC) (1 of 3)

October

  • Board Update on Initiative 2B and 2C, including OUSD Charter Renewal Update
  • Board Update on Implementation Goal #4: Baseline student retention from 2023-24

November

  • Board Update on Initiative 2A and 2C, including OUSD Charter Renewal Update
  • Initiative 2A and 2B: LCPS Leadership Meeting (2 of 6)
  • Implementation Goal 1 and 2: Launch Bi-Annual Staff Survey (1 of 2)

December

  • Board Report on CORE Districts and CDE School Dashboards (from 2023-24 SY) Baseline Measures Impact Goals 1, including CCI indicator, college matriculation from class of 2024 and preliminary college application process.
  • Initiative 2A and 2B: LCPS Leadership Meeting (3 of 6)
  • Impact Goal 4: Student Led Conferences (2 of 3)

158 of 227

CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.3.24

Strategic Priority 2: Update on Initiative 2B and 2C

158

Update:

2B: We have taken the following steps to improve our communications strategy:

  • Leadership Step-Back and “Re-groups” scheduled 6 times each year
  • Aligned communications vs. Strategic Plan at multiple levels

2C: Parent Engagement in multiple forms

  • Coffee Tuesday / PACs with ~20 to ~30+ each meeting
  • ~75% of Families attended Student Led Conferences (SLCs) on 9/20
  • Social Media engagement around academics and culture

159 of 227

CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.3.24

Strategic Priority 2: Update on Implementation Goal #4

159

160 of 227

Board Update on Implementation Goal #4: Baseline

Student Retention

Goal is to retain 90% of students annually

160

Summary of Findings

Key

Org Wide

  • OVERALL: 87,38%
  • Organization-wide retention rates are variable, with specific

grade levels/sites at, near, and below 90% goal. .

  • Grades 3-8 shows the most consistent retention.
  • Grades with high teacher retention rates led to strong student

retention.

  • Both our high schools need improvement.

By School overall

  • Lighthouse (5 green, 6 yellow, 1 red)
    • High school needs improvement.
  • Lodestar (4 green, 2 yellow, 6 red)
    • Lower Lodestar grades and High School need improvement.

Data by Demographic Groups

  • Latinx students return at a rate of 91%
  • African American students return at a rate of 74.7%
  • Students with Disabilities return at a rate of 87.9%

90% or Above

85%- 89.9%

84.9% or Below

LCPS

87%

161 of 227

Board Update on Implementation Goal #4: Baseline Student Retention (By Grade at the Time)

Goal is to retain 90% of students annually

161

Lodestar

Lighthouse

Number Returning

Percentage

Number Returning

Percentage

K

27/38

71.1%

46/51

90.2%

1st

39/48

81.3%

47/48

98%

2nd

47/57

82.5%

48/55

87.3%

3rd

53/57

93%

51/54

94.4%

4th

51/59

86.4%

48/55

87.3%

5th

49/51

96.1%

50/53

94.3%

6th

75/82

90.2%

66/76

86.8%

7th

68/78

87.2%

72/81

88.9%

8th

69/76

90.8%

80/84

95.2%

9th

47/58

81.0%

70/78

89.7%

10th

56/75

74.7%

65/81

80.2%

11th

47/54

87%

70/79

88.6%

LH

89.6%

LS

85.1%

162 of 227

Board Update on Implementation Goal #4: Baseline Student Retention (District Summary)

Goal is to retain 90% of students annually

162

2023-2024 > 2024-2025

OVERALL

87.38%

LH K-5

92.3%

LH 6-8

90.5%

LH 9-12

86.1%

LS K-5

85.8%

LS 6-8

89.4%

LS 9-12

80.2%

District Summaries

Grades Green

9 / 24

37.5%

Grades Yellow

7 / 24

29.1%

Grades Red

7 / 24

29.1%

163 of 227

2024-25 Strategic Priority #3: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

163

First Semester - Board Presentations

First Semester - Staff Experiences

August

  • Initiative 3A: Launching Shared Classroom Walkthrough with all leadership teams, develop protocol + track baseline data
  • Initiative 3B: Launching cross-site collaboration on 8/28

September

  • Initiative 3B: Launching Teacher-Led Instructional Leadership Team Professional Development (every 2nd and 4th week of each grading cycle)
  • Initiative 3C and 3D: Begin Teacher Coaching cadences based on development needs

October

  • Board Update on Initiatives 3A and 3B

  • Initiative 3B: Launch Professional Development on TDEF Teaching and Engagement domains

November

  • Board Report on Baseline Measures Impact Goals 1, 2, and 4
  • Initiative 3B: Launch Professional Development on TDEF Intervention domains
  • Strategic Priority #3: All Staff Professional Development Institute ( 1 of 4)

December

  • Board Update on Initiatives 3A and 3B
  • Teacher Observation and Coaching Dashboard -
  • Implementation Goal 1 and 2: Launch Bi-Annual Staff Survey (2 of 2)

164 of 227

CEO Update for LCPS Board of Directors - 10.3.24

Strategic Priority 3: Update on Initiative 3A and 3B

164

165 of 227

Professional Development and Coaching Theory of Action

Implement and lead weekly walkthroughs

Directors of Academics

Principals and Assistant Principals will develop in identifying the highest leverage instructional needs more effectively resulting in improved TDEF scores.

(Priority: 1B, 1C, 1D)

Identify highest leverage academic and culture trends

School Principals

Coaching and professional development will be aligned and improve academic performance.

(Priority: 1B, 1C, 1D)

Execute individual coaching aligned to professional development and walkthrough skills

Assistant Principals

Staff will be aligned in vision and will have practiced how to teach more effectively multiple times prior to executing with students.

(Priority: 3A, 3B, 3C)

Implement practices from Professional development and coaching

Teachers

Teachers will feel more supported and successful as a result of improve student outcomes.

(Priority: 3A, 3B, 3C)

If

then

#3A - Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures

DRAFT

166 of 227

Current State of Professional Development and Coaching

166

  1. Taken Steps to Align Quality of Professional Development through
    1. Walkthrough Look Fors to support alignment in PD
    2. Professional Development Criteria for Success
    3. Providing feedback on PD to school leaders
    4. Turn Key Template

  • Individual intensive coaching when applicable.

  • Launched a Central Location for all Professional Development to be housed

Current State

  1. Launch Aligned Professional Development Feedback

  • Provide Professional Development feedback aligned to the Criteria for Success

  • Observe coaching and get a baseline for “how effective coaching is supporting student outcomes and alignment to PD

  • Launch First Network Professional Development Experience (November 1st)

Next Steps

Data & Research

Survey Feedback Trends

  • K-5 staff have reported that PD this year has felt more actionable and able to be implemented immediately

  • 6-12 staff have reported that PD has been highly applicable as well as effective in building community.

167 of 227

168 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25

August 7 2024

169 of 227

August 7, 2024

Appendix: ROADMAPS

  • Strategic Priority 1:
  • Strategic Priority 2:
  • Strategic Priority 3:

170 of 227

Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

170

171 of 227

Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

171

Intended Impact Statements

172 of 227

Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

172

Impact Goals

173 of 227

Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

173

Implementation Goals

Initiatives

174 of 227

Strategic Priority #1: Rigorous, Student Centered Learning

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

174

Work Plan

175 of 227

2024-25 Strategic Priority #1: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

175

First Semester - Board Presentations

First Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations

August

  • Board Overview: Strategic Priority #1

  • Impact Goal 2: ELPAC initial testing (new multilingual learners)

  • Impact Goal 3: Beginning of Year Aimsweb Plus (K-5)

September

  • Implementation Goal 4: Initial Teacher Observations

October

  • Board Introduction to Curriculum Internalization; Initiative 1D
  • Board Update on Implementation Goal 4

  • Implementation goal 2 and 3: SBAC Interim Testing aligned to CAASSP (grades 3-11)

November

  • Board Update on Interim Testing (from October)
  • Board Update on Initiatives 1B and 1D

December

  • Board Report on CORE Districts and CDE School Dashboards (from 2023-24 SY) Baseline Measures Impact Goals 1, 2, and 4
  • Impact Goal 3: Mid Year Aimsweb Plus (K-5)

176 of 227

2024-25 Strategic Priority #1: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

176

Second Semester - Board Presentations

Second Semester - Student Assessments / Teacher Observations

January

  • Board Mid Year Update: Strategic Priority #1

February

  • Board Introduction to Crew: Initiative 1A
  • Implementation goal 2 and 3: SBAC Interim Testing aligned to CAASSP (grades 3-11)

  • Impact Goal 2: ELPAC summative testing (all multilingual learners)

March

  • Board Update on Interim Testing (from February)

  • Implementation Goal 4: Initial Teacher Observations

April / May

  • Board Update on Implementation Goal 4 (Teacher Observation)
  • Impact Goal 3:Impact Goal 1, 2, and 4: Summative CAASSP
  • Impact Goal 3: End of Year Aimsweb Plus (K-5)

June

  • Board End of Year Update: Strategic Priority #1
  • Board Update on Impact Goal 1 (if available)

177 of 227

178 of 227

Strategic Priority #2: Multi-Generational Opportunities

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

178

179 of 227

By 2028, we will

enhance multi-generational opportunities

as a model community school

Strategic Priority #2: Multi-Generational Opportunities

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

179

Intended Impact Statements

We will welcome all students daily to joyful, inclusive, and anti-racist spaces for learning

We will amplify strong and enduring community partnerships in order to maximize access to - and enrichment of - learning

We will prepare all students for a opportunity-rich future through college and career readiness

We will build enduring advocacy and investment in our community through strategic parent and alumni empowerment efforts

180 of 227

Strategic Priority #2: Multi-Generational Opportunities

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

180

Impact Goals

181 of 227

Strategic Priority #2: Multi-Generational Opportunities

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

181

Implementation Goals

Initiatives

Priority #2 Implementation Goals

  • 85% staff agree that decision-making process is done in a timely and inclusive manner as measured by a biannual staff survey (2a)
  • 90%+ of staff participate in LCPS biannual survey and 75% agree that communication is timely and inclusive (2a, 2b)
  • 50 families participate in decision making groups (ELAC, SSC) per school (2c)
  • 90% of students return to LCPS YoY as measured by annual student retention data (2c)
  • 80% of students/families who have received services from community partners agree the support was effective (2d)

182 of 227

Strategic Priority #2: Multi-Generational Opportunities

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

182

Work Plan

183 of 227

2024-25 Strategic Priority #2: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

183

First Semester - Board Presentations

First Semester - Student, Family, and Community Events

Monthly

  • Note: CEO Monthly Updates will have data progress on Impact Goals 2 and 3 (Chronic Absenteeism and Suspension Rates)

September

  • Board Overview: Strategic Priority #1

  • Initiative 2A and 2B: LCPS Leadership Meeting (1 of 6)
  • Impact Goal 4: Student Led Conferences (1 of 3)
  • Initiative 2C: Parent Advisory Committee Meeting (SSC/ELAC) (1 of 3)

October

  • Board Update on Initiative 2B and 2C, including OUSD Charter Renewal Update
  • Board Update on Implementation Goal #4: Baseline student retention from 2023-24

November

  • Board Update on Initiative 2A and 2C, including OUSD Charter Renewal Update
  • Initiative 2A and 2B: LCPS Leadership Meeting (2 of 6)
  • Implementation Goal 1 and 2: Launch Bi-Annual Staff Survey (1 of 2)

December

  • Board Report on CORE Districts and CDE School Dashboards (from 2023-24 SY) Baseline Measures Impact Goals 1, including CCI indicator, college matriculation from class of 2024 and preliminary college application process.
  • Initiative 2A and 2B: LCPS Leadership Meeting (3 of 6)
  • Impact Goal 4: Student Led Conferences (2 of 3)

184 of 227

2024-25 Strategic Priority #2: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

184

Second Semester - Board Presentations

Second Semester - Student, Family, and Community Events

January

  • Board Mid Year Update: Strategic Priority #2

  • Initiative 2C: Parent Advisory Committee Meeting (SSC/ELAC) (2 of 3)

February

  • Board Presentation: Launching our Charter Renewal Family Engagement Strategy (Part 1 of 2) Initiative 2B and 2C
  • Initiative 2A and 2B: LCPS Leadership Meeting (4 of 6)
  • Initiative 2C: Launch of “Lit for Literacy” partnership with Families In Action

March

  • Board Presentation: Launching our Charter Renewal Family Engagement Strategy (Part 2 of 2) Initiative 2B and 2C

  • Initiative 2A and 2B: LCPS Leadership Meeting (5 of 6)
  • Impact Goal 4: Student Led Conferences (3 of 3)
  • Implementation Goal 1 and 2: Launch Bi-Annual Staff Survey (2 of 2)

April / May

  • Board Update on Implementation Goal 1: College decisions update, FAFSA completion data, and Anticipated College Career Index and Graduation rate
  • Initiative 2C: Parent Advisory Committee Meeting (3 of 3) (SSC/ELAC), Annual Family and Student survey

June

  • Board End of Year Update: Strategic Priority #2
  • Board Update on Impact Goal 1, 2, 3, and 4 and Implementation Goals and share results from family/student survey and annual family engagement data.
  • Initiative 2A and 2B: LCPS Leadership Meeting (6 of 6)

185 of 227

186 of 227

Strategic Priority #3: Investing in our Educators and Leaders

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

186

187 of 227

By 2028, we will

deeply invest in our educators and leaders -

our greatest asset

Strategic Priority #3: Investing in our Educators and Leaders

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

187

Intended Impact Statements

We will recruit and retain teachers and leaders who are committed to and reflective of our community

We will deliver the world-class professional development and coaching that our teachers and leaders deserve

We will foster a collaborative and cohesive leadership team that removes barriers for, supports, and celebrates its teachers

We will grow and strengthen our teacher and leadership pipelines

188 of 227

Strategic Priority #3: Investing in our Educators and Leaders

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

188

Impact Goals

189 of 227

Strategic Priority #3: Investing in our Educators and Leaders

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

189

Implementation Goals

Initiatives

Priority #3 Implementation Goals

  • 90% of teachers and instructional leaders are rated skillful or higher on the TDEF / LDEF (3a, 3b, 3c)
  • 90% of staff participate in 90% of PD structures (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) (3b, 3c)
  • 85% of staff agree each PD structure (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) is effective and purposeful in driving academic progress as measured by biannual staff survey (3b)
  • 80% of coaches and managers are effective as measured by a coaching rubric or the People Management domain of the Leader Effectiveness tool (3d)

190 of 227

Strategic Priority #3: Investing in our Educators and Leaders

Update for LCPS Board of Directors

190

Work Plan

191 of 227

2024-25 Strategic Priority #3: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

191

First Semester - Board Presentations

First Semester - Staff Experiences

August

  • Initiative 3A: Launching Shared Classroom Walkthrough with all leadership teams, develop protocol + track baseline data
  • Initiative 3B: Launching cross-site collaboration on 8/28

September

  • Initiative 3B: Launching Teacher-Led Instructional Leadership Team Professional Development (every 2nd and 4th week of each grading cycle)
  • Initiative 3C and 3D: Begin Teacher Coaching cadences based on development needs

October

  • Board Update on Initiatives 3A and 3B

  • Initiative 3B: Launch Professional Development on TDEF Teaching and Engagement domains

November

  • Board Report on Baseline Measures Impact Goals 1, 2, and 4
  • Initiative 3B: Launch Professional Development on TDEF Intervention domains
  • Strategic Priority #3: All Staff Professional Development Institute ( 1 of 4)

December

  • Board Update on Initiatives 3A and 3B
  • Teacher Observation and Coaching Dashboard -
  • Implementation Goal 1 and 2: Launch Bi-Annual Staff Survey (2 of 2)

192 of 227

2024-25 Strategic Priority #3: Timeline Overview

Month to Month - where we are headed!

192

Second Semester - Board Presentations

Second Semester - Staff Experiences

January

  • Board Mid Year Update: Strategic Priority #3
  • Strategic Priority #3: All Staff Professional Development Institute (2 of 4)

February

  • Board Update on Initiatives 3A and 3B
  • Strategic Priority #3: All Staff Professional Development Institute (3 of 4)

March

  • Board Update on Initiatives 3C

  • Implementation Goal 1 and 2: Launch Bi-Annual Staff Survey (2 of 2)

April / May

  • Board Update on Staff Intent to Return Process

  • Strategic Priority #3: All Staff Professional Development Institute (4 of 4)

June

  • Board End of Year Update: Strategic Priority #2
  • Board Update on Impact Goal 1, 2, 3, and 4 and Implementation Goals and share results from family/student survey and annual family engagement data.

193 of 227

194 of 227

LCPS Strategic Plan Update - 2024-25

June 2024

195 of 227

June, 2024

Appendix: LCPS Strategic Plan

196 of 227

Lighthouse Community Public Schools

Strategic Planning

Updated May 16, 2024

196

197 of 227

197

Strategic Plan: Table of Contents

Who Are We

  • Mission, Vision, and Core Values
  • Student Demographics
  • Graduate Profile

Where Are We Now

  • Network Strengths
  • Emerging Growth Areas

Where We Are Going

  • Intended Impact Statement & Goals
  • Strategic Priorities, Initiatives, & Implementation Goals

How We Will Get There

  • Implementation Plan
  • Recommended Next Steps

Appendix

198 of 227

Executive Summary

  • Lighthouse Community Public Schools is deeply committed to transforming the landscape of education. Serving a student population that has been historically underserved by the traditional school system in Oakland, LCPS knows that an exceptional education brings out each child’s unique light and potential, but that inequity in public schools severely limits the potential of students, their families, and the future of Oakland.
  • LCPS has numerous successes and strengths to celebrate, including an emphasis on building and maintaining strong relationships across students, families, and staff; a robust approach to talent recruitment and staff retention; and the selection of rigorous and reputable curricula.
  • LCPS also has several areas of improvement to address, including strengthening an aligned vision for curriculum implementation and instructional best practices; enhancing professional development and coaching supports for staff; and refining decision making and communication structures across stakeholders.
  • To address these areas of opportunity, LCPS set quantitative goals to define its intended impact for students, families, staff, and the organization as a whole over the next 4 years
  • Aligned to these goals, LCPS has identified 3 strategic priorities to guide its work:
  • All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day
  • Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school through shared power, voice, and trust
  • All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

198

199 of 227

A committed team of LCPS leaders led the development of this strategic plan

199

Advisory Committee

Member

Role

Belen Orozco

Director of Operations

Cody Marshall

Lodestar K-5 Principal

Dominique Hayes

Lodestar High School Assistant Principal of Culture

Erin Wesseldine

Senior Director of Special Education & Specialized Programs

Joshua Weintraub

Director of College and Career

Kelly Norris

Lighthouse Middle School Assistant Principal of Instruction

Miriam Vasquez

Director of Student Services

Shaina Hurley

Lighthouse K-5 Principal

Maiyanna Barron

Lighthouse Elementary School Assistant Principal of Culture

Steering Committee

Member

Role

Rich Harrison

Chief Executive Officer

Megan Bacigalupi

Chief of Staff

Tina Hernandez

Chief Academic Officer

Anna Martin

Chief Operating Officer

The Steering Committee met weekly to make key strategic planning decisions and build/review content and tools associated with the plan

The Advisory Committee - which also included members from the Steering Committee - met for two intensive working sessions to review important content, brainstorm solutions, and make recommendations to inform decision-making

200 of 227

200

Focus Groups

(2 student, 6 teacher, and

2 parent groups)

1:1 Stakeholder Interviews

(20 individual interviews)

LCPS Team Self-Assessment

Classroom Observations

(22 classrooms, all schools)

Student Achievement Data

Internal Data & Artifacts

The strategic planning process leveraged a variety of inputs to form an opinion on overall strengths and opportunities for growth

201 of 227

201

Strategic Plan: Table of Contents

Who Are We

  • Mission, Vision, and Core Values
  • Graduate Profile
  • Student Demographics

Where Are We Now

  • Network Strengths
  • Emerging Growth Areas

Where We Are Going

  • Intended Impact Statement & Goals
  • Strategic Priorities, Initiatives, & Implementation Goals

How We Will Get There

  • Implementation Plan
  • Recommended Next Steps

Appendix

202 of 227

Mission:

The mission of Lighthouse Community Public Schools is to prepare a diverse K-12 student population for college and a career of their choice.

Vision:

We believe that all young people have the potential to become lifelong changemakers who realize their unique vision—rooted in their identity, knowledge, and skills—to create equity in their own lives and in the community, leading to a healthier, more joyful world. We are an innovative model for public education that puts each child at the center of their own learning. The Lighthouse community is equal parts love and rigor where children discover their unique light within.

202

For 22 years, LCPS’ has served the East Oakland community with a mission and vision rooted in equity, rigor, and love for its young people

203 of 227

203

LCPS currently serves 1,600+ students; over 96% are either Black or Latinx

204 of 227

204

LCPS aims to cultivate a unique set of knowledge, skills, habits, and mindsets through an inspiring graduate profile

Purposeful and Self-Aware

  • Develop and take pride in identities
  • Cultivate interests and career objectives
  • Set, monitor, and achieve goals

Academically Proficient

  • Demonstrate disciplinary literacy
  • Produce high-quality work
  • Persist in solving authentic problems

Relationship Builder

  • Show empathy and resolve conflicts
  • Collaborate effectively with diverse people
  • Develop and maintain physical and emotional health

Independent Lifelong Learner

  • Use agency to lead own learning
  • Reflect and seek feedback
  • Demonstrate stamina and persistence

Committed to Service & Justice

  • Advocate for self and others
  • Demonstrate leadership
  • Interrupt privilege and the status quo

205 of 227

205

…that has resulted in LCPS’ students achieving a level of postsecondary success that helps redefine what’s possible in East Oakland

206 of 227

206

LCPS is nearing the end of a 3-year LCAP cycle focused on five organizational goals across categories of quality, culture, and impact

QUALITY

All students,

every day.

Priority #1: Educational Justice and Excellence: Dramatically improve the quality of our academic program, address disproportionate performance by student subgroups and achieve non-racialized outcomes of our academic program through System-Wide Tools and Processes and Teacher, Leader, and Staff Development.

CULTURE

All Belong.

All take responsibility

for equity.

Priority #2: Culture of Shared Responsibility for Equitable Outcomes: Create a high performing team culture grounded in equitable outcomes and develop yearly Action Plans grounded in our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Pillars and Commitments and LCPS Board Resolution to Promote Equity and Anti-Racism and combat Anti-Blackness.

IMPACT

All in.

In Oakland.

Priority #3: Powerful Community Engagement: Build community, stronger relationships, and political presence in our Oakland Community, shared leadership and decision making with our students, families, and staff through effective decision making processes and formal structures, including School Site Councils (SSC/ELAC), and follow through on our material revision to serve our community’s students and families that qualify for McKinney Vento

Priority #4: Strong and Sustainable Operational, Technology, and Financial Models: Ensure strong, sustainable support of LCPS schools, staff, and families.

Priority #5: College and Career Readiness: Dramatically increase the number of College and Career ready students as measured by A-G completion, 4 year college acceptance, dual credit completion, and cohort college persistence/6 yr graduation rates.

207 of 227

207

Strategic Plan: Table of Contents

Who Are We

  • Mission, Vision, and Core Values
  • Graduate Profile
  • Student Demographics

Where Are We Now

  • Network Strengths
  • Emerging Growth Areas

Where We Are Going

  • Intended Impact Statement & Goals
  • Strategic Priorities, Initiatives, & Implementation Goals

How We Will Get There

  • Implementation Plan
  • Recommended Next Steps

Appendix

208 of 227

208

Outcomes: academic performance, student / adult culture, talent, and leadership

Common factors considered across all components: Org Mission, Vision, Core Values, Commitment to DEI

Academics

Network & School Culture

Talent

Leadership

Community Engagement

Governance

Operations

Finance

Strategic Planning

C

O

M

P

O

N

E

N

T

S

Program Vision & Design

Culture Vision & Expectations

Talent Philosophy

Org Roles & Responsibilities

Family �Engagement

Board Membership & Composition

Technology

Financial Planning & Forecasting

Long-Term Planning

Curriculum

Positive Relationships

Recruitment, Hiring, & Onboarding Practices

Decision- Making Structures

Community Partnerships

Board Governance Structures

Data Systems & Processes

Budgeting Tools & Processes

Annual Planning

Instruction

Community Building Practices

Professional Development & Coaching

Meeting Structures

Strategic Oversight

Physical Environment

Fundraising Capacity

Data and Assessment

Non-Academic Skill Building

Staff Collaboration

Internal & External Communications

Board Culture

Daily Building Logistics

Response to Intervention / MTSS

Restorative/ Discipline Practices

Evaluation, Retention & Promotion

Distributed Leadership

Student �Recruitment & Enrollment

Student Supports

7

5

6

8

9

LCPS assessed its current state across nine dimensions of school health and performance - with a focus on the first four

1

2

3

4

209 of 227

209

Relationships

  • Students at both campuses spoke highly of relationships with peers, specifically noting the K-12 environment results in students “feeling like family”
  • Many students referenced relationships with teachers as a highlight that makes LCPS different from other schools
  • Teachers and staff recognized the sense of community amongst the team, referring to colleagues as “close knit”
  • Teachers also named staff knowledge of students and families as a strength of the organization

Talent Strategy: Recruitment

  • Talent strategy has been developed with priority emphasis on people development, performance management, retention, and career pathways
  • LCPS has demonstrated a commitment to hiring a large, diverse staff at both teacher and leader levels, and an effort to promote from within
  • LCPS is implementing a grow-your-own program to support local talent to become teachers
  • LCPS recently conducted a robust salary study and engaged the board to increase staff salaries in an effort to in an effort to attract and retain high quality educators

Curriculum Selection

  • LCPS has adopted curricula that are rigorous and reputable, equity-centered, and include high quality instructional materials
  • Research-based phonics instruction is embedded into LCPS’ early literacy approach
  • Interim assessments (e.g. CAASPP interims) are implemented with a high degree of fidelity across the organization
  • In classroom observations, Lighthouse K-5 stood out as a positive proof point for using curriculum with fidelity across grade levels

The assessment elevated numerous strengths within and across LCPS schools

210 of 227

LCPS’ recent hiring data exemplifies how these strengths translate to concrete and meaningful outcomes

210

At LCPS, nearly 70% of teachers and 80% of all staff identify as BIPOC -

with 45% identifying as Black or Latinx

211 of 227

211

Curriculum Implementation & Instruction

  • Curriculum Implementation: While strong curricular materials have been selected for the network, campuses were inconsistent with usage, understanding, and internalization of curriculum; leaders and teachers cited the need for training on curricular materials
  • Instructional Quality: Varying degrees of instructional quality were observed, specifically in the effectiveness of lesson facilitation and implementation of focal instructional strategies (e.g., time-saving procedures, checks for understanding, and academic monitoring)
  • Instructional Strategies: Leaders named classroom discourse as a stated instructional priority, however only 25% of classrooms were observed implementing classroom discourse strategies
  • Crew Implementation: Missed opportunities to align culture and instruction were observed; school leaders identified the inconsistencies of Crew implementation as a contributing factor

Professional Development & Coaching

  • Organizational Priorities: Organizational goals and priorities were not consistently evident in observations or conversations with staff
  • Development Structures: While development structures are in place (e.g., PD, PLCs, coaching), school leaders described a lack of cohesiveness in collectively driving towards organizational priorities
  • Development Effectiveness: Varying degrees of quality and fidelity to implementation of the structures were observed; many referenced the deprioritization of development structures due to crisis management, insufficient time to accommodate the high demand for coaching, and/or a lack of effectiveness in the execution of development structures

Decision Making & Internal Communication

  • Vertical Decision Making Structures: There was not evidence of a clear decision making structure that defines and balances the need for network-wide consistency with school-specific needs; leaders described decision-making as “top down” and “one-size-fits-all”, in some cases leading to a breakdown of trust
  • Horizontal Decision Making Structures: Conversations revealed limited structures to support departmental collaboration for making inclusive organizational decisions, particularly regarding academic matters; for example, the academics team may have little to no input in other departmental decisions or in initiatives that directly impact academic programming
  • Internal Communication: Leaders cited untimely and fragmented communication stemming from ineffective decision-making structures

Several important growth areas across LCPS also emerged

212 of 227

212

We believe that focusing on these opportunity areas will help LCPS address gaps in current achievement results, in ELA and math

In ELA, both Lighthouse and Lodestar perform below CA and OUSD averages; 11th grade at Lighthouse, however, is strong positive outlier

In math, Lighthouse and Lodestar perform mostly below CA and OUSD averages, with concerning performance in 4th, 7th, 8th, and 11th grades

213 of 227

213

Strategic Plan: Table of Contents

Who Are We

  • Mission, Vision, and Core Values
  • Graduate Profile
  • Student Demographics

Where Are We Now

  • Network Strengths
  • Emerging Growth Areas

Where We Are Going

  • Intended Impact Statement & Goals
  • Strategic Priorities, Initiatives, & Implementation Goals

How We Will Get There

  • Implementation Plan
  • Recommended Next Steps

Appendix

214 of 227

214

LCPS engaged in the creation of a 4-yr strategic plan, beginning with a clear articulation of what impact it seeks to have by the end of the plan

Strategic Priority #1

Strategic Priority #2

Strategic Priority #3

4-Yr Intended Impact Statement & Goals

LCPS graduates are independent lifelong learners, purposeful & self-aware, academically proficient, relationship-builders, and committed to service & justice

1

2

3

VISION

MISSION

VALUES

Priority #1 Implementation Goals

Priority #2 Implementation Goals

Priority #3 Implementation Goals

5

Strategic Priorities: Major categories of work that will accelerate LCPS towards its intended impact goals

Initiatives: Smaller workstreams that break down each strategic priority into more concrete action steps

Graduate Profile: The long-term skills, habits, & mindsets LCPS seeks to instill in graduates

3

4

Priority Implementation Goals: The specific, measurable, and time-bound outcomes that define success for each priority over the four years

5

1

4-Yr Intended Impact Statement & Goals: High-level qualitative and quantitative description of the mission-aligned impact LCPS seeks to have by 2028

2

Initiative 1A

Initiative 1B

4

Initiative 1C

Initiative 1D

Initiative 2A

Initiative 2B

Initiative 2C

Initiative 2D

Initiative 3A

Initiative 3B

Initiative 3C

Initiative 3D

215 of 227

215

By 2028, Lighthouse Community Public Schools will be a beacon of academic excellence in East Oakland and beyond, serving as a model of community-centered educational justice

for 1700+ Black and Brown TK-12 students and families.

strengthening multi-generational opportunities as a

model community school…

ensuring rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students…

…and deeply investing in

our educators and leaders

- our greatest asset.

We will do this by…

An intended impact statement was created to define success

216 of 227

By 2028, we will

ensure rigorous, student-centered learning

in all classrooms, for all students

216

We will exceed the CA state average in math and ELA proficiency

We will diagnose, differentiate, and accelerate academic growth through tiered supports for all students

We will drive consistent english language development for emerging bilingual students - especially our newcomers and earliest learners

We will provide exemplar supports for students with disabilities, especially those requiring more intensive services

217 of 227

By 2028, we will

strengthen multi-generational opportunities

as a model community school

217

We will welcome all students daily to joyful, inclusive, and anti-racist spaces for learning

We will better prepare all students for an opportunity-rich future through an exemplary TK program and robust college and career readiness supports

We will amplify strong and enduring community partnerships in order to maximize access to - and enrichment of - learning

We will build enduring advocacy and investment in our community through strategic parent and alumni empowerment efforts

218 of 227

By 2028, we will

deeply invest in our educators and leaders -

our greatest asset

218

We will recruit and retain educators and leaders who are committed to and reflective of our community

We will deliver the world-class professional development and coaching that our educators and leaders deserve

We will foster a collaborative and cohesive leadership team that removes barriers for, supports, and celebrates its educators

We will grow and strengthen our educator and leadership pathways

219 of 227

219

To accompany this qualitative picture of success, LCPS developed a set of quantitative intended impact goals

Intended Impact Category

Potential 4-yr Intended Impact Goals (to achieve by 2028)

Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning in all classrooms, for all students

In grades 3-8 and 11, LCPS students’ ELA and math proficiency rates meet or exceed the CA state average, both in the aggregate and across all student groups

60% of Emerging Bilingual students advance at least 1 EPLI level or maintain a level 4

85% of 2nd grade students are in the 25th percentile or higher on the Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) portion of AimsWeb (equivalent to 6% growth annually off of 2024 baseline)

Students with disabilities, on average, exceed the CA SWD average on CAASPP scale score growth

Strengthen multi-generational opportunities as a model community school

95% of LCPS graduates either enroll in a 2- or 4-yr college/university or are employed within a technical career/pathway upon graduation

Reduce chronic absenteeism rates to less than 15% by 2028.

Reduce suspension rates across all student groups to <1.5% for at least 2 consecutive years

90%+ families attend at least 2 school sponsored events/workshops annually

Deeply invest in our educators and leaders

- our greatest asset

On average, retain 85%+ educators and leaders YoY with <10% variance across sites

Maintain >75% of LCPS staff identifying as BIPOC

LCPS career pathways account for 30-40% of teacher, leader, and student support staff

Across all demographic groups, 80% of staff are “engaged” according to LCPS internal survey

220 of 227

Throughout this process, LCPS sought to honor and align efforts with OUSD’s strategic plan and the broader community schools movement

220

Deeply invest in our teachers and leaders - our greatest asset

Ensure rigorous, student-centered learning

in all classrooms, for all students

Enhance multi-generational opportunity pathways as a model community school

221 of 227

221

To achieve its overall intended impact and goals, LCPS articulated 3 strategic priorities and aligned initiatives to focus its work

Strategic Priority #1

Strategic Priority #2

Strategic Priority #3

4-Yr Intended Impact Statement & Goals

LCPS graduates are independent lifelong learners, purposeful & self-aware, academically proficient, relationship-builders, and committed to service & justice

1

2

3

VISION

MISSION

VALUES

Priority #1 Implementation Goals

Priority #2 Implementation Goals

Priority #3 Implementation Goals

5

Strategic Priorities: Major categories of work that will accelerate LCPS towards its intended impact goals

Initiatives: Smaller workstreams that break down each strategic priority into more concrete action steps

Graduate Profile: The long-term skills, habits, & mindsets LCPS seeks to instill in graduates

3

4

Priority Implementation Goals: The specific, measurable, and time-bound outcomes that define success for each priority over the four years

5

1

4-Yr Intended Impact Statement & Goals: High-level qualitative and quantitative description of the mission-aligned impact LCPS seeks to have by 2028

2

Initiative 1A

Initiative 1B

4

Initiative 1C

Initiative 1D

Initiative 2A

Initiative 2B

Initiative 2C

Initiative 2D

Initiative 3A

Initiative 3B

Initiative 3C

Initiative 3D

222 of 227

222

Here are the detailed initiatives & implementation goals for Strategic Priority #1

Strategic Priority #1

All students deeply engage in high-quality curriculum and learning experiences, every day

Initiative 1B:

Our teachers, leaders, and families are united in a vision for academic excellence for all students in all classrooms

Priority #1 Implementation Goals

  • 90% of teachers effectively implement curriculum (Crew + content) with fidelity as measured by a classroom walkthrough tool (1A)
  • X% of students per grade are meeting/exceeding standards on CAASSP interims for Math (1B, 1C, 1D); varies by grade
  • 80% of students demonstrate scale score improvement (50 points+) on interims for ELA and Math (1B, 1C, 1D)
  • 90% of teachers are effective relative to target indicators in Domain 1 and 2; 70% in Domain 3, 4, and 5 for Q1, Q2, Q4 and Q4 as measured by instructional excellence rubric (TDEF/LDEF) (1B, 1C, 1D)

Initiative 1C:

Our teachers leverage research-based, content-specific instructional visions & aligned practices

Initiative 1D:

Our teachers authentically internalize high-quality instructional materials daily & our leaders ensure equity in student experiences across all classrooms through systems of support & accountability

Initiative 1A:

Our team will create an environment in which all feel safe, respected, and bring their authentic selves through consistent implementation of the Crew framework

223 of 227

223

Here are the detailed initiatives & implementation goals for Strategic Priority #2

Strategic Priority #2

Students, families, community partners, and staff collectively contribute to a thriving community school

through shared power, voice, and trust

Initiative 2A:

Our leaders codify a collaborative leadership approach with a clear network model, meeting structure, and inclusive decision-making process

Priority #2 Implementation Goals

  • 85% staff agree that decision-making process is done in a timely and inclusive manner as measured by a biannual staff survey (2a)
  • 90%+ of staff participate in LCPS biannual survey and 75% agree that communication is timely and inclusive (2a, 2b)
  • 50 families participate in decision making groups (ELAC, SSC) per school (2c)
  • 90% of students return to LCPS YoY as measured by annual student retention data (2c)
  • 80% of students/families who have received services from community partners agree the support was effective (2d)

Initiative 2B:

Our leaders establish a timely and inclusive communications strategy that empowers diverse stakeholders and leads to collective action

Initiative 2C:

Our students and families experience multiple and varied opportunities to shape key decisions and see evidence that their voice is heard and valued

Initiative 2D:

Our community partners provide services and supports, and opportunities aligned to the needs of our students and families

224 of 227

224

Here are the detailed initiatives & implementation goals for Strategic Priority #3

Strategic Priority #3

All staff members experience the clear, coherent, and world-class professional development and coaching they deserve

Initiative 3A:

Our team is unified in a clear and coherent purpose and theory of action for professional development and coaching structures

Priority #3 Implementation Goals

  • X% of teachers and instructional leaders are rated skillful or higher on the TDEF / LDEF, respectively (3a, 3b, 3c)
  • 90% of staff participate in 90% of PD structures (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) (3b, 3c)
  • 85% of staff agree each PD structure (PD, PLCs, coaching, etc.) is effective and purposeful in driving academic progress as measured by biannual staff survey (3b)
  • 80% of coaches and managers are effective as measured by a coaching rubric or the People Management domain of the Leader Effectiveness tool (3d)

Initiative 3B:

Our team experiences professional development aligns to our organizational priorities and honors the diverse needs of our team

Initiative 3C:

Our team participates in a clear and consistent org-wide coaching structure that balances coaching capacity with development needs

Initiative 3D:

Our team experiences high quality coaching through research-based coaching protocols and emerging technologies to develop and sustain educators

225 of 227

225

Strategic Plan: Table of Contents

Who Are We

  • Mission, Vision, and Core Values
  • Graduate Profile
  • Student Demographics

Where Are We Now

  • Network Strengths
  • Emerging Growth Areas

Where We Are Going

  • Intended Impact Statement & Goals
  • Strategic Priorities, Initiatives, & Implementation Goals

How We Will Get There

  • Implementation Timeline
  • Recommended Next Steps

Appendix

226 of 227

The work to implement the strategic plan is sequenced by initiative over the next four years

226

Initiative

Initiative Shorthand

2024-25

2025-26

2026-27

2027-28

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

1A

Crew implementation

1B

Vision for instruction

1C

Instructional strategies

1D

Curriculum internalization

2A

Decision-making

2B

Comms strategy

2C

Student & family voice

2D

Community partners

3A

PD Theory of Action

3B

PD structure

3C

Coaching structure

3D

Coaching efficacy

227 of 227

Over the next 3 months, LCPS will focus on finalizing and communicating this plan

227

Finalize the Plan

Communicate the Plan

  • Finalize all metrics to include numerical goal targets
  • Finalize any outstanding measuring tools (e.g. Internal Eval doc)
  • Review and modify the implementation timeline as necessary
  • Draft plan, priority, and initiative ownership using the template on the first tab of the implementation tracker
  • Refine goals when EOY data comes back and set annual benchmarks towards intended impact goals
  • Consider other strategic priorities outside of the domain of Bellwether’s work (e.g. org / financial sustainability) and embed into the plan
  • Review all revisions with the Advisory Committee
  • Present the implementation timeline to the Advisory Committee and seek input
  • Communicate priority and initiative ownership and action plans for each priority
  • Communicate plan to board, families, team, etc.