1 of 63

Immunological techniques in Diagnosis

M. Dankyau

June 2023

2 of 63

  • Based on WHO Laboratory training for Field Epidemiologists

3 of 63

Outline

  • Introduction
  • Antigen-Antibody detection
  • Advanced techniques
  • Application implications
  • Discussion
  • Summary
  • Conclusion

4 of 63

Introduction

5 of 63

6 of 63

The Diagnostic-Therapeutic Cycle: A Simplified View

Patient

Data collection:

-History

-Physical examinations

-Laboratory and other tests

Decision

making

Planning

Information

Diagnosis/assessment

Therapyplan

Data

7 of 63

Brief history of antibodies

  • Study of antibodies began in 1890 when Emil von Behring and Shibasaburo Kitasato described antibody activity against diphtheria and tetanus toxins.
  • Behring and Kitasato put forward the theory of humoral immunity, proposing that a mediator in serum could react with a foreign antigen.

8 of 63

Brief history of antibodies 2

  • 1891: Term “Antikörper” coined by Paul Ehrlich
    • Substance in the blood that confers immunity
    • "if two substances give rise to two different antikörper, then they themselves must be different”
    • “Lock-and-Key” theory
  • 1920’s: Heidelberger and Avery identified antibodies as proteins
  • 1940’s: Linus Pauling confirms lock-and-key theory

9 of 63

Brief history of antibodies 23

  • 1948:Immunoprecipitation: use of antibodies for detection
  • 1956: Glick and Chang- Bursa of Fabricius: Antibodies come from B cells
  • 1962: Rodney Porter elucidated the structure of antibody gammaglobulin (IgG)
  • 1976: Hozumi and Tonegawa, antibody gene rearrangement

10 of 63

Useful characteristics of antibodies

  • Epitope: the portion of an antigen that makes contact with a particular antibody or T cell receptor
  • Specificity: Ability to recognize individual epitopes
  • Cross-reactivity:
    • Ability to bind to more than one epitope
    • Shared epitopes between different antigens

11 of 63

Epitope

12 of 63

Useful characteristics of antibodies 2

  • Strength of binding:
    • Affinity: Strength of binding between Fab and epitope
    • Avidity: Overall strength of binding of serum and antigen

13 of 63

14 of 63

Antigen-Antibody reactions

15 of 63

Antibody specificity

Good: recognize and identify related antigens

Bad: Confuse one antigen with a related antigen

16 of 63

Antibody types

  • Polyclonal antibodies:
    • Isolated from immune serum
    • Many different idiotypes
    • Recognize many different epitopes
      • Strong avidity
      • Highly sensitive
    • Cross reactive: Less specific
  • Monoclonal antibodies:
    • Single idiotype
    • Single epitope
    • Highly specific
    • Lower avidity

17 of 63

Immunological assays

  • Diagnostic:
    • Assay for antigen
    • Assay for antibody

  • Research:
    • Identify cells
    • Identify cell products
    • Isolate cells or macromolecules
    • Assay cell function

18 of 63

Examples

Diagnostic assays

  • Hemagglutination
  • Hemagglutination inhibition
  • Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
  • Radioimmunoassay (RIA)
  • Immunofluorescent assay (IFA)

Research techniques

  • ELISA
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Flow cytometry
  • Cell sorting
  • ELIspot
  • Immunoblot
  • Immunoprecipitation
  • Mixed lymphocyte response
  • Chromium release assay

19 of 63

� �Antigen and antibody detection�

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

20 of 63

Detection

  • Detection of antigen-antibody complex
  • Antigen-antibody complex requires specific conditions
    • temperature
    • pH
  • Complex may be directly visible or invisible

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

21 of 63

Detection

Directly visible – agglutination

Invisible

  • requires specific probes (enzyme-labelled anti-immunoglobulin, isotope-labelled anti-immunoglobulin, etc.)
  • binds Ag-Ab complex and amplifies signals
  • signals can be measured by naked eyes or specific equipment e.g. ELISA, RIA, IFA

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

22 of 63

Methods for Ag-Ab detection

  • Precipitation
  • Agglutination
  • Hemagglutination and hemagglutination inhibition
  • Viral neutralization test

  • Radio-immunoassays
  • ELISA
  • Immunofluorescence
  • Immunoblotting
  • Immunochromatography

23 of 63

Precipitation

Principle

    • soluble antigen combines with its specific antibody
    • antigen-antibody complex is too large to stay in solution and precipitates

Examples

    • flocculation test
    • immuno-diffusion test
    • counter-immuno-electrophoresis (CIEP)

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

24 of 63

Flocculation test �(precipitation reaction)

Principle

    • precipitate, a concentrate of fine particles, is usually visible (macroscopically or microscopically) because the precipitated product is forced to remain suspended

Examples

    • VDRL slide flocculation test
    • RPR card test
    • Kahn’s test for syphilis

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

25 of 63

Flocculation test �(A precipitation reaction)

RPR card test

(1) Non Reactive (2) Weakly Reactive (3,4) Reactive

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

26 of 63

Precipitation: Performance, applications

  • Advantages
    • sensitive for antigen detection
  • Limited applications
  • Time taken - 10 minutes

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

27 of 63

Direct agglutination

Principle

  • combination of an insoluble particulate antigen with its soluble antibody
    • forms antigen-antibody complex
    • particles clump/agglutinate
  • used for antigen detection

Examples

    • bacterial agglutination tests for sero-typing and sero-grouping e.g., Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella spp

Positive Negative

Ag-Ab complex

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

28 of 63

Passive (indirect) agglutination

Principle

    • precipitation reaction converted into agglutination - coating antigen onto the surface of carrier particles like red blood cells, latex, gelatin, bentonite
      • background clears

Examples of types

    • latex agglutination
    • co-agglutination
    • passive hemagglutination (treated red blood cells made resistant)

Examples of tests - agglutination for leptospirosis; Widal test (typhoid fever)

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

29 of 63

Reverse passive agglutination

Principle

    • antigen binds to soluble antibody coated on carrier particles and results in agglutination
    • detects antigens

Example

    • detecting cholera toxin

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

30 of 63

Reverse passive agglutination

Positive

Negative

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

31 of 63

Agglutination:�Performance, applications

Advantages

    • sensitive for antibody detection

Limitations

    • Prozone phenomenon:
      • requires the right combination of quantities of antigen and antibody
      • handled through dilution to improve the match

Time taken

    • 10-30 minutes

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

32 of 63

Hemagglutination

Principle

    • many human viruses have the ability to bind to the surface structures on red blood cells from different species thereby causing agglutination

Example

    • influenza virus binds to fowl red blood cells

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

33 of 63

Hemagglutination inhibition

Principle

Antibodies to the virus in the patient serum bind to the virus; blocks binding sites on the viral surfaces

    • prevents the virus from agglutinating the red cells

Example

    • detecting antibodies to influenza and dengue viruses

Positive

Negative

Hemagglutination inhibition for detection of Dengue antibodies

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

34 of 63

Hemagglutination:�Performance, applications

Advantages

    • highly specific
    • can be used as gold standard

Limitations

    • technically demanding
    • time consuming
    • cannot distinguish IgG from IgM

Time taken

    • 1 day

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

35 of 63

Neutralization assays

Principle

    • antibodies in serum neutralize antigens on the surface of viruses �(neutralizing antibodies)
    • inhibited viruses cannot infect cell lines

Example

    • plaque neutralization assay for dengue virus, Japanese encephalitis virus
    • antibodies to bacterial toxins and other extra-cellular products that display measurable activities (e.g., ASLO, diphtheria toxin, clostridium toxin)

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

36 of 63

Neutralization:�Performance, applications

  • Advantages
    • Highly specific
    • Often used as gold standard
  • Limitations
    • Technically demanding
    • Time consuming
    • Can only be used for viruses that can be grown
    • Complexity limits the use beyond gold standard
  • Time taken
    • 1 week

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

37 of 63

Positive

Negative

Neutralization Assay

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

38 of 63

Radio-immunoassays

  • Principle
    • Radioactively labelled-antibody (or antigen) competes with the patient’s unlabelled antibody (or antigen) for binding sites on a known amount of antigen (or antibody)
    • Reduction in radioactivity of the antigen-patient antibody complex compared with control test is used to quantify the amount of patient antibody/antibody bound
    • Limited use due to the problems with handling radioisotope
  • Example
    • HBsAg
    • Thyroid function test

Response

Antibody

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

39 of 63

Radio-immunoassays:�Performance, applications

Adantages

    • highly sensitive
    • can be used for detection of small quantities
    • quantification possible

Limitations

    • expensive
    • requires isotopes

Time taken

    • 1 day

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

40 of 63

Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA)

Principle

    • use of enzyme-labelled immunoglobulin to �detect antigens or antibodies
    • signals are developed by the action of �hydrolyzing enzyme on chromogenic substrate
    • optical density measured by micro-plate reader

Examples

    • Hepatitis A (Anti-HAV-IgM, anti-HAV IgG)

Labeling technique

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

41 of 63

ELISA

Antibody

Response

Micro-plate reader

96-well micro-plate

Positive result

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

42 of 63

Types of ELISA (Ag Ab tests)

Competitive

  • Antigen or antibody are labelled with enzyme and allowed to compete with unlabeled ones (in patient serum) for binding to the same target
  • Hydrolysis signal from Ag-Ab complex (enzyme-labelled) is measured
  • Antigen or antibody in serum is then calculated
  • No need to remove the excess/unbound Ag or Ab from the reaction plate or tubes)

Labeling technique

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

43 of 63

Types of ELISA used in the detection of antigens and antibodies

  • Non-competitive
  • must remove excess/unbound Ag�or Ab before every step of reactions
  • Direct ELISA
  • Indirect ELISA
  • Sandwich ELISA
  • Ab Capture ELISA (similar to sandwich ELISA but in 1st step,� anti-Ig (M or G) is coated �on the plate
  • Then antibodies in patient serum �are allowed to capture in next step

Labeling technique

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

44 of 63

ELISA:�Performance, applications

  • Advantages
    • Automated, inexpensive
    • Objective
    • Small quantities required
    • Class specific antibodies measurable
  • Limitations
    • Expensive initial investment
    • Variable sensitivity / specificity of variable tests
    • Cross contamination
  • Time taken - 1 day

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

45 of 63

Immuno-fluorescence

  • Principle
    • Use fluorescein isothiocyanate labeled-immunoglobulin to detect antigens or antibodies according to test systems
    • Requires a fluorescent microscope
  • Examples
    • Herpes virus IgM
    • Dengue virus
    • Rabies virus
    • Scrub and murine typhus

Labeling technique

Cell infected with Dengue virus

V. Cholerae

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

46 of 63

Immuno-fluorescence:�Performance, applications

  • Advantages
    • Sensitive and specific
    • Can be used for discrepant analysis
  • Limitations
    • Expensive (Reagents and equipment)
    • Subjective
    • Cross reactivity
    • Non-specific immuno-fluorescence
  • Time taken
    • 1 day

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

47 of 63

Advanced techniques

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

48 of 63

Western-blot analysis (1)

  • Principle
    • Antigens are separated by Poly Acrylomide Gel Electrophoresis (PAGE) and trans-blotted onto nitrocellulose/nylon membranes
    • Antibodies in serum react with specific antigens
    • Signals are detected according to the principles of test systems
    • Antibodies against microbes with numerous cross-reacting antibodies identified more specifically
  • Examples
    • T. pallidum, B.burgdorferi,
    • Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2

Anti HIV-1

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

49 of 63

Western-blot analysis (2)

  • Serum, saliva, urine can be tested
  • Kits are commercially available
  • Recombinant immuno-blotting assays (RIBA) uses recombinant proteins

Anti HIV-2

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

50 of 63

Immunoblot:�Performance, applications

  • Advantages
    • Used for discrepant analysis
    • Highly specific
    • Rapid kits available
  • Limitations
    • Cost
    • Concern validated data
  • Time taken
    • 1 day

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

51 of 63

Immuno-chromatography: �Principle (1)

  • Dye-labelled antibody, specific for target antigen, is present on the lower end of nitrocellulose strip or in a plastic well provided with the strip.
  • Antibody, also specific for the target antigen, is bound to the strip in a thin (test) line
  • Either antibody specific for the labelled antibody, or antigen, is bound at the control line

Lysing agend

Labled AB.

Test band

(bound AB)

Control band

(bound AB)

Nitrocellulose strip

Bound

AB

Free labled

AB

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

52 of 63

Immuno-chromatography: �Principle (2)

  • If antigen is present, some labelled antibody will be trapped on the test line
  • Excess-labelled antibody is trapped on the control line

Captured Ag-labelled Ab-complex

Captured labelled Ab

Labelled AB-AG-complex

Captured by bound AB of �test band

Labelled AB-AG-complex

Captured by bound AB of

control band

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

53 of 63

Immuno-chromatography:� Performance, applications

  • Advantages
    • Commercially available
    • Single use, rapid test
    • Easy to perform
    • Can detect antigen or antibody
    • Can be used in the field
  • Limitations
    • Cost
    • Concern validated data
  • Time taken - 1 hour

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

54 of 63

Application Implications

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

55 of 63

Interpretation of antigen detection tests

  • In general, detection of the antigen denotes a presence of the pathogen
  • More important in some parasitic and fungal diseases

Antigen test

Interpretation

Positive

  • Current or recent infection

Negative

    • No infection
    • Insufficient number of organisms
    • Sensitivity of testing is low �(Consider test by test)

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

56 of 63

Interpretation of a single, acute IgM test

IgM test

Interpretation

Negative

  • No current infection

Positive (Newborn)

  • Congenital infection

Positive (Adult)

  • Primary or current infection

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

57 of 63

Interpretation of a single IgG test

* Collected between onset and convalescence

Test

Interpretation

Negative

  • No exposure or immuno-suppression

Positive (Newborn)

  • Maternal antibodies crossed the placenta

Positive (Adult)

  • Evidence of infection at some un-determined time
  • Infection in some cases (e.g., rabies, legionella, Ehrlichia)
  • May be significant if immuno-suppression (e.g., AIDS)

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

58 of 63

Interpretation of two, acute and convalescent IgG tests *

Test

Interpretation

Negative

  • No current infection
  • Past infection
  • Immuno-suppression

Positive �(4-fold rise or fall in titer)

  • Recent infection

* Convalescent serum collected 2-4 weeks after onset

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

59 of 63

Elements influencing the sensitivity and specificity of a given test kit

  • Test format
    • Precipitation versus IFA, Rapid test versus ELISA
  • Purity of the antigen used
    • Crude versus purified antigen versus synthetic peptides
  • Type of the antibody used
    • Polyclonal versus monoclonal antibodies
  • Interfering substances in the sample
    • Presence of rheumatoid factor in the serum of the patient
  • Similarity in antigenic composition of pathogens
    • Cross reactivity

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

60 of 63

Discussion

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

61 of 63

Summary

  • Precipitation
  • Agglutination
  • Hemagglutination and hemagglutination inhibition
  • Viral neutralization test
  • Radio-immunoassays
  • ELISA
  • Immunoflourescence

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

62 of 63

Conclusion

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

63 of 63

Bibliography

  • WHO. (2007). Antigen and antibody detection
  • Eaton K. (2016). Practical immunology