1 of 10

Perception of Power Dynamics from Educators 

Dave Blanchard, M.S.

Kristen Carlson, Ed.D. 

2 of 10

Welcome!

BACKGROUND AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS

METHODS

RESULTS & FINDINGS

3 of 10

Background

  • With the shift away from direct instruction, constructivist learning design allows for learning experience that engages all participants in co-constructed learning. With the teacher in a facilitator role, students are empowered to direct their own learning and create meaning out of the experiences. With a restructuring of the power dynamics in the classroom, the learning environment becomes more diverse, equitable, and inclusive. 

  • This study explores the perceptions of teacher education graduate students around constructivism and power dynamics.  

4 of 10

Research Questions

  • RQ1: How do the perceived power dynamics in a higher education course impact the learners’ interpretations of learning experiences?​�​
  • RQ2: How does the use of constructivism in the graduate-level course impact the power dynamics between students and teachers?

5 of 10

Methods

Data collection: Fall 2022 M.S. Curriculum and Instruction course

  • Pre-course interviews. 
  • Participants were shown a mini lecture provided by the researchers on the topics of constructivism and power dynamics. 
  • After the lecture, the course proceeded for eight more weeks.
  • During the last week of the course, research participants were asked to record a post-course interview about their experience in the constructivist classroom and their perceived connections between the experience and their knowledge of power dynamics. 

6 of 10

Power Dynamics

Perceived power within a classroom or learning experience.

How are perceptions around power formed?

Imbalance of power between learners and instructors. 

7 of 10

Constructivism

Co-construct, learning through powerful experiences with active discovery, collaboration, and assimilation of new knowledge with previously lived experiences.

1970s Piaget & Vygotsky

8 of 10

Results

  • Constructivism (n=6) All participants indicated they had a foundational understanding of constructivism and 33% (n=2) had indicated no formal learning on this topic before this study.
  • Learning Experiences Several participants (n=4; 66%) indicated that learning is intentionally collaborative, while 33% (n=2) indicated that learning was transactional in nature. 
  • Power Dynamics All of the participants (n=6) reported that their current understanding of power dynamics included a hierarchal structure or structure based on positional power. Post-interview resulted in 100% (n=3) of participants indicating they had active reflections about power dynamics regarding teacher/student interactions and assignment expectations

9 of 10

Findings:�A Need to Balance the Power Dynamic

Hammond, Z. L. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain. Corwin Press.

Building a Culture of Care

Learning Partnerships

Rapport + Alliance �= Cognitive Insight

10 of 10

Questions or Comments?

@000Dave

@DrKCarlson