Baseline Findings Shareback | September 28, 2021
Design and Impact Evaluation of a Digital Reproductive Health Program in Rwanda
Overview of CyberRwanda
CyberRwanda
Can a digital health intervention improve young people’s access �to HIV testing and contraception?
Ippoliti N, Sekamana M, Baringer L, Hope R. Using Human-Centered Design to Develop, Launch, and Evaluate a National Digital Health Platform to Improve Reproductive Health for Rwandan Youth. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Nov 29;9(Suppl 2):S244-S260.
CyberRwanda
Phase I: DISCOVERY
Aug 2016 - Aug 2017
Phase II: TEST & ITERATE
Sept 2017 - Sept 2018
Phase III: PILOT, BASELINE, IMPLEMENTATION
MIDLINE & ENDLINE Sept 2018 - Dec 2023
LAUNCH AT SCALE
Jan 2023 - Sept 2024
Design Research & Ideation
Prototyping I
Prototyping II
Production
Planning &
Permissions
Pilot
Pilot Evaluation
Implementation,
Midline & Endline
Launch at Scale
CR Implementation and Evaluation Timeline
Data collection: HCD ( n= 1074)
Objectives:
Understanding desirability, acceptability, feasibility of early prototypes; mapping existing interventions to avoid duplication; using data to optimize usability of high-fidelity prototypes and final digital products and marketing materials�
Methods:
1. Predominantly qualitative data from a wide range of stakeholders (youth, parents, teachers, nurses, pharmacists etc
2. Small sample quantitative data e.g. knowledge quiz pre- and post-use of prototype
Data collection: Pilot (n=158)
Objectives: Assess feasibility, acceptability, and engagement and inform the impact evaluation design.
Methods:
1. Targeted quantitative and qualitative data from youth, parents, teachers, nurses, pharmacists etc.
2. Google Analytics data on engagement with platform.
Data collection: Impact Evaluation (n=6082)
Objectives of impact evaluation: Measure the impact and cost-effectiveness of the intervention in schools and youth centers.
Methods:
1. Three-arm non-inferiority RCT in 60 schools and cross-sectional study in 8 youth centers.
2. Cost effectiveness analysis
3. Qualitative studies at midline and endline
4. M&E: Google Analytics data on platform usage and qualitative data from users to inform ongoing iterations of program design.
Baseline
CyberRwanda
Objectives
Improve Knowledge
Our youth-designed intervention helps adolescents learn health and economic empowerment information in a private, safe space. Topics range from puberty and voluntary FP/RH care to relationships and goal setting.
1. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) [Rwanda], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda], and ICF International. 2014–15 RDHS Key Findings. Rockville: NISR, MOH, and ICF International; 2015.�2. Baseline and midline impact study findings (unpublished).
CyberRwanda
Objectives
Improve Access
CyberRwanda improves adolescents’ access to adolescent health information, health products including FP/RH services through online resources and trained public and private sector providers.
1. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) [Rwanda], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda], and ICF International. 2014–15 RDHS Key Findings. Rockville: NISR, MOH, and ICF International; 2015.�2. Baseline and midline impact study findings (unpublished).
CyberRwanda
Objectives
Improve Quality
CyberRwanda Provider training and tools improve service quality �by increasing provider knowledge on FP/RH and providing adolescent-friendly care to increase service quality for youth.
1. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) [Rwanda], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda], and ICF International. 2014–15 RDHS Key Findings. Rockville: NISR, MOH, and ICF International; 2015.�2. Baseline and midline impact study findings (unpublished).
CyberRwanda
Impact evaluation
(Randomized Controlled Trial)
Intervention schools
Control schools
CyberRwanda Facilitated schools
CyberRwanda Self-service schools
CyberRwanda Impact
Evaluation Study
CyberRwanda
Hybrid “Type 2” Effectiveness
-Implementation Study
Study districts
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04198272; Nolan, C., Packel, L., Hope, R. et al. Design and impact evaluation of a digital reproductive health program in Rwanda using a cluster randomized design: study protocol. BMC Public Health 20, 1701 (2020).
Randomization
Kopper, S, Sautmann, A. Randomization. Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab.
Uptake of modern contraceptive method
Initiation of
childbearing
HIV
Testing
Cost-
effectiveness
Outcomes measures
Baseline Progress & Interim Findings
Are youth who are exposed to CR in the intervention group significantly more likely to be currently using a modern contraceptive method compared to youth who are �not exposed?
Are female youth who are exposed to CR in the intervention group significantly less likely to have initiated childbearing by the end of the study compared to female youth who are not exposed?
Are youth who are exposed to CR in the intervention group significantly more likely to be tested for HIV compared to youth who are not exposed?
Is a “self-service”, �less- resource intensive �model as effective as a peer-facilitated model of CyberRwanda in reaching �the desired outcomes?
CyberRwanda
Youth-Led Implementation
Trained 200 youth across 40 schools to support the rollout of the program
CyberRwanda
CyberRwanda Implementation Models
14
| Arm 1: Self-Service | Arm 2: Facilitated |
Digital Engagement Activities | | |
Marketing materials in schools | ✔ | ✔ |
Instruction booklet/troubleshooting guide | ✔ | ✔ |
Trained student ambassadors | ✔ | |
Trained teachers | ✔ | ✔ |
Allocated CyberRwanda usage time | ✔ | ✔ |
Message Engagement Activities | | |
Trained peer facilitators for club sessions | | ✔ |
Clubs Activity Booklet | | ✔ |
Hands-on support | | |
End-of-term check-in | ✔ | ✔ |
Periodic face-to-face support to schools | | ✔ |
CyberRwanda
Stakeholder Engagement
Implementation
Baseline and Midline Surveys
Baseline Characteristics, overall and by study group
| Control (N=2040) | CR facilitated (N=2026) | CR self-service (N=2016) | Overall (N=6082) |
Age | | |||
Mean ± SD | 15.4 ± 1.54 | 15.3 ± 1.54 | 15.4 ± 1.54 | 15.4 ± 1.54 |
Median (IQR) | 15.0 (14.0-16.0) | 15.0 (14.0-16.0) | 15.0 (14.0-16.0) | 15.0 (14.0-16.0) |
Sex | | |||
Female | 1052 (51.6%) | 1031 (50.9%) | 1047 (51.9%) | 3130 (51.5%) |
Male | 988 (48.4%) | 995 (49.1%) | 969 (48.1%) | 2952 (48.5%) |
Level | | |||
S1 | 1177 (57.7%) | 1135 (56.0%) | 1147 (56.9%) | 3459 (56.9%) |
S2 | 863 (42.3%) | 891 (44.0%) | 869 (43.1%) | 2623 (43.1%) |
Partnered | 402 (19.7%) | 408 (20.1%) | 373 (18.5%) | 1183 (19.5%) |
Smartphone in household | 715 (35.0%) | 671 (33.1%) | 773 (38.3%) | 2159 (35.5%) |
Household hunger | | |||
Little to none | 1476 (72.4%) | 1541 (76.1%) | 1477 (73.3%) | 4494 (73.9%) |
Earth/mud floor in dwelling | 905 (44.4%) | 994 (49.1%) | 844 (41.9%) | 2743 (45.1%) |
Missing data for variables: Partnered (married or in a relationship, n=5), Smartphone in household (n=2), Household hunger (per Household Hunger Scale; n=9), Earth/mud floor in dwelling (n=3) | ||||
Common Misconceptions
about Contraception
18
CyberRwanda
Condom Norms Suggest Opportunities for Education
CyberRwanda
Partners
CyberRwanda
Thank You!
CyberRwanda