Site Supervision & Operations
Dr Adewale Abimbola, FHEA, GMICE
Learning Outcome and Assessment Criteria
P5. Describe the key principles of construction project management.
Aim and Objectives
Aim: Forms of Contractual Relationship.
Objectives: At the end of the lesson, students should be able to:
Contractual Arrangements
Benefits:
Video: Critical construction contract terms
The payment method
Choices of contract types
Contract strategy (policies and procedures) to implement client requirements regarding a project.
Type of contract (lump sum, re-measurement, cost reimbursement) is instrumental in the decision as to which form of contract (NEC, JCT, RIBA, FIDIC, ICC, etc.) a client prefers. Furthermore, a client’s choice of finance, design, operation, and management of a project could influence the options/strategies of contract (Design and build, BOOT, BOO, construction management, term contract, turnkey, etc.) available to them.
Payment can be based either on prices submitted by or agreed with the contractor or on the actual costs which the contractor incurs.
The main choices are:
Types of Contracts �(Based on Pricing/Cost Mechanism)
Fixed Price or Lump Sum | Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) | Target Price or Cost |
|
|
|
Types of Contracts �(Based on Pricing/Cost Mechanism)
Cost Reimbursable (Also known as a cost plus contract) | Remeasurement (Also known as measure-and-value’)/Unit Price |
|
|
QUIZ
Options/Strategies of Contract
Traditional Procurement Route
Design and Build Contract
Options/Strategies of Contract
Turnkey Contract/ Engineering Procurement and Construction (EPC) Contract
Build, Own, Operate and Transfer (BOOT) Contract
Prime Contracting
Options/Strategies of Contract
Construction Management Contract
Build – Own – Operate (BOO)
Operation & Maintenance Contract
Small Contracts | |||
Small residential projects <£500,000. Simple projects <1yr. Design work usually completed.�It follows the traditional procurement route.�5% retention. | Small residential projects.�Homeowners deals directly with the contractor.�5% retention. | Small residential projects; renovations, extensions, maintenance & new buildings. Agreement between the client and contractor.�Payment in sections. | Small commercial projects in both private and public sectors.�Payment in sections. |
Forms of Contract
Major Projects | ||
More detailed than Minor Works Building Contract, but less detailed than the Standard Building Contract.�BOQ & spec provided. Can be used by both private and public employers. | Large or complex construction projects including refurb.�Design work mostly complete,�Some design work part of contract. | Often used by government departments such as local authorities. Public sector projects, new roads, rail lines, nuclear facilities, water utilities, etc.�Lump sum/cost plus contract. Involvement of designers & constructors with projects at least three years after construction completion. |
Forms of Contract
Describe any:
Additionally, discuss, where applicable, the:
- Risk allocation: who bears the risk? client, contractor, or both.
- Benefits/strengths: proactive issue resolution, faster decision making, high transparency with contractors required to share real-time cost and progress data, clear milestones reduce ambiguity, etc.
- Weaknesses/limitations: high levels of trust is required, administrative burden from detailed reporting, frequent audits and open-book accounting, potential lack of transparency leading to late issue identification, etc.
Self-assessment Task
| Major Projects (Additional Info.) | ||
Aspect | |||
Description |
| - For larger, more complex projects, including refurbishment projects�- A traditional form of contract published in three versions: With Quantities, Without Quantities, and With Approximate Quantities. - Allows for use of provisional sums - Suitable for projects where the design work has been done by or on behalf of the employer, and where the contractor designs a part(s) of the work, and where the work is being carried out in sections | - Published by the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE) - Collaborative approach or partnership between key parties - Emphasis on project management - Various engineering and construction projects, such as public sector projects, new roads, rail lines, nuclear facilities, and water utilities. |
Key parties involved | - Employer�- Contractor�- Architect/quantity surveyor/Contract Administrator (CA) to administer the conditions | - Employer�- Contractor�- Architect/Contract Administrator (CA)�- Quantity Surveyor | - Employer�- Contractor�- Project Manager administer the conditions�- Architects - Supervisor |
Forms of Contract
Forms of Contract
| Major Projects | ||
Aspect | |||
Responsibility for design works | - Primarily employer, unless specified otherwise | - Primarily employer, with options for contractor design portions | - Flexible, can be client or contractor depending on chosen options. The Works Information should state who is responsible for the design of the works |
Retention | - Typically 3-5%�- Released in stages. Clause 4.9.2. | - Typically 3-5%�- Released in stages - Clause 4.9.2.1 and 4.18-4.20 | - Not standard, but can be included as secondary option. If Option X16 is selected, the employer may withhold retention monies. |
Defects rectification | - Defects liability period specified�- Contractor to rectify. - Clause 2.30 and 2.31. | - Defects liability period specified�- Contractor to rectify. The certificate of making good is issued by the architect/CA once all rectification have been made good. - Clause 2.38 and 2.39. | - Defects correction period�- Emphasis on early identification and correction -Clause 40-45. The supervisor notifies the contractor for defects and issues the defects certificate. |
| Major Projects | ||
Aspect | |||
Dispute resolution | - Mediation: Clause 8.1 &( ADR) - Adjudication (Clause 8.2)�- Arbitration (Clauses 8.3-8.8)�- Litigation (article 6) | - Mediation: Clause 9.1 &( ADR) Adjudication (clause 9.2)�- Arbitration (clauses 9.3-9.8)�- Litigation (article 9) | - Dispute resolution hierarchy Option W1 – Adjudication followed by litigation or arbitration Option W2 – used in the UK when the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 applies – Adjudication followed by litigation or arbitration.�- Emphasis on early resolution |
Payment type | �- Final account - Lump sum or (re)measurement contracts with possibility of interim payments | - Interim valuations�- Final account� |
|
Forms of Contract
Forms of Contract
Aspect: Flow of information | JCT Intermediate 2024 | JCT Standard 2024 | NEC4 |
Decision-Making Speed | Slow (hierarchical approvals). The Architect or Contract Administrator acts as the central authority for issuing instructions, approving variations, and certifying payments | Moderate (multi-tier reviews). The involvement of additional roles, such as the Quantity Surveyor (for cost validation) and the Architect (for design administration), ensures thorough checks. | Fast (proactive Early Warning System; EWS). This requires stakeholders to notify each other of potential risks or issues as soon as they are identified. |
Transparency | Limited to contractual needs. Contractors are not obligated to share detailed cost breakdowns or internal data unless explicitly requested. | Document-focused. While it provides more detailed reporting (e.g., through interim certificates and final accounts), transparency is still limited to formal documentation. There is little emphasis on sharing non-contractual information or fostering open communication. | High (shared risk registers). NEC4 promotes open communication through tools like shared Risk Registers and open-book accounting. These mechanisms ensure that all parties have access to critical project information, fostering trust and collaboration. |
Forms of Contract
Aspect: Flow of information | JCT Intermediate 2024 | JCT Standard 2024 | NEC4 |
Collaboration | Low (adversarial tendencies). Communication is typically reactive, with issues addressed only when formally raised. | Moderate (role-based). The inclusion of roles like Quantity Surveyors and more detailed provisions for contractor-designed portions allows for some level of collaboration. However, the overall structure remains hierarchical and formal. | High (mandatory early warnings). NEC4’s framework is built around collaboration. Tools like Early Warning Systems, shared Risk Registers, and regular programme updates ensure that all parties work together to identify and resolve issues proactively. |
Technology Use | Limited (traditional methods). Both forms rely on traditional methods of communication (e.g., written notices, formal instructions). While they can accommodate modern tools like Building Information Modelling (BIM), they do not explicitly mandate their use. Limited | Encouraged (BIM, CDE platforms). These tools facilitate real-time information sharing and improve coordination across disciplines. | |
References/Bibliography