Floodplains by Design Lunch and Learn�� USACE Permitting Pre-Application: What is it, how to use it and why?
May 4th, 2023
Please feel free to eat and get comfortable during
the Lunch and Learn
Hearing from You and Group Tips and Tricks
If you have comments, questions, or even just frustrations with the permitting process you’d like to share, please submit them here and the backbone team will integrate them into our efforts to help bring more ease into permitting processes.
See slides 17-21 to provide any Tips and Tricks you may have!
Today’s Speakers:
�Evan Carnes is the Chief of the Columbia Basin Section for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Regulatory Branch. He currently supervises staff that cover all of southwest, central, and eastern Washington. Among his other duties, Evan leads the Seattle District Regulatory Program’s ‘Restoration Project Permit Streamlining’ effort throughout the State of Washington.
Christina Schoenfelder is the Engineering Supervisor for the River & Flood Division of Whatcom County Public Works. Christina currently supervises staff that implement capital projects for River & Flood such as levee repairs, debris flow risk reduction projects, and streambank erosion protection, as well as multi-objective projects that integrate fish habitat, flood control, and agricultural needs. Among her other duties, she works directly with staff, consultant teams, and agency representatives to apply for permits and incorporate environmental mitigation at a project level.
Todays Agenda:
12:00 - 12:05 - Welcome and Invitation
12:05 - 12:25 - Evan Carnes, US Army Corps of Engineers
12:25-12:30 - Christina Schoenfelder, Whatcom County Flood
12:30 - 12:55 - Evan and Christina Discussion
12:55-1:00 - Closure and next steps
1:00-1:30 - Informal post Lunch and Learn chat
USACE REGULATORY�OVERVIEW AND PRE-APPLICATION COORDINATION ��FLOODPLAINS BY DESIGN LUNCH AND LEARN
Evan G. Carnes
Chief, Columbia Basin Section
Date: 05 May 2023
CUI
CUI
5
CUI
CUI
SEATTLE DISTRICT
6
SEATTLE DISTRICT REGULATORY BRANCH
7
REGULATORY MISSION STATEMENT
To protect the Nation’s aquatic resources, while allowing reasonable development through fair, flexible, and balanced permit decisions.
Civil Works Program
The Civil Works Program in Seattle District has traditionally been centered on navigation and flood control. Since the Water Resources Act of 1986, Seattle District has assumed a growing role in environmental restoration. Seattle District offers many programs for helping communities, counties, tribes, and other non-federal governments. We help these organizations solve water resource problems and take advantage of opportunities.
8
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMITS
Individual Permits
General Permits
Complexity
9
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
Why?
When?
How?
10
DA PERMITTING CONSIDERATIONS
Department of the Army Permitting Process Considerations | ||||
Required Coordination and Approval | Less Complex | Moderately Complex | Complex | Agency |
Section 401 Water Quality Certification/ CZMA | Meets general certification for Nationwide Permit | Meets NWP but needs Individual 401 (120 days for non-CZM counties and 180 days for CZM counties) | USACE Standard Individual Permit and Individual 401 (Public Notice and 1 year from valid WQC request) | Ecology |
Section 7 Endangered Species Act (ESA) | No ESA species present | FPRP or Limit 8 | Requires individual ESA consultation (6-months to 1-year+) | NMFS and USFWS |
Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) | No native ground disturbed - no potential to effect Cultural Resources/ Historic Properties | No effect to historic properties (30–45-day consultation with DAHP/Tribes) | Affect historic properties - requires MOA, MOU (1-year+) | DAHP & Tribes |
Tribal Coordination/ Consultation | No tribal concerns | Minor design comments/minor cultural resource issues | Substantive cultural resource impacts or tribal concerns | Tribes |
Section 408 | No federally authorized projects in project area | No effect | 408 - affects fed project | USACE Nav/Levee/ Real Estate Teams |
Pre-Application Meeting
11
RESOURCES
https://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Regulatory/
https://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Regulatory/Forms/
https://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Regulatory/Contact-Us/
12
CANADA
BELLINGHAM
SAN JUAN ISLANDS
Cougar Creek Project
Discussion
Glacier-Gallup
�State Highway
Connect and expand two bridges
PL-8499 levee repairs and relocations
Two Fish Bearing Creeks
Debris flow risk
Flood risk
Habitat forming processes disrupted
Water line on bridges
Small under-resourced jurisdiction
Multi-
.
Questions
should the timing be at the "30%" design stage of "60%" design stage?
If we work for the Tribe who would be the Tribe consulted with for a project within their historical territory, does submitting a Cultural Resources review letter from them with our JARPA help speed up that 30-45 day consultation process? Or does the USACE have to wait the 30-45days no matter what?
If we have funding sources from two separate federal agencies (NOAA and NRCS for instance) for one large project, who decides who is the lead entity?
Is there a way for USACE to let the project proponent know when the Section 106 consultation has started so we have a general idea of where our project is in the review process?
Upcoming Lunch and Learns
June 1: Partnering with Ecology through the 401 permitting process
July 6: Cultural Resource Review with WA Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP)