1 of 18

Floodplains by Design Lunch and Learn�� USACE Permitting Pre-Application: What is it, how to use it and why?

May 4th, 2023

Please feel free to eat and get comfortable during

the Lunch and Learn

2 of 18

Hearing from You and Group Tips and Tricks

If you have comments, questions, or even just frustrations with the permitting process you’d like to share, please submit them here and the backbone team will integrate them into our efforts to help bring more ease into permitting processes.

See slides 17-21 to provide any Tips and Tricks you may have!

3 of 18

Today’s Speakers:

Evan Carnes is the Chief of the Columbia Basin Section for the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Seattle District, Regulatory Branch. He currently supervises staff that cover all of southwest, central, and eastern Washington. Among his other duties, Evan leads the Seattle District Regulatory Program’s ‘Restoration Project Permit Streamlining’ effort throughout the State of Washington.

Christina Schoenfelder is the Engineering Supervisor for the River & Flood Division of Whatcom County Public Works. Christina currently supervises staff that implement capital projects for River & Flood such as levee repairs, debris flow risk reduction projects, and streambank erosion protection, as well as multi-objective projects that integrate fish habitat, flood control, and agricultural needs. Among her other duties, she works directly with staff, consultant teams, and agency representatives to apply for permits and incorporate environmental mitigation at a project level.

4 of 18

Todays Agenda:

12:00 - 12:05 - Welcome and Invitation

12:05 - 12:25 -  Evan Carnes, US Army Corps of Engineers

12:25-12:30 - Christina Schoenfelder, Whatcom County Flood

12:30 - 12:55 - Evan and Christina Discussion

12:55-1:00 - Closure and next steps

1:00-1:30 - Informal post Lunch and Learn chat

5 of 18

USACE REGULATORYOVERVIEW AND PRE-APPLICATION COORDINATION ��FLOODPLAINS BY DESIGN LUNCH AND LEARN

Evan G. Carnes

Chief, Columbia Basin Section

Date: 05 May 2023

CUI

CUI

5

CUI

CUI

6 of 18

SEATTLE DISTRICT

6

7 of 18

SEATTLE DISTRICT REGULATORY BRANCH

7

8 of 18

REGULATORY MISSION STATEMENT

To protect the Nation’s aquatic resources, while allowing reasonable development through fair, flexible, and balanced permit decisions.

Civil Works Program

The Civil Works Program in Seattle District has traditionally been centered on navigation and flood control. Since the Water Resources Act of 1986, Seattle District has assumed a growing role in environmental restoration. Seattle District offers many programs for helping communities, counties, tribes, and other non-federal governments. We help these organizations solve water resource problems and take advantage of opportunities.

8

9 of 18

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMITS

Individual Permits

      • Standard
      • Letter of Permission

General Permits

      • Nationwide
      • Regional

Complexity

9

10 of 18

PRE-APPLICATION MEETING

Why?

  • Alerts your Corps Project Manager of the upcoming application and builds a relationship
  • Helps to identify potential permit pathway, process considerations, likely agency/tribal coordination/consultation requirements, and potential needs for additional project funding
  • Provide insight into potential timeline associated with Department of the Army authorization

When?

  • Request a pre-application meeting when you have a firm understanding of the proposed project, but still have the ability to make design changes and complete any potential additional document preparations (Cultural Resource Survey, Engendered Species Act documents, etc.)
  • Pre-application meetings are generally more appropriate for complex permit actions (Standard Individual Permits, or large-scale general permits)

How?

10

11 of 18

DA PERMITTING CONSIDERATIONS

Department of the Army Permitting Process Considerations

Required Coordination and Approval

Less Complex

Moderately Complex

Complex

Agency

Section 401 Water Quality Certification/

CZMA

Meets general certification for Nationwide Permit

Meets NWP but needs Individual 401 (120 days for non-CZM counties and 180 days for CZM counties)

USACE Standard Individual Permit and Individual 401 (Public Notice and 1 year from valid WQC request)

Ecology

Section 7 Endangered Species Act (ESA)

No ESA species present

FPRP or Limit 8

Requires individual ESA consultation (6-months to 1-year+)

NMFS and USFWS

Section 106 National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA)

No native ground disturbed - no potential to effect Cultural Resources/ Historic Properties

No effect to historic properties (30–45-day consultation with DAHP/Tribes)

Affect historic properties - requires MOA, MOU (1-year+)

DAHP & Tribes

Tribal Coordination/

Consultation

No tribal concerns

Minor design comments/minor cultural resource issues

Substantive cultural resource impacts or tribal concerns

Tribes

Section 408

No federally authorized projects in project area

No effect

408 - affects fed project

USACE Nav/Levee/ Real Estate Teams

Pre-Application Meeting

11

12 of 18

RESOURCES

  • Seattle District Regulatory Website:

https://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Regulatory/

  • Forms, Templates, and Info Papers:

https://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Regulatory/Forms/

  • Application Instructions/Procedures:

https://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Portals/27/docs/regulatory2/Public%20Notices/SPNs/20191223-SPN-PaperlessInit.pdf?ver=2020-01-03-172729-440

  • Project Manager List by County:

https://www.nws.usace.army.mil/Missions/Civil-Works/Regulatory/Contact-Us/

12

13 of 18

CANADA

BELLINGHAM

SAN JUAN ISLANDS

14 of 18

Cougar Creek Project

15 of 18

Discussion

16 of 18

Glacier-Gallup

State Highway

Connect and expand two bridges

PL-8499 levee repairs and relocations

Two Fish Bearing Creeks

Debris flow risk

Flood risk

Habitat forming processes disrupted

Water line on bridges

Small under-resourced jurisdiction

Multi-

.

17 of 18

Questions

should the timing be at the "30%" design stage of "60%" design stage?

If we work for the Tribe who would be the Tribe consulted with for a project within their historical territory, does submitting a Cultural Resources review letter from them with our JARPA help speed up that 30-45 day consultation process? Or does the USACE have to wait the 30-45days no matter what?

If we have funding sources from two separate federal agencies (NOAA and NRCS for instance) for one large project, who decides who is the lead entity?

Is there a way for USACE to let the project proponent know when the Section 106 consultation has started so we have a general idea of where our project is in the review process?

18 of 18

Upcoming Lunch and Learns

June 1: Partnering with Ecology through the 401 permitting process

July 6: Cultural Resource Review with WA Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP)