1 of 223

DISCOVER YOUR TRUE COLOURS�Leading others with impact�Investigating distributed, adaptive & conscious leadership

1

June 19 & 20th, 2025 - Training for MS Amlin

Ledoux.laurent@gmail.com

+32 478 62 14 20

2 of 223

2

Check In

3 of 223

Check-in: What do you want to learn & practice about leadership today?

  • Sharing your prioritary leadership questions, concerns or practical issues

  • Feedback 1x1 on the Insights self- assessments

  • Quick presentation in plenary of the Insights Self-assessments and key points to improve (presented by each other)

  • Structuring together the rest of the day in function of your priorities (giving different weights to the topics to be adressed)

  • Announcing the SWOT analysis to be prepared at the end of the training

3

4 of 223

Building a distributed, adaptive & conscious leadership culture - the 3 levels

Note: the 3 types of leadership are complementary and affect all 3 transformation levels

4

Transformation

Organisational

Governance: Establishment of the 2 basic elements and the

5 coordination mechanisms

Transformation

CulturalDaily acts

to fill the confidence bucket

Transformation

Personal

Change of authentic posture

(top to bottom of managers,

starting with the top)

5 of 223

  • 3 types
  • Non musical chairs
  • Cases
  • Send to sarita & Flavio

5

Distributed leadership

Organizing to thrive in a complex world

6 of 223

The game of the non-musical chairs: set-up & rules

6

This game allows to understand in a fun way the interest of the iterations in a process of continuous improvement.

Set-up

  1. Place chairs in a chaotic way in one room with a wide enough gap between them.
  2. Leave one more chair than the number of participants in the game so that there is always a free chair.

Rules of the game

  1. When the facilitator gives the go, he will walk slowly in the direction of the free chair in order to sit on it. Somebody will measure his time to succeed in doing so.
  2. To prevent this, participants will have to move from their chair to go to and sit on the empty chair.
  3. If a participant gets up from his chair, he will not be able to sit back on it; he has to sit on another chair before.
  4. Participants will not be able to use any traps to prevent the facilitator to sit on a chair (they cannot block him, nor cannot move their chairs); they will only be able to move from chair to chair.
  5. When the facilitator has succeeded to sit on the free chair, he will suggest the participants to take 1 minute to see together how to do better to prevent the facilitator to sit down. During the first rounds, participants usually last no more than 15 seconds.
  6. The participants will aim to improve at each iteration of the game by preventing the facilitator to sit down longer. In general, a minimum of 4 iterations is necessary for participants to find “flow” together and prevent the facilitator to sit on one chair. Once they reach the threshold of (around) 1 minute and 30 seconds, the facilitator gives up and concedes his defeat.  

7 of 223

The game of the non-musical chairs: purpose

7

Purpose

  1. The real purpose of the game is for the participants to learn together, through each iteration, how to collaborate to win: they will learn as much during each round as during the interaction in between. They will have to learn to uncover together the basic rules of collaborative governance.
  2. The facilitator will distill gradually the possible lessons to be drawn from the way they interact during and between the various rounds.
  3. The interest of the game for the participants will be greatly enhanced by the capacity of the facilitator to gradually help the participants to uncover the rules and postures they should adopt together to find “flow” (through careful observation of the way they play and invitation for them to play more “consciously”).

 

 Note: I am not the inventor of this game but I don’t know who is either, so I cannot give him/her credit.

 

8 of 223

Lessons from the game of the non-musical chairs

8

Take initiatives while respecting group rules

  • Adopt clear and simple group rules: Overly sophisticated solutions cause confusion; they cannot be internalized by people and easily turned into action.
  • Allow distributed leadershipWhile respecting the rules defined together, people can take initiatives without formal approbation by someone else but always announcing it clearly to the group and requesting advice from those impacted by the initiatives.
  • Trust the group dynamicsTake initiatives for the benefit of the group while trusting collective intelligence; Put your ego behind; in complex situation, distributed leadership is always more effective than hierarchical command & control.
  • Test your actions through the lens of the 3 key psychological needs: Do they increase your colleagues natural need for Inclusivity, autonomy and growth?

Be fully present

  • Stay calm: Frenzy kills collective intelligence; breathe and 'meditate' before you act; Start any meeting with two or three minutes of silence.
  • Pursue objectives without losing track of the rest (ie. The wellbeing of your colleagues): Observing is just as important as acting. Observe the companions, observe the robot. Be present.
  • Talk less, try moreMake sure that whatever you say is essential for the group. And if not, shut up. The best way to display leadership is often to shut up and don't add unnecessary complications.
  • Listen activelyQuestion your ideas and certainties before making a judgement on others' ideas.

9 of 223

9

  1. Why Distributed leadership (or Collaborative management)?

10 of 223

Why collaborative management?

Strong customer focus

Commitment

&

Attracting and retaining talent

Elimination of silos

& cost reduction

Agility

Innovation

throughout the organisation

11 of 223

Growing employee disengagement (Gallup 2019)

13%

52%

35%

Committed

Disengaged

Actively Disengaged

12 of 223

Mc Gregor's Theory X & Y - Abandoning the X vision of managers

12

Douglas Mc Gregor

The human side of the business (1957)

13 of 223

13

Pleasure

Satisfaction

Frustration

Types of motivation

Universal psychological needs

Correlation with physiological and psychological health

Intrinsic motivation

Extrinsic Motivation

Meaning

Power

Awards

Deci & Ryan's theory of self-determination

(1985 - summarised by J. Forrest & L. Ledoux)

Greater commitment thanks to the satisfaction of 3 universal needs

Inclusion

Autonomy

Pers. Dev.

Inclusion

Autonomy

Pers. Dev.

  • ENERGY
  • CONCENTRATION
  • HIGH PERFORMANCE
  • PERF. EXTRA ROLES
  • AGILE
  • BURNOUT
  • DISTRACTION
  • LOW PERFORMANCE
  • COMPORT. ANTISOC.
  • NOT AGILE

14 of 223

Self-esteem: the key to solving organisational problems

14

Will Schutz

The human element

(1994)

According to Schutz, well-being at work and collaboration require improving employees' self-esteem by reducing their fears of being...

Rejected

2

Skills

(Pers. Development)

Humiliated

3

Control over your work (Autonomy)

Ignored

1

Inclusion

15 of 223

15

Mazars survey in France (2019) confirms Deci, Ryan & Schutz

16 of 223

16

Clare Graves

Ken Wilber

Don Beck

Evolving raison d'être & Spiral Dynamics

17 of 223

Reinventing organizations (Laloux): a simple grid for the evolution of organisations inspired by the dynamic spiral�

17

Impulsive" stage

Red

Traditional" stage

Amber

Competitive" stage

Orange

Pluralistic" stage

Green

Evolving" stage

Opale

18 of 223

3 main models of approach to collaborative management

18

A work organisation system based on continuous improvement and waste reduction:

Brings certain collaborative governance practices to a hierarchy of individuals

Project management system (IT) adapted to the management of organisations and their governance:

Brings certain collaborative governance practices to a hierarchy of individuals

Integrated sets of collaborative practices, "à la carte" (Sociocracy 3.0) or "fixed" (Holacracy):

Complete collaborative governance system

LEAN

AGILE

SOCIOCRACY 3.0 (& HOLACRACY)

19 of 223

19

Philosophies and tools to support collaborative management

Philosophies

transformation towards collaborative governance

Tools

transformation collaborative governance

Freedom

Inclusion

Personal Development

Philosophy of liberating leadership

Getz

Disbanded hierarchy

Rules & Principles based

Maintained hierarchy Democratic hierarchy & Agile ops

Circle-based governance

Light or strict

Philosophy of the coastal living organism

Laloux

20 of 223

Collaborative management has long since proved its worth

20

Gore

(1958)

Buurtzorg (2006)

Patagonia

(1973)

Semco Partners (1980)

  • Manufacture of Gore-tex fabric
  • Sales: $1.2 billion (2003) to $3.7 billion (2019)
  • Employees: 10,500
  • Presence in over 25 countries
  • Double-digit annual growth since the start

  • Home care (nurses)
  • Sales: €362 million (2016)
  • Employees: 10,000
  • Double-digit annual growth since its creation (+16% in 2016)

  • Eco-designed sportswear
  • Sales: $750 million (2015)
  • Employees: 2,000 (2014)
  • Double-digit annual growth since the CG
  • Profits tripled between 2008 and 2014

  • Systems engineering and management
  • Founded in 1960; taken over by Ricardo Semler in 1980
  • Employees: From 90 in 1994 to 3,000 in 2003
  • Sales: from $4 million in 1982 (start of the CG) to $212 million in 2003

21 of 223

Study: "The How Report" by Dov Seidman

21

22 of 223

22

Example of David Market & the US Santa Fe Nuclear Submarine

Link

https://youtu.be/OqmdLcyES_Q

23 of 223

Building a collaborative culture - The case of the Federal Public Service Mobility

23

  • Improving service quality
  • Reduced processing times
  • Lower absenteeism and long-term sickness rates
  • Substantial, recurring savings

24 of 223

24

25 of 223

Alan Leadership principles

25

26 of 223

26

2. How to implement collaborative management?

27 of 223

27

Collaborative culture

28 of 223

Building a collaborative culture - the 3 needs

Inclusivity

Respect

Autonomy

Trust

Personal development

Care

29 of 223

Respect - Encouraging questioning

29

  • Co-development of strategy
  • Management meetings open to all
  • Training on "objectives and indicators" open to all
  • Criticism encouraged (e.g. encouragement to leave any meeting where time is wasted)
  • Little Pebbles Committee

30 of 223

Respect - Acting with fairness and humility

30

  • Adopting a low posture
  • Renouncing symbols of power
  • Fair treatment for all and attention for the most vulnerable: winning with everyone
  • Reinventing spaces for everyone
  • 360° feedback
  • Balancing (M/F) the management committee

31 of 223

Inclusivity

RESPECT

Autonomy

TRUST

Dev. Pers. CARE

Everyone wants to take the initiative

32 of 223

Autonomy - letting go, protecting and supporting those who are most motivated

32

  • Helping and coaching managers to delegate and let go
  • Allowing the right to make mistakes
  • Simplify processes (eliminate unnecessary controls)
  • Supporting the most motivated

33 of 223

Autonomy - Using HPFO’s

Every week, all team members share on Slack or the internal app their HPFO which stands for :

  • Highlight (the achievements we’re most proud of)

  • Priorities (top priorities for the week ahead)

  • Fire (the issues we faced and the projects where we fell short)

  • Objectives (review progress towards OKRs).

See on the right, an example of one of my own HPFOs for a company (slightly different here than the usual form)

33

34 of 223

Inclusivity

RESPECT

Autonomy

TRUST

Everyone has the freedom to take initiatives

Dev. Pers. CARE

35 of 223

Care - Helping everyone to pursue their Sweetspot (Ikigai)

35

  • Elimination of pre-defined training lists
  • Opening of training courses
  • Rotation for thankless tasks
  • Regular, informal, descriptive and positive feedback
  • Adoption of Vineet Nayar's motto: "Employees first, Customers second

SWEETSPOT

Pleasure

Capabilities

Relevance

36 of 223

Care - Example of the programme put in place at SPF Mobility

36

D.R.I.V.E

D

R

I

V

E

Development

  • Talent management
  • Self-knowledge
  • Emotional intelligence / Meditation
  • Time management
  • Coaching
  • ...

Liability

  • Team objectives
  • Assessment cycles
  • Delegation
  • Strategic Vision
  • ...

Innovation

  • Blue Ocean
  • Continuous process improvement
  • ...

External value

  • Availability
  • Conflict management
  • ...

Exchange

  • Teambuilding
  • 2-way feedback
  • Communication
  • Contribution to the team
  • ...

37 of 223

Care - Enabling everyone to do a "good" job

37

  • Allocation of the time needed to do a "beautiful" job, like a craftsman, with a "macro-efficient", holistic approach
  • Organisation of work in relatively small teams/BUs, ideally with their own P&L ('mini-factories')

38 of 223

Care - Forging links at every level

38

  • Non-violent communication (NVC) training for all
  • Celebrations
  • Thanks & Wow channel
  • Sponsors
  • ...

39 of 223

Inclusivity

RESPECT

Autonomy

TRUST

Dev. Pers.

CARE

Everyone has the ability to take the initiative

40 of 223

40

Collaborative governance

41 of 223

41

41

2.

Roles

5.

Rules

4.

Meetings

3.

Decisions

1.

Purposes

Gathering together and validating the rules of the game that apply to everyone

Clarify roles and responsibilities and distribute leadership roles

Strengthening collaboration with a coherent hierarchy of purposes

Adopting inclusive decision-making methods

  • Requests for advice
  • Elections without candidates
  • Consent decisions

Structuring and facilitating meetings effectively

5 structural pillars of collaborative governance

42 of 223

1. Replace/reinforce the hierarchy of people with that of reasons for being

42

1 person can play roles in multiple circles

1 similar role can be filled by different people

1 circle is a set of roles with a common purpose

The organisation is the encompassing circle

Partena Pro

  • 11.4 people per circle
  • 1.5 circle/pers.

43 of 223

1. Start with Why – Simon Sinek

43

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4ZoJKF_VuA&ab_channel=TEDxTalks

44 of 223

2.1. Clarify roles and responsibilities together

44

Partena Pro

  • 2.7 roles/pers.
  • On average, roles are changed every 2 months.
  • Total transparency of roles
  • +400% more OKRs created in the last 3 months

45 of 223

2.2. Distributing the roles included in the managerial function

45

Lead Link

Strategy (alignment of reasons for being)

Facilitator

Collaboration

(facilitating meetings, etc.)

Secretary

Transparency

(Record of decisions and follow-up, etc.)

Partena Pro

  • Management functions have been split and distributed

46 of 223

3. Adopting inclusive ways of resolving tensions and making decisions

46

Partena Pro

  • Equities: +50
  • Projects: +50

47 of 223

4. Structuring and facilitating effective meetings

47

Partena Pro

  • Shorter meetings
  • Voltage resolution +50
  • 47% of tensions resolved outside meetings

48 of 223

5. Co-define the rules of the game that apply to everyone

Partena Pro

  • Adoption & ongoing improvement of a ten-page governance code...

Partena Professionals:

Social Secretariat Services

2000 employees

The largest Belgian company in GC

Accompanied by Phusis

49 of 223

3 key success factors in the transformation to collaborative management

#1.

A genuine commitment

#2.

A co-created approach

#3.

Rigorous, flexible management

49

50 of 223

Summary: What do collaborative practices mean to you?

50

Applicable governance principles

to all

Clear roles and responsibilities

2 basic elements

to enable

distributed leadership

4 coordination mechanisms

to align initiatives & innovations

Inclusive decision-making

Hierarchy of reasons for being with OKRs

Feedback via structured meetings

New

structural roles

Changes in posture

& practicalities

to stimulate initiatives

& innovations in the field

Autonomie

Trust

Inclusion

Respect

Pers. dev.

Care

51 of 223

51

Going deeper into the 5 pillars of Collaborative

Gouvernance

52 of 223

52

  1. Clarify purpose, roles and responsibilities

53 of 223

Clarifying roles and responsibilities together

54 of 223

1.1. THE COMPONENTS OF A ROLE�(or a circle of roles)

55 of 223

1.1.1. Purpose/vision

The raison d'être is the goal of the role/circle/organisation*, its highest potential impact.

It defines why the role/circle/organisation exists in an energising and inspiring way, in the form of the result sought (in the shortest possible sentence in the present tense; not an action verb).

Each role, circle and organisation has a reason to exist.

What is there to think about?

  • Why do you do what you do?
  • What would the world miss if your organisation were to disappear?
  • Does the sentence use uplifting words such as optimal, perfect, etc.?

* A circle or an organisation is nothing more than a set of roles that contribute to the same raison d'être.

56 of 223

1.1.2. Accountabilities

The accountabilities of a role (or circle/organisation) are the essential recurring activities that support its raison d'être or serve the other roles. More than the term 'responsibilities', the term 'accountabilities' looks to the future (rather than the past): what is expected of the role?

They constitute what the other roles can expect from this role.

What is there to think about?

  • The right level of detail is one that clearly indicates what others can expect from you, and what you can expect from them.
  • Accountability begins with an action verb that expresses one of the recurring actions to be carried out to achieve the purpose of the role.
  • Check with the people around you, including those outside the circle. Is it clear to them?

57 of 223

1.1.3 Indicators/Metrics/KPIs

  • Indicator or Metric = Measurable or quantifiable translation of the Purpose and Strategy of a circle or role.
  • It is therefore an indicator of the health of the circle.

Here are some examples:

  • Customer/Employee Satisfaction Index
  • Error rate
  • Gross margin
  • Number of "thank you" messages this week
  • Feeling of well-being (from 1 to 10, for example)

57

58 of 223

How can we distinguish between accountability and raison d'être?

Accountability = recurring activity of a circle/role, expected by other circles/roles. Examples:

  • Advising and supporting accountants
  • Interpreting, expressing and relaying customer needs in order to turn them into opportunities for improvement or innovation

Raison d'Etre of a circle/role = the positive impact resulting from the fulfilment of these various responsibilities and which contributes to the raison d'être of the encompassing circle. Examples:

  • Financial investments support the achievement of our objectives
  • We have the equipment and tools we need to meet customers

59 of 223

1.1.4. Domains and Policies

  • A domain is a field of actions (of responsibilities) which is the "private property" of a Circle/Role.
  • All Circle and Sub-Circle roles have access to Circle domains.
  • Initially, all the domains implicitly belong to the Anchor Circle (the global circle, which is often the equivalent of an organisation's management committee). So, initially, everyone has access to everything. At a governance meeting, you choose to allocate a domain to a role or sub-circle, to restrict access to others.
  • Keep them to a strict minimum

No domain: anyone can access it...

Area allocated to the Circle: all members and sub-circles have access to this area.

Domain assigned to a role: only this role controls the domain.

60 of 223

Responsibilities are assumed with a "framework" of autonomy

  • Each person is the leader of their role.

  • Each role takes the decisions it deems necessary to achieve its raison d'être

  • Each role decides its own priorities in the first instance.

  • No one imposes, everything is asked for.

  • A "framed" autonomy through a binding advice process: Opinions (non-binding)

61 of 223

How can we distinguish between accountability and domain?

  • The domain defines a limit to the autonomy of roles other than the role or roles that 'own' the domain in question.
  • This is not to be confused with the playground, or the perimeter within which the owner role(s) are active.
  • The domain is not a permission either, because by default everything that is not forbidden is authorised (as long as we follow the advice process, which requires us to seek the opinion of experts and those affected before taking action).

Examples:

Role: Webmaster

  • Accountability: Maintaining and securing the website
  • Domain: website user access

Role: Trainer

  • Responsibilities :

- Layout of training material

- Developing and updating training materials

  • Domain: Event registration process.

62 of 223

Checklist for a role

Rationale :

  • Does it describe the goal to be achieved, the "highest potential positive impact"?
  • Is it energising/inspiring?
  • Is it short (ideally less than 20 words)?

Responsibilities :

  • Are these recurring activities that the organisation can expect from this role to serve its raison d'être?
  • Do they meet the expectations of other roles? Which other roles?
  • Do they begin with action verbs?
  • Are they clear and understandable to everyone?

Indicators/Metrics/KPIs :

  • Can they be used to measure the health of the role?

Fields of expertise :

  • Is it essential to set up this domain to protect the organisation? Or is it dangerous to leave this domain open to all roles?
  • Is the estate currently owned by an encompassing circle?

63 of 223

1.2. The new structural roles in each circle

  • Structural roles in each circle

1.2.1. Lead Link: aligning the reasons for being

1.2.2. Facilitator: collaboration

1.2.3. Secretary: transparency

  • The Lead Link of a circle is also a full member of the surrounding circle.
  • The Lead Link of the encompassing circle designates the Lead Links of the secondary circles and/or defines how they are designated.

63

64 of 223

Divide the management function into roles assigned to different people

64

LeadLink

(or 1° Link)

Strategy (alignment of reasons for being)

Facilitator

Collaboration

(facilitating meetings, etc.)

Secretary

(or Rapporteur)

Transparency

(Record of decisions and follow-up, etc.)

65 of 223

1.2.1. The Lead Link

Raison d'être

  • The governance, resources and priorities of the Circle are aligned with the organisation's raison d'être

Responsibilities

  • Assign employees to Circle Roles
  • Monitor the fit between the roles and the employees assigned to them, and provide feedback to improve the fit.
  • Reassign roles to other employees if necessary to achieve a better match
  • Allocate available Circle resources to the various Projects and/or Roles
  • Steering the definition of the Circle's Strategies and Objectives via the meetings scheduled for this purpose

Domains

  • Assigning roles to circles
  • Devising Circle Strategies and Objectives

  • Resolve any priority conflicts at the request of the roles in the circle
  • Defining Indicators for the Circle
  • Seek to understand the Tensions transmitted by the Organisation and discern those that it is relevant to deal with in the Circle
  • To take on the responsibilities assigned to the Circle insofar as these have not been delegated to other Roles or processes within the Circle.

65

66 of 223

1.2.2. The Facilitator

Raison d'être

  • The quality of collaboration within the circle is maximised, in line with the code of governance.

Reserved areas

  • No

Responsibilities

  • Facilitate circle meetings as described in the Governance Code
  • Ensure that the governance and operational practices of the Circle and sub-Circles are in line with the Code of Governance
  • Declare a breach of process when behaviour incompatible with the code of governance is observed

66

67 of 223

1.2.3. The Secretary (or Rapporteur)

Raison d'être

  • The circle's memory and transparency are guaranteed

Reserved areas

  • No

Responsibilities

  • Organise the Circle meetings required by this Code and inform all Circle Members of the dates and venues.
  • Capture and publish the results of required Circle meetings and maintain a compiled view of ongoing Governance, Checklist items and Circle Indicators.
  • Judging the confidentiality of certain elements, and deciding whether to adapt the transcript.
  • Interpret Governance and this Code on request.

67

68 of 223

1.3. Circles

  • A circle brings together roles that share a common purpose
  • They are defined as the roles, with the help of a Raison d'être, responsibilities, possible areas and indicators.
  • These elements exist at the level of the circle and are delegated (totally or partially) to the roles of this circle
  • Within the framework of its raison d'être and responsibilities, as defined by the Circle, the Circle is autonomous, i.e. it has the freedom to take initiatives it deems appropriate to accomplish its missions (see raison d'être and responsibilities).
  • Circles (like roles) are created as a result of governance tensions
  • Each circle typically contains three structural roles: Lead Link, Facilitator, Secretary.
  • For small circles (2-3 roles) the governance structure can be streamlined

68

69 of 223

69

2. Define and describe the circle's operational roles

70 of 223

Complete/replace the hierarchy of people with that of reasons for being

70

Outil : Holaspirit

1 person can play roles in multiple circles

1 similar role can be filled by different people

1 circle is a set of roles with a common purpose

The organisation is the encompassing circle

The raison d'être is the purpose of the role or circle, its highest potential impact.

It defines why the role exists.

71 of 223

The 3 stages of operational circle design

1. Brainstorming in sub-groups

  • Identify the tasks you do on a daily/regular basis?
  • Bringing together activities with a common objective
  • Give a name to these sets of activities

2. Sharing and identifying roles

  • Define the purpose of these activities (reasons for being)?
  • Clarify the division of responsibilities within the Circle (in other words, how are the responsibilities of the Circle delegated among its members?)
  • Identify what other roles the team needs to function?
  • Check whether all the responsibilities of the circle are properly reflected in the various roles.

3. Consent validation for this initial design

  • Agree that it's OK to start, knowing that you can change it at any time using a governance tension?

71

72 of 223

72

3. Resolving tensions and making decisions

73 of 223

3.1. The organisation is constantly adapting to changing tensions

There are 4 TYPES of voltage:

  1. Organisational or governance "we work on the organisation".
  2. Operational "we work in the organisation".
  3. Interpersonal "we work between people".
  4. From Personal Development "we work on ourselves

Each tension felt by each person tells us how the organisation could evolve to best achieve its raison d'être.

73

 

74 of 223

3.2. Voltages are managed according to their type

Tension has a creative force. It is simply the gap felt between a given situation and the ideal pursued.

74

CF Operational Autonomy

CF Governance Meeting

CF Process Tensions Interperso

Coaching, Intervisions...?

75 of 223

3.3. Interpersonal tensions apply to the OSBD

75

76 of 223

3.4. Operational autonomy speeds up decision-making

I freely take the necessary initiatives and decisions, without necessarily seeking validation or consensus, provided that:

    • This contributes to the pursuit of the Raison d'Être of one or more Roles.
    • In the case of roles led by others, I am free and legitimate to ask them to act.
    • I have taken into account the Strategies that apply.
    • I manage my priorities. In the event of conflict, the Lead Link decides.
    • I have taken into account the opinions of the people affected and experts via requests for opinions (see 3.6.).
    • When I impact a Domain to which I do not have access, I have requested authorisation or followed the Policy in force.

Tension

Stratégies

Priorities

Advice

Domains

Raison d’être/Purpose

Action

Which role(s)?

77 of 223

3.5. Everyone acts according to their roles

  • Everyone uses their roles and responsibilities to
    • define your to-do list
    • make requests of others
    • accept or refuse tasks.
  • Each person specifies the role in which they are acting and the role they are addressing.
  • Everyone consults the roles database whenever they need to
  • Everyone records their actions in projects and checklists that are visible to everyone.

77

Dear Pierre, I see from Holaspirit that you're "Link Com" for One Ops, and that you're currently working on a project to clarify the publication rules. When do you plan to deliver? In my role as Co-ordinator of the Liège team I'll need it ASAP. Could you make a version for urgent communications? Does this make sense in your role? Thanks for your time!

78 of 223

3.6. Request for advice replaces hierarchical approval

78

Seeking advice is a binding process, with a non-binding result

For each decision with a significant impact, each role is asked to seek the opinion of the roles affected and the experts on the subject.

This can take various forms: meetings, telephone calls, emails, etc.

79 of 223

3.7. The consent decision facilitates inclusive group decisions

The consent decision means that consensus is not sought on a proposal, only that there are no valid objections.

This type of decision allows :

  • rapid decision-making
  • improving the proposal through collective intelligence
  • support for initiatives
  • continuous improvement.

We're not looking for a perfect proposal, but "Safe enough to try".

The process is very strict in order to avoid debates and lengthy discussions.

79

80 of 223

The 3 steps from decision to consent

80

Proposal

After some discussion, one person makes a clear proposal from which we start.

  1. Round of clarification questions

Everyone can ask as many questions as they need to understand the proposal. No reactions! The proposer may or may not clarify.

2. Reaction tower

Each person in turn gives their opinion on the proposal, suggesting improvements, alternatives, etc.

Amendments and clarifications

The proposer clarifies or amends his proposal as he sees fit in the light of the reactions.

3. Round of objections

Each person in turn indicates whether they see an objection. The objection is tested (see next slide)

Integration

If there is a valid objection, we try to modify the proposal so that the objection disappears but the initial problem is still solved.

Validation

When there are no more objections, the decision is validated!

81 of 223

How do you test an objection?

An objection is valid only if the person raising it is convinced, and can argue with elementary logic (an example may suffice), that the following three conditions are met:

  • The proposal is damaging to the organisation. It's not just useless or incomplete.
  • The wrong is created by the proposition and would not exist without the proposition.
  • The harm will certainly occur or, if it is anticipated, it will not be possible to adapt before a significant harm occurs.

In all other cases, the objection is invalid.

81

82 of 223

3.8. Elections without candidates legitimise choices

  • A process derived from sociocracy, which uses collective intelligence to elect the right person for the right role at the right time.

  • It's a way of creating links and genuine exchanges, offering recognition, making room for new people, highlighting new skills and developing oneself.

82

83 of 223

83

4. Structuring meetings

84 of 223

4.1. Operational meetings

("Tactical" or "Business")

Objective: To share the state of play of the Circle, synchronise and unblock

Frequency: Depending on the team, once every 1 or 2 weeks or every day if necessary.

Stages:

○ Review of checklists, metrics, projects

○ Voltage processing :

  • Sharing information
  • Information gathering
  • Identification of necessary actions
  • Setting up projects
  • Decision to set up a tension resolution meeting for tensions requiring in-depth analysis

84

85 of 223

How do you deal with tension? What do you need?

85

  • Points of attention :
    • Keeping the magazine sharp: clarifications only
    • Systematically return to the owner of the tension to refocus or put an end to a discussion
    • Do not seek consensus ("we all agree that.....?")

86 of 223

4.2 Governance meetings

86

Objective: Improve the organisation; review the roles required within the circle, create some, remove some, etc.

Recurrence: once every 1 or 2 months or when necessary

Stages : Dealing with consent tensions

Points of attention :

○ Proposals must be based on perceived tensions (supporting example if necessary)

Proposals don't have to be perfect to be tried

○ Objections are opportunities to improve the proposal

87 of 223

4.3. Specific tension resolution meetings

Objective: To find innovative solutions to tensions raised, particularly during operational meetings.

Recurrence: ad hoc

Stages:

○ Define the problem: What? Who? Who? When? Where? How?

○ Identify success criteria & root causes: 5 whys, affinity diagram, logic tree, fishbone diagram, etc.

○ Propose a solution: Brainstorming, 1-2-4-8 sessions, Worlds cafés, case analysis, etc.

Points of attention

○ The proposed solutions are then tested, their impact is measured and they are then confirmed or modified (PDCA cycle).

87

To translate

88 of 223

4.4. Specific Team Development Meetings

88

Objective: To improve the team's ability to work together

Recurrence: once every 1 or 2 semesters

Stages :

○ Collaborative performance review

○ Sharing individual feedback

○ Treatment of voltages with a view to

  • Modify the team charter
  • Initiate actions or projects relating to our team culture

To translate

89 of 223

4.5. Specific strategy meetings

Objective: Collective reflection on our objectives and how to achieve them.

Recurrence: once every 1 or 2 semesters or when necessary

Stages :

○ Review of Strategies and Objectives

○ Brainstorming - free technique

○ Summary during or after the meeting

89

To translate

90 of 223

4.6. The facilitator's position in meetings

  • Neutral in content, strict in form
  • At the service of the group (Uses its power transparently, for the benefit of the group - even if the person who has the role of facilitator has other operational roles - but the group and the individuals remain responsible for their choices and the results).
  • Assertive (Dares to assert himself, not too empathetic, knows how to "cut off" interventions, etc.)
  • Promoter (Role model, Inspirational, Listener, Observer, etc.)

90

91 of 223

4.7. The facilitator & secretary ensure that meetings are effective & take place in a good atmosphere.

91

They ensure

...that participants know where they stand and where they're going.

...that they feel free to express themselves and are listened to.

...so that everyone feels comfortable in their role (Lead Link, others...).

...let them enjoy themselves!

...that they transform Diversity into Wealth.

...that they deal with the "Real Problems" and take decisions.

92 of 223

4.8. Participants also ensure the quality of meetings

  • They respect each other
    • I say what I have to say
    • I dare to confront
    • I feel responsible for the result

  • They respect others
    • I speak for myself
    • I'm not aggressive
    • I qualify
    • I respect speaking times
    • I am open
    • I have confidence in the process
  • They respect the group
    • I am aware of the common objective...
    • ...which takes precedence over my individual objectives

92

93 of 223

4.9. A few rules to make meetings easier

  • Take refuge in the process by trusting it!
  • Enforce the strict observance of Table Turns and Speaking Times, cutting people off despite the feeling of rudeness, and redirecting the flow, putting the focus back where it belongs.
  • Turn to the owner of the tension to accept or refuse a complement, refocus or end a discussion.
  • Be attentive and agile in your time management! Make the group aware, but don't decide for them!
  • Pay attention to detail: note-taking visible to all and live, catering, circle shapes, pauses, tools such as gongs or bells or hourglasses...
  • Distinguish your roles!
  • Ask colleagues for help, get someone to cover for you on a sensitive point...

93

94 of 223

94

5. Writing a governance code

95 of 223

How and why do we need a Code of Governance?

95

Co-define the rules of the game that apply to everyone: "Rules of the game that give everyone the desire, freedom and ability to undertake the actions that he or she deems best for the collective project".

  • Strategic objectives
  • Guiding principles
  • Essential roles
  • Processes and methods

96 of 223

Adaptive leadership

Mobilizing your team to face its own challenges  

97 of 223

Warm-up

  1. What do you think leadership is?

  • How is leadership different from management?

  • What does/doesn't a good leader do?

  • What are the 5 main qualities of a leader?

  • Do you think there are different types of leadership? And which ones?

  • Read the text "Ruckelshaus & the Asarco Company" and comment: do you think Ruckelshaus is a good leader or not? Why or why not?

97

98 of 223

"The tree": What does this video tell us about leadership?

98

99 of 223

What is the group's challenge in this video? *

"The most common source of leadership failure is that people in leadership positions treat adaptive challenges as technical problems."

Heifetz and Linsky

99

Adaptive challenge?

Request

from

leadership

The analysis in this video uses the concepts developed by Ronald Heifetz in "Leadership without easy answers" & "Adaptive leadership".

Technical challenge?

Request

expertise

Distinguishing the challenges

100 of 223

The Group's commitment requires a change of vision

"Leadership is an activity that consists of mobilising people to adapt". (changing values, beliefs and habits)

Ron Heifetz & Marty Linsky

100

Leadership is about getting the group to change its view of the world...

... to mobilise and free up collective action to meet its challenges

Helping to change vision to free up action

101 of 223

What actions and postures does the child adopt?

101

Discernment

"Climb to the balcony

draw the pizza".

(Diagnose the system)

Conversation

"Dare to tackle taboo subjects

(Mobilise the system)

Care

"Listen to and protect the song of fragile canaries".

(Mobilise the system)

Inclusion

102 of 223

What actions and postures does the child adopt?

102

Courage

"Dare to step outside your area of authority".

(Mobilise the system)

Setting an example

"Act even in the dark of night, on behalf of others".

(Mobilise the system)

Withdrawal

"Know when to step up & step back".

(Mobilise the system)

Autonomy

103 of 223

What actions and postures does the child adopt?

103

Stress modulation

"Distinguishes challenges, understands their maturation & gives the work back to the group".

(Mobilise the system)

* Source of graph: "Leadership without easy answers" by Ronald Heifetz

Autonomy

104 of 223

What actions and postures does the child adopt?

104

Discipline

"Name your own development path

(Expand)

Humility

"Let yourself be crossed by

what is beyond you".

(See yourself as part of the system)

Serenity

"Listen to the inner peace that is already within you".

(See yourself as part of the system)

Personal development

105 of 223

Humility: authority comes from the Latin "auctor", which means "to grow"...

105

Hyacinthe Dubreuil

(extract from "L'équipe et le ballon", 1948)

"The true function of a leader is to

more to serve than to command,

for the vain satisfaction of foolish self-esteem.

It is in this prestige that he will have to find

the origin of its authority, and not

in the use of old authoritarian formulas

that ruffle the feathers of those who have to endure them.

106 of 223

What makes us commit?

106

  • What led the girl in the yellow turban to sign up?

  • What leads you to get involved in certain situations, to take the lead?

107 of 223

4 essential distinctions between heroic and adaptive leadership

107

Heroic

Leadership

Adaptive leadership

Power

Progress

Personality

Presence

Authority

Leadership

Technical problems

The challenges of adaptation

Source: "Leadership without easy answers", by Ronald Heifetz, adapted by Ledoux

108 of 223

The skills needed to adopt the posture of a leader

108

2.

Mobilise the system

3.

See yourself as (part of) a system

4.

Deploy

yourself

1.

Diagnose the system

109 of 223

Leadership skills

109

1.1.

Diagnose the system itself

1.2.

Diagnose the adaptive challenge

1.3.

Diagnose the political landscape

1.4.

Understand the qualities that make an organisation adaptable

1.

Diagnose the system

110 of 223

1.1. Diagnose the system itself

110

Leave the dance floor and go out onto the balcony to watch the dancers' movements.

111 of 223

1.2 Diagnose the adaptive challenge

111

1.

Gap between values and behaviour

2.

Competitors' commitments

4.

Conversations (missing)

3.

Work avoidance

adaptive

Distinguish the adaptive challenge via 4 archetypes

112 of 223

1.2 Diagnose the adaptive challenge

112

Solution and implementation

Primary locus of resp. for the work

Kind of work

Problem definition

Challenge

Clear

Clear

Physician

Technical

Clear

Requires learning

Physician and patient

Technical and adaptive

Requires learning

Requires learning

Patient > physician

Adaptive

Type I

(Technical e.g. flu)

Type II

(Mix e.g. obesity)

Type III

(Adaptive e.g. terminal cancer)

Source: “Leadership without easy answers”, by Ronald Heifetz

Distinguishing technical problems and adaptive challenges (1/2)

113 of 223

1.2 Diagnose the adaptive challenge

113

Distinguishing technical problems and adaptive challenges (2/2)

Leader’s

Social function

Direction

Protection

Role Orientation

Controlling conflict

Norm maintenance

Challenge

Technical

Authority provides problem definition and solution

Authority defines adaptive challenge, provides diagnosis & questions about problem definitions & solutions

Adaptive

Authority protects from external threat

Authority discloses external threat

Authority orients

Authority disorients current roles, and resists pressure to orient people in new roles too quickly

Authority restores order

Authority exposes conflict, or lets it emerge

Authority maintains norms

Authority challenges norms, or allows them to be challenged

Source: “The practice of adaptive leadership”, by Alexander Grashow, Ronald Heifetz & Marty Linsky

114 of 223

1.2.4. Conversations: We construct meaning in conversations

114

Conversation creates shared meaning

We cannot know what shared meaning will be created

Communication is the sharing of created meaning

History is to identity what conversation is to shared meaning

In conversation, knowledge is not a fixed thing

Leaders need to create space for conversations where people can create a new shared meaning

115 of 223

1.2.4. Conversations : Breaking with the past helps us find new meaning

  1. Use direct language: 1st/2nd person, active voice, no jargon.
  2. Question every vague thought
  3. Find questions that engage
  4. Formulate stories that shed light on the situation
  5. Keep the conversation going with these questions and stories

115

116 of 223

1.2.4. Conversations : Clarify your wording about leadership

116

Source: “Leadership without easy answers”, by Ronald Heifetz, adapted by Ledoux

117 of 223

1.2.4. Conversations: Listen to the songs beneth the words

117

  1. To identify the adaptive challenges confronting an organization, look beyond what people are saying about them. That’s listening to the song beneath the words.

  • There is so much more data than just the actual words being said. Look for the body language, eye contact, emotion, energy. For example, pay as much attention to what is not being said as you do to what is being said.

118 of 223

1.2.4. Conversations: Questions and exercises

  1. Think of professional discussions that covered a lot of ground.
  2. How would you describe the 'path' of speaking and listening? Straight? Twisting and turning?
  3. Do you remember a new light shed on the situation that opened up a new path? How did this happen?

2. Audit your group's conversations: Is there an essential conversation at the heart of your vision, strategy, planning, project design, product design, cultural change processes?

3. Exercise

3.1 Name a conversation you are going to reanimate

3.2 Identify two people as partners

3.3. Undertake a relatively simple action to keep the conversation going

118

119 of 223

Care – NVC & DESC

119

  • Non-violent communication (NVC / DESC) training for all
  • Celebrations
  • Thanks & Wow channel
  • Sponsors
  • ...

120 of 223

120

121 of 223

Care – DESC: an alternative to NVC

121

122 of 223

Care – Give frequent, descriptive, informal ad hoc feedbacks

122

How to give better feedback to your colleagues in 9 steps

  1. Focus on professional aspects. ...
  2. Get specific. ...
  3. Highlight the positives. ...
  4. Praise publicly, scold privately. ...
  5. Give your feedback freely. ...
  6. Ask for feedback as well. ...
  7. Turn giving feedback into a routine. ...
  8. Pay attention to the things you say.
  9. Look for people with growth mindsets

See more details on how to give proper feedback on this website.

123 of 223

Care – Use questions to give effective feedback

123

13 Questions To Solicit High-Quality Employee Feedback

Here are 13 questions you can ask employees in your 1-on-1s to help deepen your connections and encourage their growth and development.

  1. What are 5-10 qualities that you think are must-haves for enriching and diversifying our team’s current culture?
  2. Do any of our processes seem inefficient to you? How can we fix them?
  3. Which company value would you like to embody more?
  4. What do you need help with?
  5. Is there anything in your work world that’s causing frustration or delays?
  6. Are you crystal clear on your role and what you should be working on? If not, what aspects aren’t clear?
  7. Looking back on the week, is there anything that could have gone better?
  8. What inspires you to succeed every day?
  9. What is the most meaningful part of your job?
  10. On a scale of 1 to 10, how hopeful are you? Why?
  11. When do you have the most fun at work?
  12. Was there a recent team discussion or meeting where you did not get to share your thoughts? Would you like to share them now?
  13. Who do you want to get to know better in the company?

124 of 223

Care – Giving feedback to a fiery red

124

🔴 Fiery Red (Assertive, Action-Oriented, Competitive)

How they like to be approached:

  • Be direct, concise, and results-focused.
  • Avoid unnecessary small talk or emotional appeals.

Feedback style:

  • Be clear and to the point.
  • Focus on goals, performance, and tangible outcomes.
  • Frame feedback in terms of impact and efficiency.
  • Don’t sugarcoat—be honest, but respectful.

Example:

“I’ve noticed that in the last project the turnaround was slower than usual. You’re usually excellent at delivering fast. What can we adjust to ensure we hit targets quicker next time?”

125 of 223

Care – Giving feedback to a Sunshine Yellow

125

🟡 Sunshine Yellow (Enthusiastic, Social, Expressive)

How they like to be approached:

  • Be friendly, energetic, and open.
  • Show interest in them personally.

Feedback style:

  • Start with appreciation and enthusiasm.
  • Keep the tone upbeat and positive, even when addressing problems.
  • Focus on how changes can lead to more collaboration or creativity.
  • Encourage them to contribute ideas for improvement.

Example:

“Your energy really helped lift the team during the campaign. One thing we could improve on is structure—how can we keep that creative spirit but make sure deadlines are met?”

126 of 223

Care – Giving feedback to an Earth Green

126

🟢 Earth Green (Supportive, Empathetic, Loyal)

How they like to be approached:

  • Be calm, kind, and sincere.
  • Build rapport and trust first.

Feedback style:

  • Be gentle and considerate.
  • Focus on values, relationships, and impact on others.
  • Use “I” statements and invite dialogue.
  • Allow time for reflection and questions.

Example:

“I really appreciate your commitment to supporting the team. I did notice, though, that during the meeting yesterday, your voice wasn’t heard as much. I'd love to help you feel more confident to speak up—how can I support you?”

127 of 223

Care – Giving feedback to a Cool Blue

127

🔵 Cool Blue (Precise, Analytical, Reserved)

How they like to be approached:

  • Be prepared, structured, and factual.
  • Avoid emotional appeals or ambiguity.

Feedback style:

  • Provide specific data or observations.
  • Be objective, logical, and focused on process.
  • Allow them time to process and respond.
  • Avoid putting them on the spot in public.

Example:

“I’ve looked at the report and noticed a couple of discrepancies in the data. Could we go over the figures together to make sure everything aligns with the source files?”

128 of 223

Care – Tips for all colors

128

  • Prepare your feedback: Know their preferred style.

  • Adapt your tone, pace, and structure.

  • Balance positive and constructive elements.

  • Follow up to support improvement and acknowledge progress.

If you know their secondary color, you can also blend your approach (e.g., for a Red-Yellow, be direct but energetic).

129 of 223

129

Care - Structure of stable relationship

Olivier

Laurent

Marina

Triad

From “Tribal leadership” by Logan, King & Fischer-Wright, 2008

130 of 223

1.3. Diagnose the political landscape – Make the pizza

130

Adaptive challenge

Faction

Participant

Groups (allies, opponents, dissidents, authorities, etc.)

131 of 223

1.3. Diagnose the political landscape: Convert pizza into a table

131

Stakeholder (individual/group)

Stakeholder’s relationship to the challenge?

Desired outcome?

Critical values?

Who is the stakeholder loyal to?

What are its potential losses?

  • Identify the values that determine the behaviour of each stakeholder
  • Identify allies, opponents, superiors and dissidents.
  • Identify losses and potential victims
  • Forge alliances (possibly hidden)

132 of 223

1.3. Diagnose the political landscape: Recognise allies

132

132

How can this ally help you to implement your intervention successfully?

What is their main objective? (Supporting you? The initiative itself? The organisation?)

Why should they be allies?

Who could be your allies?

133 of 223

1.3. Diagnose the political landscape: Recognise opponents

133

133

How can you neutralise their opposition or get them on your side?

What do they stand to lose if your initiative succeeds?

Why are they adversaries?

Who might your opponents be?

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

134 of 223

1.3. Diagnose the political landscape: Recognise your high authorities

134

134

What could you say or do to get their support during the implementation of your initiative?

What signals do they give about how the organisation perceives your intervention?

Why are they important?

Who are the senior authorities most important to the success of your operation?

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

135 of 223

1.3. Diagnose the political landscape: Recognise dissidents

135

135

How can you protect them from being marginalised or silenced?

How can you ensure that their ideas are heard?

What ideas do they bring to the table that could be useful for your intervention?

Who are the dissidents in your organisation - those who generally express radical ideas or mention the unmentionable?

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

136 of 223

1.3. Diagnose the political landscape: Name the losses and potential victims

136

Who will be the victims of your intervention?

What will they lose?

What new skills would help them to survive the change and thrive in the new organisation?

How could you help them acquire these skills?

Which victims will have to leave the organisation?

How can you help them succeed elsewhere?

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

137 of 223

1.3. Diagnose the political landscape: Recognise loyalties

137

137

How can you protect them from being marginalised or silenced?

How can you ensure that their ideas are heard?

What ideas do they bring to the table that could be useful for your intervention?

Who are the dissidents in your organisation - those who generally express radical ideas or mention the unmentionable?

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

138 of 223

138

1.4. Understand the qualities that make an organisation adaptable

Ranking

(1: very low; 10: very high)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Description

How long does it take for conversations to move from people's heads to the coffee machine and then to the meeting rooms? How quickly are crises identified and bad news discussed? Are there structures, incentives and support to talk about the unspeakable?

To what extent do people in your organisation, particularly senior managers, act with a view to improving the organisation as a whole, rather than worrying about and protecting their individual groups or silos?

To what extent are members of your organisation valued for their own judgement rather than for their ability to guess the boss's preferences? When someone takes a reasonable risk in the service of the mission and it doesn't work out, to what extent is this seen as a learning opportunity rather than a personal failure?

To what extent do people know where they are in the organisation and what their opportunities are for growth and advancement? Do they have an agreed plan on how they are going to reach their potential? And to what extent are senior managers expected to identify and coach the following people?

Adaptability criteria

The elephants in the room are named

Responsibility for the future of the organisation is shared

An independent judgment is expected

Leadership skills are developed

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Does the organisation make time for individual and collective reflection and experiential learning? To what extent does the organisation allocate time, space and other resources to get diverse perspectives on how work could be improved?

Reflection and continuous learning are institutionalised

139 of 223

Leadership skills

139

2.1.

Make interpretations

2.3.

Design effective interventions

2.4.

Influence & Act politically

2.5.

Orchestrate the conflicts

2.6.

Build a culture of adaptation and collaboration

2.2.

Inspire through the 4 arts of leadership

2.

Mobilise the system

140 of 223

2.1. Make interpretations: Naming (We live in language)

140

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

Life sucks (2%)

My life sucks (22%)

I'm fine (49%)

We're great (25%)

Life is great (2%)

Insane

Separate

Personal domination

A stable partnership

Team

From "Tribal leadership" by Logan, King & Fischer-Wright, 2008; adapted by Ledoux

Language

Relationships with people

The 5 stages of language in organisations

141 of 223

2.1. Make interpretations: Naming (Reshape your questions)

141

What is our leadership model?

  • What does it mean for each of us to be wise here?
  • What fuels our pride? What kills it?
  • What idea have we simply avoided, put aside or rejected because we are too afraid to ask, say or hear it?
  • How can we highlight and honour the excellence of our staff?
  • What are the stories we're most proud of from doing something different?

What is our action list?

What were the key points of our discussion?

What is our innovation strategy?

How do you become a "learning organisation"?

How do we cascade our engagement programme?

  • Where do we see craft and community among our group?"

What is our strategy?

  • What kind of new history do we want?

What is our culture?

  • What are the founding stories that have made us who we are?

What kind of culture do we need?

  • Who are we proud of?

What are our values?

  • What fuels our pride? What kills it?

142 of 223

2.1. Make interpretations: Naming - Questions and exercises

Question: do you create space for people to name themselves in a more real and powerful way?

Exercise in the language of management

  1. Name the language in your organisation that robs people of the power to think and work better.
  2. Name a stronger, truer language.
  3. Choose a person, a group and a regular interaction where you will start to use this better language.
  4. Commit to this plan.
  5. Assess your impact in a month's time.
  6. Adapt your strategy accordingly.

"A leader's first responsibility is to define reality.

The last is to say thank you. In between, the

The leader must become a servant and a debtor. This

sums up the progress of an astute leader."

Max de Pree

142

143 of 223

2.2 Inspire through the 4 arts of leadership

The story gives a clearer picture of the reality of a team and the challenges it faces.

(>< Abstraction)

Brilliance results from highlighting and developing the unique abilities of each team member

(>< Compliance)

The promise gives the team the hope and conviction that it can meet its challenges and that it makes sense to do so.

(>< Inauthenticity)

Grace is the profound disposition to treat everyone without regard to status or merit.

(>< Elitism)

143

PROMISE

GRACE

BRILLANCE

STORY

144 of 223

2.2.1. The art of storytelling - We are our stories

144

Develop your vision

  1. Keep up to date
  2. Quote the best of the past that can still inspire the future
  3. Name the present in terms of what must continue and what must change
  4. Draw up a picture of the future that pays tribute to the past and takes current realities into account
  5. Name themes that bring energy to the past, present and future
  6. Set an example of committed imagination
  7. Adopt simple, direct language
  8. Get to the heart of the story in a few memorable sentences.

Name your vision-story

  1. Present your vision in the form of a story
  2. Name three fundamental statements
  3. Assess the extent to which the story has become memorable and well-known.

Use your story to encourage cultural change

  1. Respect the culture
  2. Learn the stories behind the culture
  3. Start developing a story that is respectfully based on these stories
  4. Tell the new story humbly and discreetly - out of wonder, not superiority - to a few people who will enrich it.
  5. Use everyday language
  6. Expand the story - express your conviction gently and humbly
  7. Wait until the plot and the desire are strong
  8. Say it often, say it everywhere

145 of 223

2.2.1. The art of storytelling: Questions and exercises

145

  1. Talk about how people describe the history and purpose of your organisation.
  2. Name three stories that are frequently told there.
  3. Assess the impact these stories have on vision, strategy, culture and performance.
  4. Evaluate the impact of the story you're telling and the way you're telling it.

146 of 223

2.2.2. The art of brilliance: Questions and exercises

146

Shine audit within your team

  1. Nominate two members of your team who clearly shine outside the workplace.
  2. Think about how this brilliance contributes - or could contribute - to your team's success.
  3. Assess the extent to which these people know they are brilliant.
  4. Assess the extent to which you are giving them the opportunity to shine at work.

Audit your team's reputation

  1. Assess your team/organisation's reputation for competence. Does it deserve it? How can you improve it?
  2. Assess your team/organisation's reputation for brilliance? Is it deserved? How can you strengthen it?
  3. Assess your team's/your organisation's reputation for integrity? Does it deserve it? How can you strengthen it?
  4. Which of these reputations needs the most attention?

Personal assessment

  1. Name where/when you created space for others to shine.
  2. Name someone you would like to encourage to identify their own brilliance in a truer and stronger way.
  3. Name one thing you could do differently to help others shine.
  4. Name the blocks inside you that prevent you from doing this.
  5. Make a commitment to change by doing what you say in 3. and by eliminating the blocks mentioned in 4.
  6. Consider the impact on yourself and your colleagues.

147 of 223

2.2.2. The art of brilliance: Exercise - Name your own brilliance

147

Pre-exercise arrangement

The exercise is more powerful when shared with someone you trust and who knows your life story. Agree to do the exercise together and meet up again later.

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

Process

  1. Each take a large sheet of paper
  2. Identify each of the significant moments in your own life
  3. Write a few words for each event
  4. Look for the themes that link these events, even if they are very different
  5. Identify the brilliance that shines through these different events
  6. Revise your name according to this brilliance: "I am the one who..."
  7. Share all this with your friend (and him about his life).
  8. Try to live by honouring your own brilliance for a month...
  9. Share with your friend what happened during the month .

Aim of the exercise

Identify your own brilliance in order to act well on behalf of others - not to feel good yourself

148 of 223

2.2.3. The art of the promise: Questions and exercises

148

AUDIT THE INTERPRETATIONS AROUND YOU

Think of someone you know outside work who you can justifiably say limits their life. What language do you regularly hear? Hint: "It's not fair. I'd love to. You don't know what it's like. If only... "

Consider the media and popular culture. What common phrases suggest a defeatist outlook on life? Hint: "There is no leadership. It's not my problem... "

Think about your workplace and your team. What do you hear? What words and behaviours do you need to 'call out'?

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

PLAN TO CHANGE THE GAME

Cite the source and environment of the most disturbing words and behaviours in your group

Identify these words and behaviours

Name the alternatives to be modelled

Identify a 'place' where you can start to model these elements.

Make a commitment to do so at the next opportunity

Evaluating results

Review and commit to the next step.

149 of 223

2.2.4. The art of grace : Questions and exercises

149

Question: Where and when have you seen kindness and thoughtfulness change people and cultures?

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

GRACE PLAN

Name a disruptive person or group. Find the story behind this behaviour

Name a wrong to be righted

Name an injury to respect

Name a perspective to take into account

Name an unnecessary status distinction to undo.

Name the simple kindnesses that are worth the risk

Commit to them

Evaluate the effect

Continue to subvert with grace

150 of 223

2.2. Engage through the 4 arts of leadership

150

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

« Engage in & stimulate courageous conversations and dare to speak into darkness on behalf of others »

Mark Strom, author of « Arts of the wise leader » and of « Leading with wisdom »

151 of 223

2.3 Design effective interventions - The 7 steps

151

AUTHENTIC TRANSFORMATION FOR COLLECTIVE PERFORMANCE

7. Keep the adaptive work at the centre

6. Analyse the factions that are beginning to emerge

5. Stand firm

4. Reflect on the framing of the challenge: stories, brilliance, promise & grace

3. Ask: "Who am I in this system?"

2. Determine the degree of maturity of the adaptive challenge for the system

1. Go out on the balcony

152 of 223

2.4 Influence & act politically

152

"Expert

(without formal authority)

Formal leader

(with formal authority)

"Manager

(with formal authority)

Informal leader

(without formal authority)

Leadership

Formal authority

153 of 223

2.3. Influence & act politically: stay under the radar…

153

… until you start getting results.

Make a few symbolic acts but don’t reveal the whole game before the changes you want to bring in have a chance to stick

154 of 223

2.3. Influence & act politically: build your coalition

154

Don’t hesitate to put aside your direct reports who are not ready or willing to support the changes

155 of 223

2.3. Influence & act politically: build your coalition across sectors

155

Public

Private

Not-for-

profit

156 of 223

2.3. Influence & act politically: build your coalition across sectors

156

Set up a board of “Critical friends”

157 of 223

2.4. Orchestrate the conflicts

157

  • Creating a waiting environment
  • Identifying leaders with or without formal authority
  • Accept support from people whose reasoning you would reject: Bringing antagonistic groups together often means allowing them to voice arguments you may personally find distasteful or even abhorrent.
  • Systematically return work to the group
  • Regulating heat

158 of 223

2.4. Orchestrate the conflicts…

158

… while protecting the weak and the voices of dissent

The voices of dissent are naysayers, the skeptics, who not only question your initiatives but question whatever is on the agenda for today. They often rest on the negative. But they are valuable for implementing adaptive change because they are canaries in the coal mine, early-warning systems, and because in addition to being unproductive and annoying much of the time, they have the uncanny capacity for asking the really tough key question that you have been unwilling to face up to yourself or that others have been unwilling to raise.

How can you protect the voices of dissent?

  • If you have formal authority in your organization, keep in mind that when someone expresses a contrary idea or asks a disturbing question during a meeting or conversation, everyone will observe your response to decide how they should react. Thus it is vital to demonstrate openness to seemingly subversive or revolutionary ideas.
  • If you are not in an authority role, you can still protect dissenters by taking them seriously and listening to them, trying to find the useful insights in what they’re saying without necessarily endorsing their perspective.

159 of 223

2.4. Orchestrate the conflicts – Regulate the heat

159

To reduce the temperature...

1. Address the aspects of the conflict that have the most obvious and technical solutions.

2. Provide structure by breaking the problem down into parts and creating deadlines, decision rules and role assignments.

3. Take temporary responsibility for difficult issues.

4. Use work avoidance mechanisms such as taking a break, telling a joke or story or doing an exercise.

To increase the temperature...

1. Draw attention to difficult questions.

2. Giving people more responsibility than they are comfortable with

3. Bringing conflicts to the surface.

4. Tolerate provocative comments.

5. Slow down the process of challenging norms and standards.

expectations

5. Name and use some of the dynamics present in the room when illustrating some of the problems faced by the group - for example: getting the authority figure to do the job, scapegoating an individual, externalising blame,...

160 of 223

2.4. Orchestrate the conflicts: learn to combine soft, hard & soft power skills

160

Hard Power (Transactional)

Soft Power (Inspirational)

  1. Emotional IQ
    • Ability to manage relationships & charisma
    • Emotional self-awareness and control

  1. Communications
    • Persuasive words, symbols, examples
    • Persuasive for near & distant followers

  1. Vision
    • Attractive to followers
    • Effective (balance ideals & capabilities)
  1. Organizational capacity
    • Manage reward & information systems
    • Manage inner & outer circles
  1. Machiavellian skills
    • Ability to bully, buy and bargain
    • Ability to build & maintain winning coalitions

Smart Power (Combined Resources)

  1. Contextual IQ (broad political skills)
    • Understand evolving environment
    • Capitalize on trends (« create luck »)
    • Adjust style to context & followers’ needs

Source: “The powers to lead” by Joseph Nye, adapted by Ledoux

161 of 223

2.4. Orchestrate the conflicts: start to name the elephant(s) in the room

161

In a highly adaptive organization, no issue is too sensitive to be raised at the official meeting, and no questions are off-limits.

What does it take to strengthen an organization’s ability to name its elephants?

  • Model the Behavior: People at the top of an organization are always sending out clues that indicate what behavior is acceptable. And that is nowhere more critical than in naming elephants.

  • Protect Troublemakers: They are contrarians, often pointing out an entirely different perspective or viewpoint when the momentum seems to be swinging in one direction. But some of the time, they are the only ones asking the questions that need to be asked and raising the issues that no one wants to talk about. Your task is to preserve their willingness to intervene and speak up.

162 of 223

2.6. Build an adaptive and collaborative culture

Inclusion

Respect

Autonomy

Trust

Personal development

Care

163 of 223

2.6.1. Start involving all levels in strategic reflection & decision-making Build

164 of 223

2.6.2. Get ahead with those are most motivated

165 of 223

2.6.3. Let people move with their feets

166 of 223

2.6.4. Start breaking down walls & eliminating “rules” (allow for opt-outs)

167 of 223

2.6.4. Establish the “whyway”, a culture where everybody feels he/she can question whatever the group does

  • Co-development of the strategy
  • Opening of management meetings to all
  • Trainings on "drivers" of the organization open to all
  • Criticism encouraged
  • Encouragement to leave any meeting where you waste your time

168 of 223

2.6.5. Respect craftmanship

Allow people to take the time to make a beautiful & impactful work

Take a holistic view of efficiency

169 of 223

2.6.6. Respect the 5 strategic principles of adaptive leadership�

Protect leadership voices w/out authority

(Cover who raises questions authorities can’t raise)

5

strategic

principles of

Leadership

Keep the distress level tolerable

(Control the pressure cooker)

Focus on ripening issues

(Counteract work avoidance mechanisms)

Give the work back to people

(Put pressure on people with the problem)

Identify the adaptive challenge

(Unbundle the issues)

Source: “Leadership without easy answers”, by Ronald Heifetz, adapted by Ledoux

170 of 223

Leadership skills

170

3.1.

Identify who you are

3.3.

Broaden your field of action

3.4.

Understand your roles

3.5.

Articulate your objectives

3.2.

Know your internal settings

3.

See yourself as (part of) a system

171 of 223

3.1. Listen to your liberating question

Do I really want this? Why?

What is the impact of my organization on society? Is it aligned with my life’s goal(s) & values?

172 of 223

3.2. Name your unspeakable loyalties

173 of 223

3.3. Understand your roles - We lead; we follow

Take stock of the past year:

  • When did you (mainly) direct?
  • When was this necessary?
  • When would you have done better to follow?
  • When did you (mostly) follow up?
  • When was this necessary?
  • When would you have been better off in charge?

173

Sometimes

you guide me

Sometimes

I guide you

174 of 223

Leadership skills

174

4.1.

Stay connected to your goals

4.3.

Inspire others

4.4.

Experiment

4.5.

Renew yourself

4.2.

Commit

courageously

4.

Deploy yourself

175 of 223

4.1. Tie your hands

Sign an

“Entreprise

Charter”

(such as B-Corp…)

Daniel Hurstel

(“Homme, Entreprise, Société”)

176 of 223

4.1. Enlarge your goal, from shareholder value to Shared value

Maximize the value

(without limits)

for shareholders

under the constraint of

the respect of the law

Optimize the value

for the society at large

under the constraint of

an adequate profit

for shareholders

Faber

VP Danone

Friedman

Chicago School

177 of 223

4.1. Work on your personal transformation, to serve & let go

178 of 223

4.1. Work on your personal transformation, to serve & let go

Laozi, 630 BC

The best leader is the one �whose existence the group barely knows

179 of 223

4.1. Work on your personal transformation, to serve & let go

Daily

physical

exercices

&

Eating

habits

180 of 223

4.1. Work on your personal transformation, to serve & let go

Give time

�Teach

&

Learn

181 of 223

4.2. Learn daily to ride your elephant (emotions)

182 of 223

4.2. Learn not to take it personally

Birds get into water without getting wet

183 of 223

4.2. Learn to think like Nature

“My capacity as a leader comes from my choice to allow life to unfold through me”

“The major problems

in the world are the result of the difference between

how nature works &

the way people think”

Senge

Bateson

184 of 223

4.2. Engage in spiritual exercise

“We only suffer

from ignoring

what is not lacking:

inner peace”

Castermane

185 of 223

4.2. Engage in spiritual exercise

Diel

Spiritualisation clarifies & prioritizes desires to meet life’s objective

186 of 223

4.2. Engage in spiritual exercise

All is one

Everything is connected

“Wisdom is knowing

that all is one”

Hawley

187 of 223

4.2. Engage in spiritual exercise

Waves are distinct but cannot be separated from the sea

188 of 223

4.2. Engage in spiritual exercise

Wise leadership…

…mobilizes the group to become conscious

that all is one ?

189 of 223

4.2. Let the effect impose itself

190 of 223

4.2. Let the effect impose itself

“It”

shoots

“Be one with

the bow, the arrow, the target & everything, everyone else”

Awa

191 of 223

Conscious leadership

Facing ethical dilemmas as growth opportunities  

192 of 223

193 of 223

193

Would you retrieve the Pinto’s from the market or not?

What would you do if you were

Lee Pinto?

194 of 223

194

What did Lee Iacoca, CEO of Ford ?

What does the 1974 Ford Pinto scandal teach us

about CSR?

195 of 223

195

What does the 2010 Toyota break scandal teach us

about CSR?

What did M. Toyoda, CEO of Toyota?

196 of 223

196

What would you do if you were

Steve Lewis?

Would you go to the meeting or not ?

197 of 223

197

“Become who you are”

(Friedrich Nietzsche)

Feelings?

Roots?

Future?

Imagination?

Who am I?

Source: Badaracco (1997); adapted by Ledoux

Questions to think «individual» dilemmas – Steve Lewis’ case

198 of 223

198

Questions to think «individual» dilemmas – Steve Lewis’ case

“Become who you are”

(Friedrich Nietzsche)

“How do my feelings and intuition

define, for me, the ethical dilemma?”

(To respect oneself or to be loyal – loyal to whom?)

“Which of the values that are in conflict

are most deeply rooted in my life

and in my community?”

(To consider the dilemma as his parents’ son)

“Looking to the future,

what is my way

(not the way of others)?”

(To become partner in an investment bank)

“What combination

of expediency and

shrewdness, coupled with

imagination & boldness, will move

me closer to my personal goals?”

(To go to St Louis but to participate to the presentation)

Who am I?

Source: Badaracco (1997); adapted by Ledoux

199 of 223

199

An ethos is the doctrine of a particular art of living the best possible life and the means to pursue this aim

(i.e. to live happily or to search for truth)

(Marcel Conche, philosopher)

Variations on the word « Ethics »

« Ethos » in Greek: custom, habit, way of behaving in an environment

The primary meaning of «Ethos» or «Ethics» has therefore to do with:

making your way,positioning yourself in an environment

Ethics is a human activity.

The purpose of ethics is not to make people ethical; it is to help people make better decisions

(Marvin Brown, author & ethics consultant)

A morality is a set of duties and imperatives

(positive or negatives) that a society or a community gives to itself and which enjoins its members to conform their behaviour, «freely» & in an «unselfish» way, to certain values enabling to distinguish right & wrong.

200 of 223

200

Potential sources to support ethical decision-making

Codes of conducts &

Mission statements

Legal

duties

Heuristics

(«sleep-test» rules)

Moral or ethical

principles

201 of 223

201

Institutional structure

Fixity & consistency

Individual processes

Adaptability & responsiveness

Results

“Doing good”

Principles

“Doing right”

Virtue

Ethics

(Aristotles, Gilligan,…)

Development

Ethics

(Etzioni, Covey,…)

Deontological

Ethics

(Kant, Rawls,…)

Teleological

Ethics

(Bentham, Mill,…)

A framework for ethical theories

Source: Fisher & Lovell (2003); adapted by LL

202 of 223

202

Conscious leadership: The Texas Instrument Ethics Quick Test (2001)

  • Is the action legal?

  • Does it comply with TI values?

  • If you do it, will you feel bad?

  • How will it look in the newspaper?

If you know it’s wrong, don’t do it!

If you’re not sure, ask.

Keep asking until you get an answer.

203 of 223

203

Conscious leadership: Suez’ Ethics Test

Questions to ask yourself in front of an ethical dilemma

  • Is it conform to the law ?
  • Is it conform to the ethical code and values of my company ?
  • Am I conscious that my decision can engage other people in the company ?
  • Do I feel alright with my decision ?
  • What would the colleagues think about my decision ?
  • What if it would be published in a newspaper ?
  • What would my family think about it ?
  • What if everybody would do the same ?
  • Should I question the person in charge of deontology ?

204 of 223

204

Ask yourself these questions concerning the decision you wish to take

4. Light-of-day test. Would I feel good or bad if others (friends, family, colleagues) were to know of my decision and action?

5. Virtuous mean test. Does my decision add to, or detract from, the creation of a good life by finding a balance between justice, care and other virtues?

Deontological ethics

6. Veil of ignorance/Golden Rule. If I were to take the place of one of those affected by my decision and plan would I regard the act positively or negatively?

7. Universality test. Would it be a good thing or a bad thing if my decision and plan were to become a universal principle applicable to all in similar situations, even to myself?

Development ethics

8. The communitarian test. Would my action and plan help or hinder individuals and communities to develop ethically?

9. Self-interest test. Do the decision and plan meet or defeat my own best interests and values?

Teleological ethics

11. Utilitarian test. Are the anticipated consequences of my decision and plan positive or negative for the greatest number?

12. The discourse test. Have the debates about my decision and plan been well or badly conducted? Have the appropriate people been involved?

3. Hedonistic or intuitive test. Does my decision correspond with my gut feeling and my values? Does it make me feel good?

Corporate credos & mission statements

Legal duties

2. Organisational test. Is my decision in accordance with my organisation’s rules of conduct or ethics

1. Legalist test. Is my decision in accordance with the law?

Virtue ethics

+/-

Veto

Respect of ethical principles

Heuristics

10. Consequential test. Are the anticipated consequences of my decision and plan positive or negative?

12 tests filter to validate or reject a decision

Trigger

205 of 223

205

What would you do if you were

Peter Adario?

What should you do

if a single parent on your staff

is falling behind

in his or her work?

206 of 223

206

Who are we ?

Other

interpretations?

Cash value?

Process?

Winning?

“Truth happens to an idea.

Its verity is in fact

an event, an idea”

(William James)

Questions to think «internal» dilemmas – Peter Adario’s case

Source: Badaracco (1997); adapted by Ledoux

207 of 223

207

Who are we ?

“What are the other strong, persuasive,

competing interpretations of the

situation or problem that I hope to use

as a defining moment for my org.?”

(To understand that, for Walters, the basic ethical issue

was irresponsibility: McNeil’s for not pulling her weight &

his for not taking action)

“What is the cash value of this situation

and of my ideas for the people

whose support I need?”

(Refine his message and shape it to the psychological &

political context in which he was working, in terms

of raising productivity or improving recruiting)

“Have I orchestrated a process

that can make the values

I care about become the truth

of my organization?”

(After hiring McNeil, to start quickly to let her & her work known

to his bosses & to campaign for a more family-friendly workplace)

“Am I playing to win?”

(To take swift actions to counter Walters:

While Adario was out of the office, she worked with one of the

bosses to swiftly resolve McNeil’s issue)

“Truth happens to an idea.

Its verity is in fact

an event, an idea”

(William James)

Questions to think «internal» dilemmas – Peter Adario’s case

Source: Badaracco (1997); adapted by Ledoux

208 of 223

208

Would you launch the RU 486 or not?

What would you do if you were Edouard Sakiz ?

209 of 223

209

Who is the

organisation?

Secured my

Position?

Thought creatively about my organization’s role

Play the lion or the fox?

Balanced approach morally & practically?

“Ethics result from the inescapable

tension between Virtue & Virtu”

(Aristote & Machiavel)

Source: Badaracco (1997); adapted by Ledoux

Questions to think «internal» dilemmas – Edouard Sakiz’ case

Source: Badaracco (1997); adapted by Ledoux

210 of 223

210

Questions to think «societal» ethical dilemmas – Edouard Sakiz’ case

Who is the

organisation?

“Have I done all I can to secure my

position and the strength & stability

of my organization?”

(To refrain to take decisions that could expose directly

The organization or to confront the BoA’s president)

“Have I thought creatively & imagina-

tively about my organization’s role

in society & its relationship

to its stakeholders?”

(To orchestrate a public debate

among the different stakeholders)

“Should I play the lion or the fox?”

(To organize and support a vote that will trigger

a massive counter-reaction from other actors)

“Have you done all you

can to strike a balance,

both morally & practically?”

(To market the new drug without endangering the organization)

“Ethics result from the inescapable

tension between Virtue & Virtu”

(Aristote & Machiavel)

Source: Badaracco (1997); adapted by Ledoux

211 of 223

211

Adaptive leadership – Reflecting upon case 2 : William Ruckhelshaus & Tacoma

What did Ruckhelshaus do or didn’t do?

What did he achieve?

Is this a leadership case?

Why or why not?

212 of 223

* Synthesis based on the texts from André Comte-Sponville, Marcel Conche & François Jourde

Economic, technical & scientific order

Possible vs. Impossible

(Natural and rational Law)

Juridical & political order

Legal vs. Illegal

Moral order

Right vs. Wrong

(Universal or universalisable duties)

limits

limits

limits

completes

Ascending

hierarchy for

individuals

Ethical order

Good vs. Bad

(Self, subjective or relative Will)

The 4 orders & the tensions between the individual and the group

Descending

hierarchy

for groups

Wisdoms

Spiritualities

Metaphysics

(secular or religious)

possibly induces

213 of 223

213

Ethical dilemmas�

Reveal

Ourselves

& stimulates creativity

Badaracco

214 of 223

214

Work on your personal transformation, to serve & let go�

215 of 223

216 of 223

15 commitments of conscious leaders by Dehtmer, Chapman & Klemp

216

217 of 223

15 commitments of conscious leaders by Dehtmer, Chapman & Klemp

217

218 of 223

219 of 223

Behind the 15 commitments of conscious leaders

220 of 223

  • Personal SWOT analysis (growth plan) – what is it, how to build it yourself?

  • Exploring the values and integrate them in the personal SWOT analysis

  • Exploring the Challenge model (Flavio)

Drafting your personal leadership SWOT & Growth plan

220

221 of 223

Bibliography

221

  • The practice of adaptive leadership, Ronald Heifetz, Alexander Grashow & Marty Linsky, HBR ed., 2009

  • Leadership without easy answers, Ronald Heifetz, HBR ed. 1994

  • Leadership on the line, Ronald Heifetz & Marty Linsky, HBR ed. 2002

  • Leadership can be taught, Sharon Daloz Parks, HBR ed. 2005

  • Quiet leadership, Joseph Badaracco, published by HBR, 2002

  • Questions of character, Joseph Badaracco, published by HBR, 2006

  • Arts of the wise leader, Mark Strom, Sophos ed., 2007 (www.artsofthewiseleader.com)

  • The powers of leadership, Joseph Nye, published by HBR, 2008

  • Leading with wisdom: spiritual-based leadership in business, Peter Pruzan & Kirsten Pruzan Mikkelsen, Response ed., 2009

  • Rational, Ethical & Spiritual Perspectives on Leadership, Peter Pruzan, Peter Lang ed. 2009

  • Leadership, spirituality and the common good, Henri-Claude de Bettignies & Mike J. Thompson, éditions Garant, 2010

222 of 223

Bibliography

222

223 of 223

223

To the loving memory ofFrançois Vassart�(1925 – 2001)��who was my first spiritual master and

made me copy a thousand time:��“If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster�And treat those two impostors just the same”

(Si tu peux rencontrer triomphe après défaite

Et recevoir ces deux menteurs d’un même front) �(Rudyard Kipling – “If”)

“Gagner pour vous,�Pour moi perdant,�Avoir été peut-être utile�C’était un rêve modeste et fou�Vous me mettrez avec, en terre�Comme une étoile au fond d’un trou”

(To win for you, losing for me

To have been, perhaps, useful

That was a modest and crazy dream

You’ll bury me with it

As a star in a deep hole)�(Aragon – “J’entends, J’entends”)