“FORGOTTEN SIGNALS IN FISHERIES MANAGEMENT”�
By, Deepak George Pazhayamadom
Department of Zoology, Ecology and Plant Science (ZEPS)
University College Cork (UCC), Cork, Ireland
Emer Rogan
(Department of ZEPS, University College Cork)
Ciaran Kelly
(Fisheries Science Services, Marine Institute)
Edward Codling
(Lecturer in Mathematical Biology, University of Essex)
Fisheries Management
(Traditional approach)
DATA
Fisheries Management
(Alternative approach)
SSB, F
[Estimated Indicators]
(Stock abundance and Exploitation)
MODELS (Assumptions)
Monitor with Reference Limits
(Acceptable, Precautionary, Limit)
Regulate with output controls
HCR (Eg: TAC)
Other measures (Eg: Effort)
Next Year
Limit 1000 1.5
Precautionary 1500 0.8
Acceptable 2000 0.5
F
SSB
Statistical Process Control�[Signal Detection Method]
Statistical Signals
[Stock Indicators]
Indicator Correlation
Spawning Stock Biomass |
80202 |
76328 |
79513 |
81415 |
75314 |
59943 |
50442 |
51140 |
54575 |
57047 |
57825 |
64478 |
62176 |
68199 |
70223 |
62100 |
60945 |
63634 |
59247 |
59088 |
54698 |
58995 |
74582 |
Year |
1984 |
1985 |
1986 |
1987 |
1988 |
1989 |
1990 |
1991 |
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
Catch Numbers Age 8 |
7749 |
8542 |
6419 |
4637 |
6490 |
8806 |
5453 |
3406 |
3601 |
2758 |
1916 |
2317 |
3397 |
3214 |
3979 |
4003 |
3616 |
4883 |
2328 |
2537 |
1949 |
3220 |
1306 |
Correlation = Degree of relationship
0.7 = Good
0.8 = Better
0.9 = Very good
INDICATORS (Examples)
Catch numbers from age group 1
Catch numbers from age group 2
Catch weights from age group 5
Catch weights from age group 4
Proportion of catch numbers
Proportion of catch weights
CN6 [BAD INDICATOR]
r= 0.09310228
PATTERNS DONT MATCH
CN11 [GOOD INDICATOR]
r= 0.90395651
PATTERNS MATCH
Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 | Y10 | Y11 | Y12 | Y13 | Y14 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
20 |
17 |
15 |
13 |
10 |
Acceptable Range (20-10)
Desired Value 15
19
16
18
13
18
15
20
15
12
14
11
10
8
15
5
10
15
20
AVERAGE LENGTH OF FISH FROM CATCH
(Traffic light monitoring)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
GREEN ZONE
PRECAUTION ZONE
PRECAUTION ZONE
Y1 | Y2 | Y3 | Y4 | Y5 | Y6 | Y7 | Y8 | Y9 | Y10 | Y11 | Y12 | Y13 | Y14 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Corrective Action
5
10
15
20
1
STATISTICAL PROCESS CONTROL
(SPC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
This is called a Control Chart
GREEN ZONE
CUMULATIVE SUM CONTROL CHART
(CUSUM)
Limits are statistically defined
-7
0
(15)
7
POSITIVE DEVIATIONS
NEGATIVE DEVIATIONS
CONSTRUCTION OF
CUSUM CONTROL CHART
ESTIMATED INDICATOR
Spawning Stock Biomass
STOCK INDICATORS
(Age based catch numbers and weights)
TRADITIONAL APPROACH
ALTERNATIVE APPROACH
COMPARISON
FOR WHICH YEARS ?
1. Cod (IS)
2. Megrim (CS & BB)
Acceptable In Control
Precautionary
Limit Out Control
68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | 72 | 73 | 74 | 75 | 76 | 77 | 78 | 79 | 80 | 81 | 82 | 83 | 84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GOOD | BAD |
Irish Sea Cod (Gadus morhua)
Reference Limits | Bpa Blim | = 10,000t = 5000t |
CN4 | = Catch number from age group 4 | |
CW4 | = Catch weight from age group 4 | |
CWABOVE | = Catch weight above age group 4 | |
CNABOVE | = Catch numbers above age group 4 | |
I – 1970
II – 1978
III – 1990
OC 1995
Traditional Approach - Spawning Stock Biomass
CN4
CW4
CWABOVE
CNABOVE
MATCH COLOUR CODES
Traditional Approach - Fishing Mortality
Irish Sea Cod
I – 1970
II – 1978
III – 1990
OC 1995
84 | 85 | 86 | 87 | 88 | 89 | 90 | 91 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 95 | 96 | 97 | 98 | 99 | 00 | 01 | 02 | 03 | 04 | 05 | 06 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
GOOD | BAD |
Celtic Sea and Bay of Biscay Megrim
(Lepidorhombus whiffiagonis, L. boscii)
I – 1990
II – 2004
Traditional Approach - Spawning Stock Biomass
CN8
CNPP6
CNPP7
CNPP8
Reference Limits | Bpa Blim | = 55,000t = Not defined |
CN8 | = Catch number from age group 8 | |
CNPP6 | = Proportions of catch numbers from age group 6 onwards | |
CNPP7 | = Proportions of catch numbers from age group 7 onwards | |
CNPP8 | = Proportions of catch numbers from age group 8 onwards | |
Traditional Approach - Fishing Mortality
Celtic Sea and Bay of Biscay Megrim
I – 1990
II – 2004
Pros and Cons