Lecture 4: �TB Prevention
Learning Objectives
This module will focus on the approaches used to prevent TB in children and adolescents including vaccination, TB preventive treatment, and TB infection control. Detection of new cases of childhood and adolescent TB among close contacts (contact screening) will also be covered
At the end of this module, participants will be able to:
Introduction
Discussion: Setting specific practices for TB prevention
| Is BCG vaccination included among the TB prevention strategies in your setting? At what age is the BCG vaccine usually given? |
What is the BCG vaccine coverage in your setting? What are some of the challenges hindering access to BCG vaccination? | |
What is the BCG vaccination policy in the context of HIV in your setting? |
Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination (1)
Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination (2)
WHO guidance on BCG vaccination in the context of HIV
Discussion: Setting specific practices for prevention
| How are close contacts of TB patients currently being identified in your setting – are you using an active or a passive contact tracing model? Are contacts identified at the household level, or only through questions to the TB case? And how do you currently ensure that all contacts are informed and screened for TB? |
Are there clear guidelines in your setting to explain roles and responsibilities related to tracing, screening and follow up of child TB contacts? Is there dedicated staff available at your facility to conduct community based household contact investigation? | |
What definition of a household contact is used in your setting? How common is it that multiple unrelated families might share a house or a plot? And if it is common, are questions asked to identify children outside of the immediate family of the TB case who might be in close contact with the case? |
Discussion: Setting specific practices for prevention
| Which contacts are eligible to receive TB preventive treatment? What are the TB preventive treatment regimens that are being used in your setting? |
How is contact management and TB preventive treatment documented in your setting? Do you have any structured tools in place to record number of child contacts identified and screened for TB? Do you have registers to record and monitor preventive treatment delivered to child contacts, including TPT completion? | |
How is this process of contact management and TB preventive treatment monitored and reported? Are there programmatic indicators for implementation? | |
If there is a high burden of MDR-TB in adults or adolescents your setting? Are there any guidelines on how to manage children exposed to MDR TB? |
TB Contact screening and management
��
TB contact screening and management
��
TB contact screening and management
��
Approaches to TB contact management �TB symptom screen
Rationale : to detect contacts of any age with presumptive TB |
* Sensitivity is the ability of a test to correctly identify individuals with the disease α Negative predictive value of a test is the probability that individuals who screen negative truly do not have the disease
|
Risk group | Sensitivity* | Negative predictive valueα |
Infants and children living with HIV | 90% | 99% |
PLHIV ≧ 10 years | 79% | 97% |
HIV negative contacts ≧ 5 years and other clinical risk groups | 73% | 99% |
Approaches to TB contact management �chest radiography
Rationale: CXR is commonly used to evaluate symptomatic contacts, often those who are sputum negative or not done. CXR can also be used to detect or rule out TB disease in older child and adolescent contacts (5 years and older) who are negative on symptom screen |
|
Approaches to TB contact management �test for infection
Rationale: TB preventive treatment is most effective in contacts without active TB who also have evidence of infection |
High-risk contacts such as young children (<5 years) and PLHIV do not require LTBI testing prior to TPT initiation Other HIV-uninfected contacts can be considered for TPT when test is unavailable |
TB preventive treatment (TPT)
Suggested Algorithm for TB screening and TPT, WHO, 2020
Example: TB contact tracing register
Example: TB contact tracing register & TPT register
TB preventive treatment options and care
TB preventive treatment options and care
Considerations for TPT initiation and follow-up
Consideration | Rationale |
Exclusion of active TB disease | Do not give TPT to a person with active TB as not effective and risks development of drug-resistance |
TB characteristics of index case | Contacts of known or presumptive DR TB are not eligible for TPT using isoniazid, rifampicin or rifapentine |
Characteristics of contact | Age*, pregnancy**, comorbidities and weight for dosage considerations |
Comorbidities and concurrent medications | Possible drug-drug interactions (such as ART); integration of care packages. Rifamycin based TPT regimen are not recommended for PLHIV on PIs or NVP based ART due to reduction in plasma levels of ART medicines |
Regimen selection | Appropriate regimen – age, availability |
Appropriate dosage | Dosage is by weight (not age) and recheck at follow-up |
* Prefer child-friendly formulations in young children.
* Rifapentine not recommended for <2 years; ** or for pregnant women
Considerations for TPT initiation and follow-up
Consideration | Rationale |
Availability of regimen option | Ensure sufficient supply for regimen completion |
Pyridoxine | INH can cause peripheral and central neuropathy due to vit B6 deficiency, though this is extremely rare in well children. Pyridoxine should be given with isoniazid-containing regimens to at-risk populations: including those with co-morbidities such as PLHIV, malnourished, renal failure and diabetes, as well as to pregnant and breastfeeding women |
Education and counseling | Ensure understanding of justification for preventive treatment for well child and adolescent contacts and PLHIV |
Follow–up; monitoring and evaluation | Monitor weight and for signs & symptoms of TB disease Assess adherence and side-effects to TPT NTP register and reporting requirements |
Considerations for TPT regimen selection
Population | Preferred TPT regimen | Alternative TPT regimen |
Children < 25 kg | 3RH (Pediatric FDC RH 75:50 formulation) | 6H* 3HP**(if ≧ 2 years) |
Children ≧ 25kg | 3RH or 3HP (Adult formulations) | 6H (Adult formulations) |
Children living with HIV | 6H* | For children on Efavirenz 3HP** (among ≧ 2 years) or 3RH |
Adolescents living with HIV | 3HP | 6H (Adult formulations) |
*Dispersible formulations for Isoniazid are preferred
** Currently there is no pediatric formulation for the 3HP regimen
Examples of dosage charts using 6H and 3RH
Weight band | Isoniazid daily dose | H 100 mg* tablet | H 300 mg tablet | RH 75/50 mg FDC |
4-7 kgs | 50 mg | 0.5 | - | 1 |
8-11 kgs | 100 mg | 1 | - | 2 |
12-15 kgs | 150 mg | 1.5 | - | 3 |
16-24 kgs | 200 mg | 2 | - | 4 |
≧ 25 kgs | 300 mg | 3 | 1 | Use adult formulations |
Dosages for in children: H 10 mg/kg (range 7-15 mg/kg); R 15 mg/kg (10-20 mg/kg)
Dosage in adolescents and adults: H 5 mg/kg, max 300 mg; R 10 mg/kg, max 600 mg
*Dispersible formulations for Isoniazid are preferred
Examples of dosage charts: 3HP using fixed dose combination tablet options
Weight band | Isoniazid (H) weekly dose | Rifapentine (P) weekly dose | HP 300/300 tablet |
10-14 kgs | 300 mg | 300 mg | 1 |
15-24 kgs | 450 mg | 450 mg | 1.5 |
25-29 kgs | 600 mg | 600 mg | 2 |
30 kgs or more | 900 mg | 900 mg | 3 |
Currently, rifapentine is not recommended for use in infants and children of less than 2 years: await safety and PK data.
Considerations for monitoring children and adolescents on TPT
Follow–up visits |
|
Weight monitoring |
|
Adherence |
|
TB symptoms |
|
Side effects |
|
How to manage TPT interruptions
TPT regimen | Duration of interruption | Management |
3RH or 6H | < 2 weeks OR > 2 weeks and > 80% of doses taken | Extend TPT duration by number of days of missed doses to complete as per original plan |
> 2 weeks and < 80% of doses taken and treatment can be completed within expected time of completion* | Continue and complete the remaining doses as per original plan | |
> 2 weeks and < 80% of doses taken and treatment cannot be completed within expected time of completion* | Consider restarting the full TPT course | |
3HP | 1 weekly dose missed and missed dose is remembered within 2 days | Advise client to take missed dose and continue TPT as per original plan following same schedule |
1 weekly dose missed and missed dose is remembered after 2 days | Advise client to take the missed dose and change the schedule for weekly intake to the day the missed dose was taken until completion. | |
1 – 3 weekly doses missed | Continue treatment until 12 doses are taken (to maximum of 16 weeks) | |
≥ 4 weekly doses missed | Consider restarting full TPT course |
*Expected time of completion = Treatment duration + 33% additional time
Always remember to address barriers to adherence
How to manage TPT related side effects
Side effect | What to do |
Hepatitis (anorexia, malaise, vomiting or jaundice) | Potentially the most serious side effect Stop TPT and refer the patient |
Gastrointestinal symptoms | Continue TPT: Usually mild – reassure the patient Suggest administer with food |
Lethargy | Continue TPT and re-assure the patient |
Itching with or without rash | Mild: continue TPT and administer antihistamines Moderate/severe: stop TPT and give steroids |
Flu-like syndrome | Likely rifamycin-related (R or P) Mild: Continue treatment and observe Moderate – severe: Stop TPT and consider 6H |
Drug-associated fever | Stop TPT and re-introduce if fever settles below 390c. Stop permanently if fever recurs |
Neurological (neuropathy, psychosis, seizures) | Likely INH-related; Stop TPT, continue pyridoxine and consider 4R |
Example: TPT treatment card (front side)
Example: TPT treatment card (backside)
TB preventive treatment and NTP
Checklist: key steps in considering TPT
Checklist: key steps in considering TPT
Considerations for TPT in DR TB contacts�WHO 2020
Considerations for TPT in DR TB contacts�WHO 2020
Case study 4: Missed opportunity for TB (and HIV) prevention
Case study 4
| Saka is an 8-month-old boy who was taken to the hospital severely ill with a decreased level of consciousness, convulsions, and fever. He had started on a course of antimalarial treatment before the onset of convulsions. Saka has a mild cough as well and has lost weight. His mother is on TB treatment and reports that he has not missed any doses. On examination, Saka responds to painful stimulation. His temperature is 38.10c. His head and neck are arched back. His fontanelle is full. No palpable lymph nodes. He has normal breath sounds with shallow and fast breaths (50/min) HIV test is positive. Urine LF-LAM test is positive and Xpert MTB/RIF on gastric aspirate is positive (MTB detected/ RIF sensitive) He is diagnosed with TBM and TB treatment is commenced.
|
Case study 7: Conducting contact screening
Case Study 7
| Paul is a 15 year-old boy who presented to the community clinic with cough and evening fevers for 3 weeks; associated profuse sweating and weight loss. He is HIV negative and has bacteriologically confirmed TB - sputum smear positive; Xpert MTB/RIF test: MTB detected/RIF sensitive. He lives with 7 other people at home, attends a nearby secondary school and helps out at the family shop after school. 1. Select the group of contacts that should be your first priority for contact screening .
2. Identify priority groups for TPT among the household members who have been traced in the community as indicated in the table that follows. 3. Complete the TB Contact tracing and TPT registers |
Case study 7: Evaluation for TPT
Contact information | Symptom screen in the community | Eligible for TPT (Yes/No/ Additional evaluation required) | Explain your response | If eligible for TPT, list regimen options |
4 years – sibling | Asymptomatic | | | |
54 years - mother | Cough for 2wks | | | |
45 years – aunt living with HIV | Asymptomatic | | | |
10 years – sibling | Asymptomatic | | | |
2 years – sibling | Poor weight gain | | | |
12 years – aunt’s son, HIV negative | Asymptomatic | | | |
9 years – sibling | Cough for 5 days | | | |
Case study 7: Conducting contact screening in a school setting
Case Study 7
| As mentioned, Paul attends a nearby secondary school 1.Select the group of contacts that should be your first priority for contact screening in the school setting.
2.Describe the contact screening approach you would use in this setting 3. Paul has now been receiving treatment at home for more than 2 weeks and is already feeling much better. What discussion with teacher about Paul’s return to school? |
Case study 9: Conducting contact screening
Case Study 9
| Ojore is a five year -old boy on ART (ABC/3TC/LPVr). He was diagnosed with bacteriologically confirmed PTB (Xpert MTB positive / RIF sensitive). He and his two siblings are being cared for by his father. During the day, his father leaves Ojore and his siblings with a neighbour who has a chronic cough. The neighbour has 2 children (3yrs and 6yrs). 1. Select the group of contacts that should be your first priority for contact screening .
2. Identify priority groups for TPT among the close contacts who have been traced in the community as indicated in the table that follows. 3. Complete the contact tracing and TPT registers |
Case study 10: Identifying priority groups for TPT
Contact information | Symptom screen in the community | Eligible for TPT (Yes/ No/ Additional evaluation required) | Explain your response | If eligible for TPT, list regimen options |
40 years – Father living with HIV | Asymptomatic | | | |
10 years – Sibling living with HIV | Cough | | | |
7 years – Sibling living with HIV | Asymptomatic | | | |
Neighbor/day carer – HIV negative | Cough for 2 months | | | |
Neighbor’s child – 3yrs | Cough | | | |
Neighbor’s child –6yrs | Asymptomatic | | | |
Discussion: Setting specific practices for infection control
| Are basic infection control measures implemented in healthcare facilities in your setting and if so, what are they? What facilities or clinical settings are regarded as settings where children might have a high risk of exposure to TB? Discuss firstly how patients and their children are protected, and then how healthcare workers are protected. |
Which children with TB that require hospitalisation are at particular risk of transmitting TB to other children in the hospital ward? What do you do to reduce this risk? | |
A mother with TB has a sick new born who requires inpatient care. How do you reduce the risk of that mother transmitting TB to other sick infants while caring for her baby? | |
Are TB patients informed about basic infection control principles that they could implement at home? Is there any opportunity (for example, home visits) where the messages about infection control could be reinforced, and the entire household could be educated? |
TB Infection Control
TB Infection Control
Role play 3: Counseling - TB infection control in the household
-Patient -Health worker -Observer | You have diagnosed Lily with Xpert MTB positive(MTB detected/ RIF sensitive). You want to counsel her about how to avoid transmitting TB to others. Lily has four children, including a 9-month old daughter that she is still breastfeeding Potential issues to address:
|
Summary of Key Learning Points
Summary of Key Learning Points
�Summary of Key Learning Points�
References
https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240002906