1 of 40

DOBBS ELEMENTARY�FY26 BUDGET FEEDBACK MEETING��FEBRUARY 11, 2025

2 of 40

AGENDA

  1. Action Items

A. Approval of Agenda

B. Approval of Previous Minutes

C. Vote in New Secretary

  1. Discussion Items
    1. Budget Development Presentation
      1. ACTION ITEM: GO Team vote on Draft Budget (AFTER presentation and discussion)
  2. Information Items
    • Principal’s Report

B .Cluster Advisory Report (if CAT has met since last meeting)

  • Announcements
  • Public Comment

2

3 of 40

MEETING NORMS

3

This is a meeting of the GO Team. Only members of the team may participate in the discussion. Any members of the public present are here to quietly observe.

We will follow the agenda as noticed to the public and stay on task.

We invite and welcome contributions of every member and listen to each other.

We will respect all ideas and assume good intentions.

4 of 40

BUDGET FEEDBACK PRESENTATION & DISCUSSION

5 of 40

GO TEAM BUDGET DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

5

Step 1: Data Review

Step 2: Strategic Plan Review

Step 3: Budget Parameters

(Strategic Priorities)

Step 4: Budget Choices

YOUR SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN…

is your roadmap and your role.

It is your direction, your priorities, your vision, your present, your future.

6 of 40

OVERVIEW OF FY26 GO TEAM BUDGET PROCESS

6

Step 1 Update Strategic Plan & Rank Priorities

Step 2 Principals Workshop FY 26 Budget

January 15

Step 3 GO Team Initial Budget Session

January 15-31 

Step 4 Principals Cluster Supt. Discussions

Step 5* GO Team Feedback Mtg. February 10-14

Step 6 Cluster Supt. Review February 17-21

Step 7 Principals HR Staffing Conferences Begin

Feb. 24-27 

Step 8* GO Team Final Budget Approval Meeting

Budgets Approved by March 14

GO Teams are encouraged to have ongoing conversations

* GO Teams will need to take ACTION on the budget at these meetings.

7 of 40

BUDGET FEEDBACK MEETING

7

  • What

During the GO Team Feedback meeting the principal will share the 25-26 Strategic Plan Breakout, provide an overview of the school’s draft budget, share updated tabs from the Excel template, and review/collaborate with the GO Team on the comments/notes to explain the use of school-level flexibility in budget allocations.

  • Why

This meeting provides an opportunity for GO Teams to discuss the principal’s proposed budget and how it supports the school's programmatic needs and key strategic priorities for the 25-26 school year. It also provides the GO Team the opportunity to review and provide feedback on proposed use of school-level flexibility.

  • When

Early February 10 - February 14th, before Cluster Superintendent review.

8 of 40

APS Strategic Priorities & Initiatives

1A. Monitor the delivery of Tier 1 Instruction to include Rollins

1B. Monitor the Data Analysis Assessments weekly & monthly

1B. Monitor the delivery of Small Group Instruction

1B. Utilize small group instruction to provide individualized instruction

3. Monitor the Collaborative Planning Process to include analyzing standards and data

2A. : Utilize the Whole Child Intervention Team to track students’ absences

2B. Monitor the reduction of chronically absent students as evidenced by the CARE TEAM

2B. Implement attendance incentive program

4A: Staff engagement in weekly data meetings

4B: Implement Weekly and Unit Common Assessments to address gaps in Standards

5. Implement & utilize the STEM learning profiles across the content areas

Dobbs Elementary

SMART Goals

School Strategies

The percentage of students in grades 3-5 scoring proficient or above in reading/ELA will increase from 12% to 17% and decrease the percentage of students scoring beginning from 58% to 53% on the 2025 GMAS.

The percentage of students in grades 3-5 scoring proficient or above in Math will increase from 10% to 15% and decrease the percentage of students scoring beginning from 61% to 56% on the 2025 GMAS.

The Average Daily Attendance rate will increase to 94% during the 2024-2025 school year. 

14

School Strategic Priorities

Mission

Vision

Fostering Academic Excellence for All Data

Curriculum & Instruction Signature Program

Building a Culture of Student Support

Whole Child & Intervention Personalized Learning

Equipping & Empowering Leaders & Staff

Strategic Staff Support Equitable Resource Allocation

Creating a System of School Support

Strategic Staff Support

Equitable Resource Allocation

1. Increase proficiency in literacy and mathematics

2. Increase daily average attendance rate

3. Increase staff capacity in literacy instruction

4. Increase staff capacity in data analysis and usage for instructional decision-making

5. Increase STEM integration

To foster a 21st century learning environment that integrates the community and school through a culture of mutual respect, high academic standards , and technology innovation.

To provide rigorous, innovative, and engaging learning experiences through diverse partnerships designed to cultivate fiscally responsible citizens who are college and career ready..

9 of 40

9

FY25 Budget Parameters

FY25 School Priorities

Rationale

Maintain lower class sizes in the primary years by funding parapros in 1st and second grade

47% mobility rate requires a great deal of teacher attention to students who enter our school throughout the year – many of which are below level.

Maximize wrap around services ie: Nurse, SSW, Counseling

This continues to be a need for our students, but we need to look closely at maximizing our budget to make this work.

Increase Reading/Lexiles and writing of 3rd – 5th grade students. How can we restructure our program to achieve this?

Data indicates that students who have been with us for more than one year have greater performance levels than students who are transient. With 47% of our students coming and going, there is a need to target these students.

Example

FY26 Budget Parameters

10 of 40

10

FY25 Budget Parameters

FY25 School Priorities

Rationale

Maximize the intervention block daily

Dedicated time for students to receive specific interventions and/or enrichment.

Utilize data to meet the individual needs of students.

Ensure that students are receiving maximized opportunities for achievement and remediation daily

Example

FY26 Budget Parameters

11 of 40

REVIEW OF FY26 SIGNATURE AND TURNAROUND PROGRAM FUNDING PROCESS

11

Overview

* The district is piloting a zero-based budgeting (ZBB) process for Signature and Turnaround Program Funds this year.

* Zero-based budgeting (ZBB) is a budgeting process that allocates funding based on program efficiency and necessity rather than budget history. As opposed to traditional budgeting, no item is automatically included in the next budget.

* As such the initial allocation for these programs at all schools will be $0.

Process

* Principals will develop proposed requests for the personnel and non-personnel they need to support the Signature and/or Turnaround Programs at their schools.

* Principals will share and discuss their proposals and rationale for the proposals with their school GO Team for feedback.

* After discussing with their GO Team, principals will submit their request for review by January 31st. Funding for these programs will be provided the week of February 3rd.

12 of 40

OVERVIEW OF SIGNATURE PROGRAM �FUND REQUEST

12

 

REQUESTEDSignature Program Coach – Aligned w/district’s request for state certification.

Rationale - The STEM Coach is vital to Dobbs Elementary’s academic success and innovation. They drive STEM certification efforts, prepare students for STEM careers through technology fairs, robotics, Esports, and STEM challenges, and integrate writing across content areas. Supporting small groups and ensuring 5th-grade science (a GMAS-tested area) mastery, the coach directly impacts CCRPI performance, helping the school achieve a 100% “Closing the Gaps” score. Their work embeds STEM principles schoolwide, ensuring hands-on learning and future readiness. Funding this position in FY26 sustains these initiatives and prepares students for success in a global, STEM-driven society.

SIGNATURE STEM LAB Teacher - The STEM Teacher is a key member of the leadership team, championing innovation and preparing students for STEM careers through engaging programs like robotics, Esports, and STEM challenges. She supports schoolwide growth by integrating STEM across content areas, providing targeted small-group instruction, and ensuring excellence in 5th-grade science, a critical GMAS-tested subject. Her contributions have driven CCRPI success, including a 100% “Closing the Gaps” score. As a leader, she fosters collaboration and creativity among staff while equipping students with essential skills for a STEM-driven future. Funding this role in FY26 ensures continued academic growth and innovation.

SIGNATURE Travel & Resources - "A $52,000 allocation of funds will be used for a STEAM at J.W. Dobbs is to use resources to integrate STEAM concepts across grade levels, provide professional development, and deliver hands-on learning experiences. Together, these roles will strengthen teachers’ abilities to implement interdisciplinary Project-based Learning (PBL) units that align with Georgia Standards of Excellence.A total of $20,000 will fund a keyboard program in music to integrate the Arts with technology and engineering, while $10,000 will purchase robotics kits (Lego Robotics, Ozobots, Sphero) to foster coding, engineering, and problem-solving skills. $10,000 for online resources will support STEAM curriculum and enhance PBL units with interactive tools.A further $7,000 will provide essential supplies for hands-on PBL activities, and $5,000 will support a STEAM celebration and community engagement event on Earth Day in 2026 to showcase student projects and encourage parent and community involvement.This budget is an investment in the future of our students, providing them with the skills needed to succeed in a rapidly evolving, technology-driven world.“ We are requesting funds to support travel for our STEAM coach and teacher to attend professional development opportunities. These experiences will expose them to cutting-edge practices in STEAM education, helping them bring innovative strategies to Dobbs.

13 of 40

OVERVIEW OF APPROVED SIGNATURE PROGRAM FUNDS

13

Per District’s Approval: Your templates have been updated with a new allotment. The new formula is:

            •  1.0 FTE at the instructional coach average salary

•   Required supplement fees ($5,000-$49,500 depending on software, dues, and agency visits)

•   And $100 per pupil to support your flexible requests, materials and supplies, etc.

 

14 of 40

OVERVIEW OF APPROVED SIGNATURE PROGRAM FUNDS

14

Per District’s Approval: Your templates have been updated with a new allotment. The new formula is:

 

•              1.0 FTE at the instructional coach average salary

•              Required supplement fees ($5,000-$49,500 depending on software, dues, and agency visits)

•              And $100 per pupil to support your flexible requests, materials and supplies, etc.

 

FY2026 Signature Earnings

$284,488

Amount Requested for Signature

$330,151

15 of 40

OVERVIEW OF TURNAROUND �FUND REQUEST

15

Turnaround Instructional Coach - Dobbs Elementary’s progress from the CSI state turnaround list to achieving significant CCRPI gains highlights the critical role of turnaround coaches. With their targeted expertise, our turnaround coaches have been instrumental in driving improvements in teacher practices, data-driven instruction, and student achievement. Our CCRPI results show the impact of their work:•Content Mastery increased from 24.2 (2022) to 34.6 (2023).•Closing Gaps improved from 90% to 100%, earning board recognition.• 3rd-Grade Reading Proficiency increased significantly, earning state recognition. Turnaround coaches provide vital support by:•Coaching teachers to implement high-quality, differentiated instruction aligned to standards. Using data to design interventions that address specific student needs. Conducting professional learning that equips staff with strategies to improve outcomes. These efforts have directly contributed to our gains, especially in closing achievement gaps and enhancing literacy proficiency. However, sustaining this momentum requires maintaining their expertise and support. It takes at least three years to fully establish the systems and structures necessary for lasting success. Without the continued guidance of turnaround coach, we risk stagnation or regression. Funding for the turnaround coaches will ensure we continue to meet our students’ needs, support teachers effectively, and solidify our progress. Their leadership has been pivotal in creating a culture of growth and achievement at Dobbs, and their ongoing presence is essential for sustaining and building on our success.“

Turnaround Teacher - Dobbs Elementary’s transformation from the CSI state turnaround list to achieving CCRPI gains has been driven by strategic staffing, including two turnaround teachers whose impact has been profound. These teachers provide targeted instruction and interventions that address the specific needs of our students, particularly in foundational skills. Our CCRPI results underscore their contributions. Content Mastery increased from 24.2 (2022) to 34.6 (2023).Closing Gaps improved from 90% to 100%, earning board recognition.3rd-Grade Reading Proficiency increased significantly, earning state recognition. Turnaround teachers support progress by: Delivering small-group and individualized instruction to close learning gaps in literacy and math. Implementing evidence-based strategies to accelerate learning for struggling students. Collaborating with classroom teachers to align interventions with core instruction. These efforts have been essential in addressing the academic challenges of our students, particularly those performing below grade level. As we work to solidify our progress, continued funding for these teachers is crucial. Research shows that turnaround efforts require at least three years to fully embed sustainable systems. Losing this support could jeopardize the gains we have made and leave gaps in the instructional support our students need. Funding for a turnaround teacher will allow us to sustain the targeted interventions that have proven successful, ensuring all students have the opportunity to achieve at high levels. Their work is integral to our mission of sustaining growth and fostering long-term academic success at Dobbs Elementary.

16 of 40

OVERVIEW OF TURNAROUND �FUND REQUEST

16

FY2026Turnaround Earnings

$284,488

Amount Requested for Turnaround

$284,488

Per district: Please know that allocations will be tightly monitored and aligned with turnaround implementation strategy.

17 of 40

DOBBS ELEMENTARY��FY26 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED STAFFING AND NON-STAFFING

-

17

18 of 40

SUMMARY TAB OVERVIEW

18

Position Title

Earned

Funded

Staffed

Dif

Comments

Teachers

Middle School Core

49.50

-

(49.50)

Middle Electives

19.00

-

(19.00)

Teacher Math 6-8

11.00

11.00

Teacher Science 6-8

10.00

10.00

Teacher Social Studies 6-8

10.00

10.00

Teacher ELA 6-8

9.00

9.00

Teacher Art 6-8

2.00

2.00

Teacher Band 6-8

1.00

1.00

Teacher Music 6-8

2.00

2.00

Teacher Orchestra 6-8

1.00

1.00

Teacher Physical Ed 6-8

7.00

7.00

Teacher Performing Arts 6-8

2.00

2.00

Teacher World Language 6-8

12.00

12.00

Teacher Gifted

13.00

11.00

(2.00)

Teacher Social Emotional Learning

-

-

EIP TEACHERS

3.50

5.00

1.50

Teacher REP 6-12

5.00

5.00

Example

The Summary Tab provides a summary of the staff in our school. The columns show how many positions are:

  • Earned – positions allocated by district departments. There is no school-level flexibility with these positions. 
  • Funded – District’s recommended staffing for positions where there is school-level flexibility with staffing the position.
  • Staffed – This shows how the principal plans to staff the position for the FY26 school year.
  • Difference—This shows the difference between the recommendation from the District and the Principal's proposed FY26 staffing plan.
  • Comments: The principal must provide comments if there is a difference in what is Funded and Staffed. Principals and GO Teams will discuss the rationale provided for the Comments section.

19 of 40

-

19

20 of 40

-

20

21 of 40

-

21

22 of 40

-

22

23 of 40

-

23

24 of 40

SUMMARY OF POSITION CHANGES TO SUPPORT THE FY26 BUDGET

24

CREATED

REMOVED

Non-Instructional Aide

Paraprofessional

Psychologist (.25 FTE)

Psychologist (.5) To match earned

World Language Teacher

NA (To meet standard of service)

25 of 40

NON-STAFFING TAB OVERVIEW

FY26 Budget Allocation

25

Description

Rec.

Allocation

Diff

Notes

 

 

 

 

 

Reserve

$ 291,149

$ 291,149

$ -

 

Teacher Stipends

 

 

$ -

 

Secretary Overtime

 

 

$ -

 

Contracted Services for Instruction

 

 

$ -

 

Contracted Services for Professional Development

 

 

$ -

 

Web-based Subscriptions and Licenses

 

 

$ -

 

Signature Program Communication/Shipping Fee

 

 

$ -

 

Computer Software

 

$ -

$ -

 

Mileage

 

 

$ -

 

Student Transportation-APS Buses

 

 

$ -

 

District Funded Field Trips

$ 60,886

$ 60,886

$ -

 

Teaching/Other Supplies

$ 81,900

 

$ (81,900)

 

Signature Program Supplies

 

 

$ -

 

Computer Equipment

 

 

$ -

 

Media Supplies

$ 13,104

 

$ (13,104)

 

Example

The Non-Staffing Tab shows how funds are allocated for non-staff items in the school. There is school-level flexibility for most of these items. The tab has columns for: 

  • Recommended—District’s recommended amount to spend on the line item.
  • Allocation – This shows how much the principal is proposing to allocate towards the line item in FY26.
  • Difference—This shows the difference between the recommended amount and the allocation.
  • Notes: The principal must provide comments if there is a difference in what is Recommended and what is Allocated. Principals and GO Teams will discuss the rationale for the notes section.

26 of 40

26

27 of 40

NON-STAFFING TAB CONTINUED

27

28 of 40

DESCRIPTIONS OF STRATEGIC PLAN�BREAKOUT CATEGORIES

28

  1. Priorities: FY25 funding priorities from the school’s strategic plan, ranked by the order of importance.
  2. Strategies: Lays out specific objectives for school’s improvement.
  3. Request: “The Ask”  What needs to be funded in order to support the strategy? 
  4. Amount: What is the cost associated with the Request?

29 of 40

FY26 STRATEGIC PLAN BREAK-OUT

29

Priorities

Strategies

Requests

Amount

Increase proficiency in literacy and math

Increase staff capacity in literacy instruction.

Increase staff capacity in data analysis.

Monitor the delivery of Tier I instruction, specifically in reading, but also math. Monitor data analysis assessments weekly and monthly

Monitor small group Instruction.

Purchase a Turnaround Teacher

Sustain Turnaround Coach

$284,488

Increase STEM integration

Implement & utilize eh STEM learning profiles across the content areas and obtain STATE certification

Signature Coach

STEM Teacher

$284,488

30 of 40

FY26 BUDGET BY FUNCTION (required)

30

* Based on Current Allocation of School Budget

31 of 40

FY26 BUDGET BY FUNCTION (required)

31

* Based on Current Allocation of School Budget

32 of 40

QUESTIONS FOR THE GO TEAM TO CONSIDER AND DISCUSS

32

Strategic Alignment and School-Level Flexibility

    • Does this budget proposal, as a whole, effectively support our school's strategic priorities?
    • How do the principal’s proposed changes directly support priorities in our strategic plan? Can we clearly connect each adjustment to a strategic goal?
    • If new positions, resources, or programs are being added, what data or feedback supports these changes? How will we measure their impact?
    • What trade-offs are involved? Are any current programs or resources being adjusted or reduced, and how will that affect our students and staff?

33 of 40

QUESTIONS FOR THE GO TEAM TO CONSIDER AND DISCUSS

33

District and Cluster Priorities

    • How do these proposed changes align with district and cluster priorities? Do we foresee any challenges or misalignments?
    • If the district has allocated funds for specific initiatives – for example Signature Programs - how are those reflected in our budget?
    • If we are sharing staff positions (e.g., nurse, counselor, teacher), how will this affect student support and service delivery at our school?

34 of 40

DISCUSSION OF RESERVE & HOLDBACK FUNDS

35 of 40

PLAN FOR FY26 LEVELING RESERVE

35

Priorities

Strategies

Requests

Amount

Increase proficiency in literacy and math

Increase staff capacity in literacy instruction.

Increase staff capacity in data analysis.

Monitor the delivery of Tier I instruction, specifically in reading, but also math. Monitor data analysis assessments weekly and monthly

Monitor small group Instruction.

This funding depends on the enrollment after the 10-day count

$85, 626

$85, 626

36 of 40

PLAN FOR FY26 TITLE I HOLDBACK

36

Priorities

Strategies

Requests

Amount

$_-23,100___

37 of 40

WHERE WE’RE GOING

37

What:

During this meeting we will review the budget, which should be updated based on feedback from the staffing conference, Associate Superintendents, and key leaders. After review, GO Teams will need to take action (i.e., vote) on the FY25 Budget. 

Why:

Principals will present the final budget recommendations for GO Team approval. 

When:

All approval meetings must be held after staffing conferences. Budgets must be approved by March 15th

Our next meeting is the Budget Approval Meeting 

38 of 40

WHAT’S NEXT?

38

  • February
    • Cluster Superintendent Review (February 17-21)
    • HR Staffing Conferences (February 24– February 27)
  • March
    • Final GO Team Approval Meeting (AFTER your school’s Staffing Conference and BEFORE Friday, March 14th)
      • ACTION (i.e.- GO Team votes) on final budget recommendation before March 14

39 of 40

THANK YOU!

40 of 40

WILL BE UPDATED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE

40