Verifiable Claims
Working Group Proposal
2016.7 Face-to-Face - Web Payments Interest Group
Manu Sporny - Verifiable Claims Task Force
Goals for this Session
Organizations participating in the surveys/task force
ETS
NACS
IMS Global
Blockstream
Rabobank
Enterprise Estonia
New Zealand Government
Pearson
Bloomberg
RIAA
ID2020 (United Nations)
Verisys
Badge Alliance
Note: This is a subset.
These are selected organizations that have been public about their participation (from ~85 total that have participated)
Problem and Mission
52 Organizations Agree With Problem and Mission Goals
Verifiable Claims Charter Scope
Set of Verifiable Claims
Digital Signature by Issuer
Claims about Subject
Subject Identifier
Claim Set Metadata
This Proposal
Data Model
Syntaxes
Attribute Exchange Protocols
Browser APIs
Not in scope
This is what we are standardizing
49 Organizations Agree with Charter Scope / Deliverables
Is there a broader vision and architecture? Yes.
Issuer
Issue Claims
Inspector
Request Claims
Holder
Acquire, Store, Present Claims
Identifier Registry
Maintain Identifiers
Issue Claims
Register Identifier
Present Claims
Verify
Identifier
Ownership
Verify
Identifier
Ownership
Are there use cases and a specification? Yes.
Has the work been thoroughly incubated? Yes.
Work starts in
Web Payments CG
Credentials CG formed
Verifiable Claims
Task Force formed
Broad industry interest /
use cases survey
Verifiable Claims WG
proposal survey
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Expert interviews / due diligence
We are here
Are there concerns? Yes.
Is there traction? Yes.
Questions / Concerns / The Ask