1 of 13

Verifiable Claims

Working Group Proposal

2016.7 Face-to-Face - Web Payments Interest Group

Manu Sporny - Verifiable Claims Task Force

2 of 13

Goals for this Session

  • Status Update on Verifiable Claims

  • Demonstrate current support for Working Group

  • Request that Web Payments IG asks W3C Management to call vote on Verifiable Claims Working Group proposal

3 of 13

Organizations participating in the surveys/task force

ETS

NACS

IMS Global

Blockstream

Rabobank

Enterprise Estonia

New Zealand Government

Pearson

Bloomberg

RIAA

ID2020 (United Nations)

Verisys

Badge Alliance

Note: This is a subset.

These are selected organizations that have been public about their participation (from ~85 total that have participated)

4 of 13

Problem and Mission

  • Problem: Currently difficult to transmit banking account information, proof of age, education qualifications, healthcare data, and other sorts of verified personal information via the Web.

  • Mission: Make expressing, exchanging, and verifying claims easier and more secure on the Web.

5 of 13

52 Organizations Agree With Problem and Mission Goals

6 of 13

Verifiable Claims Charter Scope

Set of Verifiable Claims

Digital Signature by Issuer

Claims about Subject

Subject Identifier

Claim Set Metadata

This Proposal

Data Model

Syntaxes

Attribute Exchange Protocols

Browser APIs

Not in scope

This is what we are standardizing

7 of 13

49 Organizations Agree with Charter Scope / Deliverables

8 of 13

Is there a broader vision and architecture? Yes.

Issuer

Issue Claims

Inspector

Request Claims

Holder

Acquire, Store, Present Claims

Identifier Registry

Maintain Identifiers

Issue Claims

Register Identifier

Present Claims

Verify

Identifier

Ownership

Verify

Identifier

Ownership

9 of 13

Are there use cases and a specification? Yes.

10 of 13

Has the work been thoroughly incubated? Yes.

Work starts in

Web Payments CG

Credentials CG formed

Verifiable Claims

Task Force formed

Broad industry interest /

use cases survey

Verifiable Claims WG

proposal survey

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Expert interviews / due diligence

We are here

11 of 13

Are there concerns? Yes.

12 of 13

Is there traction? Yes.

  • 2014 - 11 organizations support initiative
  • 2015 - 24 organizations support initiative
  • 2016 - 49 organizations support initiative
    • 15 commitments to build verifiable claims products
    • 27 commitments to deploy verifiable claims products

13 of 13

Questions / Concerns / The Ask

  • Questions?
  • Concerns?
  • Does the Web Payments IG want to recommend to W3C Management that the proposed Verifiable Claims Working Group Charter be taken to a member vote at W3C?