1 of 15

RI

Housing

Alicia Mies

Brandon Huang

Cynthia Lu

Ruth Bamuwamye

Ecosystem

2 of 15

Refine the housing ecosystem map...

Our Task

3 of 15

Guiding Questions

  1. What does the housing ecosystem in Rhode Island look like? How do institutions like non-profits, community development corporations, courts, private sector real estate entities, public housing authorities, city and state committees, etc. interact with one another in order to develop and manage affordable housing?
  2. What is the best way to organize and visualize information to convey what the housing ecosystem in RI looks like? How do we best categorize housing entities?
  3. How do we make our visualizations most helpful to a variety of stakeholders, including non-profit organizers, legislators and community partners?

4 of 15

Process

5 of 15

Process/Challenges

  1. Collection
    1. No centralized databases
    2. Obscured process
  2. Organization of Data
    • Format
    • Categorizations/descriptors
  3. User Optimization
    • Visualization
    • Understanding the users of the information (shareholders/actors)

GOAL: Creating a way for community organizations to quickly access basic info/understand the RI housing ecosystem

6 of 15

7 of 15

Takeaways

  • 172 housing organizations; 448 subsidized affordable housing developments; 32 policies and programs
  • Housing ecosystem seems extensive
  • Good way to give credit where credit is due
  • Resources potentially spread thin?
  • Many organizations did many things
  • Religious organizations merited their own category
  • Providence, South Bay are hotspots; Pawtucket seems unique
  • No multiple categorizations: losing information? New mechanism?

8 of 15

Visualizations

9 of 15

10 of 15

11 of 15

12 of 15

13 of 15

Booklet

14 of 15

Future Work

15 of 15

Next Steps

  • Further research
    • Adding more information
    • Existing resources
    • Diving in identities/specific communities
  • Refining the spreadsheet
    • Ease of additions and corrections
  • In depth analysis and takeaways
    • Evaluating the effectiveness of the system
    • Transformations
    • Identifying relationships and patterns
    • Overlaps or gaps in the system
    • More comprehensive sources of funding
  • Involving more stakeholders
    • Community partners
    • Government agencies
    • Maintain accuracy, vetting process
    • Question of ownership
  • Front-end platform
    • Interactive visual component