1 of 38

Aerial Optical Fiber Access Network

Aerial Fiber to the X network

ABADISDYNAMIC.COM

About this DOC :

Proposal of ABADIS DYNAMIC TECHNOLOGY

On 9 August 2024

2 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

List of Technical Parameter Differences Between Aerial Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks:
1. Due to mechanical constraints of utility and streetlight poles in Iran, the number of aerial optical fiber cables that can be installed on these structures is typically limited to two.
2. The inability to effectively manage the installation of multiple cables along a single route, combined with the high long-term costs of maintenance and fault detection, is further exacerbated by cable congestion.
3. The use of aerial cabling limits the potential for future infrastructure expansion to accommodate emerging capacity demands.
4. Deploying multiple cables along a single route results in a several-fold increase in network implementation costs.
5. In some areas, branching from existing routes is either prohibitively expensive or technically unfeasible.
6. Due to the limitations of ADSS cables, branching at high numbers and short spatial intervals is not feasible.
7. Repairing faults involves high costs and extended timeframes.
8. The requirement to maintain fiber optic cable continuity when crossing aerial obstacles results in low installation speed and high costs.
9. Lower mechanical strength and durability of the cable compared to micro-duct systems.

AD-Tech

3 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

Due to mechanical constraints of utility and streetlight poles , the number of aerial optical fiber cables that can be installed on these structures is typically limited.

AD-Tech

4 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

The use of aerial microducts eliminates the need for multiple cable installations, requiring only a single micro-duct along the intended path.

AD-Tech

5 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

The inability to effectively manage the installation of multiple cables along a single route, combined with the high long-term costs of maintenance and fault detection, is further exacerbated by cable congestion.

AD-Tech

6 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

With the use of aerial microducts, the management and control of network installation, maintenance, and fault detection becomes significantly easier , faster and cheaper.

AD-Tech

7 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

The use of aerial cabling limits the potential for future infrastructure expansion to accommodate emerging capacity demands.

AD-Tech

8 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

The use of aerial microducts enables network expansion at a significantly lower cost, with much greater speed and ease.

AD-Tech

9 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

Deploying multiple cables along a single route results in a several-fold increase in network implementation costs .

AD-Tech

10 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

With the use of aerial microducts, only a single micro-duct is installed along each route, eliminating the need for re-cabling and the associated costs for different paths and independent cables.

AD-Tech

11 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

In some areas, branching from existing routes is either prohibitively expensive or technically unfeasible.

AD-Tech

12 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

With the use of aerial microducts, new branches can be created at any point along the route with minimal cost.

AD-Tech

13 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

The limitations of ADSS cables prevent high numbers of branches and short spatial intervals, as a single high-capacity cable is used instead of multiple lower-capacity cables

AD-Tech

14 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

The use of aerial microducts allows for the creation of more branches along the route, covering a greater number of points..

AD-Tech

15 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

Repairing failures in the aerial cable network requires high costs and a long time.

AD-Tech

16 of 38

Comparison of Aerial Optical Fiber Cable Networks and Aerial Microduct Networks

The use of aerial microducts enables much faster and more cost-effective network repairs, while allowing for the easy replacement of all existing micro cables along the route

AD-Tech

17 of 38

Ability to withstand environmental forces induced by snow and wind

Resistance to the effects of UV radiation

Ability to withstand 40 bar air pressure during cable blowing

Resistance to the effects of electric fields generated by power transmission lines

The very low weight and minimal cross-sectional area of the microducts reduce the force exerted on power and lighting transmission poles

Aerial Microduct Specifications

AD-Tech

18 of 38

Advantages of the Proposed Design

Operational Experience in Thailand:

AD-Tech

19 of 38

Advantages of the Proposed Design

Significantly greater network capacity and coverage capability

Lower implementation cost

Reduced implementation time

Lower maintenance costs and faster fault recovery

High ease of scalability.

Capability to meet all requirements of Tavanir and the network operator

AD-Tech

20 of 38