SESSION 1A · Saturday, August 1 · 10:00–11:30 am
Listening to Learners
Using Student Reasoning and Authentic Data
to Teach Correlation and Regression
Jen McNally · Laura Callis
DISCUS-IS · Homework, Attendance, & Final Exam Grade
NSF DUE 2314358
NSF DUE 2235355
INSTITUTE FOR INTRODUCTORY STATISTICS INSTRUCTORS�SPONSORED BY EAPOST: EXPANDING THE ART & PRACTICE OF STATISTICAL THINKING
While you wait:
Sign up for inclusivestatistics.com
Quantitative Data: �The Relationship Between Final Exams, Attendance, Homework
Dr. Laura Callis, Curry College
While you wait:
Sign up for inclusivestatistics.com
Activity Context
A COMMON QUESTION
“What do you think I’ll get on the final exam?”
Why grades? We needed contexts that were super-obvious to students – they all understood grades!
Step 1: Ask a research question��How well can we predict final exam grade from homework grade & attendance?
Step 2: Design a Study & Collect Data
46 students in my classes:
🗨️How do you think
these 3 variables
are related?
Step 3: Explore The Data
What do you notice? Wonder?
TEACHING: �WHAT DO STUDENTS THINK?��Note: These Are Interviews, Not Teaching Moments��Let’s develop cognitive empathy with students
STUDENT THINKING�INSTITUTE_1A_CLIP1.MP4 �INSTITUTE_1A_CLIP3.MP4�INSTITUTE_1A_CLIP2.MP4 ���How are these students approaching the scatterplot? �What do you wonder about how the third student is thinking about the regression equation?
Step 3: Explore The Data
Data: https://tinyurl.com/Correlation2NSF
Applet:
https://www.rossmanchance.com/applets/2021/regshuffle/regshuffle.htm
Or Google “Rossman Chance Applets”
Click “Analyzing Two Quantitative Variables”
Step 3: Explore The Data
ASSOCIATION
Positive Association | Observational units that have above-average values for the explanatory variable tend to have above-average values for the response variable. Observational units that have below-average values for the explanatory variable tend to have below-average values for the response variable. |
Negative Association | Observational units that have above-average values for the explanatory variable tend to have below-average values for the response variable. Observational units that have below-average values for the explanatory variable tend to have above-average values for the response variable. |
Association Strength | The degree to which the above tend to be true |
Using the definition of positive and negative association, what type of association do you think there is between these variables?
Correlation Coefficient
Line of Best Fit
Line of Best Fit
Use Your Line to Predict
Sum Of Absolute Errors
To figure out which line is the best prediction line, it would make sense to add up all of these residuals or errors – but, we should make them all positive so that the negatives and positives cancel out.
1. Click on “Show residuals.” What are all of those blue lines about?
2. Use the Sum of Absolute Errors (SAE) to compare your prediction lines with others. Who has the best line? How are you deciding?
Sum Of Square Errors
Did you do better than using �the mean Final Exam score?���
COMPUTER’S ANSWER
Click “Show Regression Line”
Click “Show Squared Residuals”
Did the computer beat you at creating a better prediction line? How can you tell? Compare your SSEs.
A comparable measure
The Sum of Square Errors depends on units and it depends on the number of data points
Add a data point that doesn’t sit directly on the line to see how the Sum of Square Errors changes
Explained variation
Compare Predictors
Step 5: Make inferences
How to Simulate:
SIMULATE
Click “Show Shuffle Options” on the Right
Use the drop-down under “Choose Statistic” to Choose “Correlation”
Under “Select Display” choose “Plot”
Shuffle once. Compare your scatterplot with a neighbor. Is that what you expected? Is it similar or different from our actual data?
Notice that the correlation coefficient from this shuffle gets plotted on the graph. Is this what you expected? How does it compare to the actual data? What about your groupmates?
MANY REPETITIONS
Increase the number of Shuffles to 1000.
How often did you get a correlation coefficient as larger as the one we got in our actual data?
What does that tell you about whether these results could be due just to chance?
In a separate tab, conduct a similar analysis for the other predictor variable.
Step 6: Draw Conclusions��Explore Multivariable Applet: https://www.rossmanchance.com/applets/2021/multreg/multreg.html
Which variable, Homework grade or Percent Missed Classes, seems to be a better predictor of Final Exam Grade? How are you deciding?
What if we use both explanatory variables? How does that change our predictions?
STUDENT THINKING INVESTIGATIONS
Sign up at inclusivestatistics.com
Once you gain access, look through some of the videos of student thinking
11:25–11:30
Before you leave this session —
write on your index card:
One thing you learned about what students actually do with correlation and regression.
One question you're leaving with about how to teach it.
Keep this card — you'll use it in action planning at 2:00 pm
Session 2A begins at 11:30