1 of 21

Race and Membership:

The Roots of Systemic Racism in U.S. Schools

Kevin Feinberg, Senior Program Director, New York

kevin_feinberg@facinghistory.org

www.facinghistory.org

2 of 21

MISSION STATEMENT

Facing History uses lessons of history to challenge teachers and students to stand up to bigotry and hate.

3 of 21

Our Pedagogical Triangle

4 of 21

5 of 21

We Are All Smog-Breathers

Beverly Daniel Tatum, President Emerita of Spelman College, author of Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria? And Other Conversations about Race (and Member of Facing History’s Board of Scholars):

Think about these [racial] stereotypes … these distortions as a kind of environment that surrounds us, like smog in the air. We don't breathe it because we like it. We don't breathe it because we think it's good for us. We breathe it because it's the only air that's available...

We're all breathing in misinformation. We're all being exposed to stereotypes, and we all have to think about how we have been impacted by that. You sometimes hear people say there is not a prejudiced bone in my body. But I think when somebody makes that statement, we might gently say to them check again. That if we have all been breathing in smog, we can't help but have our thinking shaped by it somehow. As a consequence, we all have work to do. Whether you identify as a person of color, whether you identify as a white person, it doesn't matter. We all have been exposed to misinformation that we have to think critically about.

(Interview with PBS, 2003: https://www.pbs.org/race/000_About/002_04-background-03-04.htm)

6 of 21

Eugenics: a 20th Century “Science”

“Eugenics is the science which deals with all influences that improve and develop the inborn qualities of a race. But what is meant by improvement? We must leave morals as far as possible out of the discussion on account of the almost hopeless difficulties they raise as to whether a character as a whole is good or bad. The essentials of eugenics may, however, be easily defined. All would agree that it was better to be healthy than sick, vigorous than weak, well fitted than ill fitted for their part in life. In short, that it was better to be good rather than bad specimens…”

From Nature magazine, 1904.

https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/origins-eugenics

Sir Francis Galton

(1822-1911)

7 of 21

Eugenics: a 20th Century “Science”

Race and Membership in American History: The Eugenics Movement

https://www.facinghistory.org/topics/race-us-history/race-membership-eugenics

8 of 21

Eugenics: a 20th Century “Science”

Y

  • Race exists - it is a biological reality.
  • Races are unequal. Some are superior and others are inferior along a continuum.
  • Physical and behavioral traits between and within races are biologically determined.
  • Environment has little or nothing to do with a person’s development.
  • These traits are passed down from one generation to another (through “blood plasma”/genes/dna).

20th Century Eugenics Movement

9 of 21

Eugenics: a 20th Century “Science”

  • Especially concerned with traits as criminality, feeblemindedness, pauperism, etc.
  • Science can help weed out “bad blood” and prevent “miscegenation” through artificial selection. (Sterilization, immigration restriction, marriage restriction, etc.)
  • Science can help society observe and measure eugenic differences in order to facilitate this process.
  • Eugenics promoted in most science textbooks, by most major universities, and by many philanthropic foundations (Harvard, Princeton, Stanford, Rockefeller, Ford, Kellogg, etc.)

20th Century Eugenics Movement

10 of 21

QUESTIONS TO ASK OF

THE EUGENICS MOVEMENT:

  • Why was the eugenics movement so popular among the white, middle and upper classes in the early 20th century?
  • How did the scientists who promoted eugenics prove their theories? What data did they collect and promote?
  • How do these ideas affect human behavior and public policy (especially educational policy)?
  • What are the legacies today?

11 of 21

Eugenics: a 20th Century “Science”

In the ferment of the early 20th century with immigration, urbanization, and the migration of African Americans from the south into the North and West driving white, middle class fears, eugenics become a popular “solution” on both the Left and the Right and drove public policies:

  • State sterilization laws
  • Tougher anti-miscegenation laws
  • Immigration Restriction Act of 1924
  • EDUCATION / SCHOOLING...

12 of 21

1905: Frenchman Alfred Binet

  • Designed the first intelligence or IQ test (called the Binet-Simon Scale)
  • Designed to identify which students needed help learning
  • Did NOT design test to predict how children would do in school
  • Rejected the notion that intelligence was a fixed quantity

13 of 21

Stanford-Binet IQ Test

  • Professor of Education at Stanford University
  • Re-designed Binet’s tests to apply eugenic principles to intelligence; became known as the Stanford-Binet IQ Tests
  • He used data gathered from the tests to “prove” the “truth” of eugenics
    • Immigrants arriving at Ellis Island (1913)
    • US army (1.7 million soldiers, 1917)
    • California Public Schools (1910s-20s)

Lewis Terman “Father of the SAT”

14 of 21

Stanford-Binet IQ Test

Alpha Test: a series of multiple choice questions.

  • Sapphires are usually: blue red green yellow
  • Cornell University is in: Ithaca Cambridge Annapolis New Haven

Beta Test: a series of images, with one item missing. There is only one right answer.

YOU WILL BE TAKING ONE PART OF THE BETA TEST.

  • You will have 3 minutes (the exact time alloted for the this section).
  • There are 20 pictures. Each picture is missing one item. What is that missing part?
  • Number your paper 1 through 20 (there are 20 questions)

https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/revising-test

15 of 21

3 minutes

Write what is missing for each item

Or draw what is missing

16 of 21

Stanford-Binet IQ Test

In your small groups (4 minutes):

  • Introduce yourself briefly.
  • Discuss:
    • What did you notice about the test?
    • Why would Educational Leaders in the 1910s - 20s think this test measures intelligence?
    • Why is this a flawed test?

Note: Don't get caught up on the “right” answers! Discuss your insights and questions about the test…

17 of 21

Results gathered from US military

In 1917 1.7 million men in the US army were tested as the ranks were growing prior to US entry into the Great War (WWI)

Test takers were divided into one of three “racial groups”

  • Nordic (Northern and Western European �“stock”)
  • Alpine and Mediterranean (from Southern

and Eastern Europe - many immigrants

or sons of immigrants)

  • Negro Draft (African Americans)

The results, presented in a bell curve,

show that, on average, the Nordic group

scored highest, and the “Negro Draft”

scored lowest

18 of 21

What policies do these data justify?

Lewis Terman, responding to results of the IQ tests given to California school children, wrote:

The tests have told the truth. These boys are ineducable beyond the merest rudiments of training. No amount of school instruction will ever make them intelligent voters or capable citizens. . . . They represent the level of intelligence, which is very, very common among Spanish-Indian and Mexican families of the Southwest and also among Negroes. Their dullness seems to be racial, or at least inherent in the family stocks from which they come…. Children of this group should be segregated in special classes and be given instruction which is concrete and practical. They cannot master abstractions, but they can often be made efficient workers…

From “The Measurement of Intelligence,” 1916

19 of 21

Eugenics’ Influence on US Education

  • Ability is innate
  • Intelligence is a fixed quantity and can not be improved
  • The purpose of education is to sort students and match them to the vocations for which they are best suited.

Thus segregation and tracking were justified through data; race based education was seen as a progressive policy to spend public funds smartly. Segregation and tracking was designed to educate students based on their innate limits and innate promise - with race as the primary factor.

20 of 21

HISTORY, RACE, & EDUCATIONAL INEQUITY

This illustration promotes the notion that the new Eugenics intelligence tests will be:

  1. A more accurate measuring device for separating out different "grades of student."
  2. Useful for tracking students into different classes and schools.
  3. Tests were an objective measure for predicting which students would be superior or inferior.

"The Pupil Becomes an Individual," American School Board Journal, 1921.

21 of 21

Legacies to Consider

Eugenics is largely discredited, but it lives on in the “smog” we breathe:

  • In the assumptions about which students can or cannot do well in traditional academic subjects
  • In which students should be steered toward certain tracks
  • In the different standards used to discipline and suspend students based on race and background
  • In the assumption that standardized and high stakes tests provide objective data on students’ intelligence and ability to achieve
  • In the formula to fund schools through local property taxes