1 of 26

Koushik Sen

Nicolaus Copernicus University Torun

Astrophysics seminar of the PAU Astrophysics Committee, Krakow

April 5, 2023

Evolution of short-period massive binary stars in the Magellanic Clouds

Collaborators: Norbert Langer, Abel Schootemeijer, Tomer Shenar, Laurent Mahy, Goetz Grafener, Chen Wang, Hughes Sana, Athira Menon, Selma de Mink

2 of 26

The Magellanic Clouds

2

Credit: J. C. Muñoz/ESO

Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC)

Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC)

3 of 26

Massive stars

  • Mass greater than 8 M

3

O type star

Early B type stars

  • More massive stars are larger in radius
  • More massive stars have shorter lifetimes
  • Mass is fundamental in stellar evolution

Radiative envelope

Convective core

4 of 26

Multiplicity of massive stars

  • Massive stars are mostly born in binaries (Sana+2012,2013)
  • Almost all O stars will interact during their lifetime (Moe+2017)

4

Fraction of interacting binaries

Sana+2012

Moe+2017

Mass M1 (M )

5 of 26

What is the need?

  • Progenitors of gravitational wave sources (Abbott+2016,2019).
  • “Rapid binary evolution” predictions inaccurate (Laplace+2020,2021).
  • Constrain “mass transfer efficiency” (Langer+2003, de Mink+2007).
  • Source of ionising radiation and mechanical feedback (Maclow+2004).

5

Kruckow+2018

6 of 26

Close binary evolution

6

M1 = 20 M M2 = 12 M

Porb = 3 d

Images credit: Philip D. Hall - CC BY-SA 4.0

M1 = 20 M M2 = 12 M

M1 = 20 M M2 = 12 M

M1 = 16 M M2 = 16 M

M1 = 8 M M2 = 24 M

a

7 of 26

Algol binaries and the Algol paradox

  • Algol or 𝜷-Persei, is a star system that shows periodic variations in brightness

7

  • The Algol paradox: Less massive star is more evolved than its companion
  • Resolution: Close binary evolution (Pustylnik+1998)

Credit: SpaceEngine

M1 = 0.7 M , R1 = 3.48 R

M2 = 3.2 M , R2 = 2.73 R Porb = 2.87 days

8 of 26

Wind-fed black hole high-mass X-ray binaries

  • Cygnus X-1: first ever black hole observed
  • Maximally spinning, only one in our Galaxy

8

collapse

Stripped star

MBH = 21.2 M

MO = 40.6 M

Credit: NASA

Kruckow+2018

9 of 26

Binary evolution modelling

  • 1D stellar evolution code
  • Individual binary components are evolved simultaneously
  • Details of mass transfer is calculated at each timestep
  • Essential for studying interacting binaries

9

Detailed binary evolution with MESA (Paxton+2011,13,15,18,19)

10 of 26

PART I: MASSIVE ALGOL BINARIES

10

11 of 26

Algol binaries: Context

11

Md = 8.7 M

Ma = 16.3 M

9.0

10.0

11.0

12.0

t [Myr]

Observations

Models

  • Milky Way (~100 Algols): Surkova+2004, Budding+2004, Papageorgiou+2018, Malkov+2020
  • SMC (~40 Algols): Harries+2003, Hilditch+2005
  • LMC (7 Algols): Ostrov+2000,2002, Mahy+2020a,b
  • Milky Way: Pols+1994, Nelson+2001, Mennekens+2017, Negu+2018
  • SMC: de Mink+2007
  • LMC:

No comprehensive binary population synthesis study of massive Algol binaries

Sen+2022A&A...659A..98S

long mass transfer phase

12 of 26

Algol binaries: Method

  • 10,000 detailed binary evolution models (MESA, Marchant2016)
  • Md,i = 1040 MSun, qi (Ma,i/Md,i) = 0.2750.975, Pi >= 1.4 d
  • Population synthesis of massive Algol binaries in the LMC
  • Constant star formation and empirical binary distribution functions
  • Compare with observed massive Algols in the LMC and Milky Way

12

13 of 26

Mass transfer efficiency

crit = (GM/R3)0.5

13

M, R, I, Ꞷi

ΔM?

ΔJ = (GMR)0.5 ΔM

ΔM/M = 𝒇 (rg2, Ꞷi/Ꞷcrit)

IꞶ

ΔM/M = 0.00-0.10 (Packet+1981)

I = rg2 MR2

In binaries, there are tidal forces!

14 of 26

Algol binaries: Results

  • Models predict high mass transfer efficiency at Porb < 5 days and vice versa

14

Sen+2022A&A...659A..98S

  • Evidence of efficient mass transfer in short orbital period massive Algols

15 of 26

Algol binaries: Takeaways from Part I

  • Mass transfer is efficient at short orbital periods.
  • Spin-dependent accretion can produce an orbital period dependent mass transfer efficiency.
  • Around 90 O-type and early B-type Algol binaries in the LMC.

15

16 of 26

PART II: WIND-FED BLACK HOLE HIGH-MASS X-RAY BINARIES (HMXBs)

16

17 of 26

BH high-mass X-ray binaries: Context

17

  • Average lifetime of stripped+O star phase (0.4 Myrs) < BH+O star phase.
  • BH-BH merger rates (Mennekens+2014; Belczynski+2016)

Stripped star

collapse

Kruckow+2018

18 of 26

BH high-mass X-ray binaries: Method

  • Observed sample of 18 stripped+O star binaries (Vanbeveren+2020).
  • Assume the stripped stars collapse to form BHs without recoil.
  • Follow the O star evolution using stellar models (Ekstrom+2012).
  • When will a BH+O binary be observable as an wind-fed High Mass X-Ray binary?

A. Formation of an accretion disk

B. X-Ray flux above detection threshold

18

19 of 26

Formation of an accretion disk

19

RO

Racc

Matter is accreted from the stellar wind (vwind) of the O star

Accretion radius of the compact object (Davidson+1973)

Specific angular momentum (j) of the accreted matter (Shapiro+1976)

figure not to scale

a

20 of 26

Formation of an accretion disk

20

  • This accreted matter can go in a Keplerian orbit of radius Rdisk with �velocity vdisk = j/Rdisk

Equating centrifugal force to gravitational force, Rdisk = j2 / GMBH

21 of 26

Formation of an accretion disk

21

  • This accreted matter can go in a Keplerian orbit of radius Rdisk with velocity vdisk = j/Rdisk

Equating centrifugal force to gravitational force, Rdisk = j2 / GMBH

  • An accretion disk can form when: Rdisk > RISCO where RISCO = 6GMBHƔ/c2

[ 𝛾± = ⅙, 1, 3/2 ]

22 of 26

X-Ray luminosity (LX)

22

-- mass accretion rate (Davidson & Ostriker 1973)

-- X-ray luminosity (Frank+2002, El Mellah 2017)

-- The Lx > 1035 erg s-1 to be observable (Wood+1984, Bradt+1991)

23 of 26

BH high-mass X-ray binaries: Results

23

Black hole spin

Sen+2021A&A...652A.138S

For Cygnus X-1

MO star = 40.6 M , MBH = 21.2 M

Orbital period = 5.9 days

Non-rotating BH: Rdisk / RISCO = 0.20

Maximally rotating: Rdisk / RISCO = 1.23

24 of 26

BH high-mass X-ray binaries: Takeaways

  • BH+O star binaries are X-ray silent for most of their lifetime.
  • Bias towards observing maximally rotating BHs.
  • Recoil velocity not necessary to explain number discrepancy.

24

25 of 26

Outlook

  • A large spectroscopic survey of massive Algol binaries in the MCs and Milky Way will provide more constraints on binary evolution.
  • Large population of X-ray quiet BH+O star binaries still to be discovered (Langer+2020, Shenar+2022, Mahy+2022).

25

26 of 26

THANK YOU

26