Project Presentation� Title: Travel Demand Modelling of IIT-Jodhpur campus
1
Abstract
2
Travel demand modelling is one of the key processes in understanding the traffic and people travel pattern of any study area, Travel demand modelling involves creating mathematical model for trip generation and using the trips produced a trip-distribution matrix is generated, modal-split analysis and route-assignment are done subsequently. The study area for this project is IIT-Jodhpur campus. Based on the results from these processes insights regarding total trips made, distribution of trips to different zone, traffic-flow, modal-split, average travel time, average cost of travel, parking analysis, identifying busy routes and methods to avoid congestion, important routes and important timings for providing E-Rickshaw service in campus. Also becomes instrumental in determining if new routes need to be laid in campus. Although travel demand modelling is applied regularly to major cities it is very rarely applied on universities. Even though campuses produce lot of trips and the travel pattern inside the campus is very different from conventional city travel trips, very less amount of research work is done in this area. By applying the 4-stage travel demand model to the university, the project aims at providing information to the management so that it can provide good travel experience and transportation facilities to its population.
Key words: Campus travel demand modelling, 4 stage travel demand modelling, Trip-generation, Uniform growth trip distribution, Modal split analysis, All or none trip assignment model.
Contents
Introduction
Methodology
Literature Review
IIT-Jodhpur Campus study
Data collection
Trip Generation
Trip Distribution
Modal Split
Trip Assignment
Conclusions and Suggestions
References
3
Introduction and Literature review
4
Methodology
5
Campus study
Data collection
Trip generation model
Trip distribution
Modal split analysis
Trip assignment
Conclusions and suggestions
Analytics
Figure 1
IIT-Jodhpur campus study
6
Year | Students | | | Total student count | Faculty | Staff | Total |
| Bachelors | Masters | Ph.D. |
| | |
|
2008-2009 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 108 | 90 | 99 | 297 |
2009-2010 | 214 | 0 | 0 | 214 | 90 | 99 | 403 |
2010-2011 | 342 | 40 | 19 | 401 | 40 | 63 | 504 |
2011-2012 | 496 | 81 | 26 | 603 | 49 | 65 | 717 |
2012-2013 | 539 | 63 | 41 | 643 | 60 | 60 | 763 |
2013-2014 | 591 | 47 | 70 | 708 | 55 | 47 | 810 |
2014-2015 | 593 | 63 | 113 | 769 | 54 | 47 | 870 |
2015-2016 | 557 | 54 | 139 | 750 | 54 | 48 | 852 |
2016-2017 | 528 | 83 | 149 | 760 | 55 | 63 | 878 |
2017-2018 | 538 | 127 | 153 | 818 | 61 | 63 | 942 |
2018-2019 | 641 | 168 | 155 | 964 | 64 | 64 | 1092 |
2019-2020 | 852 | 435 | 315 | 1602 | 125 | 67 | 1794 |
2020-2021 | 1178 | 835 | 551 | 2564 | 186 | 82 | 2832 |
2021-2022 | 1335 | 1031 | 667 | 3033 | 224 | 85 | 3087 |
Avg of 2020-2022 | 1256 | 933 | 609 | 2798 | 205 | 83 | 3086 |
Figure 2: Campus master plan
Figure 3: IIT-J population
Table 1: IIT-J population over years
IIT-Jodhpur campus study
7
Origin Locations | Longitude-E | Latitude-N |
B1 Hostel | 73.116 | 26.4738 |
B-2 Hostel | 73.1172 | 26.4738 |
B-3 Boys Hostel | 73.118 | 26.473 |
B-5 Hostel | 73.1159 | 26.4732 |
G-2 Hostel | 73.1172 | 26.474 |
G-4 Hostel | 73.1178 | 26.4738 |
G-5 Hostel | 73.1172 | 26.4738 |
G-6 | 73.1155 | 26.473 |
I2 Hostel | 73.1159 | 26.472 |
Type B housing | 73.111 | 26.474 |
Faculty housing | 73.111 | 26.4749 |
Type C housing | 73.113 | 26.467 |
Entrance | 73.1159 | 26.4669 |
Destination Locations | Longitude-E | Latitude-N |
Bioscience and Bioengineering, Dept | 73.115 | 26.476 |
Chemistry, Dept | 73.115 | 26.476 |
Computer Science & Engineering, Dept | 73.115 | 26.4758 |
Mechanical Engineering, Dept | 73.1169 | 26.4798 |
Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Dept | 73.1168 | 26.479 |
Electrical Engineering, Dept | 73.1169 | 26.4798 |
Humanities & Social Sciences, Dept | 73.115 | 26.4758 |
Lecture hall | 73.114 | 26.473 |
Metallurgical & Materials Engineering, Dept | 73.117 | 26.48 |
Library | 73.114 | 26.472 |
School of Management | 73.1178 | 26.4806 |
Main Drop-Off | 73.116 | 26.467 |
Admin block | 73.114 | 26.472 |
Mathematics, Dept | 73.115 | 26.4758 |
Physics., Dept | 73.117 | 26.48 |
Geo-Referencing and digitizing the campus
Table 2 co-ordinates
Table 3 co-ordinates
IIT-Jodhpur campus study
8
2.3 Digitizing Campus Buildings, Infrastructure and Roads
Figure 4:Digitized Campus model
IIT-Jodhpur campus study
9
Zones of campus:
Zone1: the entrance gate of the campus, security guards watch tower comes under this zone.
Zone2: Type-C faculty housing, Community center and other facilities nearby.
Zone3: This zone is a cluster of Main office building, Library, Lecture Hall and shop.
Zone4: student hostels as well as mess, and also sports facility and Gymnasiums.
Zone5: Type-B faculty housing and also laundry service in berms is also considered under this zone
Zone6: This zone houses the following departments-Computer science and mathematics, Bio and chemical departments, Humanities and social sciences.
Zone7: This zone is comparatively more populous than zone6 as it consists of more departments. Civil and Infrastructure, Mechanical, Metallurgy, Electrical, Physics, Material science, School of management and Entrepreneurship. It also has the campus health center.
Zoning of campus:
Zoning is a process in which the entire study area is divided into smaller regions called zones to study and understand the travel pattern that occurs in the study-area.
Figure 5: Campus zoning
Data collection
10
Data collection process is one of the key steps to obtain good results. “Quality of data is more important than the quantity of the data”.
Amount of Data required:
As the people of same categories more or less follows same kind of travel pattern it is considered that very large amount of survey data is not very much necessary for the modelling.
Direct and Indirect data:
Figure 6: Travel survey form
Data collection
11
Avoiding sampling Bias:
Groups of people in campus:
By observing as well as by conducting field studies and survey the following groups are predominantly present in the campus:
Figure 7: Actual population percentage distribution vs Sample population distribution percentage
Trip generation
12
Trip Generation
Travel demand modelling starts with trip generation. Because trip generation involves in finding or predicting the total number of trips made or attracted from different zones or from the entire study area.
Trip Production and Trip Attraction:
Types of Trips:
Trips are classified based on the purpose also the involvement of house or living zone
Figure 8: Home and Non-home trips
Trip generation
13
Home based trips in campus
In campus for students Hostels are considered as homes and for faculty and staff their respective type-B and type-C housing are considered as homes. So, any trip made by students involving hostels, for faculty either of type b or c is involved either in origin or destination then those trips are considered as home-based trips.
Difference between campus and city travel
Factors that can Influence Trip Generation in Campus
Trip generation inside campus is different when compared to the trips generated outside campus. Trips in towns and cities happen for various reasons like for earning money, to work, to school. To cinema hall etc.
But in Campus it happens due to number of
trips made to sports facility, trips made to department, trips made to library, trips made to auditorium, trips made to lecture hall, mode choice, trips made to campus-dhobi, trips made to mess, trips made to hostel, trips made by security personnel, trips made by watch men all these factors decide the number of trips produced inside the campus.
Trip generation
14
When compared to students, PhD scholars, teaching and non-teaching faculty the trips made by Security personnel and Watchmen is very much restricted. Once they take charge of particular location, they do the duty for 8 hours. Also, after their duty they go back to their homes or rest rooms. So, their movements are very less and can be tracked more accurately.
There are around 180 security guards in campus. These guards work in 8-hour shifts, so in a day there are 3 timings namely 6am-2pm, 2pm-10pm,10p6am. So a total of around 360 trips happen.
2. Travel Pattern of Hostel Watchman inside the campus:
There are around 42 Hostel watchmen in the campus. These guards work in 8-hour shifts, so in a day there are 3 timings namely 6am-2pm, 2pm-10pm,10pm-6am. During each slot around 14 security guards are posted at hostels. During the shift change around 28 guards will make travel in campus. Therefore, a total of 84 trips are possible. Around 30 guards have 2 wheelers.
3. Travel Pattern for Dhobi Service:
Dhobi service can be availed by the students twice a week. Also, the service on specific days is provided
When it comes to students, they are free to move anywhere in the campus and also, they don’t have much constraints apart from classes. For example, a student has 2 classes and a lab on a particular day, he needs to be present at lecture hall for 2 hours and at department for 1 hour and these trips are mandatory and, in a way, can be taken as fixed travel but after that the student can go to sports facility, his room, to shop, to dhobi etc. places and it depends on his wish which is difficult to predict without the data from the student so we will do direct survey with student.
Trip generation
15
Y | Average number of trips made by an individual in a day |
C | Intercept |
X1 | Vehicle-code |
X2 | Zone Difference |
X3 | In a day on Average how many times do you used to go to your department (pre-Covid times) |
X4 | In a day on Average how many times do you go or (used to) go to ground/ Sports Facilities (Pre-Covid times) |
X5 | Do you get your clothes washed by dhobi |
X6 | In a day on Average how many times do you go to Lecture Hall (Pre-Covid times) |
X7 | In a day on Average how many times do you go to library (pre-Covid times) |
X8 | In a day on Average how many times do you go to Kendriya Bandar or ADMIN-block (pre-Covid times) |
Table 4: Coefficients of the regression equation
Trip generation
16
Regression Statistics | |
Multiple R | 0.795917 |
R Square | 0.633485 |
Adjusted R Square | 0.615821 |
Standard Error | 1.317625 |
Observations | 175 |
ANOVA | | | | | |
| df | SS | MS | F | Significance F |
Regression | 8 | 498.1215 | 62.265 | 35.86425 | 1.75354E-32 |
Residual | 166 | 288.198 | 1.7361 | | |
Total | 174 | 786.32 |
|
|
|
| Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value |
C | 0.897816153 | 0.51376041 | 1.7475386 | 0.08239308 |
x1 | 0.241335636 | 0.117783426 | 2.0489779 | 0.04203844 |
x2 | 0.158721445 | 0.098665347 | 1.6086848 | 0.10958547 |
x3 | 0.600262215 | 0.09016172 | 6.6576172 | 3.8849E-10 |
x4 | 0.540627395 | 0.133669899 | 4.0444962 | 8.015E-05 |
x5 | 0.684302275 | 0.271198992 | 2.5232479 | 0.01256756 |
x6 | 0.673813257 | 0.092776889 | 7.2627275 | 1.3998E-11 |
x7 | 0.520489683 | 0.121872361 | 4.270777 | 3.2705E-05 |
x8 | 0.8426729 | 0.128317056 | 6.5671153 | 6.3031E-10 |
Understanding the table
Table 5,6,7: regression equation analysis
17
Trip generation
Trip generation
18
Trips made to lecture hall �
Lecture hall is located in zone-3 and the following results are the number of trips made by students, Ph.D. students and faculty members to lecture hall in a day
Figure 9: Comparison of trips made by students, Ph.D. students and faculty to lecture hall
Trip generation
19
Usage of Dhobi service �
Dhobi service center is located in zone-5 and the following results are the usage of dhobi service by students, Ph.D. students and faculty members
Figure 10: Comparison of usage of dhobi service by students, Ph.D. students and faculty
Trip generation
20
Trips made to department�
There are 2 zones for departments i.e. zone6 for department cluster-1 and zone7 for department cluster2 is located in zone-3 and the following results are the number of trips made by students, Ph.D. students and faculty members to respective department in a day
Figure 11: Comparison of trips made by students, Ph.D. students and faculty to department
Trip generation
21
Time | Monday | Tuesday | Wednesday | Thursday | Friday |
8-8.50 | 870 | 870 | 870 | 870 | 870 |
9-9.50 | 730 | 730 | 730 | 730 | 730 |
10-10.50 | 660 | 460 | 660 | 660 | 660 |
11-11.50 | 930 | 930 | 930 | 930 | 930 |
12-12.50 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1-1.50 | 320 | 320 | 320 | 320 | 320 |
2-2.50 | 315 | 315 | 315 | 315 | 315 |
3-3.50 | 395 | 395 | 395 | 395 | 590 |
4-4.50 | 270 | 240 | 270 | 270 | 240 |
5-5.50 | 200 | 150 | 200 | 150 | 870 |
Figure 12: Number of students having classes during working hours in a week
Table 8: Number of students having classes during working hours in a week
Number of students having classes during working hours in a week:
In this we tried to find out how many students may be travelling to classes during different hours on different days of a week
Assumptions made:
Trip distribution
22
| | Zone1 | Zone2 | Zone3 | Zone4 | Zone5 | Zone6 | Zone7 | |
| | ENT | C | OFF | Hos | B | Dep1 | Dep2 | GEN |
Zone1 | ENT | 0 | 2 | 56 | 16 | 10 | 10 | 15 | 109 |
Zone2 | C | 2 | 0 | 34 | 30 | 28 | 7 | 6 | 107 |
Zone3 | OFF | 56 | 34 | 0 | 613 | 56 | 3 | 5 | 767 |
Zone4 | Hos | 16 | 30 | 613 | 0 | 56 | 104 | 253 | 1072 |
Zone5 | B | 40 | 28 | 56 | 56 | 0 | 10 | 28 | 218 |
Zone6 | Dep1 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 104 | 10 | 0 | 3 | 137 |
Zone7 | Dep2 | 15 | 6 | 5 | 253 | 28 | 3 | 0 | 310 |
| ATT | 137 | 105 | 659 | 1026 | 150 | 120 | 252 | 2720 |
Table 9: Trip distribution matrix for the sample population
Trip distribution
23
| | Zone1 | Zone2 | Zone3 | Zone4 | Zone5 | Zone6 | Zone7 | |
| | Ent | C-Type | OFF/Lib | Hostel | B-Type | Dep1 | Dep2 | GEN |
Zone1 | Ent | 0 | 50 | 484 | 183 | 121 | 121 | 169 | 1128 |
Zone2 | C-Type | 50 | 0 | 283 | 249 | 233 | 58 | 50 | 923 |
Zone3 | OFF/Li | 484 | 283 | 0 | 5097 | 466 | 25 | 42 | 6396 |
Zone4 | Hostels | 183 | 249 | 5097 | 0 | 466 | 865 | 2104 | 8964 |
Zone5 | B-Type | 371 | 233 | 466 | 466 | 0 | 83 | 233 | 1851 |
Zone6 | Dep1 | 121 | 58 | 25 | 865 | 83 | 0 | 25 | 1177 |
Zone7 | Dep2 | 169 | 50 | 42 | 2104 | 233 | 25 | 0 | 2622 |
| ATT | 1156 | 890 | 659 | 8914 | 1563 | 1139 | 252 | 23061 |
The growth factor is 8.3153
| | Zone1 | Zone2 | Zone3 | Zone4 | Zone5 | Zone6 | Zone7 | |
| | ENT | C | OFF | Hos | B | Dep1 | Dep2 | GEN |
Zone1 | ENT | 0 | 17 | 466 | 133 | 83 | 83 | 125 | 906 |
Zone2 | C | 17 | 0 | 283 | 249 | 233 | 58 | 50 | 890 |
Zone3 | OFF | 466 | 283 | 0 | 5097 | 466 | 25 | 42 | 6378 |
Zone4 | Hos | 133 | 249 | 5097 | 0 | 466 | 865 | 2104 | 8914 |
Zone5 | B | 333 | 233 | 466 | 466 | 0 | 83 | 233 | 1813 |
Zone6 | Dep1 | 83 | 58 | 25 | 865 | 83 | 0 | 25 | 1139 |
Zone7 | Dep2 | 125 | 50 | 42 | 2104 | 233 | 25 | 0 | 2578 |
| ATT | 1156 | 890 | 659 | 8914 | 1563 | 1139 | 252 | 22617 |
Table 10: Trip distribution matrix for the total population excluding security guards trips
Table 11: Trip distribution matrix for the total population
Trip distribution
24
Reason for selecting Uniform growth factor model:
There are numerous methods to distribute trips and for creating a origin destination matrix for entire population of study area but uniform growth model is selected because
1.It preserves the travel pattern of study area.
2. It gives good results when there is more uniformity in the travel nature of population of the study area
3. It is comparatively easy to implement and to understand.
Desire line diagram
All the distributed trips from different zones can be represented in a diagram called as Desire line diagram
Figure 13: Desire Line Diagram
Modal split
25
walk | Bicycle | Bike | Auto | Total | |
1491 | 620 | 19 | 59 | 2189 | Student |
137 | 435 | 12 | 25 | 609 | Ph.D. |
44 | 44 | 89 | 111 | 288 | Staff |
Figure 14: Comparison of mode choice split of students, Ph.D. students and faculty
Table12: Modal split table
Trip assignment
26
Trip or traffic assignment is a process in which the traffic that is flowing in the study area is assigned to different routes to understand the travel pattern of the study area and also how much usage of different roads is happening and also the traffic volume of different roads can be observed.
All or Nothing trip assignment:
In this type of trip assignment, the roads users choose a path that has minimum travel cost or minimum travel time. Based on this if there are n number of routes between A to B but among all the n routes the whole traffic moves in a single route i.e., the route which has least travel time or least travel cost.
Reasons for selection All or nothing trip assignment:
In campus there are very fewer alternate routes and those alternate routes present are also comparatively long in distances. Also, the campus is designed in such a way that people are encouraged to travel by Bicycle or by feet so the short distant routes are created in the heart of campus to easily connect all important locations. To facilitate travel of heavy-duty vehicles like construction trucks, water vans, load carrying lorries wide outer roads are built so that they need not enter the heart of campus and can travel bypass. Also, from field observations it is understood that almost all the student, faculty and staff population use short distant routes for their day-to-day commute. Based on all these it is decided All or nothing trips is best for campus trip assignment.
Figure 15: All or Nothing Trip assignment
Trip assignment
27
Most used Travel routes in the Campus
All the important routes that are used for travel are plotted in the network model, using least distance algorithm the routes are marked in Arc-GIS and in practice (via field observation) also those same routes are being used mostly by the maximum population of the campus
Origin | Destination | | | | | | |
| zone1 | zone2 | zone3 | zone4 | zone5 | zone6 | zone7 |
Zone1 | ~ | R2 | R1+(R4/R5) | R1+R8 | R1+R4 | R1 | R1+R7 |
Zone2 | R2 | ~ | R2+R1+(R4/R5) | R2+R1+R8 | R2+R1+R4 | R2+R1 | R2+R1+R7 |
Zone3 | (R3/R4/R5)+R1 | (R3/R4/R5)+R1+R2 | ~ | (R3/R4/R5)+R1+R8 | (R3/R4/R5)+R6 | (R3/R4/R5)+R9 | (R3/R4)+R5+R6+R1+R7 |
Zone4 | R8+R1 | R8+R1+R2 | R8/(R8+R1+(R3/R5) | ~ | R8+R6 | R8+(R1/R9) | R8+R1+R7 |
Zone5 | R4+R1 | R4+R1+R2 | R6/R4+(R5) | R6+R5+R1+R8 | ~ | R7+R10 | R7 |
Zone6 | R1/(R9+R5+R1) | R1/(R9+R5+R1)+R2 | R9/(R9+R5) | (R1/R9)+R8 | R10+R7 | ~ | R1+R7 |
Zone7 | R7+R1 | R7+R1+R2 | R7+R1+R9+R5 | R7+R1+R8 | R7 | R7+R1 | ~ |
Table 13: roads used for travelling between different zones
Figure 16: Trip assignment routes
Trip assignment
28
Algorithm of the Arc-GIS in finding shortest routes:
In the network model, first roads have to laid by digitizing the real roads which are visible on the campus tiff image, then all the roads are to be designated as single network unit. The entire campus needs to be geo-referenced such that any point on the map will have co-ordinates. Now if an origin and destination locations are marked then the algorithm moves along the road networks which are constructed and will travel in the route which is having least distance based on the origin and destination co-ordinates
Travel cost matrix: This matrix provides the cost of travel between two zones for 1 trip
Origin | Destination | Distance | Cost for travel by car in rupees | Cost for travel by Bike in rupees | Cost for travel by cycle in rupees | Cost for travel by public transport in rupees |
Zone 1 | Zone 1 | 0.0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 |
Zone 1 | Zone 2 | 871.4 | 4.36 | 1.57 | 0.44 | 10 |
Zone 1 | Zone 3 | 870.6 | 4.35 | 1.57 | 0.44 | 10 |
Zone 1 | Zone 4 | 1040.2 | 5.20 | 1.87 | 0.52 | 10 |
Zone 1 | Zone 5 | 1186.9 | 5.93 | 2.14 | 0.59 | 10 |
Zone 1 | Zone 6 | 1194.5 | 5.97 | 2.15 | 0.60 | 10 |
Zone 1 | Zone 7 | 1666.6 | 8.33 | 3.00 | 0.83 | 10 |
Zone 1 | Zone 8 | 1350.4 | 6.75 | 2.43 | 0.68 | 10 |
Zone 2 | Zone 3 | 776.4 | 3.88 | 1.40 | 0.39 | 10 |
Zone 2 | Zone 4 | 946.0 | 4.73 | 1.70 | 0.47 | 10 |
Zone 2 | Zone 5 | 1092.7 | 5.46 | 1.97 | 0.55 | 10 |
Zone 2 | Zone 6 | 1100.3 | 5.50 | 1.98 | 0.55 | 10 |
Zone 2 | Zone 7 | 1572.4 | 7.86 | 2.83 | 0.79 | 10 |
Zone 2 | Zone 8 | 1464.9 | 7.32 | 2.64 | 0.73 | 10 |
Zone 3 | Zone 4 | 628.7 | 3.14 | 1.13 | 0.31 | 10 |
Zone 3 | Zone 5 | 404.6 | 2.02 | 0.73 | 0.20 | 10 |
Zone 3 | Zone 6 | 359.8 | 1.80 | 0.65 | 0.18 | 10 |
Zone 3 | Zone 7 | 833.2 | 4.17 | 1.50 | 0.42 | 10 |
Zone 3 | Zone 8 | 963.6 | 4.82 | 1.73 | 0.48 | 10 |
Zone 4 | Zone 5 | 832.3 | 4.16 | 1.50 | 0.42 | 10 |
Zone 4 | Zone 6 | 459.4 | 2.30 | 0.83 | 0.23 | 10 |
Zone 4 | Zone 7 | 905.2 | 4.53 | 1.63 | 0.45 | 10 |
Zone 4 | Zone 8 | 861.1 | 4.31 | 1.55 | 0.43 | 10 |
Zone 5 | Zone 6 | 518.1 | 2.59 | 0.93 | 0.26 | 10 |
Zone 5 | Zone 7 | 967.9 | 4.84 | 1.74 | 0.48 | 10 |
Zone 5 | Zone 8 | 1098.3 | 5.49 | 1.98 | 0.55 | 10 |
Zone 6 | Zone 7 | 473.4 | 2.37 | 0.85 | 0.24 | 10 |
Zone 6 | Zone 8 | 603.8 | 3.02 | 1.09 | 0.30 | 10 |
Zone 7 | Zone 8 | 612.6 | 3.06 | 1.10 | 0.31 | 10 |
Table 14: Travel cost matrix
Figure 17: shortest route plotted in Arc-GIS
Conclusions and suggestions
29
Re-routing the motorized traffic:
Figure 18: Current route vs Proposed route for motorized vehicles
Conclusions and suggestions
30
Hostel and home allocation based on department and nature of travel:
It is important to understand the nature of mode of transport of groups of population and their work nature and department to allocate residence is campus.
For a person if the distance between office and work is very less the chances of him using cycle or walk to the office is very high.
In other case if the distance is high the chance of using motorized vehicle is high.
So persons who are willing to cycle to work should be given preference to stay in Type-B housing facility.
And among student population Bachelors and masters students have less cycle usage so they should be given hostels near to lecture hall.
Figure 19: Hostels nearer to and far away from lecture hall
Conclusions and suggestions
31
Building cycle renting stands in campus
In recent time after the introduction of E-rickshaw in campus more number of students are using it to travel to far-away distance and the trips made by E-rickshaw is increasing.
So if cycle renting system is in place, trips of E-rickshaw can be reduced and also the locations which are more favorable for this rental stand is also suggested.
Figure 20: Bicycle rental locations analysis
Conclusions and suggestions
32
Parking Locations analysis:
Dedicated Parking zones
There are certain places in Campus that are dedicated for parking and these are facilities that are established with roofs and have markings indicating individual spaces. Generally, these zones are built near faculty housing B, C and also near the office blocks on the main entrance road.
Parking zones formed out of demand:
These are the places which attract lot of vehicles and so are formed into parking zones. Generally, these zones are formed near offices, departments and near lecture hall buildings
Time table design based on population capacity and to reduce parking congestion:
Creating time table for classes based on the number of students enrolling for slots so as to not over populate or under populate the roads during those slots. This looks a bit difficult task but with help of certain AI mapping tools this can be achieved in near future.
E-rickshaw services in faculty areas along with timings that match with class timings
E-Rickshaw service are more needed in the faculty housing zone, especially in type-C housing as it is far away. Also, the E-rickshaw should be scheduled to make trips from Type-c to departments based on the time-table of faculty who can’t drive to work
Figure 21: Parking locations analysis
Analytics
33
| destination | |
| | | | | | |
Origin | Zone 1 | Zone 2 | Zone 3 | Zone 4 | Zone 5 | Zone 6 | Zone 7 | Zone 8 | Average Distance |
Zone 1 | 0 | 871.4 | 870.6 | 1040.2 | 1186.9 | 1194.5 | 1666.6 | 1350.4 | 1022.6 |
Zone 2 | 872.8 | 0.0 | 776.4 | 946.0 | 1092.7 | 1100.3 | 1572.4 | 1464.9 | 978.2 |
Zone 3 | 834.7 | 739.2 | 0.0 | 628.7 | 404.6 | 359.8 | 833.2 | 963.6 | 595.5 |
Zone 4 | 1047.1 | 951.6 | 645.8 | 0.0 | 832.3 | 459.4 | 905.2 | 861.1 | 712.8 |
Zone 5 | 1194.6 | 1099.1 | 428.6 | 833.1 | 0.0 | 518.1 | 967.9 | 1098.3 | 767.5 |
Zone 6 | 1194.5 | 1099.0 | 323.9 | 452.4 | 510.4 | 0.0 | 473.4 | 603.8 | 582.2 |
Zone 7 | 1673.8 | 1578.3 | 804.5 | 905.4 | 967.4 | 480.6 | 0.0 | 612.6 | 877.8 |
Zone 8 | 1347.8 | 1461.0 | 925.1 | 851.6 | 1088.0 | 601.2 | 602.8 | 0.0 | 859.7 |
Average distance | 1020.6 | 974.9 | 596.8 | 707.2 | 760.3 | 589.2 | 877.7 | 869.3 | 799.5 |
Mode of travel | Avg travel speed | Avg time spent in travel in a day |
Car | 18km/hr | 19.02 min |
Bike | 20km/hr | 17.12 min |
Cycle | 10km/hr | 34.24 min |
Walking | 5km/hr | 68.49 min |
Mode of travel | Avg travel cost | Avg amount of money spent on travel /day |
Car | 4.42 rupees/trip | 31.58 rupees/day |
Bike | 1.59 rupees/trip | 11.35 rupees/day |
Cycle | 0.44 rupees/trip | 3.16 rupees/day |
Walking | 0 | 0 |
Average travel distance= Average trip distance * number of trips
= 799.5*7.14=5708 meters or 5.708 Kms in a day
Average travel time = Average travel distance/ average speed
Table 15: Zone to zone matrix
Table 16: Travel time matrix
Table 17: Travel cost matrix
Analytics
34
ORIGIN | DESTINATION | Distance in meters |
B1 Hostel | Admin block | 588.1 |
B1 Hostel | Bioscience and Bioengineering, Dept | 423.0 |
B1 Hostel | Chemistry, Dept | 423.0 |
B1 Hostel | Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Dept | 916.9 |
B2 Hostel | Humanities & Social Sciences, Dept | 520.4 |
B2 Hostel | Lecture hall | 687.5 |
B2 Hostel | Library | 708.2 |
B2 Hostel | Main Drop Off | 1108.0 |
G4 Hostel | Bioscience and Bioengineering, Dept | 602.7 |
G4 Hostel | Chemistry, Dept | 602.7 |
G4 Hostel | Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, Dept | 1096.6 |
Table 18: Travel cost matrix
Figure 22: Travel distance network model for all buildings
References
35
[1]. Garikapati, Venu & You, Daehyun & Pendyala, Ram & Patel, Tushar & Kottommannil, Jiji & Sussman, Aaron. (2016). Design, Development, and Implementation of a University Travel Demand Modeling Framework. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2563. 105-113. 10.3141/2563-15.
[2]. Dhulipala, Sowjanya & Tahlyan, Divyakant & Chalumuri, Ravi Sekhar. (2014). Travel Demand Modelling for a Metropolitan City.
[3]. Shekhawat, Arun. (2016). TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING - A Case study of sitapura industrial area.
[4]. Vechione, Matthew & Paudel, Sohil & Gurbuz, Okan. (2021). Trip Distribution Patterns on a University Campus: A Smarter Travel Demand Forecasting Approach. 1-7. 10.1109/ISC253183.2021.9562860.
[5]. Schoeman, Ilse. (2014). Land use and transportation integration within the greater area of the North West University (Potchefstroom Campus), South Africa: problems, prospects and solutions. 607-618. 10.2495/UT140501.
[6]. Sanghai, Sanket. (2014). Development of Trip Generation model using Activity based Approach. International Journal of Civil, Structural, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering Research and Development (IJCSEIERD). 4. 61-78.
[7]. Berki, Zsolt & Monigl, Janos. (2017). Trip generation and distribution modelling in Budapest. Transportation Research Procedia. 27. 172-179. 10.1016/j.trpro.2017.12.023.
[8]. Chu, Zhaoming & Cheng, Lin & Chen, Hui. (2012). A Review of Activity-Based Travel Demand Modeling. 48-59. 10.1061/9780784412442.006.
[9]. Chang, Justin & Jung, Dongjae & Kim, Jaekyung & Kang, Taeseok. (2014). Comparative analysis of trip generation models: Results using home-based work trips in the Seoul metropolitan area. Transportation Letters The International Journal of Transportation Research. 10.1179/1942787514Y.0000000011.
[10]. Kaplan, David & Clapper, Thomas. (2007). Traffic Congestion on a University Campus: A Consideration of Unconventional Remedies to Nontraditional Transportation Patterns. Planning for Higher Education.
[11]. Santos, Georgina & Maoh, Hanna & Potoglou, Dimitris & Brunn, Thomas. (2013). Factors Influencing Modal Split of Commuting Journeys in Medium-size European Cities. Journal of Transport Geography. 30. 127-137. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2013.04.005.