Opportunities with plasma-accelerated electrons at LESA
Hezin Serez Kaya, Boğaziçi University
Thamine Dalichaouch, UCLA
Peter Kicsiny, Yuri Nosochkov, Spencer Gessner, SLAC
Injectors and Beam Physics Workshop
September 15, 2026
What is LESA?
The Linac to End Station A (LESA) beamline delivers 4-8 GeV beams from LCLS-II to End Station A (ESA).
LCLS-II makes 10x more electron beam than can be sent to the undulators.
SLAC has previously hosted a Test Beam Program for detector development in ESA.
LESA will accommodate both a Test Beam program and the LDMX dark matter experiment.
The LESA users only require 1 electron per pulse.
LESA Overview
LCLS-II
Transfer Line
BSY/S30XL/A-Line
ESA
LESA Overview
What’s the plan for LESA?
LDMX at LESA
The Light Dark Matter eXperiment (LDMX) searches for dark matter particles with a “missing momentum” signature.
Normally, electrons emit a bremsstrahlung photon when they hit the target. The signal is a deflected electron without a gamma-ray photon.
LDMX tags each incoming electron individually, so it can only handle one electron at a time.
LDMX requires 1E15 electrons-on-target (EOT) for the full program. A year has 1E7 seconds.
arXiv:2508.11833
Test Beams at LESA
Test Beam workshop held at SLAC in early September.
Highlighted unique capabilities for LESA and test in End Station A.
Representatives from DESY, CERN, and Fermilab test beam programs presented on their programs. CERN and Fermilab will be down for upgrades for several years.
HEP wants to ramp up detector testing for FCC-ee.
Future Demands for Test Beam Facility
The FCC-ee drives demand for electron beam test facilities for the coming decades.
FCC-ee calorimeters are design to measure >45 GeV particle energy.
“5D” calorimetry is a new idea for time-resolved calorimetry.
Detector tests will benefit from:
Global Test Beam Facilities
Global Test Beam Facilities
None of these facilities provide the combination of high energy, precise energy resolution, and timing information desired by FCC-ee detector tests.
Can we use plasma to boost the LESA beam energy?
Plasma Acceleration at FFTB and FACET
Relatively easy to achieve a high-energy electrons in a continuous spectrum.
FFTB (1999-2006)
“Energy Doubling” experiment.
42 GeV → 84 GeV
Continuous spectrum of electrons
FACET (2010-2016)
“More than Energy Doubling” experiment.
20 GeV → 50 GeV
Continuous spectrum of electrons
Proposal: Plasma-Boosted Electrons at LESA
The LCLS-II beams are high-quality and can drive strong wakes in dense plasmas.
We propose a plasma cell in the S30XL beamline that will boost the energy of electrons in the tail of the LCLS-II bunch.
We expect to deliver “few” electrons with energy in excess of 20 GeV, with the 8 GeV LCLS-II bunch as the driver.
Plasma cell in this region
QPAD simulations with ideal LCLS-II beams
Prop. dir.
Peak decel.
8 GeV/m
Peak accel.
32 GeV/m
Simulation Parameters - QPAD Code
Beam
E = 8 GeV
𝜎z = 10 μm
εx,y = 0.5 μm
βx,y = 0.5 m
Plasma
n0 = 4✕1017 cm-3
L = 1 m
H. Serez Kaya
T. Dalichouch
QPAD simulations with ideal LCLS-II beams
H. Serez Kaya
T. Dalichouch
Some electrons in tail accelerated to 40 GeV.
Simulation Parameters - QPAD Code
Beam
E = 8 GeV
𝜎z = 10 μm
εx,y = 0.5 μm
βx,y = 0.5 m
Plasma
n0 = 4✕1017 cm-3
L = 1 m
QPAD simulations with ideal LCLS-II beams
H. Serez Kaya
T. Dalichouch
Use bends and collimators to select only highest energy electrons.
Some electrons in tail accelerated to 40 GeV.
Simulation Parameters - QPAD Code
Beam
E = 8 GeV
𝜎z = 10 μm
εx,y = 0.5 μm
βx,y = 0.5 m
Plasma
n0 = 4✕1017 cm-3
L = 1 m
Implementation in S30XL/LESA Beamline
There is plenty of space in the S30XL beamline to install a plasma source.
Can we focus the beam down to the small spot needed to drive a wake in a high density plasma?
Challenges:
Solutions:
Dispersion
Implementation in LESA Beamline
Start
Rolled dipole
Transfer line
Transfer line
First A-line dipole
Septum Magnet
R&D at FACET-II?
?
R&D at FACET-II?
Can we simulate the LCLS-II bunch?
Work within the context of E300/E301?
Key measurements:
LESA as a Beam Test Facility?
A-Line Upgrade
A-Line Upgrade
Challenges:
Big ol’ magnets
Few quads
Large R56
No chromatic correction
Few diagnostics
Solution:
Multi-bend achromat upgrade
Conclusion
We are well-positioned to deliver very high energy electrons to LESA on a few-year time scale!
Backup
Additional R&D at LESA
S30XL and LESA provide a unique opportunity for accelerator R&D with the high-quality LCLS-II beams. R&D items include:
Test Beam Program at ESA (Carsten Hast)
Program ended in 2019
Plan to restart in 2027
g-2 Calorimeter (Previous Program)
Plasma Wakefield R&D Facilities at SLAC
Plasma at FFTB (1999-2006)
FACET (2010-2016)
FACET-II (2020–)
Plasma Wakefield Acceleration
Drive beam
Witness beam
The drive beam deposits energy in the plasma and creates the wakefield.
The witness beam rides the wakefield and gains energy.
Accelerating gradients are typically measured in GeV/m.
The drive-witness scheme requires precise 6D control of each of the beam parameters.
Plasma Acceleration at FACET and FACET-II
Significant progress on beam quality, but not without challenges!
FACET (2010-2016)
First high-efficiency, two-bunch acceleration demonstrated in plasma.
Egain = 2 GeV
𝜎E = 2%
FACET-II (2020--)
High-efficiency and high-quality two-bunch acceleration.
Egain = 6 GeV
𝜎E = 0.69%
Significant improvements in energy spread and charge capture compared to FACET results.
D. Storey et al. In prep.
Plasma Wakefield Acceleration
Drive beam
Witness tail
Alternatively, a long drive beam can self-accelerate its own tail.
The result is a continuous spectrum of accelerated electrons.
This scheme is self-aligning and simpler to achieve experimentally.
Next Steps and Roadmap
Optimize plasma simulations for realistic beam parameters and lattice constraints.
Simulation
Plasma and beam transport simulations incl. collimation.
Include beam jitter effects, based on measurements in S30XL.
R&D at FACET
High energy gain experiments with few-electron diagnostics.
Scaled demonstration at FACET-II.
Development of discharge plasma source in collaboration with BELLA.
Engr. for LESA
Now
+3 years
+2 years
Scout candidate locations.
Services, RP considerations, chamber design.
Engineering drawings.
Install and commissioning.
White paper within 1 year