1 of 47

Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Michael S. Mulvihill, MD

Assistant Professor of Surgery

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery

University of Minnesota

8 January, 2026

2 of 47

Disclosures

  • No financial disclosures

  • Discussions of the following includes the off-label use of otherwise approved devices

3 of 47

Topic Overview – Mechanical Circulatory Support

  • Temporary vs Durable – shock vs end-stage heart failure

  • Left sided, right sided, and biventricular support

  • Bridges and exit strategies

4 of 47

Temporary Support & Cardiogenic Shock

  • Clinical trial definitions generally have 4 elements
    • Hypotension (SBP < 90 for ≥30 minutes or use of circulatory support)
    • Preload adequacy (congestion or wedge ≥ 15)
    • Low cardiac output (CI ≤ 1.8 L/min/m2)
    • Hypoperfusion (oliguria < 30 mL/h, serum lactate > 2.0mmol/L)

  • Further granularity to severity as discussed previously
  • Cardiogenic shock as a final common pathway for multiple acute cardiovascular causes
    • Acute myocardial infarction
    • Acute heart failure
    • Myocarditis
    • Post-cardiotomy

5 of 47

Goals

  • Rapid identification, early resuscitation, and multidisciplinary management of the population
  • Improve clinical outcomes by supporting cardiac output, reducing tissue hypoxemia, resolving systemic hypoperfusion, and ultimately mitigating end-organ dysfunction
  • Successfully manage short-term situation in order to properly ascertain appropriate long-term management strategies
  • “door to support” decisions

Shock team outcomes summarized by Moghaddam et al (2021)

6 of 47

Planning & Considerations

  • All responses can be characterized based on context, specificity, and magnitude (Allan Kirk)

  • Timing and team familiarity
  • Location & Setting
  • Projected duration of support
  • Goals and destination considerations

7 of 47

Overview of Temporary Mechanical Support Strategies

Percutaneous

Surgical

Left-Sided Support

IABP (femoral, axillary)

Impella CP

TandemHeart (LA-Ao)

IABP (axillary graft)

Impella 5.5 (axillary graft)

Impella 5.5 (direct aortic)

LV CentriMag (LV apex)

Right-Sided Support

Impella Flex V

TandemHeart (RA-PA)

ProtekDuo/Spectrum RVAD (RA-PA)

RV CentriMag (RV / RA-PA)

Biventricular Support

Peripheral VA ECMO

Impella CP + Flex V or Protek

Central cannulation VA ECMO

Axillary cannulation ECMO (Axillary / IJ)

Biventricular CentriMag

8 of 47

L Sided Support

  • Percutaneous Devices
    • IABP – femoral or axillary (percutaneous or open)
    • Impella
    • TandemHeart

  • Surgically-Placed Devices
    • IABP – axillary graft
    • Axillary 5.5 – axillary graft or direct aortic
    • CentriMag

9 of 47

L Sided Support - Impella

10 of 47

DanGer Shock and Impella Support

2013-2023, enrolled 360 patients – 18 and older with STEMI and cardiogenic shock (SBP < 100), arterial lactate ≥2.5, LVEF ≤ 45%.

Patients who had been resuscitated from OOHCA and remained comatose on arrival and those with overt RV failure were excluded

11 of 47

R sided Support

  • Protek and Spectrum Cannulas with RVAD
    • Single stage, dual-lumen cannula, with or without an oxygenator
  • Impella RP Flex
    • Micro-axial flow pump
  • TandemHeart
  • Surgical CentriMag (RA-PA)

12 of 47

Biventricular Support

  • Percutaneous / Peripheral ECMO
  • Central and hybrid (axillary + femoral) ECMO
  • Biventricular CentriMag
  • Dual-percutaneous options

13 of 47

Biventricular Support - ECMO

  • Modification of cardiopulmonary bypass with centrifugal pump and membrane oxygenator

  • > 5L flow
  • Permits weeks of support
  • Higher levels of anticoagulation
  • Ambulation may depend on cannulation strategies
  • Time to support variable depending on cannulation strategies

Via ELSO

14 of 47

Biventricular Support - CentriMag

  • Extracorporeal ventricular assist via centrifugal flow pump
  • Left, right, or biventricular configurations (RA-PA, LA/LV-Ao, both)
  • Formally approved for 30 days of use
  • >5L maximal support

15 of 47

Summary Considerations – Temporary Support

  • The goal of mechanical circulatory support remains to improve clinical outcomes by supporting cardiac output, reducing tissue hypoxemia, resolving systemic hypoperfusion, and ultimately mitigating end-organ dysfunction
  • Permits appropriate long-term management strategies
  • A team-based approach with regular contact and diverse input likely ensures the best chance that patients are matched with an optimal management strategy

16 of 47

Indications and Options for Durable Support

  • Total Artificial Heart (TAH)
  • Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVAD)

  • Indications
    • NYHA IV Symptoms
    • EF < 25%
    • Inotrope dependent or CI < 2.2 L/min/m2 with one of:
    • ADHF for ≥14 days and dependent on IABP/tMCS ≥7 days or
    • Failed OMM for at least 45 of last 60 days

17 of 47

Heart Failure Classification

18 of 47

Heart Transplant Volume – United States

19 of 47

Heart Failure - Unmet Needs

20 of 47

Cooley first implantation of a total artificial heart, 1969

21 of 47

Total Artificial Heart

  • Dual LVAD in RVAD and LVAD configurations (“HeartMate 6”)
  • Syncardia TAH
  • BiVACOR
    • Investigational use – early feasibility
  • CARMAT
    • Investigational use
    • 3 patients 2021
    • Second cohort beginning

22 of 47

Total Artificial Heart - Syncardia

23 of 47

Total Artificial Heart - Syncardia

24 of 47

Total Artificial Heart - BiVACOR

25 of 47

Total Artificial Heart - CARMAT

26 of 47

27 of 47

Brief Aside – BrioVAD

  • Currently enrolling in INNOVATE - pivotal phase clinical trial
  • Safety phase completed
  • Non-inferiority trial designed to compare to Abbott Heartmate III

28 of 47

29 of 47

30 of 47

Heart Mate III - 2 Year Outcomes

31 of 47

Heart Mate III - 2 Year Outcomes – Momentum III

32 of 47

Heart Mate III - 2 Year Outcomes – Intermacs

33 of 47

Heart Mate III - 2 Year Outcomes – Intermacs

34 of 47

Heart Mate III – Survival by Intermacs Profile

35 of 47

36 of 47

HeartMate 3 – 5 Year Outcomes

37 of 47

HeartMate 3 – 5 Year Outcomes

38 of 47

HeartMate 3 – 5 Year Outcomes

39 of 47

HeartMate 3 – 5 Year Outcomes

40 of 47

HeartMate 3 – 5 Year Outcomes – Overall Survival

41 of 47

HeartMate 3 – 5 Year Outcomes – Survival by Age

42 of 47

HeartMate 3 – 5 Year Outcomes – Stroke

43 of 47

HeartMate 3 – 5 Year Outcomes – Pump Thrombosis

44 of 47

Durable LVAD Recommendations

45 of 47

LVAD Quality of Life

46 of 47

Over 30,000 patients have been implanted with �the HeartMate 3 LVAD*

  • MORE THAN 19,000 PATIENTS RECEIVE ONGOING SUPPORT

13,047

19,580

8,648

5,279

2,692

1,257

| 46

439

MAT-2002006 v13.0 | Item approved for U.S. use only.

69

11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

The above numbers are cumulative. Patients with a duration of > 2 years are included in the number of patients listed as > 1 year.

47 of 47

Thank you!

Michael Mulvihill, M.D.

University of Minnesota

mmulvihi@umn.edu