1 of 4

case study: (s)ifr + scwg - transition under SD model

(S)IFR

Call for SCWG

Board Review

SCWG

Board Rejects

Accepts

Decides on separation & IFO

CM Review

Board Review

Full Escalation /

Enforcement path

mediation

Board Rejects

Accept

Top part

of enforcement

path

Transition to new Names IFO

ccNSO Review

GNSO Review

comments

comments

comments

comments

comments

Feedback loop

Feedback loop

CM

ccNSO Review

GNSO Review

comments

2 of 4

Case study - SCWG recommends transition

Board

CM

Approve

Reject

Implement

Transition & Separation

escalation up the enforcement staircase

Unlikely but possible.

Same as ?

no change

1. GNSO & ccNSO agree

2. Board & CM review

e.g. ALAC & ASO

say no

Escalation

Enforcement

Go to

court

Replace 1

or more

directors

Mediation IRP

Arbitration

Approve

Reject

3 of 4

Enforcement as related to separation under SD

Arbitration�based on adherence to�|

  • bottom up multistakeholder process article
  • fundamental separation bylaw

Removal of one or more Board Members

  • GNSO &/or ccNSO based on doing what is best for designator

Legal Proceedings

  • Based on SD as legal person
  • challenge on basis of:
    • bottom up multistakeholder process article
    • fundamental separation bylaw

IRP�based on adherence to

  • bottom up multistakeholder process article
  • fundamental separation bylaw

Replacement of the Board

  • CM enforcing CWG recommendation

1st level

2nd level

Last resort

4 of 4

...spare

board

CM

Y

Y

N

Y

N