Theta Theory & Selection
LIN 131 - Introduction to Syntactic Theory
Masoud Jasbi
Y-Model
Grammar
(Theory)
D-Structure
S-Structure
Phonetic Form
Logical Form
Interpretation
Speech
Movements
X-bar Rules
P-Rules
Interpretive Rules
Judgments
(Data)
X-bar Theory
X-bar Schema (Chomsky 1970)
XP → (YP) X’ Specifier Rule
X’ → X’ (ZP) Adjunct Rule
X’ → X (WP) Complement Rule
(X = N, V, A, C, …)
Argument Structure
Why do different verbs take different number and types of arguments?
* Bob placed.
* Bob placed the pen.
* The table placed Bob on the pen.
* The table placed Bob Emily on the pen.
Thematic Relations
Common Relations:
[Bob]Agent placed [the pen]Theme/Patient [on the table]Goal
Theta Theory
Theta Role: A syntactic Bundling of Thematic Relations mapped into a syntactic position
Theta Grid for a verb like place
Theta Criterion: every theta role must be assigned to exactly one argument
Uniformity of Theta Assignment Hypothesis (UTAH):
Agent Role → Specifier of vP
Goal Role → Complement of V
Patient Role → Specifier of VP
Agent | Theme | Patient |
DPi | DPj | DPk |
Lexicon with Theta Grids
Verbal Selectional Restriction:
“verbs” restricting possible structures by selecting specific arguments
“create” [V] | |
Agent | Patient |
DPi | DPj |
“hate” [V] | |
Experiencer | Theme |
DPi | DPj |
“rain” [V] |
“give” [V] | ||
Source | Recipient | Theme |
DPi | DPj | DPk |
“die” [V] |
Patient |
DPi |
EPP
Extended Projection Principle:
All sentences must have subjects
Expletive Insertion Rules:
Insert a dummy subject (it) to avoid violating EPP
Y-Model
Syntax
(Theory)
D-Structure
S-Structure
Phonetic Form
Logical Form
Interpretation
Speech
Movements
X-bar Rules
P-Rules
Interpretive Rules
Judgments
(Data)
Lexicon
Theta Roles
Constraint: Theta Criterion > EPP > ..
Functional Selectional Restrictions
the book/books/*Abe/*him
a book/*books/*Abe/*him
“a/an” [D] |
NP [-plural, -proper, -pronoun] |
“the” [D] |
NP [-proper, -pronoun] |
“book” [N, -plural, -proper, -pronoun] | |
|
“books” [N, +plural, -proper, -pronoun] | |
|
“Abe” [N, -plural, +proper, -pronoun] | |
|
“him” [N, -plural, -proper, +pronoun] | |
|
Functional Selectional Restrictions
Abe thinks (that) the Earth is flat.
Abe ordered Bob to go.
Abe ordered (that) Bob leave.
Abe inquired if Bob left.
“that” [C] |
TP [-Q, +fin] |
“if” [C] |
TP [-Q, +fin] |
“think” [V] | |
[DP] | [CP, -Q, +fin] |
“order” [V] | |
[DP] | [CP, -Q] |
“wonder” [V] | |
[DP] | [CP, +Q, +fin] |
“” [C] |
TP [-Q, +fin] |
Functional Selectional Restrictions
You must eat the cake.
The cake must be eaten.
You must be eating the cake.
You must have eaten the cake.
You must have been eating the cake.
* You must will eat the cake.
“must” [T] |
[bare, +V] |
“be” [Prog, bare, +V] |
[-perf, -prog, gerund, +V] |
“eaten” [V, part] |
[DPi], [DPj] |
“eating” [V, gerund] |
[DPi], [DPj] |
“have” [Perf, bare, +V] |
[-perf, part, +V] |
“be” [Voice, bare, +V] |
[-perf, -prog, -pass, part, +V] |
“eat” [V, bare] |
[DPi], [DPj] |
“been” [Prog, part, +V] |
[-perf, -prog, gerund, +V] |
Functional Selectional Restrictions
You ate the cake.
You eats the cake.
“must” [T] |
[bare, +V] |
“be” [Prog, bare, +V] |
[-perf, -prog, gerund, +V] |
“eaten” [V, part] |
[DPi], [DPj] |
“eating” [V, gerund] |
[DPi], [DPj] |
“have” [Perf, bare, +V] |
[-perf, part, +V] |
“be” [Voice, bare, +V] |
[-perf, -prog, -pass, part, +V] |
“eat” [V, bare] |
[DPi], [DPj] |
“been” [Prog, part, +V] |
[-perf, -prog, gerund, +V] |
“ate” [V, perit] |
[DPi], [DPj] |
“eats” [V, pres] |
[DPi], [DPj] |
“” [T] |
[pres] |
“” [T] |
[pert] |