Preparedness Innovation – Air Force�
Mapping & Graphing Uncertainty in Science & Technology
Captain Simon Reay Atkinson RAN (PhD)
(A/PROF USYD)
Principal Investigator, Preparedness Innovation – Air Force
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Agenda
2
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Headquarters Air Command
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
From Ape to AIPP (AI App)?
3
From Ape to AIPP (AI App)? (Reproduced by kind permission of the Navy League of Australia (SRAKCAM©2023)) [41]
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Headquarters Air Command
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Logistic S-curve applied to Scientific Maturity
4
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Headquarters Air Command
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Microchip Moore’s Law v Exponential growth
5
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Headquarters Air Command
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Scientific Ages - to Synthetical
6
Analogue to Digital to Synthetic?
New Age – New Knowledge?
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
New Knowledge?
To err is human; to forgive divine – without imperfection, there will be no divine 1
Knowledge is social (or human), as is the Infotechnological 2
Existential Knowledge is the knowledge of all living beings in order to sustain life on earth. It is an inherent, practical intelligence that all living beings are born with – providing interpretation of reasoning by Kierkegaard's (1843-1846) “assertion of the subjectivity of truth”; noting morality is more important than universal ethics. (Reay Atkinson (2023))
Interstitial Knowledge is apriori, scripted knowledge that forms, or occupies only at the interstices between data and information. It may be ethical and by rules (ROE) and codes of conduct etc., but inherently amoral – since it lacks humanity. It is possible to say, for example, that a robot or ChatGBT “interstist” –since “they are” but may not “be.” (Reay Atkinson (2023))
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Headquarters Air Command
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Technology Readiness Level (TRL)
8
Level | Technology Readiness Level Definition |
TRL 1 | Basic Research: Initial scientific research has been conducted. Principles are qualitatively postulated and observed. Focus is on new discovery rather than applications. |
TRL 2 | Applied Research: Initial practical applications are identified. Potential of material or process to solve a problem, satisfy a need, or find application is confirmed. |
TRL 3 | Critical Function or Proof of Concept Established: Applied research advances and early stage development begins. Studies and laboratory measurements validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. |
TRL 4 | Lab Testing/Validation of Alpha Prototype Component/Process: Design, development and lab testing of components/processes. Results provide evidence that performance targets may be attainable based on projected or modelled systems. |
TRL 5 | Laboratory Testing of Integrated/Semi-Integrated System: System Component and/or process validation is achieved in a relevant environment. |
TRL 6 | Prototype System Verified: System/process prototype demonstration in an operational environment (beta prototype system level). |
TRL 7 | Integrated Pilot System Demonstrated: System/process prototype demonstration in an operational environment (integrated pilot system level). |
TRL 8 | System Incorporated in Commercial Design: Actual system/process completed and qualified through test and demonstration (pre-commercial demonstration). |
TRL 9 | System Proven and Ready for Full Commercial Deployment: Actual system proven through successful operations in operating environment, and ready for full commercial deployment. |
Time Constant (1 to 9) ~ 15 years
DSTG / Research Labs
(More Invention)
JDI / CASG
(More Innovation)
DPI/DAP
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Scientific Discovery Levels (SDL)
9
Level | Scientific Discovery Level Definition |
SDL 9 | Abductive Research: Fundamental research to understand the philosophy and identify the underlying systems, principles and ontology as postulated with a focus on discovery and invention. |
SDL 8 | Deductive Research: Research focussed on established science, results, and experiments to inform the theoretical development, classify, falsify, and ground scientific principles. |
SDL 7 | Inductive Research: Research focussed on abstracting the philosophy and theory to model, test, develop, and validate ontology and designs through lab-based experimentation. Seeks to answer the research questions and provide models for scaling future research and forecasting advances. |
SDL 6 | Conceptual Research: Research focussed on standardising the concepts to envision new languages, and adapt technologies, applications, and processes for projected or modelled system prototyping. |
SDL 5 | Research Design: Design, development, and field testing of components/processes and prototypes. Results provide evidence that science may be taught as a discipline, and applied by attainable projected or modelled technologies. |
SDL 4 | Engineering / Strategic Research: System/process scaling to engineer/build/develop technology/ procedures/ processes, for technical training on a pre-production prototype and demonstrating in a strategic environment. |
SDL 3 | Applied Research: System/process prototyping applying new/existing technologies and capabilities in an operational environment (integrated pilot system level). Connecting to TRL 2. |
SDL 2 | Develop Research Expertise: Providing ‘explanation of intuition’ and ‘invention of reason’ for leading research. Where expertise is typified by ‘fluid’ decision making and taking.[29, 30] |
SDL 1 | Reflection: critical reflection of system meta-datum and systems, classes, and genus. Develop diagnostic hypothesises and draw rational conclusions from system patterns; including holistic recognition of ‘whole not parts’ and create membership of associated programmes/networks. [29, 30] |
DSTG / Research Labs
(More Invention)
DPI/DAP
(More Innovation)
Time Constant (9 to 1) ~ 45 years
JDI
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Thematic-Temporal (Heuristic)
10
Level | NASA Technology Readiness Level Definition | Level | RAAF Science Discovery Level Definition |
TRL 1 | Basic Research: Initial scientific research has been conducted. Principles are qualitatively postulated and observed. Focus is on new discovery rather than applications. | SDL 9 | Abductive Research: Fundamental research to understand the philosophy and identify the underlying systems, principles and ontology as postulated with a focus on discovery and invention. |
TRL 2 | Applied Research: Initial practical applications are identified. Potential of material or process to solve a problem, satisfy a need, or find application is confirmed. | SDL 8 | Deductive Research: Research focussed on established science, results, and experiments to inform the theoretical development, classify, falsify, and ground scientific principles. |
TRL 3 | Critical Function or Proof of Concept Established: Applied research advances and early stage development begins. Studies and laboratory measurements validate analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. | SDL 7 | Inductive Research: Research focussed on abstracting the philosophy and theory to model, test, develop, and validate ontology and designs through lab-based experimentation. Seeks to answer the research questions and provide models for scaling future research and forecasting advances. |
TRL 4 | Lab Testing/Validation of Alpha Prototype Component/Process: Design, development and lab testing of components/processes. Results provide evidence that performance targets may be attainable based on projected or modelled systems. | SDL 6 | Conceptual Research: Research focussed on standardising the concepts to envision new languages, and adapt technologies, applications, and processes for projected or modelled system prototyping. |
TRL 5 | Laboratory Testing of Integrated/Semi-Integrated System: System Component and/or process validation is achieved in a relevant environment. | SDL 5 | Research Design: Design, development, and field testing of components/processes and porotypes. Results provide evidence that science may be taught as a discipline, and applied by attainable projected or modelled technologies. |
TRL 6 | Prototype System Verified: System/process prototype demonstration in an operational environment (beta prototype system level). | SDL 4 | Engineering / Strategic Research: System/process scaling to engineer/build/develop technology/ procedures/ processes, for technical training on a pre-production prototype and demonstrating in a strategic environment. |
TRL 7 | Integrated Pilot System Demonstrated: System/process prototype demonstration in an operational environment (integrated pilot system level). | SDL 3 | Applied Research: System/process prototyping applying new/existing technologies and capabilities in an operational environment (integrated pilot system level). Connecting to TRL 2. |
TRL 8 | System Incorporated in Commercial Design: Actual system/process completed and qualified through test and demonstration (pre-commercial demonstration). | SDL 2 | Develop Research Expertise: Providing ‘explanation of intuition’ and ‘invention of reason’ for leading research. Where expertise is typified by ‘fluid’ decision making and taking. |
TRL 9 | System Proven and Ready for Full Commercial Deployment: Actual system proven through successful operations in operating environment, and ready for full commercial deployment. | SDL 1 | Reflection: critical reflection of system meta-datum and systems, classes, and genus. Develop diagnostic hypothesises and draw rational conclusions from system patterns; including holistic recognition of ‘whole not parts’ and create membership of associated programmes/networks. |
Technology S-Curve
15 years
In other words, each (of 9) TRL may be estimated at taking up to 18 months.
Science S-Curve
45 years
In other words, each (of 9) SDL may be estimated at taking up to 5 years.
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Headquarters Air Command
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Three TRL into One SDL
11
Tech A = First Science Harmonic (~1-15 years)
Tech A = Second Science Harmonic (~16-30 years)
Tech A = Third Science Harmonic (~31-45 years)
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Invention-Innovation Pivot
12
Age | Stage | Science Harmonic | Technology Phase | Technology Harmonic |
Scientific Time Constant | Crawl | 3-12 years | TEC A | 1-4 years |
6-9 years | ||||
10-14 years | ||||
Walk | 18-27 years | TEC B | 1-4 years | |
6-9 years | ||||
10-14 years | ||||
Run | 33-42 years | TEC C | 1-4 years | |
6-9 years | ||||
10-14 years |
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Invention-Innovation Pivot
13
Science Led
(Explorative)
Technology Led
(Exploitative)
Three TRL 1-9 (TEC A,B,C) Per SDL
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Scientific Age | Science Technology Harmonic | Generation (Age in 2024) |
Turbine 1886-1930 | TEC A 1886-1900 | 1890-1903 Centennials |
TEC B 1901-1915 | 1904-1917 Edwardians | |
TEC C 1916-1930 | 1918-1931 Great Generation (93-106) | |
Industrial 1931-1975 | TEC A 1931-1945 | 1932-1945 Depressionals (79-92) |
TEC B 1946-1960 | 1946-1959 Baby Boomers (65-78) | |
TEC C 1961-1975 | 1960-1973 Gen X (51-64) | |
Information 1976-2020 | TEC A 1976-1990 | 1974-1987 Gen Y (37-50) |
TEC B 1991-2005 | 1988-2001 Millennials (23-36) | |
TEC C 2006-2020 | 2002-2015 Gen Z (Zed, 9-22) | |
Synthetical 2021-2065 | TEC A 2021-2035 | 2016-2029 Gen Alpha (0-8) |
TEC B 2036-2050 | 2030-2043 Gen Beta? | |
TEC C 2051-2065 | 2044-2057 Gen Gamma? |
Thematic-Temporal (Heuristic)
Age to Generation
Each Human Generation, connects to its Technology Harmonic to its Scientific Age
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
PI-AF Preparedness Focus
15
In accordance with the Defence Strategic Review (DSR) and reporting to DGPREP-AF, the implied Preparedness focus of DPI-AF, is considered to be:
Pareto
In accordance with Agile methodology, we are working towards an early IOC (or 80% / Pareto) solution, with a long tail to FOC – which may never be reached.
Another way of thinking of 80% is to adopt Sir Robert Watson-Watts’ “Cult of the Imperfect” (based on the Law of Parsimony / Occam’s Razor) which comes down to:
Second Best Today, because:
First best never comes, and we know what third best looks like.
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Filling the Invention – Innovation (I-I) Spectrum
16
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Headquarters Air Command
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
PI-AF Heuristics (Temporal-Thematics)
17
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Headquarters Air Command
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
RULS Graphing Uncertainty
18
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
RAAF Uncertainty Load Scale (RULS)
19
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
RULS of Uncertainty (1)
20
The Major Impact at Stage 1 is the Science on the Technology on the Capability, & the Problem Set.
Assessment
Pos. 1: SDL 9, TRL 3, CAP 7, PS 7, IN 2 –
UI = 33.8% (Poss DSTG)
Pos. 2: SDL 8, TRL 6, CAP 7, PS 7, IN 2 –
UI = 35.6% (Poss DSTG or JDI?)
Pos. 3: SDL 6, TRL 2, CAP 7, PS 7, IN 2 –
UI = 33.8% (Poss. Accelerator?)
Pos. 4: SDL 5, TRL 5, CAP 7, PS 7, IN 2 –
UI = 30.5% (Poss ACII or JDI)
Pos. 5: SDL 4, TRL 9, CAP 7, PS 7, IN 2 –
UI = 32.1% (Poss. Accelerator?)
Pos. 6: SDL 3, TRL 4, CAP 7, PS 7, IN 2 –
UI = 27% (Poss ACII?)
Pos. 7: SDL 1, TRL 9, CAP 7, PS 7, IN 2 –
UI = 27% (Poss. Accelerator?)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Note: Combinations are ruled by the Science.
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Questions
Simon Reay Atkinson
Captain RAN (PhD) | A/Professor (USYD)
PI - Preparedness Innovation – Air Force
Directorate of Preparedness Innovation
Preparedness Branch – Air Force
Headquarters Air Command | RAAF Base Glenbrook
Simon.atkinson5@defence.gov.au
P: 02 5108 9622 | M: 0457 757 078 |
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
SUM
22
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’
Headquarters Air Command
Headquarters Air Command
’One team – swift, decisive, resilient and respected’