1 of 17

Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage: green solution or dangerous distraction?

2 of 17

Graphic: ActionAid

NOTE: Same concept can apply to agricultural crops

What is BECCS?

BECCS stands for Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage

3 of 17

BECCS as a climate solution?

​

  • BECCS is seen by some as way to draw carbon dioxide out of atmosphere
  • Because burning wood for energy is classed as ‘carbon neutral’ & ‘renewable’, BECCS would be classed as ‘carbon negative’

​

​

​

 

4 of 17

Drax Power Station, Selby, Yorkshire

  • World’s biggest biomass burner

​

  • UK’s single largest carbon emitter: emitted over 13m tonnes of CO2 in 2020 from burning 7m tonnes of wood
  • Burns wood from clear-felled forests in the Southern USA, Canada, Estonia & Latvia

​

  • BECCS planning application this

year & Drax wants new subsidies�

 

5 of 17

Some problems with BECCS

​

1. BECCS exists only as an idea: not proven technology

​

  • no fully-functioning wood biomass BECCS scheme operating anywhere in the world

​

6 of 17

BECCS and ethanol fermentation

  • Some CO2 is emitted during ethanol fermentation e.g. by fermenting corn, wheat, sugar cane
  • Capturing this pure CO2 is fairly cheap and easy
  • CO2 from an ethanol plant in Illinois is being sequestered

7 of 17

What about BECCS with ethanol production?

  • But this capture CO2 is not carbon negative
  • Far more CO2 is emitted from burning fossil fuels to run the refinery than can be captured.

8 of 17

What about capturing CO2 from burning wood at Drax?

​

  • 2019/20: Unsuccessful attempt by C-Capture to capture 1 tonne of CO2 a day;

​

  • Mitsubishi carrying out product testing of new amine solvent at Drax since 2020;

​

  • No CO2 stored or utilised – no means of storage

​

  • Drax admission in March 2021 – “our BECCS assumptions for energy are not based on trials, they will be based on our detailed design work” = no real-world experience
  • ” 
  • https://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/2021/drax-plcs-carbon-capture-claims-not-based-on-any-real-world-evidence-company-reveals-to-campaigners/

9 of 17

Why BECCS technology is unlikely to work

  • Many unsuccessful attempts to capture carbon from burning coal
  • Biomass burns differently to coal, so knowledge from coal CCS can’t just be transferred;
  • It takes lots of energy to capture and compress CO2 –
  • will need around a third more biomass to be burned for the same energy output

10 of 17

​

2) What if BECCS technology did work one day? �

​

  • Burning wood for energy is already harming forests, wildlife & communities around the world

​

  • Creating an even bigger demand for wood for BECCS can only lead to more logging of forests or conversion of arable land into monoculture plantations.

​

11 of 17

3) BECCS isn’t “carbon negative”

12 of 17

4) High cost of BECCS: Ember research

​

  • Ember estimates that £31.7 billion in subsidies will be needed for BECCS at Drax - without delivering negative emissions
  • Equivalent to almost £500 per person in the UK, directly adding more than £16 a year to each household’s energy bill.
  • Danger that Drax could get subsidies for being “carbon capture ready” without having to reduce emissions

13 of 17

Alternatives to BECCS: protecting forests

  • BECCS would probably make us miss climate targets & prevent meaningful climate action
  • Protecting mature forests and allowing them to grow is the most effective way of sequestering carbon from the atmosphere & keep global warming from going beyond 1.5 or even 2 degrees

14 of 17

Genuine solutions: Redirecting biomass subsidies & preventing BECCS subsidies

​

  • Transfer over £1 billion in UK renewable subsidies from tree burning to renewable wind & solar�https://www.cutcarbonnotforests.org/email-your-mp/

​

  • Also need to prevent new subsidies for BECCS
  • Benefits for wildlife, forests, communities and green jobs in genuinely renewable energy

​

​

  • ​
  • ​

15 of 17

The need for a Just Transition

​

  • Huge potential for a Just Transition to green jobs without relying on unproven techno-fixes:

https://www.cacctu.org.uk/sites/data/files/sites/data/files/Docs/climatejobs-2021-web.pdf

https://neweconomics.org/2021/06/powering-the-just-transition

16 of 17

Genuine carbon capture- trees

“Protecting and restoring the world’s forests is a climate change solution, burning them is not.”

​

The Biomass Delusion: Paper signed by over 170 environmental groups

​

17 of 17

Thank you!

​