1 of 24

Lobster Ecosystem�Modeling + Monitoring

NNA Lobster Network All-Hands Meeting

21 November 2024

Andrew Goode

2 of 24

Overarching Research Goals / Objectives

Monitoring

    • Collaborate with The Lobster Institute, The Gulf of Maine Lobster Foundation, and NOAA to help expand benthic temperature monitoring by the Environmental Monitoring on Lobster Traps (eMOLT) program.

Modeling

    • Integrate multiple avenues of early lobster life history research to develop a Larval Life History Model to simulate drift, growth, mortality, and settlement of larval / Postlarval lobsters.

3 of 24

Monitoring: eMOLT

Why?

  • Provides critical benthic temperatures and water column profiles necessary to tune the hydrodynamic models to real conditions in the Gulf of Maine

How?

  • in situ temperature-depth sensors, satellite transmission of data in near-real time

4 of 24

eMOLT 2024

  • In 2024 the NNA program and GOMLF added 10 new participating lobstermen to the eMOLT program ranging from Bucks Harbor to Kittery
    • 12 Temperature-Depth Sensors
    • 12 DO Sensors

  • NNA Total: 18 new participants

  • Add Pete’s figure*****

NNA

All eMOLT

5 of 24

Modeling

Objective:

    • Integrate HYCOM-NEMURO products to particle tracking simulations

Larval Tracking Simulations

SSB Distribution

Hatch

Phenology

Prey Field

Modified Mortality

Settlement Potential

Large-scale Settlement Relationships

Environmental

Characteristics

Larval Development

6 of 24

Modeling: Previous All Hands Discussion

Larval Tracking Simulations

SSB Distribution

Hatch

Phenology

Prey Field

Modified Mortality

Settlement Potential

Large-scale Settlement Relationships

Environmental

Characteristics

Larval Development

7 of 24

Modeling: Today’s Topic – development and mortality

Larval Tracking Simulations

SSB Distribution

Hatch

Phenology

Prey Field

Modified Mortality

Settlement Potential

Large-scale Settlement Relationships

Environmental

Characteristics

Larval Development

8 of 24

Modeling: revisiting development and mortality

9 of 24

Modeling: revisiting development and mortality

    • What about temperature dependence?

10 of 24

Modeling: revisiting development and mortality

  • Literature review of stage-specific temperature-dependent relationships to larval stage duration

  • Revisit MacKenzie (1988) data for temperature-dependent, stage-specific larval mortality

  • Q: Can we refine these relationships with existing data, and what inferences can we gain from the two?

11 of 24

Larval development

Results

  • Comparable equations to MacKenzie (1988)

  • Improves eq. fit to results from 7 studies

    • Especially at low temperatures where the MacKenzie eqs. perform poorly

12 of 24

Larval mortality

Results

  • MacKenzie (1988) data (Table 1), were able to generate daily mortality rates that varies with temperature.

  • 2nd order polynomials with decreasing sensitivity to temperature with advancing larval stage

13 of 24

Survival

Results

  • Non-linear relationships between temperature and development/mortality create unique, non-linear functional relationships between larval survival and temperature.

  • Cumulative survival is largely dictated by patterns established/experienced as a stage I larva.

14 of 24

Fitness

New questions

  • Can larval fitness (Survival / Max Survival) be used to investigate patterns of larval habitat suitability?

  • How has larval habitat suitability changed over space/time?

  • How do these patterns relate to lobster settlement patterns (the end result of successful survival and settlement to the early benthic stage)

15 of 24

Fitness Over Space

Results

  • Larval Fitness estimates show significant variation in larval habitat suitability across NOAA statistical areas.
    • Highest along Mid-coast ME

  • Fitness changes inshore/offshore, but the patterns aren’t the same everywhere

16 of 24

SST Regime Shifts

17 of 24

Larval Fitness Regime Shifts

18 of 24

Non-linear Responses Make a Difference

  • Rapid changes in the thermal environment have caused shifts in regional larval habitat suitability.

  • Non-linear relationships to temperature cause heterogeneous responses to habitat suitability given similar changes in temperature

19 of 24

Fitness and Post-larval Settlement

  • Regional declines in settlement correspond to regime shift phenology of larval fitness
  • How well do they relate?

20 of 24

Fitness vs Settlement

  • Linear mixed effect model
    • Relationship between fitness and settlement rate varies over statistical areas due to spawner biomass, connectivity, benthic habitat suitability, etc.
    • Statistical area as random effects to slope and intercept to address regional patterns

  • Model R2 = 0.21

  • A significant part of the story that needs to be accounted for

21 of 24

Tracking Simulations

Start

End

22 of 24

23 of 24

Integration Needs

    • HYCOM-NEMURO zooplankton abundances
    • Tracking Using HYCOM

Larval Tracking Simulations

SSB Distribution

Hatch

Phenology

Prey Field

Modified Mortality

Settlement Potential

Large-scale Settlement Relationships

Environmental

Characteristics

Larval Development

24 of 24

Next Steps

  • Integrate spawner biomass weighting, egg hatch phenology, revised temperature-dependent development and mortality to estimate annual larval supply and distribution.

  • Use benthic thermal habitat, post-larval supply phenology, and large-scale settlement behavior dynamics to estimate annual post-larval supply.

  • Relate supply to regional settlement

  • Use zooplankton abundance to evaluate its ability to affect the relationship between post-larval supply and settlement density