1 of 50

Annual Performance Review Data Summary

  • Produced for South Ward Promise Neighborhood
    • By Caroline Taggart & Shontay Barnes, Via Evaluation
    • Summer 2023

2 of 50

introduction

01

table of contents

student academic performance and demographic gpras

02

student survey perception and participation data and gpras

03

community survey data

04

additional data

05

key findings & conclusions

06

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

3 of 50

introduction

  • overview of south ward promise neighborhood’s data and evaluation process

4 of 50

  • How are these performance measures and data points important and meaningful?
      • The South Ward Promise Neighborhood is funded by a US Department of Education Promise Neighborhoods grant. These grants require that funded organizations report on 10 established Government Performance and Results Act indicators, known as GPRAs. Grantees must also conduct a school climate and culture survey of 6th through 12th grade students attending partner schools every year, and a community survey of people residing in their Promise Neighborhood every other year.
      • This presentation shares these data with the community.
      • While the required data are intended to provide a comprehensive assessment of progress and impact of the Promise Neighborhood’s work, there are additional data that may be more meaningful to the community in understanding how well the Promise Neighborhood is operating.

why are we talking about this?

introduction

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

4

5 of 50

      • The South Ward Promise Neighborhood is a powerful collaborative effort of more than 25 organizations working together to invest in South Ward families. The South Ward Promise Neighborhood launched in 2018 with a U.S. Department of Education Promise Neighborhood grant. Partners offer free programs and services to ensure children receive support at every stage of development from prenatal to college and career. Our goal is to ensure every child growing up in the South Ward Promise Neighborhood will have access to high-quality early childhood centers, schools, healthcare, and housing. The South Ward Promise Neighborhood offers a system of family and community support services to ‘knock down walls and build up kids’ changing the course of generations to come, beginning with you!

what is the South Ward Promise Neighborhood?

introduction

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

5

6 of 50

      • The South Ward Promise Neighborhood includes the 4 neighborhoods within the South Ward. The prior round of grant funding focused on Upper Clinton Hill and Dayton, while the current round of funding focused on Lower Clinton Hill and Weequahic.
      • The zip codes 07108 and 07112 are the primary zip codes within the currently-funded South Ward Promise Neighborhood.

where is the South Ward Promise Neighborhood?

introduction

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

6

7 of 50

when are we collecting data?

introduction

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

2022-23

2023-24

2024-25

2025-26

2026-27

2021-22

baseline

Aug

Sept

Oct

Nov

Dec

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

June

July

K Readiness Assessment

Student Survey

NJSLAs

End-of Year data

  • GPRA 1
  • GPRA 6 (healthy eating)
  • GPRA 7 (safety)
  • GPRA 10 (internet access)
  • climate & culture
  • GPRA 2
  • GPRA 3 (attendance)
  • GPRA 4 & 5 (grad & post-grad)
  • GPRA 8 (student mobility)

Community Survey

  • GPRA 9 (reading)
  • perceptions
  • needs & assets

Community Survey

  • GPRA 9 (reading)
  • perceptions
  • needs & assets

7

8 of 50

when are we reporting on data?

introduction

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

YEAR 1

2022

YEAR 2

2023

YEAR 3

2024

YEAR 4

2025

YEAR 5

2026

Jan

Feb

Mar

Apr

May

Jun

July

Aug

Sept

Oct

Nov

Dec

APR

Ad-Hoc APR

All-Partner Meeting

All-Partner Meeting

CAN Meetings

CAN Meetings

8

9 of 50

student academic indicators

  • student academic performance and demographic gpras

10 of 50

student academic indicators

32%

K Ready in Fall 2022�

  • ACCS (7%)
  • Great Oaks (37%)

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

There is no baseline data presented for this GPRA because of a change in student population and how the tool was being administered.

Students are classified as ready by meeting K performance standards on numeracy and literacy tools, as set by the tool (NWEA MAP).

kindergarten readiness ∙ number and percent of kindergartners who demonstrate age-appropriate functioning across multiple domains

GPRA 1

10

11 of 50

student academic indicators

19%

Proficient in Math Spring 2022�

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

Students are considered proficient if they score a level 4 or level 5 on the NJSLA in Mathematics.

math performance ∙ number and percent of 3rd – 8th and HS students at or above grade level according to state mathematics assessments

GPRA 2.1

32%

Proficient in Math Spring 2023�

  • ACCS = 19% (51/274)
  • Great Oaks = 20% (242/1185)
  • KIPP = 20% (658/3258)
  • North Star = 47% (1717/3652)
  • ACCS = 21% (58/276)
  • Great Oaks = 20% (244/1213)
  • KIPP = 15% (269/1825)
  • North Star = 40% (137/345)

11

12 of 50

at or above performance in Math by grade

student academic indicators

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

12

13 of 50

student academic indicators

51%

Proficient in ELA Spring 2023�

  • ACCS = 40% (111/278)
  • Great Oaks = 40% (477/1187)
  • KIPP = 39% (1277/3280)
  • North Star = 66% (2411/3669)

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

Students are considered proficient if they score a level 4 or level 5 on the NJSLA in ELA.

ela performance ∙ number and percent of 3rd – 8th and HS students at or above grade level according to ela assessments

GPRA 2.2

38%

Proficient in ELA Spring 2022�

  • ACCS = 40% (111/276)
  • Great Oaks = 39% (421/1068)
  • KIPP = 31% (580/1842)
  • North Star = 65% (224/347)

13

14 of 50

student academic indicators

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

at or above performance in ELA by grade

14

15 of 50

at or above performance by grade and subject

student academic indicators

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

3rd

4th

5th

6th

7th

8th

HS

3rd

4th

5th

6th

7th

8th

HS

15

16 of 50

student academic indicators

79%

Average Daily Attendance 2021-22�

  • 6th grade = 76%
  • 7th grade = 76%
  • 8th grade = 78%
  • 9th grade = 87%

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

ADA is calculated by dividing the sum of each student’s days of attendance by the sum of each student’s total days of enrollment.

attendance rate ∙ average daily attendance for 6th – 9th grade students

GPRA 3.1

  • ACCS = 94%
  • Great Oaks = 61%
  • KIPP = 86%
  • North Star = 89%

Average Daily Attendance 2022-23�

  • 6th grade = 90%
  • 7th grade = 89%
  • 8th grade = 90%
  • 9th grade = 87%

89%

  • ACCS = 93%
  • Great Oaks = 91%
  • KIPP = 88%
  • North Star = 91%

16

17 of 50

average daily attendance by grade

student academic indicators

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

17

18 of 50

student academic indicators

35%

Chronically Absent in 2022-23�

  • 6th grade = 36%
  • 7th grade = 37%
  • 8th grade = 30%
  • 9th grade = 40%

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

Students who missed 10% of enrolled days are considered chronically absent.

chronic absenteeism ∙ percent of 6th – 9th grade students who missed 10% or more of enrolled school days

GPRA 3.2

Chronically Absent in 2021-22�

  • 6th grade = 49%
  • 7th grade = 48%
  • 8th grade = 38%
  • 9th grade = 51%

46%

  • ACCS = 21%
  • Great Oaks = 21%
  • KIPP = 45%
  • North Star = 24%
  • ACCS = 13%
  • Great Oaks = 52%
  • KIPP = 53%
  • North Star = 23%

18

19 of 50

chronic absenteeism by grade

student academic indicators

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

19

20 of 50

student academic indicators

94%

Class of 2023 Graduated

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

This is a 4-year cohort graduation rate, measuring the percent of students who earn a HS diploma within 4 years of starting 9th grade.

high school graduation ∙ percent of students graduating in four years

GPRA 4

  • Great Oaks = 97%
  • North Star = 92%
  • KIPP = N/A at time of report

Class of 2022 Graduated

96%

  • Great Oaks = 95%
  • KIPP = 96%

20

21 of 50

student academic indicators

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

post-secondary enrollment ∙ percent of PN students who enroll in a 2-yr or 4-yr college or university within 16 months of HS graduation

GPRA 5.1

89%

Class of 2023 Enrolled in Post-Secondary

  • 2-Year = 2%
  • 4-Year = 88%

Class of 2022 Enrolled in Post-Secondary

93%

  • 2-Year = 7%
  • 4-Year = 86%

21

22 of 50

student academic indicators

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

post-secondary completion ∙ percent of PN students who graduate from a 2-yr, 4-yr, or vocational certificate program

GPRA 5.2

We don’t have data on this at this time. We are still working to define who counts as a “PN student” and how to find out whether they have completed these programs within the timeframe requested by the Department of Education.

22

23 of 50

student academic indicators

13%

Student Mobility Rate 2022-23�

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

This is calculated by dividing the number of students who enter and exit participating schools during the school year by the total number enrolled across the whole year.

student mobility ∙ percent of students switching schools within the school year

GPRA 8

Promise Neighborhoods uses this as a measure of “stable communities”, but we know that students may transfer schools without moving homes.

  • ACCS = 19%
  • Great Oaks = 11%
  • KIPP = 13%
  • North Star = 12%

11%

Student Mobility Rate 21-22�

  • ACCS = 9%
  • Great Oaks = 12%
  • KIPP = 12%
  • North Star = 13%

23

24 of 50

student survey results

  • student survey perception and participation data and gpras

25 of 50

student survey results

      • Over 1000 5th – 12th grade students attending South Ward Promise Neighborhood partner schools completed a valid survey.

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

Enrollment data for North Star HS were not available

school attending

response rate

Student survey was administered in Feb 2023

25

26 of 50

student survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

racial identity

black or african american

multiple races

hispanic or latino

african national or caribbean islander

another racial identity

missing

gender identity

girl

boy

non-binary, gender fluid, gender queer, or gender expansive

do not wish to answer

not listed or self-describe

26

27 of 50

student survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

No Answer

Outside SWPN

In SWPN

26%

32%

42%

n=1068

residence

27

28 of 50

student survey results

22%

Eat 5+ fruits and veggies daily �

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

This is an approximated percent based on responses to 4 questions about how many days in a week students consumed fruits and vegetables (see notes for more detail).

children are healthy ∙ percent of children who consume 5 or more servings of fruits and vegetables daily

GPRA 6

Promise Neighborhoods uses this to measure “children are healthy”, but the questions are very difficult to answer and responses are likely to be inaccurate. Consider with caution!

2022 survey�

15%

28

29 of 50

student survey results

53%

Feel safe traveling to/from school

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

children feel safe ∙ percent of children who feel safe at school (a) OR traveling to & from school (b)

GPRA 7a & b

42%

Feel safe at school

45%

57%

2023

2022

29

30 of 50

student survey results

28%

Feel safe at and traveling to/from school

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

This is a calculated by summing the number of students who either strongly agree or agree that they feel safe at school AND that they feel safe travel to/from school.

children feel safe ∙ percent of children who feel safe at school and traveling to & from school

GPRA 7c

Feel safe at and traveling to/from school

33%

30

31 of 50

other safety perception results

student survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

A large portion of students responded “Neutral” or “Don’t Know” to questions about safety.

31

32 of 50

safety to/from school by mode of transportation

student survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

Feel Safe

Neutral/Don’t Know

Unsafe

32

33 of 50

student survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

children internet access ∙ percent of children who school and home access to broadband internet and a connected computing device

GPRA 10

The 2023 survey questions did not adequately capture access to broadband internet needed to measure this GPRA.

33

34 of 50

ease of technology use

student survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

80%

Easily use technology for school assignments

This is a calculated by summing the number of students who responded that using technology for school assignments was very, somewhat, or slightly easy.

34

35 of 50

internet access at school by device

student survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

35

36 of 50

students have positive relationships �even though they may not feel proud of or like they belong at their school

student survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

36

37 of 50

community survey results

  • parent/family member survey perceptions and gpras

38 of 50

community survey results

  • Phone Calls
      • Cornerstone Research conducted a phone survey, calling over 5000 phone numbers associated with people living in South Ward zip codes. They conducted 310 surveys.

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

Community survey was administered in early 2023

      • Over 500 residents of the South Ward Promise Neighborhood completed a valid survey.

Internet Reach

      • Child Trends administered the survey online through an open email invitation to residents of the South Ward. A total of 43 people responded and completed a survey.
  • Partner Invitation
      • South Ward Promise Neighborhood partner organizations distributed the survey link to their email lists. A total of 160 people completed a survey in response to receiving one of these emails. These respondents are referred to as “partner-connected” in this data presentation.

38

39 of 50

community survey results

  • Respondents live in:
  • Clinton Hill 07108 = 229 or 45%
  • Weequahic 07112 = 241 or 47%
  • Dayton 07114 = 43 or 8%

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

Respondent residence

229

241

43

39

40 of 50

community survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

Over half of respondents are parents of children 18 & under

56%

Have child(ren)

43%

79%

all respondents

random sample

partner-connected sample

Partner-connected respondents were almost twice as likely to be parents of children 18 and under.

40

41 of 50

community survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

over one-third of respondents have heard of SWPN

37%

Heard of SWPN

55%

Heard of SWPN

This increases to 55% among those who were invited to complete a survey by a SWPN partner. However, nearly half (45%) of people who are connected to SWPN organizations reported that they had not heard of SWPN.

all respondents

partner-connected respondents

41

42 of 50

community survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

reading to children ∙ percent of parents/families who read to their children (ages birth to 5-years old) or encourage their children to read (K-8th)

GPRA 9.1

75%

Read to their young children or encourage their K-8th children to read to themselves or others

63%

Read to their young children

80%

Encourage their K-8th grade children to read

42

43 of 50

community survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

college & career∙ percent of parents/families who talk about the importance of college with their children from 9th-12th grade

GPRA 9.2

93%

Talk about the importance of college

88%

Talk about the importance of career

83%

Talk about BOTH the importance of college & career

43

44 of 50

community survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

Applying to college or other schools after high school

Specific jobs your child might apply for after completing/ leaving high school

Planning and preparation for college entrance exams

Selecting courses or programs at school

Often

Sometimes

Never

most parents talk to their teens about future plans

44

45 of 50

student survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

Applying to college or other schools after high school

Specific jobs your child might apply for after completing/ leaving high school

Planning and preparation for college entrance exams

Selecting courses or programs at school

Often

Sometimes

Never

but teens may not recall these conversations

as indicated by their recollection of how often their parents talk to them about these topics

45

46 of 50

community survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

two-thirds of respondents are working

Full-Time

Part-Time

Not Working

More than 1 job

Partner-connected respondents were 3x more likely to work part-time jobs.

46

47 of 50

community survey results

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

the financial needs of some are met, but parents struggle

58%

Financial needs are met

Meets financial needs

Doesn’t meet

Random

Not Parents

Partner-connected

Not Parents

Partner-connected

PARENTS

Random

PARENTS

47

48 of 50

community survey results

most people seek health care at a doctor’s office

92%

97%

Have a place they usually go when sick

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

adults

children

Doctor’s Office

Hospital ER

Clinic or Urgent Care

48

49 of 50

community survey results

most parents are the main childcare for their kids

intro

academics

student survey

community survey

additional data

conclusions

younger children are more likely to be cared for outside the home.

n=56

PreK or Head Start

Daycare

Self or Partner

Other in-home

Self or Partner

Other in-home

School Care

Other

Self or partner

Other in-home

49

50 of 50

  • contact information
    • For more info, please contact us at

    • Caroline Taggart
    • Via Evaluation
    • caroline@viaeval.com
    • 716.362.0627

thank you