“BUT WHY CAN’T �I SEE THAT?” �EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF ACCESS RESTRICTIONS ON RESEARCHERS
Katrina Windon, Collections Management & Processing Unit Head, University of Arkansas Special Collections
DiAnna Hemsath, Archivist, University of Nebraska Medical Center McGoogan Health Sciences Library
Elizabeth Russell, Photo & Visual Materials Archivist, University of Washington Libraries Special Collections
Ashlyn Velte, Senior Processing Archivist, CU Boulder Libraries
Veronica Denison, Digital Archivist & Special Collections Librarian, Rhode Island College
How are researchers impacted by access restrictions and what strategies can archives use to mitigate any negative impacts?
Participants and Demographics
Survey
Interviews
FINDINGS THEMES: Transparency
WAYS TO PROVIDE TRANSPARENCY
FINDINGS THEMES: Consistency
FINDINGS THEMES: Impacts on Research
• Most of our respondents report concerns about access: over a third said restrictions affect their work; 40% say they may.
• Researchers said they build in extra time in case of potential restrictions, abandon topics, or limit how openly they describe projects to archivists in order to gain access to materials.
• Restrictions can delay, disrupt, or create gaps in research
• Inconsistent enforcement and credential-based limits produce unequal research conditions
• Participants call for clearer, more consistent communication—especially in finding aids, policies, and staff guidance.
• Improving transparency and consistency could significantly enhance research outcomes and user experience.
Conclusion