DIFFERENT CLASSIFICATIONS OF ASSESSMENT
LESSON 3
1
Learning Objectives
● Illustrate scenarios in the use of different classifications of assessment;
● Rationalize the purpose of different classifications of assessment; and
● Decide on the kind of assessment to be used.
2
Significant Culminating Performance Task and Success Indicators
3
Content of the Illustrative scenario | Success Indicators |
Rationalized the kind of assessment used | All the possible justifications to help the teacher identify student learning and how learners will benefit from the information are provided. |
Provide the procedure on how to conduct the assessment | All necessary procedure that are appropriate in conducting the assessment are describe. |
Provide the purpose of the assessment | All the possible purposes of conducting the assessment are clearly indicated. |
Demonstrate your knowledge and skills in illustrating and selecting the appropriate
kind of assessment given the purpose of what you need to determine among learners.
What are the different classification of assessment?
4
CLASSIFICATION | TYPES |
Purpose | Educational |
Psychological | |
Form | Paper-and-pencil |
Performance-based | |
Function | Teacher-made |
Standardized |
What are the different classification of assessment?
5
CLASSIFICATION | TYPES |
Kind of learning | Achievement |
Aptitude | |
Ability | Speed |
Power | |
Interpretation of learning | Norm-referenced |
Criterion-referenced |
1. PURPOSE (EDUCATIONAL VS. PSYCHOLOGICAL)
6
Examples:
> Formative Assessment- is a continuous process of gathering information about student learning at the beginning, during and after instruction.
1. What learners know and do not know so that instruction can supplement what learners do not know.
2. Misconception of learners so that they can be corrected.
3. Confusion of learners so that they can be clarified.
4. What learners can and cannot do so that enough practice
can given to performance task.
> Summative Assessment- is to determine and record what the learners have learned.
1. PURPOSE (EDUCATIONAL VS. PSYCHOLOGICAL)
7
Examples:
For cognitive measure – tests for ability, aptitude, intelligence, and critical thinking.
For affective measures – test for personality, motivation, atitude, interest, and disposition.
2. FORM � (PAPER-AND-PENCIL VS. PERFORMANCE BASED)
8
Examples: binary (true or false), short answer (identification), matching type, multiple choice test.
Examples of learning target that require a paper-and-pencil type of assessment.
* Identify the parts of the plants
* Label the parts of the microscope
* Compute the compound interest
* Classify the phase of a given matter
* Provide the appropriate verb in the sentence
* Identify the type of sentence
2. FORM � (PAPER-AND-PENCIL VS. PERFORMANCE BASED)
9
Examples: writing an essay, reporting in front of the class, reciting a poem, demonstrating how a problem is solve.
Examples of learning targets that require a performance-based assessment:
* Varnish a wooden cabinet
* Draw a landscape using paintbrush in the computer
* Write a word problem involving mutiplication and polynomials
* Deliver a speech convincing your classmate that you are good candidate for the student council
* Write an essay explaining how humans and plants benefit from each other
* Mount a plant specimen on a glass slide
3. FUNCTION � (TEACHER-MADE VS. STANDARDIZED)
10
Examples: quizzes, long tests, and exams.
3. FUNCTION � (TEACHER-MADE VS. STANDARDIZED)
11
Examples: Metropolitan Achievement Test, Licensure Examinations
3. FUNCTION � (TEACHER-MADE VS. STANDARDIZED)
12
Category | Specific Example | Visit the site for their description |
Intelligence test | Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale | |
Achievement test | Metropolitan Achievement Test | |
Aptitude test | Raven’s Progressive Matrices | |
Critical Thinking Test | Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal | |
Interest test | RIASEC Markers Scale | |
Personality test | NEO Personality Inventory |
4. KIND OF LEARNING� (ACHIEVEMENT VS. APTITUDE)
13
Examples: National Achievement Test (NAT)
4. KIND OF LEARNING� (ACHIEVEMENT VS. APTITUDE)
14
Examples:
> Cognitive Abilities Measurement- measures working memory capacity, ability to store old information and process new ones, and speed of an individual
in retrieving and processing new information.
5. ABILITY (SPEED VS. POWER)
15
Examples:
>Typing test – in which the examinees are required to correctly type as many words as possible given a limited amount of time.
5. ABILITY (SPEED VS. POWER)
16
Examples:
>Test developed by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics - determines the ability of the examinees to utilized data to reason and become creative, formulate, solve, reflect critically on the problems provided.
6. INTERPRETATION OF LEARNING� (NORM-REFERENCED VS. CRITERION-REFERENCED)
17
Norm - is a standard and is based on a very large group of samples. It is also used to convert a raw score into standard scores for interpretability.
Two Uses of Norms
> A norm is basis of interpreting a test score.
> A norm can be used to interpret a particular score.
6. INTERPRETATION OF LEARNING� (NORM-REFERENCED VS. CRITERION-REFERENCED)
18
> For example, in a 50-item test, 40-50 is very high, 30-39 is high, 20-29 is average, and 10-19 is low, and 0-9 is very low.
> One approach in criterion in criterion-referenced interpretation is that the score is compared to a specific cutoff. An example is the grading in schools where the range of range of grades 96- 100 is highly proficient, 90-95 is proficient, 80-89 is nearly proficient, and below 80 is beginning.
Group 2
Bagacina, Gern Hans B.
Belgado, Jinkee T.
Dacara, Charlyn
Dudang, Armina Roselle M.
Larcena, Salve P.
Marmol, Katherine L.
Oliveros, Danica D.
Pajenago, Mhelgar M.
Quiӣano, Alily Jane E.
19
“
THANK�YOU!!!