news | march mammal madness!!!
evolution | micro vs macro
Microevolution:
Macroevolution:
the theory of evolution | making predictions
"To suppose that the eye with all its inimitable contrivances for adjusting the focus to different distances, for admitting different amounts of light, and for the correction of spherical and chromatic aberration, could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree." (Darwin 1859, from On the Origin of Species)
the theory of evolution | darwin (19thcen)
If evolution is a theory, then we can find ways of testing it
Darwin’s 5 Theories:
darwinism | perpetual change
darwinism | index fossils
darwinism | index fossils
darwinism | perpetual change
darwinism | common descent
darwinism | common descent
darwinism | common descent
darwinism | common descent
axolotl & mudpuppies
different growth rates
stunted growth rates
darwinism | multiplication of species
Ancestral species split into new groups
darwinism | multiplication of species
Ancestral species split into new groups
darwinism | multiplication of species
darwinism | multiplication of species
darwinism | multiplication of species
darwinism | gradualism vs punctuated equilibrium
"... it is probable that the periods, during which each [species] underwent modification, though many and long as measured by years, have been short in comparison with the periods during which each remained in an unchanged condition."
Darwin in Origin of Species
~
We [Eldredge & Gould] argued that two outstanding facts of the fossil record -- geologically "sudden" origin of new species and failure to change thereafter (stasis) -- reflect the predictions of evolutionary theory, not the imperfections of the fossil record. In most theories, small isolated populations are the source of new species, and the process of speciation takes thousands or tens of thousands of years. This amount of time, so long when measured against our lives, is a geological microsecond . . .
Since we proposed punctuated equilibria to explain trends, it is infuriating to be quoted again and again by creationists -- whether through design or stupidity, I do not know -- as admitting that the fossil record includes no transitional forms. Transitional forms are generally lacking at the species level, but they are abundant between larger groups.
Gould in Hens Teeth & Horse Feathers
darwinism | gradualism
darwinism | gradualism
darwinism | gradualism
darwinism | gradualism (peppered moth)
Natural Selection
Darwin’s explanatory model of evo by nat sel
natural selection | Darwin’s elephants
Daughters/Elephant | Pop’n after 500 yrs | # F/M |
0 | 0 | - |
1 | 22 | .22 |
2 | 64,771 | .89 |
3 | 864,333 | 2.32 |
4 | 7,315,931 | 5.53 |
5 | 13,368, 523 | 15.81 |
6 | 0 | - |
natural selection | Darwin’s elephants
What does natural selection shape?
What it does not shape or explain?
darwinism | biogeography
life history | biogeography
What an organism needs from start to finish: