1 of 51

PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW

Conceptual Design of a Business Class Jet

Course: Aircraft Design & Optimisation

Prepared by: Group 3 (Business Jet)

2 of 51

DESIGN 1

3 of 51

Primary Mission Specs:

Core Weight Assumptions:

Passenger Capacity: 8 (Business Class)

Design Range: 3,000 km (≈ 1,620 nmi)

Cruise: Mach 0.75 @ 41,000 ft

Takeoff Field Length: ≈ 1,500 m

• Standard Pax/Crew: 90 kg

• Checked Baggage: 20 kg per pax

• ISA Atmospheric Conditions

MISSION REQUIREMENTS & ASSUMPTIONS

Dantu Phani Surya

4 of 51

Low Swept Wing

Optimized for structural efficiency, retractable landing gear housing, and fuel volume capacity.

Rear Turbofans

Rear-mounted twin engines ensure clean airflow over the wing and reduced interior cabin noise.

T-Tail Design

Keeps the horizontal stabilizer in clean airflow, free from wing wake and engine exhaust turbulence.

CONFIGURATION SELECTION LOGIC

Dantu Phani Surya

5 of 51

Component

Standard Allocation

Subtotal (kg)

8 Passengers

8 × 90 kg

720

2 Flight Crew

2 × 90 kg

180

Baggage

8 × 20 kg

160

Total Design Payload (Wpayload)

1,060 kg

PAYLOAD WEIGHT CALCULATION

Dantu Phani Surya

6 of 51

Cumulative Mission Ratios:

• Start & Taxi: 0.990

• Cruise (3000 km): 0.6

• Reserve & Loiter: 0.970

MISSION FUEL FRACTION SUMMARY

0.44

Priyangshu Karmakar

7 of 51

0.41

We/W0

Component Selection Logic:

High usage of composite airframe primary structures.

Pressurized cabin integration for high-altitude cruise.

Advanced executive avionics and interior outfitting.

Modern high-bypass turbofan nacelle weight.

EMPTY WEIGHT STATISTICAL SIZING

Priyangshu Karmakar

8 of 51

(Baseline for initial performance sizing and propulsion integration)

6000kg

Converged Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)

TOTAL GROSS WEIGHT ESTIMATION

= 6000 kg

Priyangshu Karmakar

9 of 51

THRUST SIZING ANALYSIS

Constraint Diagram Analysis:

Target T/W = 0.30 to meet takeoff field length and climb gradient requirements.

Sizing Result: Twin turbofans @ 6.25 kN each.

N

Dheeraj

10 of 51

Wing loading (W/S) impacts takeoff speed, cruise efficiency, and stall safety margins.

WING LOADING COMPARATIVE STUDY

Dheeraj

11 of 51

Corrected Area (S): 12.0 m²

Aspect Ratio (AR): 8.5

Wing Sweep (\Lambda): 25°

INITIAL WING PLANFORM DESIGN

Dheeraj

12 of 51

3,000 km mission range supported by fuel fraction W_f/W_0 approx 0.44.

MISSION ALTITUDE PROFILE TREND

Abhishek Lakhera

13 of 51

CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT SKETCH

Preliminary 3-view blueprint

incorporating all major design choices:

Pressurized Cabin for 8 Pax.

Rear Mounted Twin Turbofans.

T-Tail Empennage Unit.

Retractable Tricycle Landing Gear.

Abhishek Lakhera

14 of 51

DESIGN 2

15 of 51

Primary Mission Specs:

Core Weight Assumptions:

Passenger Capacity: 18 (Business Class)

Design Range: 5677 km (≈ 3527 miles)

Cruise: Mach 0.75 @ 41,000 ft

Takeoff Field Length: ≈ 3500 m

• Standard Pax/Crew: 95 kg

• Checked Baggage: 20 kg per pax

MISSION REQUIREMENTS & ASSUMPTIONS - 2

Meet Raju Meshram

16 of 51

Wing position: Low

Low wing selected for structural efficiency, high fuel volume, shorter landing gear, and improved cruise aerodynamics (higher L/D).

Rear Turbofans

Rear-mounted turbofans selected for clean wing aerodynamics, lower cabin noise, and reduced wing structural penalties.

Cruciform Design

Cruciform tail chosen to keep the horizontal stabilizer in clean airflow, avoiding wing wake and engine exhaust effects.

CONFIGURATION SELECTION LOGIC

Meet Raju Meshram

17 of 51

Component

Standard Allocation

Subtotal (kg)

18 Passengers

18 × 95 kg

1710

2 Flight Crew

2 × 95 kg

190

Baggage

18 × 20 kg

360

Total Design Payload

2250 kg

PAYLOAD WEIGHT CALCULATION

Wpayload = 1710 + 180+ 360 = 2260 kg

Meet Raju Meshram

18 of 51

Cumulative Mission Ratios:

• Start & Taxi: 0.990

• Cruise (3000 km): 0.77

• Reserve & Loiter: 0.970

MISSION FUEL FRACTION SUMMARY

Fuel Fraction

0.28

Wf/Wo =1.06(1−0.99×0.77×0.97) = 0.28

Meet Raju Meshram

19 of 51

0.50

We/W0

Component Selection Logic:

  • Aluminum semi-monocoque structure for durability and certification reliability.
  • Pressurized circular cabin enabling efficient high-altitude cruise.
  • Rear-mounted medium-bypass turbofans for low cabin noise and clean wing aerodynamics.
  • Integrated glass cockpit avionics optimized for single-pilot operations.�

EMPTY WEIGHT STATISTICAL SIZING

Jenish Patel

20 of 51

(Baseline for initial performance sizing and propulsion integration)

10701 kg

Converged Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)

TOTAL GROSS WEIGHT ESTIMATION

Wo = 2250/(1-0.28-0.50) = 10701 kg

Jenish Patel

21 of 51

Corrected Area (S): 18.0 m²

Aspect Ratio (AR): 7.5

Wing Sweep (\Lambda): 27°

Airfoil: NACA 23014

INITIAL WING PLANFORM DESIGN

34.37

Jenish Patel

22 of 51

THRUST SIZING ANALYSIS

Constraint Diagram Analysis:

Target T/W = 0.25 to 0.45 required for Business jet to meet takeoff field length and climb gradient requirements.

Sizing Result: Twin turbofans @ 13.12 kN - 23.62 kN each.

T = 0.25 * 10701* 9.81 = 26244.2 N

T = 0.45 * 10701* 9.81 = 47239.6 N

Jenish Patel

23 of 51

DESIGN 3

GULFSTREAM G800

24 of 51

Parameter

Value

Unit

Wing Span (b)

31.2

m

Wing Aspect Ratio

9.3

-

Wing Wetted Aspect Ratio

2.2

-

Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (TSFC)

(for cruise altitude of 10000 m)

90

g/KN.s

Range

15000

Km

L/D

15.4

-

Overview of Design/Sizing Parameters

max

Sanjeev

25 of 51

L/D

15.4

L/D

13.34

Maximum lift to drag ratio trends

The maximum L/D ratio of our a/c is taken from this graph

max

cruise

Sanjeev

26 of 51

Parameter

Value (in Kilogram kg)

W

2600

W

200

W

24912

Initial Gross Weight (GUESS)

(W )

47900

W (Calculated)

18831

Aircraft Weights

Payload

Empty

Crew

Fuel

0

Key Definitions:

Weight Breakdown of Business Jet

Wpayload​: Represents the weight of passengers, baggage, and other cargo

Wcrew​: Accounts for the flight crew's weight

Wempty​: Covers the aircraft's structural weight without fuel, payload, or crew

Wfuel​: The calculated fuel weight required to

meet mission demands

W0​ (Initial Gross Weight): The total weight of the

aircraft at the beginning of the mission, including all components: empty weight, crew, payload, and fuel

Sanjeev

27 of 51

Parameter

Value

Unit

Wing Area (S )

104.671

m

Wetted Area (S )

442.4727

m

Area Ratio (S /S )

4.2273

m

L/D (cruise)

13.3364

m

Calculated Wing Parameters

Wet

ref

ref

Wet

2

2

2

2

Sanjeev

28 of 51

Parameter

Value

Warmup and Takeoff

0.97

Climb

0.985

Landing

0.995

Mission Segment Weight Fractions

Historical Mission Segment Weight Fractions (W /W )

i

i-1

Cruise Weight Fraction (W /W )

3

2

Mission Profile

Breguet Range Equation

Loiter Weight Fraction (W /W )

4

3

Nandini

29 of 51

Weight Fraction Calculations

Nandini

30 of 51

Parameter

Value

Unit

Initial Gross Weight (W0) - Guess

46543

Kg

Warmup and Takeoff (W1)

45146.71

Kg

Climb (W2)

44469.51

Kg

Cruise (W3)

29683.39

Kg

Loiter (W4)

28922.315

Kg

Landing (W5)

28777.704

Kg

Gross Weights during different Missions

Nandini

31 of 51

Designation

Mission

Fuel Fraction

(W / W )

0

Initial Fuel Fraction

0.41

1

Take-off

0.0300

2

Climb

0.0446

3

Cruise

0.3622

4

Loiter

0.3814

5

Landing

0.3845

Fuel Fraction during different Missions

*A fuel margin of 6 % is kept for emergency & reserve purposes

fx

0

Nandini

32 of 51

Conceptual Sketch

Top View of Aircraft

Front View of Aircraft

Sanjeev,Nandini

33 of 51

Conceptual Sketch

Side View of Aircraft

Sanjeev,Nandini

34 of 51

Conceptual Sketch

Isometric View of Aircraft

Sanjeev,Nandini

35 of 51

Conceptual Sketch

Front View of Cabin Cross-Section

Sanjeev,Nandini

36 of 51

DESIGN 4

37 of 51

Executive Summary

This jet is a modern business jet optimized for medium-range corporate missions, emphasizing fuel efficiency and passenger comfort.

Parameter

Value

MTOW

20,000 kg

Cruise Speed

Mach 0.80

Range

4,500 km

Engines

2x High-Bypass

DESIGN GOAL

To bridge the gap between light jets and intercontinental cruisers with a cost-effective platform.

Praveen Tiwari

38 of 51

Mission Requirements

SAFETY MARGIN

Reserve fuel calculated per standard ICAO/FAA regulations for commercial operations.

Takeoff

5 min max thrust Climb to 41,000 ft

Cruise

4,500 km range @ Mach 0.80

Reserves

30 min loiter + 6% fuel reserve

Praveen Tiwari

39 of 51

Initial Weight Estimation

Gross Weight Calculation:

Empty Weight Fraction:

Empty (59%) Fuel (28%) Payload (13%)

Empirical constants A=1.59, C=-0.10 for Jet Trainers/Business Jets.

Apoorva

40 of 51

Fuel Fraction Analysis

The cruise segment dominates fuel consumption. Calculated using the Breguet Range Equation:

Where R=Range, C=SFC, V=Velocity, L/D=Lift-to-Drag.

Segment

Fraction

Takeoff & Climb

0.960

Cruise

0.820

Loiter & Land

0.975

Total Fuel Fraction

0.722

RESULT

Wf / W0 = 1 - 0.722 = 0.278 (approx 28%)

Apoorva

41 of 51

Aerodynamic Design

Wing Configuration

Equivalent Aspect Ratio:

Used to estimate L/D max of 15.

Sweep: 25° (Transonic efficiency)

Aspect Ratio: 6.6

Airfoil: Supercritical RAE 2822

JUSTIFICATION

Supercritical airfoils delay shockwave formation, allowing higher cruise speeds (Mach 0.80).

Ashmit

42 of 51

Schematic of Business Jet

Ashmit

43 of 51

Propulsion System

Type: 2x High-bypass Turbofan

Thrust: 32 kN each (64 kN Total)

SFC: 0.8 kg/(N·hr)

Mount: Rear Fuselage

INTEGRATION

Rear mounting allows for a clean wing aerodynamic surface and reduced cabin noise.

Ashmit

44 of 51

Engine Mounting

Ashmit

45 of 51

Performance Estimates

Thrust-to-Weight Ratio Calculation:

Speed

Cruise: Mach 0.80 Max: Mach 0.85

Runway

TO: 1,650 m LND: 1,350 m

Climb

Ceiling: 45,000 ft

G Aavishkar

46 of 51

Configuration

Fuselage: Circular cross-section (2.1m dia) for pressure efficiency.

Empennage: T-Tail to clear engine wake.

Landing Gear: Tricycle retractable.

FINENESS RATIO

Fuselage fineness ratio of 9.6 selected to minimize skin friction drag while ensuring adequate internal volume.

G Aavishkar

47 of 51

Fuselage Cross Section

G Aavishkar

48 of 51

Systems & Avionics

Key Systems

Avionics: Glass cockpit, Fly-by-wire.

ECS: 8,000 ft cabin alt @ FL450.

Power: 2x 28V DC Generators.

PASSENGER COMFORT

HEPA filtration and low cabin altitude reduce fatigue on long missions.

Apoorva

49 of 51

Conclusion

This jet design meets all preliminary performance targets.

Range: 4,500 km (Achieved)

Efficiency: L/D 15 (Verified)

Cost: Competitive DOC

RECOMMENDATION

Proceed to CFD analysis and scale model wind tunnel testing.

Apoorva

50 of 51

Q&A

Thank you for your attention.

Aircraft Design and Optimisation Lab, GROUP - 3 (Business Jet)

Preliminary Design Phase: COMPLETE

51 of 51

https://aircraftgeometrycodes.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/screenshot-2019-03-02-20.37.03.png?w=529

Source: aircraftgeometrycodes.wordpress.com

https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/app/uploads/sites/4/2022/07/WingPlanform.png

Source: eaglepubs.erau.edu

https://images.dassault-aviation.com/f_auto,q_auto,g_center,dpr_auto/wp-auto-upload/2/files/2017/05/NNTP0029_P_Si.jpg

Source: www.dassault-aviation.com

IMAGE SOURCES