Stratospheric chemistry and SMVGEAR II in GEOS-CHEM model
Gabriele Curci
University of L’Aquila
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
ROAD MAP
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY �IN CURRENT GEOS-CHEM
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
1200
Deposition
500
Transport from stratosphere
4200
Chem loss in troposphere
4900
Chem prod in troposphere
Global sources and sinks of ozone (Tg O3 y-1) in GEOS-CHEM model
NOx emissions (Tg N y-1) to the troposphere
FOSSIL FUEL
23.1
AIRCRAFT
0.5
BIOFUEL
2.2
SOILS
5.1
LIGHTNING
5.8
STRATOSPHERE
0.2
BIOMASS
BURNING
5.2
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY �IN CURRENT GEOS-CHEM
It would be helpful a better simulation of stratospheric chemistry?
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
A STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY VERSION OF GEOS-CHEM
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
MAIN FEATURES OF THE MODEL
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
A STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY VERSION OF GEOS-CHEM: EVALUATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
Stratospheric GEOS-CHEM ozone column
vs
TOMS column
(1998)
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
A STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY VERSION OF GEOS-CHEM: EVALUATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
Simulation of the Antarctic Ozone Hole
(1998)
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
SMVGEAR II IN GEOS-CHEM
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
A GEOS-CHEM 1-month run using SMVGEAR II reveals:
MAIN FEATURES OF THE PACKAGE
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
SMVGEAR II IN GEOS-CHEM: EVALUATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
Relative differences between SMV1 and SMV2 simulations after 1 month
NOx
-1.6 ÷ 0.2 %
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
SMVGEAR II IN GEOS-CHEM: EVALUATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
Relative differences between SMV1 and SMV2 simulations after 1 month
Ox
0 ÷ 1.6 %
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
SMVGEAR II IN GEOS-CHEM: EVALUATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
Relative differences between SMV1 and SMV2 simulations after 1 month
CO
-0.55 ÷ 0 %
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
SMVGEAR II IN GEOS-CHEM: EVALUATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
Relative differences between SMV1 and SMV2 simulations after 1 month
OH
0 ÷ 10 %
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
TROPOSPHERIC-STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY SIMULATION
IF ( LEVEL < TROPOPAUSE ) THEN
80 species, 288 kinetic reactions, 51 photolysis, 5 heterogeneous reactions
ELSE
40 species, 120 kinetic reactions, 30 photolysis, 6 heterogeneous reactions
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
BASIC IDEA OF THE SIMULATION
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
TROPOSPHERIC-STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY SIMULATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
MAIN FEATURES OF THE MODEL
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
TROPOSPHERIC-STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY SIMULATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
MAIN MODIFICATIONS TO THE CODE
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
TROPOSPHERIC-STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY SIMULATION: EVALUATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
Relative differences between STD and T-S simulations
Ox
0 ÷ 60 %
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
TROPOSPHERIC-STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY SIMULATION: EVALUATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
Zonal mean of Ox in January
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
TROPOSPHERIC-STRATOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY SIMULATION: EVALUATION
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
Zonal mean of Ox in January
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
CONCLUSIONS AND DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
POSSIBLE APPLICATIONS
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University
END��☺ THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION! ☺
6/2/2003
Gabriele Curci
GEOS-CHEM users’ meeting
Harvard University