1 of 16

Municipal Contract Law �Maddie Cash �MAT Spring Short Courses 2024

2 of 16

Scope of MCL

  • CONTRACTING AUTHORITY
    • Minn. Stat. § 365.02
    • Minn. Stat. § 365.025
  • MCL AUTHORITY
    • Minn. Stat. § 471.345
  • THERE ARE EXPRESSED EXEMPTIONS OF MCL
  • ESTIMATING CONTRACT COST IS THE FIRST STEP!

3 of 16

- may be made by quotes or direct negotiation in the open market

- at least two quotes retained for one year

- no specific requirements for making the contract in the open market

- must be done by either direct negotiation by receiving two written quotes or upon sealed bids.

- if used, the two or more quotes must be retained for one year

- sealed bids require the most complicated procedure and are not typically used at this level

- MUST be let by sealed bids solicited by public notice using the procedures established for townships

- sealed bids process is a mix of statutory requirements, case law and common practice

- performance bonds and payment bonds quired

- Lowest responsible bidder requirement

$0-25,000

$25,000-175,000

Over $175,000

Contracting levels

4 of 16

Lowest Responsible Bidder Requirement

“a contract let on bid must be let to the lowest responsible bidder.” Minn. Stat. § 365.37, subd. 2

Separate from the requirements of MCL, but whenever the board initiated the sealed bidding process, the lowest responsible bidder requirement MUST be followed regardless of the value of the contract.

Simply giving a contract to the low bidder without considering whether the contractor can adequately perform the contract will not necessarily serve the public’s interests, so the municipality has some discretion.

If a low bid is rejected because it is made by an irresponsible bidder, the board must show some fact as to why the bidder is irresponsible (e.g. cannot complete the job, lacks the skill).

4

5 of 16

Lowest Responsible Bidder: Factors to consider

- FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

- INTEGRITY

- SKILL

- ABILITY

- LIKELIHOOD OF PROVIDING FAITHFUL AND SATISFYING WORK

- PAST EXPERIENCE/RELIABILITY (NOT RUMORS)

6 of 16

Lowest Responsible Bidder: Equipment

CONSIDER:

Bid price

Quality

Suitability

Adaptability

DECIDING FACTORS MUST BE REASONABLE AND BASED ON SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCE IN QUALITY OR ADAPTABILITY.

OTTER TAIL POWER CO. V. VILLAGE OF ELBOW LAKE, 49 N.W. 2D 197, 201 (MINN. 1951).

7 of 16

Lowest Responsible Bidder: �Support Your Decision

  • Courts consider many factors to determine if the contract was properly awarded including:
    • The amount of time investigating the bids
    • Reasonableness of factors used to evaluate the quality and sustainability of an item
  • Develop supportable facts
    • Do not rely on rumors of incompetence
    • Detail any factual findings in minutes
  • The decision to move to the next lowest bidder is a significant one! Be deliberate and objective.

8 of 16

Lowest Responsible Bidder: �Violations

  • The legislature has made it a crime for town officers to fail to comply with the lowest responsible bidder requirements. Minn. Stat. § 365.37, subd. 5.
  • A contract made in violation of the lowest responsible bidder requirement is void. Minn. Stat. § 365.37, subd. 5.
  • The town will be responsible for paying the contractor who acted in good faith for any benefit conferred to the town under the voided contract.
  • Remember: defense of criminal charges are not covered by the town’s insurance policies and may not be paid by the town unless the officer is ultimately found not guilty. Minn. Stat. § 465.76.

8

9 of 16

Splitting contracts

  1. Examples:
  2. If the town uses a general contractor for a project, the whole project may be over $175,000, but if the town is acting as the general contractor, then each part of the project may be a less expensive separate contract that would not require sealed bids.
  3. Splitting a road project between seasons (complete one half this year and complete the next half another year)

9

Some townships may want to avoid the sealed bidding process by breaking up larger expensive contracts into smaller less expensive contracts.

Can we do that??

Not for the sole purpose of avoiding the need to advertise for sealed bids.

How??

Independent, identifiable parts of the project split in a reasonable way.

10 of 16

  1. MCL is not applicable to all contracts
  2. The statute defines a contract to be “...an agreement entered into by a municipality for the sale or purchase of supplies, materials, equipment or the rental thereof, or the construction, alteration, repair or maintenance of real or personal property.” Minn. Stat. § 471.345, subd. 2.
  3. Contracting statutes interpreted narrowly and not extended to contracts not clearly within their respective purviews or the intent of the legislature.
  4. A complete list of examples is in Minn. Stat. § 471.345.

10

MCL Exemptions

Examples of excluded contracts:

    • Real estate purchases and sales
    • Employment contracts
    • Professional service contracts
    • Garbage hauling contracts
    • Service contracts
    • Limited contracts involving economically disadvantaged persons
    • Fuel purchase for municipal power generation
    • Cooperative purchases
    • Between governments
    • Electronic purchasing process
    • Emergency
    • Joint powers

11 of 16

Best Value Procurement Alternative

  • A process based on competitive proposals as an alternative to bidding that awards the contracts to, “the vendor or contractor offering the best value, considering the specifications of the request for proposals, the price and performance criteria as set forth in [Minn. Stat. § 16C.02, subd. 4a] and described in the solicitation document.”
  • The Department of Administration is supposed to run training courses on the best value contracting method, and the township isn’t supposed to use it until the board, or their agent is trained in its use.
  • Need to be doing a really big project to make it worthwhile. (Most things you can break into pieces to avoid sealed bidding).
  • Even with best value contracting, the board must give reasons for why their selected contractor is better than others.

12 of 16

Violating MCL

  • Any contract formed in violation of MCL requirements is void and unenforceable. Minn. Stat. § 365.37, subd. 5 and Minn. Stat. § 471.89, subd. 1.
  • It is a misdemeanor for any township official to violate the MCL and makes such an offense ground for removal from office. Minn. Stat. § 365.37, subd. 3

12

Challenges can be brought by the losing bidder or by a taxpayer in the community

Injunction against the contract that was improperly awarded.

Re-let the contract to the lowest bidder or restart the process from the beginning.

Losing bidder is entitled to recover cost of preparing the bid, and town may still have to pay for benefits received under the voided contract.

13 of 16

Conflict of Interest

  • Township officials are prohibited from being a party to, being directly or indirectly interested in, or otherwise benefit financially from any sale, lease, or other contract in which the official is authorized to participate in any manner.
  • The authority to vote on a contract that benefits the officer is what violates the conflict of interest, not the actual vote itself so obtaining from a vote alone is not enough.
  • It is not always easy to determine when there is a conflict but as a rule of thumb, anytime a supervisor is getting paid to do work outside the supervisor role as an elected official, there is a conflict of interest.

13

14 of 16

Conflict of Interest: Exemptions

  • If a supervisor has a direct or indirect financial interest in a contract with the town, it may only form the contract if it falls under one of the specific exceptions provided in the statutes. Minn. Stat. § 471.88, subd. 1
  • There is an extensive list of contracts in which public officials are allowed to have an interest. Minn. Stat.§ 365.37 and Minn. Stat. § 471.87. Two that pertain to townships include:
    • Any contract for which competitive bids are not required
    • A contract to provide construction material or services if sealed bids are used and the officer does not vote on the contract (only for towns with a population of less than 1,000) Minn. Stat. § 471.88, subd. 12.

14

To rely on an exemption, the board must:

Exemption

Unanimously vote, with the interested officer abstaining, to authorize the contract;

Vote

authorize the contract by resolution prior to performance of the contract; and

Resolution

The interested officer needs to file an affidavit with the clerk each time they submit a claim for payment.

Affidavit

15 of 16

Questions?

16 of 16

Thank you!

16

Maddie Cash

763-488-4055