Nimbus Design System user research
Developer interviews (MeetingPlace ART & �Self Service ART) �PI1 2023
April 2023
Understanding the dev Nimbus experience
What we knew
Emerging questions
Efficiency | Simplicity | Inclusivity
2
Key findings 1�Systems and process
Developer processes vary when breaking down designs for development, and many depend on consistent component naming between Figma designs and component naming in the Nimbus UI kit. We heard from multiple devs, particularly from SS-ART, who lost significant time and momentum in locating the correct component to use.
Findability of components
Lack of standardisation across development docs and UI kits.
Components are being added to the Nimbus UI kit in Storybook with incomplete or non-existent documentation (e.g., radio buttons) that helps define how the component should or can be used by other developers.
Component standardisation
Developers are not clear on what are core components and, what components belong in Nimbus and what don’t.
As a result, components are being added to Storybook UI that does not align with the design documents defined by the Design Team as a point of truth.
What is a ‘core’ component?
Developers observed that some components are inconsistent and out of sync across the Console Core UI kit, project UI kits and Nimbus UI kit.
Largely a result of time pressure on our devs, components may be copied over from Core into Nimbus but then updated in Core as requirements change, and these often do not get synchronised back to Nimbus UI.
Lack of synchronicity
Efficiency | Simplicity | inclusivity
4
“I think the documentation is sort of a bit hit and miss, …. Some, some things are better documented than others.”
5
MeetingPlace dev
Impact on the business
Why is this a problem
Efficiency | Simplicity | inclusivity
6
Key findings 2�People & governance
No standard onboarding process exists for new staff to explain how Nimbus works and how to get the most benefit from it.
We heard of a range of strategies, from pointing junior devs at an out-of-date wiki page, dedicated inter-ART information workshops, and side-by-side peering with experienced and junior devs or designers, but nothing that could point to a clear and consistent message of intent and process.
Nimbus relies on consensus rather than a strict rule set, as seen in InfoSec. Still, knowledge about what makes a Nimbus component, when it should be added and what it looks like is not wildly known. The results of an unrestrained process lead to the inconsistency and missing content outlined previously. Guidelines on when and what to contribute, points of truth and managing discrepancies will assist developers and designers in getting the best from the design system.
Onboarding
Governance
Efficiency | Simplicity | inclusivity
7
Developers are time-poor was the most consistent reason why components were not added to the Nimbus Storybook UI kit when created or updated after changes in Console Core.
Feature implementation is the priority but one developer indicated that it is quicker to develop new components in the Console UI kit and copy and paste across to Nimbus if time allows.
Updates are low priority
“Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor.”
Efficiency | Simplicity | inclusivity
8
Impact on people
Why is this a problem?
Efficiency | Simplicity | inclusivity
9
Why should we fix it & �What’s next?
Efficient. Simple. Inclusive. Despite the challenges highlighted, developers see the benefits of Nimbus.
“It makes it easy to use components within a component you are making.”
The component library and design tokens are convenient building blocks that “increase productivity” and are seen as “an Investment in future work efficiency for self and business …. reusability!”
Efficiency | Simplicity | inclusivity
10
Opportunity to improve the developer experience. I
Next steps