W08 Assignment: �Data Collection Instrument EXAMPLES
PUBH 381
Ashley Suker
Observer Name:_________________
Assessment Date:__/__/__
Observed Community Name and Location:_________________
Observed Location (ex. park, shopping center, school): ________________
Which of the following best describes the community?
◻︎ Rural
◻︎ Urban
◻︎ Suburban
◻︎ Other
| Never | Occasionally | Often | Very Often | Always |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Scoring Information:
Total Score Questions 1-3:________
Total Score Questions 4-6:________
Total Score Questions 7-8:________
Grand Score Total: _____________
Scoring Information:
Score: 25+ High Risk for Food Insecurity: :________
Score 20-24, Potential Risk for Food Insecurity: :________
Score Less than 20+ Potential Risk for Food Insecurity Low Risk for Food Insecurity: :________
Those communities with scores of 25+ or higher will receive additional assistance and reviews from researchers Until their status changes.
SAMPLE W08 Assignment: Community Hunger Assessment Scale
Observation Start Time:_________________
Observation End Time:_________________
Observer Name:_________________
Assessment Date:__/__/__
Employee Position:
◻︎ Physician (MD, DO)
◻︎ Advanced Practice Provider (NP, DNP, PA)
◻︎ Nurse (MSN, BSN, RN, LPN)
◻︎ Aides (CNA, MA)
◻︎ Other ___________________
| Yes | No | Comments |
| 1 | 2 | |
| 1 | 2 | |
| 1 | 2 | |
| 1 | 2 | |
| 1 | 2 | |
| 1 | 2 | |
| 1 | 2 | |
Scoring Information:
Total Score:______________
Yes: 1, No: 2
Scoring Information:
Score: 10+, Incorrect PPE use, retraining required
Score 8-9, most PPE donned correctly, educational materials provided for review
Score 7, PPE donned correctly, no retraining needed
Supervisor Signature: ____________________________
Employee Signature: _____________________________
SAMPLE W08 Assignment: PPE Direct Observation Checklist (Donning)
Observation Start Time:_________________
Observation End Time:_________________
Unit:_____________
Employee Name: ____________________
Last, First
Annotated Bibliography, TOPIC X |
Citation: Source: |
Summary: |
Notes: |
Relevant to topic
Yes No
Keywords:_____________
Subtopic: _____________
Secondary Data Collection
This non-survey data collection instrument does NOT meet the Module 8 assignment requirements, but it frequently seen in public health practice.
Annotated Bibliography, TOPIC X |
Citation: (Kevern & Primrose, 2020) Source: Kevern, P., & Primrose, D. (2020). Changes in Measures of Dementia Awareness in UK Church Congregations Following a ‘Dementia-Friendly’ Intervention: A Pre–Post Cohort Study. Religions, 11(7), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1107033 |
Summary: The Dementia Friendly Church program (DFCh), a variation of the Dementia Friendly Community program, has been implemented in various dioceses throughout the UK. The church setting was selected because it is an existing part of the social structure of most communities, particularly rural communities, the church community is involved in supporting the family and individuals with dementia, knows the family support system, and tends to be stable over periods of time. |
Notes: How can this be applied to our delivery method? How are our sites and presentations selected? Are we going through churches in rural areas? The US lacks a centralized church, is a state church necessary to push this information into the community? |
Relevant to topic
Yes No
Keywords:_____________
Subtopic: _____________
Secondary Data Collection
This non-survey data collection instrument does NOT meet the Module 8 assignment requirements, but it frequently seen in public health practice.