�
Authors: Nguku, Julius N. 1;Gathogo,Janet W. 1 ;Kamau,Faith W.1; Nganga,Gibson W. 1 ; Makau,Joseph 2 ; Koech,Emily 2; Wangusi, Rebecca N. 2 ; Kenyatta,Wyckliffe O.3; Mutisya,Immaculate 3 ; Ngunu,Caroline 4 ;Wafula, Samuel2
Presenting Author: Dr Julius N. Nguku
HOPE worldwide Kenya
Affiliations: 1-HOPE worldwide Kenya; 2-CIHEB-Kenya; 3-CDC-Kenya;
4-Nairobi City County Department of Preventive and Promotive Health
Track D7-Adolescents, Young People and HIV
Introduction
DREAMS Theory of Change
Method
Geographical coverage of the CONNECT DREAMS Program
44 wards, 15 sub counties in 18 sites in Nairobi’s Informal Settlements
DREAMS primary package of services provided
10-14 years | 15-17 years | 18-24 years |
|
|
|
DREAMS secondary package of services provided
Intervention | Services |
Biomedical services | HTS testing, PrEP, PEP, STI treatment, TB treatment, Family planning, HPV, cervical cancer screening |
Post Violence Care (PVC) |
|
Education Subsidies |
|
Comprehensive Economic Strengthening |
|
Data collection and Analyses
Results
Age of the AGYW | | Site Type | | Time Since Enrollment | | Level of Education | | Schooling Status | | Contact Days at SABs | ||||||||
10-14 yrs | 15-19 yrs | 20-24 yrs | | Low Volume | High Volume | | 0-6 months | 7-12 months | 13-24 months | | Primary and Below | Secondary and Above | | In School | Out-of-School | | >10 days | 10 or less days |
6,742 | 9,137 | 5,737 | | 5,471 | 16,145 | | 129 | 7,410 | 11,759 | | 12,840 | 8,776 | | 17,294 | 4,322 | | 4,817 | 16,799 |
31% | 42% | 27% | | 25% | 75% | | 1% | 34% | 54% | | 59% | 41% | | 80% | 20% | | 22% | 78% |
Social Demographic and Programmatic Factors of AGYW in the 4 DREAMS CONNECT project sites (n=21,616)
Bivariate Analyses-Associations between programmatic and demographic characteristics with layering status of AGYW
| | | Layered | Not Layered | OR | 95% CI | p-value | ||
Contact days at SAB | >10 contact days | 4,817 | 3,935 | 82% | 882 | 18% | 2.758 | 2.548-2.986 | p<0.0001** |
<=10 contact days | 16,799 | 10,381 | 62% | 6418 | 38% |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age of AGYW | 10-14 yrs | 6,742 | 4,550 | 68% | 2,192 | 32% | 1.201 | 1.115-1.293 | p<0.0001** |
15-19 yrs | 9,137 | 6,322 | 69% | 2,815 | 31% | 1.299 | 1.212-1.396 | p<0.0001** | |
20-24 yrs | 5,737 | 3,634 | 63% | 2,103 | 37% | ref |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site Type | Low volume | 5,471 | 4,525 | 83% | 946 | 17% | 3.104 | 2.875-3.352 | p<0.0001** |
High Volume | 16,145 | 9791 | 61% | 6,354 | 39% | ref |
|
| |
Predictors of being layered:more than 10 contact days at SABs, younger than 20 years, being in a low volume site
| | | Layered | Not Layered | OR | 95% CI | p-value | ||
Time since enrolment
| 0-6 months | 129 | 64 | 50% | 65 | 50% | ref |
|
|
7-12 months | 7,410 | 4,480 | 61% | 2,930 | 39% | 1.553 | 1.096-2.199 | p=0.013 | |
13-24 months | 11,759 | 7,881 | 67% | 3,878 | 33% | 2.064 | 1.458-2.921 | p<0.0001 | |
25+ months | 2,318 | 2,081 | 90% | 237 | 10% | 8.912 | 6.158-12.916 | p<0.0001 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level of Education of AGYW | Primary and below | 12,840 | 8047 | 62.7% | 4,793 | 37.3% | ref |
|
|
Secondary and above | 8,776 | 6459 | 74% | 2,317 | 26% | 1.146 | 1.660-1.762 |
p<0.0001 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schooling Status | In school | 17,294 | 9,338 | 54% | 7,956 | 46% | ref |
|
|
Out of School | 4,322 | 2,722 | 63% | 1,600 | 37% | 1.449 | 1.353-1.552 | p<0.0001 | |
Bivariate Analyses-Associations between programmatic and demographic characteristics with layering status of AGYW (Contd)
Predictors of being layered: older than 6 months in the program, secondary school education, being out-of-school
Layering Status by time since enrolment of the AGYW. The results show that the longer an AGYW stays on the Program, the more likely she is to be layered. O.Rs and p-values comparing with AGYW in the program for 0-6 months are inset
Layering with Time since Enrolment
Pearson’s correlation coefficients showing associations between pairs of variables
| Age in years | Level of Schooling | Time since enrolment | Number of SAB Contact days | Layered Status | |
Age in years | Pearson Correlation | 1 |
|
|
|
|
Sig. (2-tailed) |
|
|
|
|
| |
Level of Schooling | Pearson Correlation | 0.466** | 1 |
|
|
|
Sig. (2-tailed) | p<0.0001 |
|
|
|
| |
Time since enrolment | Pearson Correlation | 0.169** | -0.010 | 1 |
|
|
Sig. (2-tailed) | p<0.0001 | P=0.137 |
|
|
| |
Number of SAB Contact days | Pearson Correlation | -0.253** | 0.041** | -0.231** | 1 |
|
Sig. (2-tailed) | p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 |
|
| |
Layered Status | Pearson Correlation | -0.011 | 0.114** | 0.263** | 0.416** | 1 |
Sig. (2-tailed) | p=0.095 | p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 | p<0.0001 | | |
Positive and significant correlations between: level of schooling, Time since enrolment, and No. of SAB contact days with layering status
Multivariate Analyses-Age, Duration in Program and Project Site with Layered Status
AGE |
| Total this category | Layered | Not Layered | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | P-value | |||
10-14 yrs' | >10 contact days | 2,445 | 36% | 1,957 | 80% | 488 | 20% | 2.604 | 2.318-2.925 | p<0.0001** |
| <= contact days | 4,306 | 64% | 2,632 | 61% | 1,715 | 39% | Ref |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-19yrs' | >10 contact days | 1,607 | 17% | 1,289 | 83% | 268 | 17% | 2.424 | 2.107-2.788 | p<0.0001** |
| <= contact days | 7,521 | 83% | 5,010 | 67% | 2,520 | 33% | Ref |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20-24 yrs' | >10 contact days | 815 | 14% | 689 | 85% | 126 | 15% | 2.278 | 1.871-2.773 | p<0.0001** |
| <= contact days | 4,922 | 86% | 2,839 | 58% | 2,083 | 42% | ref |
| |
Multivariate Analyses-Age, Duration in Program and Project Site with Layered Status(cntd)
Time since enrolment |
| Total this category | | Layered | | Not Layered | | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | P-value |
0-12 mnths
| >10 contact days | 4,495 | 69% | 2,909 | 53% | 2,586 | 47% | ref |
|
|
<= contact days | 2,044 | 31% | 1,635 | 80% | 409 | 20% | 3.554 | 3.149-4.009 | p<0.0001 | |
13-24 mnths
| >10 contact days | 9,828 | 91% | 6,286 | 64% | 3,542 | 36% |
|
|
|
<= contact days | 1931 | 9% | 1,595 | 83% | 336 | 17% | 2.675 | 2.361-3.029 | p<0.0001 | |
more than 24months
| >10 contact days | 2078 | 89% | 1848 | 89% | 230 | 11% |
|
|
|
<= contact days | 240 | 11% | 233 | 97% | 7 | 3% | 4.143 | 1.929-8.895 | p=0.0003 |
Multivariate Analyses-Age, Duration in Program and Project Site with Layered Status(cntd)
Project Site | Total | | Layered | Not layered | OR | 95% C.I | p-value | |||
Savannah | >10 contact days | 6786 |
| 3,255 | 48% | 3,531 | 52% | Ref |
|
|
| <= contact days | 1518 |
| 1,057 | 70% | 461 | 30% | 2.487 | 2.208-2.803 | p<0.0001 |
Kayole | >10 contact days | 5430 |
| 3,442 | 63% | 1,988 | 36% | Ref |
|
|
| <= contact days | 2411 |
| 2,037 | 85% | 374 | 15% | 3.171 | 2.802-3.589 | p<0.0001 |
Kibagare | >10 contact days | 2463 |
| 1,786 | 73% | 677 | 27% | Ref |
|
|
| <= contact days | 103 |
| 86 | 84% | 17 | 16% | 1.916 | 1.1313-3.250 | p=0.0156 |
Kiambiu | >10 contact days | 2120 |
| 1,898 | 90% | 222 | 10% | Ref |
|
|
| <= contact days | 783 |
| 755 | 96% | 30 | 4% | 2.943 | 1.992-4.349 | p<0.0001 |
Discussions and Recommendations
Our study shows that factors associated with being layered for AGYW being served by CONNECT DREAMS Program include:
We recommend that to improve layering:
Acknowledgements