1 of 16

Does (non)accommodative language influence romantic partners' conflict appraisal?

Dr. Anuraj Dhillon & Shelby Wong

Communication Studies

2 of 16

01. STUDY GOALS

02. COMMUNICATION ACCOMMODATION THEORY (CAT)

03. OUR STUDY

04. CONVERSATION THEMES

05. THE ROAD AHEAD

What are our objectives?

What is CAT?

The details of our research.

What are our conversation themes?

What’s to come?

3 of 16

GOALS OF THE STUDY

​

Does (non)accommodative language influence romantic partners' conflict appraisal?

  1. Identify language in terms of accommodation & non-accommodation during romantic couples’ conflict conversations.

​

  1. The effect of language on partners’ conversation and relationship satisfaction.

4 of 16

Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT)

5 of 16

COMMUNICATION ACCOMMODATION THEORY (CAT)

​

Giles, 2008

When one person adopts the speaking patterns and mannerisms of another (Remland, 2017)

Accommodation

(aka. convergence)

Distancing ourselves from others by adopting speech patterns that differ from theirs (Remland, 2017)

Non-accommodation

(aka. divergence)

Conversation

Satisfaction

Accommodative behaviors during conflict Greater conversation satisfaction (Dhillon et al., in press)

Ex. (+) accommodative behavior = (>) conversation satisfaction (Dhillon et al., in press)

6 of 16

Our Study

​

7 of 16

OUR STUDY

H1: Use of accommodative phrases during conflict conversation will positively predict a) conversation satisfaction, b) relationship satisfaction.

H2: Use of nonaccommodative phrases during conflict conversation will negatively predict a) conversation satisfaction, b) relationship satisfaction.

RQ: What are the other conversation themes that emerge out in romantic partners conflict conversations?

8 of 16

OUR STUDY

Participants (N = 100)

50 heterosexual couples

Age: 18 to 31 years (M = 19.91, SD = 1.81)

Majority White (n = 61)

Relationship length (M = 16 months, Range = 3 – 70 months)

Data Collection

Transcribed videos

Identified and categorized phrases by themes

Analysis

Conversation satisfaction

Relationship satisfaction

Measures

Themes

Positive, negative accommodation, non-accommodation, neutral phrases, humor, and sarcasm

9 of 16

Conversation Themes

10 of 16

CONVERSATION THEMES

​

Adams, 2019

Accommodative language ex:

“I will work on that, because I don’t like doing that to you” (Couple 12AB).

Non-accommodative language ex:

“Yeah. I don't know. I think it's just hard for me to visualize you hanging out with a, with a guy friend that's not, like that doesn't seem flirty” (Couple 13 AB).

(Non)accommodation

Neutral language ex:

“Yeah, well I was trying to leave, but then I went to go eat so that I wouldn't miss dining hall.”

Neutral

Humor & sarcasm ex:

I’m bein’ truthful. I’m bein’ honest

“Do it. Yes, punch me” (Couple 12 AB).

​

Humor & sarcasm

12 AB

13 AB

11 of 16

The Road Ahead

12 of 16

13 of 16

Continue Data Analyses

Analyze associations between objective behavior and self-reported measures to test the hypotheses stated earlier.

Quantify the data

Analyze use of themes to understand what is perceived as accommodation and/or non-accommodation by the partner

Use LIWC

Using the themes that emerged from the data, we plan to create language toolkit to help partners navigate stressful/ difficult conversations

​

Create language toolkit

14 of 16

REFERENCES

Adams, A. (2019). Communication Accommodation Theory [Professor Notes]. Canvas@CalPoly.

https://canvas.calpoly.edu/

Dhillon, A., Denes, A., Crowley, J.P, Ponivas, A., Winkler, K.L., & Bennett, M. (In press). Does Testosterone Influence Young Adult Romantic Partners’ Accommodation during Conversations about Stressors?. Human Communication Research.

Giles, H. (2008). Accommodating Translational Research. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909880801922870

Remland, M. S. (2017). Nonverbal communication in everyday life. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

15 of 16

STUDENT TESTIMONY

Being a part of the BEACoN program has been a truly rewarding experience. Although I joined the program later, my professor, Dr. Dhillon, and I have become a lot closer and she has given me the chance to explore COMS research. I had the opportunity to work on real data with my mentor and learn what it’s like to be a COMS researcher. I’m thankful to BEACoN for creating an inclusive and diverse space where I feel empowered as a woman of color in research. My mentor has become a big support for me and I now have a greater breadth of knowledge to apply to my life.

16 of 16

THANKS!

​

Does (non)accommodative language influence romantic partners' conflict appraisal?

Contact:

​

Dr. Anuraj Dhillon adhill06@calpoly.edu

​

Shelby Wong swong104@calpoly.edu

CREDITS: This presentation template was created by Slidesgo, including icons by Flaticon, and infographics & images by Freepik

​

​