1 of 16

BEST 402 Industrial Ecology�(Modeling Project Development)

Qingshi Tu, PhD

Department of Wood Science

University of British Columbia

1

2 of 16

Learning objectives

  • Be familiar with some good practices of modeling project development

2

3 of 16

Come up with project ideas

3

4 of 16

Strategies

  • Change topic
  • Modify topic
  • Criteria to consider:
    • Novelty = Originality + Importance
    • Feasibility = Resource Availability + Time Constraint

4

5 of 16

Matrix to assess your project idea

5

Criteria

Excellent

Great

Good

Originality

A blank sheet!

I find a gap!

I find a crack!

Importance

Resource (personnel, data, funding, etc.)

Time

6 of 16

Matrix to assess your project idea

6

Criteria

Excellent

Great

Good

Originality

A blank sheet!

I find a gap!

I find a crack!

Importance

A “million-dollar” problem!

Partially solved a critical problem!

Cool! Good to know!

Resource

Time

7 of 16

Matrix to assess your project idea

7

Criteria

Excellent

Great

Good

Originality

A blank sheet!

I find a gap!

I find a crack!

Importance

A “million-dollar” problem!

Partially solved a critical problem!

Cool! Good to know!

Resource (personnel, data, funding, etc.)

All resources are available

Most resources are available, the rest are easy to secure

Very likely that all resources can be secured

Time

8 of 16

Matrix to assess your project idea

8

Criteria

Excellent

Great

Good

Originality

A blank sheet!

I find a gap!

I find a crack!

Importance

A “million-dollar” problem!

Partially solved a critical problem!

Cool! Good to know!

Resource (personnel, data, funding, etc.)

All resources are available

Most resources are available, the rest are easy to secure

Very likely that all resources can be secured

Time

I can hit all the milestones of the timeline

May need to work on weekends for a couple of milestones

It’s a stretch, but I can make it

9 of 16

Design of your project

  • At this stage, you should already have a project idea that checks at least all the “good” boxes in the abovementioned matrix
  • Factors to consider:
    • Rigorousness of experiment design
    • Rigorousness of results analysis
    • Sophistication of the method
    • Versatility of the outcome

9

10 of 16

Rigorousness of experiment design

  • Will the outcome answer the research question(s)?
  • Full vs partial factorial design

  • Reproducibility

10

11 of 16

Rigorousness of results analysis

  • Observations: “it is what it is”
    • Present the results in an unbiased way
  • Discussions and conclusions
    • Compare with benchmark
    • Correlation or causation
    • Assess the sensitivity of the results
    • Assess the uncertainty of results
    • Attribute the uncertainty to input data and/or model assumptions
  • Limitations of conclusions due to:
    • Data availability and/or quality
    • Model assumptions and scope of application

11

12 of 16

Sophistication of the method

  • Platform: programming code, existing tools, Excel, etc.
  • Output of the method:
    • Numeric outcome: single data point, range of data w/ or w/o statistical inference
  • Calculation: manual, semi-automated, automated
  • IO of data and results: manual, semi-automated, automated
  • Connection with other methods (if applicable): soft-linking, hard-linking

12

13 of 16

Versatility of the outcome

  • Deliverables:
    • Framework(s)
    • Model(s)
    • Dataset(s)
    • Document(s): report, peer-reviewed articles, PowerPoint slides, etc.
  • Presentation of findings:
    • Graphs with annotations
    • Tables
    • Synopsis

13

14 of 16

How can people use the outcome of your project?

  • Results
  • Discussions
  • Conclusions
  • Methodology
  • Introduction
    • Problem statement
    • Literature review

14

15 of 16

How can people use the outcome of your project?

  • To those who have the same interest:
    • Quantitative results in Abstract and Conclusion
    • Quantitative results from figures (if annotated) and/or tables
      • E.g., GWP results on a bar chart
      • E.g., LCI data table
    • Discussions
      • E.g., causation statement
    • Qualitative conclusions and future work -> identify gaps
    • Equations that can be applied in their projects

15

16 of 16

How can people use the outcome of your project?

  • To those who have peripheral interest:
    • A good quantitative literature review results
      • E.g., a range of reported GWP values for renewable diesel
    • Thought-provoking insights/perspectives

16