1 of 20

In class investigation of EPA EJ/Screening Tool

Side by Side Maps of Houston

2 of 20

Resources

3 of 20

Links to Presentations

Group # and Link

Names

Group # and Link

Names

4 of 20

Fill out these slides. Example slides are below this set.

5 of 20

Example Map (you choose a different pollution source and demographic variable)

6 of 20

Example Map Analysis:

  1. Discuss and write down any terms here you don’t know, look them up online and add definitions (see resources slide).

  • Describe in your own words what the map on the left shows

  • Describe in your own words what the map on the right shows

  • Compare the two maps and write 3 summary interpretations of the maps

7 of 20

Group X: Individual Investigations

Please read and comment on another group’s project. Links are in slide 3. Share what is interesting, surprising, similar and/or different from your findings.

8 of 20

Example User Interface Experience recommendations

Things to improve:

Recommendations:

9 of 20

Who and what is EJ Screen serving?

Use algorithmic ecology to evaluate the impacts

10 of 20

Who and what is EJ Screen serving?

Use algorithmic ecology to evaluate the impacts

  • Who is the community impacted by this algorithm?
  • What kinds of harm or benefit does the algorithm create?

11 of 20

Who and what is EJ Screen serving?

Use algorithmic ecology to evaluate the impacts

  • What is the function of the algorithm?
  • Where is the data stored?
  • Who interacts with the algorithm?
  • What do they do with it?

12 of 20

Who and what is EJ Screen serving?

Use algorithmic ecology to evaluate the impacts

  • Who funds the program?
  • Who benefits?
  • What interests came together to create the program?

13 of 20

Who and what is EJ Screen serving?

Use algorithmic ecology to evaluate the impacts

  • What ideologies motivate the actors within this system?
  • What ideologies are upheld, intentionally or unintentionally, by the algorithmic ecology?

14 of 20

Strengths and Limitations of EJ Screen

  • Nationwide EJ lens
    • Provides uniform scoring method across the country
    • Can identify large-scale EJ concerns within the country
  • Provides screening-level analysis using nationally data at the census block level
  • Useful for compliance and permitting
  • Data limitations
    • Limited environmental data
    • Census data is biased
  • Limited coverage in small areas/populations
    • Does not capture fine-scale issues experienced by communities
  • Scoring method is not comprehensive
    • Combining demographics/indicators by multiplying percentiles introduces uncertainties

15 of 20

Example Slides

16 of 20

Example Map (you choose a different pollution source and demographic variable)

17 of 20

Example Map Analysis:

  • Discuss and write down any terms here you don’t know, look them up online and add definitions (see resources slide).
  • Describe in your own words what the map on the left shows
  • Describe in your own words what the map on the right shows
  • Compare the two maps and write 3 summary interpretations of the maps

18 of 20

Group X: Individual Investigations

Please read and comment on each other’s projects, share what is interesting, surprising, similar and/or different from your findings, make at least 1 comment per project, add a +1 to comments you agree with or support

19 of 20

Example Ideas for more historicized EJ screen maps

  • Borders of present-day indigenous lands, if present in area
    • Toggle ancestral indigenous lands over rest of data
  • Show primary languages of linguistically isolated households
    • Not defined by only “absence of English” but “presence of other languages”
  • Display densities of white populations on map, leaving holes where EJScreen shows “minority” majority populations
    • Toggle button for displaying white versus non-white population densities
  • Slider to show different years of data

20 of 20

Example User Interface Experience recommendations

Things to improve:

  • Data missing or outdated
  • Color scale problems: switching from color to grey, ability to change color unintuitively located
  • Difficult to set boundaries
  • Menu configuration: no scrolling, reordering elements, no visual distinction between selected menus
  • NULL URLs
  • Confusing or obscure terminology, mismatch between EPA and EJScreen
  • Percentiles were confusing

Recommendations:

  • Use two-color gradient to illustrate ranges of data
  • Default: set map boundaries, e.g. town borders
    • Have menu for changing map default display (borders, town names, etc.)
  • Menus: enable scrolling; visual hierarchy between menu items (indents, text size), ability to move menu items around
  • Link to EPA terminology page, w/same vocabulary as on EJScreen
  • Replace percentiles with concrete data