1 of 37

State Report Card Data and Improvement Efforts

November 14, 2022

1

2 of 37

Summative Designations

2

3 of 37

Types of Student Testing Data on Illinois Report Card that we will review tonight

  • % of students proficient in English Language Arts (ELA) on Illinois Assessment of Readiness (IAR) and SAT
  • % of students proficient in Math on IAR/SAT
  • Avg student growth percentile in Math/ELA
  • % of students proficient in Science on Illinois Science Assessment (ISA)

3

4 of 37

Comparison District Chosen and their Demographic Data

4

% White

% Black

% Hispanic

% Asian

% Low Income

% EL

% IEP

% Mobility

Oswego 308

51

10

26

8

24

11

14

6

Naperville 204

36

9

13

36

18

11

12

7

Plainfield 202

50

13

25

7

26

11

17

6

West Aurora 129

22

11

61

3

44

30

16

11

Yorkville 115

64

7

22

2

16

7

17

7

State

46

17

27

5

47

14

17

8

5 of 37

Comparison District Additional Information

5

Amount spent per student

% of adequacy funding

Admin Avg Salary

Admin- Student ratio

Teacher Avg Salary

Student/Teacher Ratio(K-8)

Oswego 308

13202

64

91,000

161:1

76,547

19:1

Naperville 204

14,212

83

109,339

134:1

78,222

18:1

Plainfield 202

11,993

66

96,257

168:1

60,940

18:1

West Aurora 129

15,697

66

99,093

120:1

71,176

16:1

Yorkville 115

14,295

68

108,121

169:1

60,813

19:1

State

16,029

71

116,000

147:1

72,300

17:1

6 of 37

Percent of Students Proficient in English Language Arts (ELA) on Illinois Assessment of Readiness (IAR)

6

2022

2019 (Pre-Covid)

SD308

32%

43%

State

30%

38%

7 of 37

7

Reading IAR by Grade Level

8 of 37

Rationale for the Selection of Demographic Groups to Analyze for this Presentation

8

9 of 37

ELA Percentage of Students Proficient on IAR

9

All

Low Income

Non low income

Boys

Girls

White

Black

Hispanic

Asian

Oswego 308

32

15

35

27

38

38

21

20

56

Naperville 204

50

23

51

45

55

46

21

28

70

Plainfield 202

37

16

34

31

43

42

24

26

60

West Aurora 129

17

11

15

14

21

33

10

12

20

Yorkville 115

40

26

43

34

46

46

25

28

50

State

30

16

31

26

35

39

12

18

61

10 of 37

Reading Growth Data on IAR

10

All

Low Income

Non low income

Boys

Girls

White

Black

Hispanic

Asian

Oswego 308

47

43

48

46

49

47

46

46

53

Naperville 204

56

50

54

54

58

56

49

51

60

Plainfield 202

55

53

56

53

57

56

52

53

62

West Aurora 129

47

45

42

44

50

50

45

45

50

Yorkville 115

49

45

47

46

52

50

48

47

55

State

50

47

49

48

52

51

45

48

59

11 of 37

Key Findings from IAR Reading Data

  • SD308, like districts around the state, is not at pre-covid levels yet
  • We are slightly above the state avg for “all”
  • We have opportunity gaps with boys scoring lower than girls and Black and Hispanic students scoring lower than White Students
  • Our growth rates are lower than the state in every demographic group other than Black students
  • There is similar growth for each demographic group

11

12 of 37

SAT Reading Data

12

All

Low Income

Non low income

Boys

Girls

White

Black

Hispanic

Asian

Oswego 308

37

15

43

31

42

47

13

23

53

Naperville 204

61

26

67

59

62

60

24

29

86

Plainfield 202

34

19

38

31

38

43

14

18

61

West Aurora 129

19

10

27

20

18

42

8

11

18

Yorkville 115

36

29

38

36

35

44

19

25

N/A

State

30

13

43

27

32

32

10

16

61

13 of 37

Key Findings from SAT

13

  • We score better than all the comparison districts except for 204 in the demographic groups of all, low income, girls, and White students
  • Our boy/girl opportunity gap is larger than the comparison districts
  • We score better than the state in all demographic groups other than Asian

14 of 37

ELA on IAR-English Learners and Children with Disabilities (CWD)

14

EL Growth percentile IAR

EL Exit rate

CWD

growth percentile

IEP Growth Percentile

Oswego 308

45

7.7

40

38

Naperville 204

48

17.5

49

44

Plainfield 202

52

7.7

49

48

West Aurora 129

43

5.6

40

38

Yorkville 115

46

9.5

43

41

State

45

6.1

43

40

15 of 37

15

Action Step

Evidence of Action Item

Person(s) responsible

Start a K-8 Literacy Framework team that meets once a month to plan professional development for continued implementation of the SD308 Literacy Framework. Monitor improvements and discuss data.

Faith and Shannon

Provide ongoing training to K-8 ELA teachers around the goals of teaching independent and guided/flexible reading

Emails, slide decks, etc

K-8 Literacy Framework team

Start HS reading intervention program for Freshman students

Plan and Progress of Data

Dan

Start and continue a HS Academics Design Team to improve Tier 1 instruction

Dan and Faith

Conduct walkthroughs to observe the implementation of the Literacy Framework

Faith

Principals will receive training in reviewing and analyzing academic data for demographic groups

Faith

Review Fall, Winter and Spring data to identify strengths and weaknesses at grade level teams within schools

Agenda and minutes

District Improvement Team

Monitor each school’s improvement plans for work on Tier 1 reading instruction

Faith, Tammie, Shannon, Dan

We will inventory interventions available district wide and then work toward establishing common expectations for instruction and/or adding additional interventions

Agenda and Minutes

K-8 Intervention Team

District Reading Improvement Goal:

Each grade tested in Fastbridge will show 3 percentage point improvement in the percentage of students testing low risk or on target from Fall (65%) to Spring ( 68%). This is in line with the district goal to improve student performance 10 percentage points by 25-26.

16 of 37

17 of 37

Percent of Students Proficient in Math on IAR

17

2022

2019 (Pre-Covid)

SD308

31%

39%

State

26%

32%

18 of 37

18

Math IAR by Grade Level

19 of 37

Math Percentage of Students Proficient on IAR

19

All

Low Income

Non low income

Boys

Girls

White

Black

Hispanic

Asian

Oswego 308

32

14

33

35

29

38

15

17

59

Naperville 204

50

19

48

52

49

45

14

22

77

Plainfield 202

30

18

33

32

27

35

16

18

54

West Aurora 129

14

9

18

16

11

29

6

9

22

Yorkville 115

31

19

28

33

29

38

10

18

54

State

26

11

24

27

24

36

7

14

62

20 of 37

Math Growth Data on IAR

20

All

Low income

Non low income

Boys

Girls

White

Black

Hispanic

Asian

Oswego 308

54

51

55

54

53

54

50

53

56

Naperville 204

57

52

54

57

57

58

48

53

60

Plainfield 202

55

53

56

56

55

57

53

53

58

West Aurora 129

49

49

48

48

50

50

48

49

51

Yorkville 115

44

43

45

44

45

44

43

46

54

State

50

47

51

50

50

51

44

49

58

21 of 37

Key Findings from IAR Math Data

  • SD308, like districts around the state, is not at pre-covid levels yet
  • We are above the state average in all demographic groups except for Asian
  • We have opportunity gaps with girls scoring lower than boys and Black and Hispanic students scoring lower than White Students
  • Grade 3 has the highest proficiency
  • Our growth rates are higher than the state in every demographic group except for Asian

21

22 of 37

Math SAT Data

22

All

Low income

Non low income

Boys

Girls

White

Black

Hispanic

Asian

Oswego 308

36

11

43

38

34

45

11

18

62

Naperville 204

60

29

66

62

59

58

21

29

90

Plainfield 202

34

16

39

35

32

42

15

19

69

West Aurora 129

17

10

23

19

13

35

4

10

32

Yorkville 115

28

19

30

32

24

37

8

14

N/A

State

29

12

41

30

28

40

8

16

67

23 of 37

Math SAT Findings

23

  • Our low-income and Asian groups have a lower percentage proficiency than the state. All other demographic groups are higher than the state

  • We score better than all the comparison districts except for 204 in the demographic groups of all, non-low income, boys, girls, and White students

24 of 37

Math IAR- English Learners and Children with Disabilities (CWD)

24

EL Growth percentile IAR

EL Exit rate

CWD

growth percentile

IEP Growth percentile

Oswego 308

45

7.7

46

42

Naperville 204

48

17.5

49

45

Plainfield 202

52

7.7

49

47

West Aurora 129

43

5.6

43

42

Yorkville 115

46

9.5

42

41

State

45

6.1

43

40

25 of 37

25

Action Step

Evidence of Action Item

Person(s) responsible

Start a K-8 math team that meets monthly to plan professional development for continued implementation of the SD308 math framework, monitor improvements and discuss data

Faith and Shannon

Provide ongoing training to K-8 math teachers around the goals of teaching precise math vocabulary and using collaborative structures

Emails, slide decks, etc

K-8 Math Framework team

Start HS math intervention program for Freshman students

Plan and data of progress

Dan

Create new elementary math vocab lists with emphasis on shortening list

Lists on resource site

Faith and shannon

Create new JH math vocab list and train staff on use

Shannon

Implement new JH math materials

Shannon

Start and continue a HS Academics Design Team to improve Tier 1 instruction

Dan and Faith

Conduct walkthroughs to monitor the implementation of precise math vocabulary and collaborative structures

Faith

Review benchmark data to identify strengths/weaknesses at grade level teams within schools

Agenda and minutes

District Improvement Team

Principals will receive training in reviewing and analyzing academic data for demographic groups

Faith

Monitor each school’s improvement plans for work on Tier 1 math instruction

Emails/peer review sessions

Faith, Tammie, Shannon, Dan

Inventory interventions available district wide and work toward establishing common expectations for instruction and/or adding additional interventions

Agenda from Design Teams /End products

Faith, Tammie, Shannon, Dan

District Improvement Goal:

Each grade tested in Fastbridge will show 3 percentage point improvement in the percentage of students testing low risk or on target on benchmarks from Fall (62.5%) to Spring (65.5%). This is in line with the district goal to improve student performance 10 percentage points by 25-26.

26 of 37

K- 12 Math Framework

27 of 37

Science Assessment Data

27

28 of 37

9th Grade on Track

Students identified as “on track” have earned at least five full-year course credits (10 semester credits) and have earned no more than one semester “F” in a core course (English, math, science, or social science).

28

29 of 37

Graduation Rate in Four Years

29

30 of 37

Equity Journey Data from 2018-2019

30

31 of 37

SD308 Climate for Learning Framework

31

32 of 37

How have we supported student learning with COVID Relief funds?

  • Hired 18 academic interventionists
  • Hired 5 instructional coaches
  • Hired additional counselors and social workers
  • Provided Summer Connections (Elementary summer school)
  • Created Kindergarten Step Up Program
  • Purchased reading materials with DEI in mind

32

33 of 37

How do we monitor improvements?

  • Conduct almost 2000 classroom walk-throughs a year
  • Have principals report what percentage of their staff that are doing daily learning targets, independent reading, etc.
  • Monitor District and School Improvement Plans
  • Review student achievement data
  • Review student, staff, and community survey data

33

34 of 37

34

Skills our Students Need in the Future

Generated from Community/Board Forum on Nov 7

35 of 37

Summative Designations

35

36 of 37

36

37 of 37

Questions?

37