1 of 11

Commuting and Gateway Communities

2 of 11

Problem:

Commuting causes:

    • Traffic and accidents
    • Decreased quality of life
    • Higher cost of living
    • Change in community character
    • Emissions and pollutants
    • Displaced infrastructure and housing costs

3 of 11

Experience:

4 of 11

Quantitative evidence:

Commuting data:

  • Census data (LODES)
  • Location of Worker Origin
  • Destination of Employment (Statistics)
  • Where do people live and work?

5 of 11

The evidence:

6 of 11

Research Questions

    • Which gateway communities have the highest proportion of workers who commute from outside the community? Why?
    • What influences commuting patterns and rates?
    • What is the spatial extent of these “spillover” effects?
    • What is the relationship between workforce housing and commuting?

7 of 11

Datasets

Data:

  • 1600 rural western communities
    • Housing characteristics
    • Growth rates
    • Second home ownership
    • Available land to be developed
    • Proximity to amenities
  • LODES data
  • On the Map: https://onthemap.ces.census.gov/

8 of 11

  • Mapped 32 gateway communities
  • Visualizing the regional nature of commuting
  • Developed online viewing tool
  • Developing a replicable methodology

Analysis

Mapping Commute-sheds

9 of 11

  • “Sink” communities: more commuters coming in than out.
  • “Source” communities: More commuters leaving than coming in.
  • “Internal Capture”: majority of workers live and work in a city (less than 10 cities)

Analysis

Commute patterns:

10 of 11

  • Spatial linear regressions:
    • Unexplained variance (~70%)
    • Higher rent communities have higher in-commuting
    • Higher cost of housing associated with more in-commuting
  • Multi-level models
    • Accounting for regional or county characteristics
  • Creating sub-sets of communities
    • High second home ownership communities
    • High proportions of jobs in tourism communities

Analysis

Explaining these patterns

11 of 11

Questions?