1 of 11

HOUSING JUSTICE

Policy Tools for Transformative Change: the 5 Ps

Nicole Montojo

July 2, 2020

Daniele Fogel

Eli Moore

AUTHORIAL SUPPORT

PRESENTER

DATE

2 of 11

visioning

to

action

moving from

3 of 11

Rent Stabilization

Bay Area Cities with Rent Control/ Stabilization (& year adopted)

  1. Richmond (2016)
  2. Mountain View (2016)
  3. Oakland (2002)
  4. San Francisco (1987)
  5. East Palo Alto (1983)

  • Only 22 out of 482 cities in California have meaningful rent control and just cause protections (Tenants Together).
  • 3 out of 4 Bay Area renter households aren’t covered by rent stabilization (PolicyLink).
  • Existing controls do not limit rent increases between tenancies or cover newer homes.
  1. Hayward (1983)
  2. Los Gatos (1980)
  3. Berkeley (1980)
  4. San Jose (1979)

Active Rent Control Campaigns Led by Tenant Unions Across the Bay

4 of 11

the 5 Ps: Toward a Comprehensive Approach

Power

Preservation

Protection

Production

Placement

step 1:

stop the harm

start here

5 of 11

the 5 Ps: Toward a Comprehensive Approach

Protection

step 1:

stop the harm

start here

  • rent stabilization/control
  • just cause for eviction
  • fair housing/anti-discrimination laws
  • fair tenant screening policy

Protecting residents means ensuring renters can remain in their homes and don’t experience the health impacts of housing instability or displacement and can continue to contribute to a healthy, vibrant community

  • Causa Justa : Just Cause
  • Tenants Together
  • Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE)
  • Safe Return Project
  • National Housing Law Project

6 of 11

the 5 Ps: Toward a Comprehensive Approach

PRESERVATION of existing housing at all affordability levels - a commitment to maintaining affordable units despite changing economic conditions, and replacing units at the same affordability levels for the same residents when preserving units is impossible.

Preservation

  • funding for acquisition & rehabilitation of older affordable homes (e.g. by land trusts or nonprofit developers)
  • tenant opportunity to purchase policies
  • demolition/�replacement policies (e.g for SROs)
  • Oakland CLT
  • East Bay PREC
  • Richmond LAND
  • Chinatown CDC

7 of 11

the 5 Ps: Toward a Comprehensive Approach

  • removing exclusionary & restrictive land use barriers,
  • inclusionary zoning/inclusionary housing policies
  • public funding: bond measures, linkage fees
  • Building public & affordable housing, �including transitional & supportive housing
  • public land policy

PRODUCTION of new housing units at needed affordability levels, and prioritizing balanced housing production through regulations and incentives for developers as well as through a commitment to using public resources for affordable housing.

Production

  • EBHO (east bay); CCHO (sf)
  • Urban Habitat (public land)
  • Destination HOME �(San Jose)
  • National Low Income Housing Coalition

8 of 11

the 5 Ps: Toward a Comprehensive Approach

PLACEMENT of housing near resources & opportunities. Housing in the Bay Area should support residents’ health in a comprehensive, holistic way. This means locating homes by transit and healthy food sources and away from sources of pollution, and ensuring ensuring equitable access to affordable housing in these places.

  • Siting/building affordable housing in high-resource neighborhoods
  • Neighborhood & community development w/o displacement
  • Equitable geographic distribution of public resources

Placement

… including addressing spatial inequities between places, eg. investing in historically disinvested neighborhoods, while ensuring that existing community is served by new investment.

  • Bay Area Regional Health Inequities Initiative
  • CA Environmental Justice Alliance
  • Fair Housing Advocates of Northern CA

9 of 11

the 5 Ps: Toward a Comprehensive Approach

Power

Strengthening the POWER of residents to ensure responsive and equitable housing decisions. Meaningful participation of residents and community leaders in planning & policymaking processes that impact their housing stability.

  • Reimagined public participation processes �(eg. City Council meetings)
  • Community control of land: land trusts, co-ops & collective ownership models
  • Organizing & education (on housing & beyond), �know your rights trainings
  • Shifting economic control to communities, democratic access to shared resources
  • The Village & East Oakland Collective
  • Moms 4 Housing
  • PICO California
  • South of Market Community Action Center
  • Sogorea Te’ Land Trust
  • Working Partnerships/ SV Rising

10 of 11

Additional Resources

11 of 11

breakout discussion: 15 minutes

Step 1: Select a strategy:

  1. Protection
  2. Preservation
  3. Production
  4. Placement
  5. Power�

Step 2: Indicate your selection by renaming yourself on zoom & adding the corresponding # before your name (eg. “ 1 - Nicole Montojo”)

Step 3: In your group, brainstorm:

What are examples you can come up with to address each strategy?

  • What policy demand(s) could work as an actionable starting point?
  • Who would be the key stakeholders/the actors involved in making this happen?
  • What resources or support would you need from key stakeholders?

Bonus Qs:

  • What policy demand(s) or solutions are manifestations of your north star?