1 of 22

Teaching Genre through Descriptive Analysis

Susan Tanner

susantanner@lsu.edu

2 of 22

This presentation will explain an approach to teaching genre forms that focuses on process, rather than product, and on descriptive rather than prescriptive instruction. Traditionally, genre is taught through prescriptive instruction where a scholar of a particular genre (e.g. an appellate brief) gives explicit instructions about the common features of the form. This type of instruction provides comfort to both students and professors because it, arguably, communicates the most amount of information in the least amount of time. But prescriptive instruction tends to focus on near rather than far transfer and therefore may not always be the most effective method for teaching real-world genres. In this presentation, I introduce the “Comparative Genre Analysis,” an assignment developed by a researcher in writing pedagogy, Joanna Wolfe, which I have adapted into a series of small assignments to be deployed in a legal writing classroom. It asks students to create their own “how-to” manuals for how to write memos and briefs in order to practice the skill of learning how to write in a new genre. The objective is to increase far-transfer and give students the skills to apply to the new genres they will be asked to learn in practice.

3 of 22

Q: How will students learn new writing tasks after they graduate?

  • “Here…make it look like this”
  • Mentorship & Try and Revise
  • Building on prior knowledge for new tasks
  • Seeking out models and examples
  • Starting from template

4 of 22

“The best writers are good readers”

5 of 22

As we know, we are tasked with fitting a lot into one year of instruction

There are too many genres to teach

Studies show students have difficulty transferring their skills

6 of 22

One solution: give students a “toolkit” to employ in all future writing situations

Tracy Norton calls this a Modular approach

7 of 22

A toolkit can be valuable for near transfer

  • Memo -> brief
  • Memo -> client letter
  • Trial brief -> appellate brief

8 of 22

But it can fail to prepare for far transfer

  • Memo -> presentation
  • Brief -> academic legal writing

9 of 22

Solution #2: Teach Genre like they do in WAC/WID

Useful where the genres are unknown to the professor

Useful where the student will have to adapt to many different types of writing

Especially useful for professional writing situations where authors have to tailor their work to specific audiences

10 of 22

The Comparative Genre Analysis Essay

Stems from work from John Swales, Joanna Wolfe and others

Has students focus on genre features among several models (either among one genre or across multiple)

Has been shown to be more effective in the long term than directly teaching the features of one genre

11 of 22

In essence, we teach students the scientific method for understanding written genres

Collect information

Form hypotheses

Test hypotheses & receive feedback

Refine methods through doing, with feedback

12 of 22

My contribution: Descriptive Analysis Assignments

Rather than essays, students must perform the work of genre comparisons as simple assignments

Trains students in how to work with models

13 of 22

The drawbacks

Students hate it. They would rather be told what to do and be certain about it

My research in another context shows that the short-term gains are reduced in favor of long-term gains

14 of 22

The benefits

Integrates well with Socratic (guide on the side) methods

Encourages intellectual curiosity and productive struggle

Less risk of replicating misinformation or particularities

Focuses on the process new lawyers will employ

Greater far transfer

15 of 22

How is it done?

16 of 22

    • Students see one student model
    • Professor edited
    • Step-by-step instructions

Rules & Org Assignment

    • Students see 2 models with similar structure
    • Students read background info about legal reasoning
    • Minimal instruction about form

Simple E-memo

    • Students examine multiple models
    • Variation is introduced over time
    • Instruction, discussion & quizzing after drafting each section

Complex E-memo

17 of 22

Capstone Assignment

Integrates Wolfe’s work on CGA with Ryan Roderick’s work on resilience

Students must narrate their process

Students document that they are working through the steps

By the end of the semester, students have created their own how-to manual

fall -> a guide for writing a memo

spring -> a guide for writing an appellate brief & guide for learning new genres

18 of 22

Capstone was designed to focus on process

Learning how to write

  • Joanna Wolfe’s Comparative Genre Analysis
  • Gives students a method for self-instruction
  • Allows professors to help work through the hard parts, rather than shifting that to internships and work

Learning how to overcome challenges

  • Ryan Roderick’s work on self-regulation and resilience
  • Focuses on reflection and metacognition of writing tasks
  • Professors and tutors are available for the inevitable handholding and calming down

19 of 22

Metacognitive knowledge has been shown to increase transfer

20 of 22

Capstone process

Students are asked to work on it every time they draft (they don’t)

Students are asked to bring it with them every time they meet with me (they do)

End of fall -> a guide for writing a memo

End of spring -> a guide for writing an appellate brief & guide for learning new genres

21 of 22

Student Results (preliminary)

  • Self-reports of less anxiety than former years’ students.
  • More complete first drafts.
  • No data yet on end-of-semester performance.

22 of 22

Thank you!

  • susantanner@lsu.edu