1 of 24

Developing User-Centered Collections at a Research Library:

An Evidence-Based Acquisition (EBA) Pilot in STEM

NYSCILIB 2021 Virtual Meeting, October 8, 2021

Jin Guo, Associate Dean, Florida International University Libraries

Clara Tran, Head of Science and Engineering, Stony Brook University Libraries

2 of 24

Does your library currently have an EBA program in place?

  • Yes
  • No
  • In process

Poll

3 of 24

  1. Evidence-Based Acquisition (EBA)
  2. Research questions
  3. Research Methods
  4. Results & Discussion
  5. Conclusions

Outline

4 of 24

  • Allow libraries to set up the cost upfront for the EBA collection
  • Provide access to the entire ebook collection
  • Libraries can purchase selected titles at the end of the EBA period
    • According to a local collection development policy

Evidence-Base Acquisition (EBA)

5 of 24

1. What is the process of implementing EBA?

2. How do SBU users use EBA ebooks versus subscribed ebook collections?

3. Is EBA an effective acquisition model and how does it impact on the future collection development strategy?

Research Questions

6 of 24

  • COUNTER reports
  • Microsoft Excel
  • Usage reports
    • Springer Nature EBA ebook collection
      • November 2019 to October 2020
      • 3186 titles
    • General STEM ebook collection
      • January 2019 to December 2019
      • Filtered from general ebook collection
      • 4406 titles

Research Methods

7 of 24

  • Selected top-100-use titles from both sources
    • Top-108-use titles ended up as the sample
      • Same downloads for multiple top titles
  • Assigned the Library of Congress (LC) Subject Headings

Research Methods

8 of 24

1. What is the process of implementing EBA?

EBA pilot setup

  • Resources management system
    • Ex Libris Alma / Primo VE
    • Three subcollections (2016, 2017, and 2018)

Research Methods

9 of 24

2. How do SBU users use EBA ebooks versus subscribed ebook collections?

Results

10 of 24

Use Intensity And Use Percent Of Two Ebook Collections

Results

11 of 24

Use Intensity And Use Percent Of Two Ebook Collections

Results and Discussion

12 of 24

High-Impact Ebook Subjects

Results

13 of 24

High-Impact Ebook Subjects

Results

14 of 24

Results

Book Category

Book Type

1. Briefs

Briefs

2. Reference

Handbook, encyclopedia, reference work

3. Research, professional and trade

Monographs, contributed volumes, proceedings, etc.

4. Textbook

Graduate, advanced undergraduate textbook, and undergraduate textbook

EBA Ebook Composition

15 of 24

EBA Title Selection

Results

16 of 24

EBA Title Selection

Results

17 of 24

EBA Title Selection

Results

18 of 24

EBA Title Selection

Results

19 of 24

  • Similar subjects in two collections
    • Computer Science
    • Engineering
    • Other sciences
  • Engineering ebooks in the EBA collection
    • Supplemented the general STEM ebook collection

Discussion

3. Is EBA an effective acquisition model and how does it impact on the future collection development strategy?

20 of 24

  • Final selection criteria
    • Type of materials
    • Year of publication
    • Title use pattern
  • Timing of the EBA ebook pilot
    • Covid period

Discussion

21 of 24

  • EBA workflow implementation
    • Ex Libris Alma
  • Supplementation
    • Good addition to general STEM ebook collection
  • Year of publication in STEM
    • Preferred most recent publications
  • Neglected monographic materials
    • Handbooks
    • Proceedings
    • Textbooks

Conclusions

22 of 24

  • Developing the EBA profile
    • Diversify ebook publishers and book types
  • Considered expanding EBA project to other disciplines
    • Humanities
    • Social sciences

Conclusions

23 of 24

Tran, C. Y., & Guo, J. X. (2021). Developing user-centered collections at a research library: An Evidence-Based Acquisition (EBA) pilot in STEM. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102434

Publication

24 of 24

Thank You!