Can we talk?
Usability testing of Canvas Discussions Redesign �with instructors and students
1
Presented by
Jennifer Englund
University of
Minnesota
Rebecca George-Burrs
University of
Minnesota
Sam Garza
Instructure
2
Session goal
3
Usability evaluation partnership
4
UX research at the University of Minnesota
5
Stakeholders
Academic
Technology community
Learning technology vendors
Usability Services
ATSS,
AT Tools,
Video Conferencing Services
UX research at Instructure
6
Chime in poll
access code 717-472
7
Usability evaluation process for Canvas Discussion tool
8
Why this tool now?
9
Usability evaluation process overview
10
Develop project plan with Usability Services
Conduct usability evaluation sessions with 4 students and 4 instructors
Debrief and review issues
Image sources: collaborate by Nithinan Tatah, Listen by Soky Art, examination by Basicon - all from Noun Project
Focus question
What prevents people from engaging with one another using the new Discussion tool in a satisfying way?
11
Photo by Saif71.com on Unsplash
Participant recruitment
Instructors from across the UMN system who had created or graded a Canvas discussion were invited to participate in the usability evaluation sessions.
Students from across the UMN system who had participated in a Canvas discussion were invited to participate in the usability evaluation sessions.
12
Student Scenarios
Encompassed the following tasks:
13
Instructor Scenarios
Encompassed the following tasks:
14
Instructure collaboration
15
Photo by charlesdeluvio on Unsplash
What UX testing uncovered and how we plan to move forward
16
Feature: Mentions (@...)
17
UX Discoveries: Mention Feature
18
Response: Mention Feature
Instructure
Created a resource detailing how new functionality works
UMN
Provide communications to students and instructors about the feature (link to Instructure resource) and how to best use it in a online class discussion
19
Feature: Anonymous Discussion
20
UX Discoveries: Anonymous Discussion
21
Response: Anonymous Discussion
Instructure
Updated the feature to allow the editing of anonymous discussion options until a learner has participated in the discussion
UMN
Including this information in a communication to instructors
22
Feature: Instructor Feedback Options
23
UX Discovery: Instructor Feedback Options
Confusion with feedback after selecting “view the full discussion”
24
Response: Instructor Feedback Options
Instructure
UMN
25
Feature: Canvas Groups
26
UX Discovery: Canvas Groups
Instructors expressed strong feelings about being annoyed with the Groups feature and how it integrates with Discussions
27
Response: Canvas Groups
Instructure
Feedback from UX study has kickstarted a discovery group to improve the Groups tool
UMN
28
Takeaways
29
Next Steps: University of Minnesota
30
Photo by charlesdeluvio on Unsplash
Next Steps: Instructure
Continue partnering with institutions
Communicate findings with all stakeholders
Incorporate more feedback and discovery into our work going forward
31
Poll results
We welcome participation in future UX studies: complete the form if you would like to be added to the interest list.
32
Photo by Katie Moum on Unsplash
Questions?
33
Try It Out
34
Enforcement Date
Instructor Resources for Discussion Redesign
Learn about other new features not covered in our presentation.
35
Section Title
Section Subtitle
36
Title
Body
37
Section Title
Description
38
Title
Body 1
Body 2
39
Title
Body
40
Title
Body
41
Section Title
Section Subtitle
42
Section Title
Description
43
Title
Body 2
Body 1
44
This is a long quote treatment. Add your quote here.
45
46
47
48
49
50
Title Here
Subtitle here
51
Title Here
Subtitle here
Title Here
Subtitle here
53
Title Here
Subtitle here
54