1 of 13

Mainstreaming Climate Change

Linking Loss and Damage with Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction

in the Philippines

  • Ana Veronica GABRIEL
  • Oscar M Lopez Center for Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Management Foundation

2 of 13

STRUCTURE

  • Introduction
  • Objectives
  • Methods
  • State of L&D assessment system in the Philippines
  • Linking L&D with CCA and DRR
  • Summary and Conclusion

3 of 13

INTRODUCTION

  • World Risk Report 2014
    • The Philippines is ranked 2nd
    • High risk and high exposure
  • Global Climate Risk Index 2015
    • Long-Term Climate Risk Index (2013): Philippines is in the top ten most affected countries of climate-related events.
  • Extreme weather events along with slow-onset events have caused massive losses and damages in the Philippines.

4 of 13

OBJECTIVES

  • To present the current state of L&D assessment system in the Philippines;
  • To discuss the challenges in incorporating L&D information with CCA and DRR;
  • To provide research and policy recommendations; and
  • To introduce a cyclic and holistic approach on tackling L&D through a framework.

5 of 13

METHODS

  • Review of literature
  • Focus group discussions
  • Key informant interviews
  • National workshop

6 of 13

State of L&D Assessment System in the Philippines

  • The Philippines is using the Post-Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) approach.
  • See figure in the right for the L&D assessment flow and key actors.

7 of 13

State of L&D Assessment System in the Philippines: Issues and Recommendations

Standardization

Data Needs

Capacity building

Governance

Partnership

Uniform set of guidelines and data requirements; data management system; national data repository

Prepare baseline data; valuation of assets and other resources; model projections on losses and damages

Regular trainings; explore possible use of new technologies

Review functions, roles, protocols, and performances of NDRRMC and related stakeholders

Build and strengthen coordination and communication

8 of 13

LINKING L&D WITH CCA AND DRR

Proposed Framework

9 of 13

RELEVANCE OF L&D INFO TO CCA AND DRR

Sectors

Relevant in the following:

Dept. of Health

Infrastructure, manpower, logistics

Dept. of Agriculture

Targeting CCA and DRR measures, to assess gaps in production, growth and development

Dept. of Trade and Industry

Information to respond to: requirement type and extent of intervention

National Economic Development Authority

Providing sense of direction (what to prioritize, evaluation of effectiveness, design infrastructure)

Dept. of Finance

Identification of appropriate model and instruments; justification of viability, to quantify budget requirement for economic recovery and reconstruction

Dept. of Public Works and Highways

Flood control and management

Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council

(Re)settlement purposes

Others

Basis for upgrading of codes, setting up new establishments, delineating expansion areas, and monitoring progress in carrying out recovery and reconstruction programs

Note: Answers are accdng to the participants of the national workshop held on 4/28/15

10 of 13

CHALLENGES IN LINKING L&D WITH CCA AND DRR

  • Poor execution of existing policies

  • Unclear delegation of tasks

  • “Individualized” implementation of harmonized CCA and DRR plans, projects, and programs

11 of 13

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

  • The Philippines has a structured L&D assessment system.

  • Issues on the L&D assessment system in the Philippines are on standardization, data needs, capacity building, partnership, and governance.

12 of 13

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

  • L&D information is essential and relevant in planning and development decisions, and can be used to improve CCA and DRR strategies.

  • There is a need to address existing challenges in the integration of CCA and DRR strategies to efficiently and fully utilize loss and damage information for the improvement of these strategies.

13 of 13

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION

  • Mainstreaming adaptation is essential to prevent future losses and damages.

  • Discussion on mainstreaming climate change should go beyond mitigation and adaptation.

  • Mainstreaming as an approach should include strategies that can enhance efforts to address loss and damage associated with the adverse affects of climate change.