What You Need to Know About Employment Law
Key Issues to Watch
Lorrie Coffey, MJ-LEL, SHRM-SCP, SPHR
Find the slides and resources at
Horizonpointconsulting.com/whatsup
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
EEOC v. Butterball: Third-Party Admin Does Not Erase Employer Liability
Consent decree takeaway: vendor-managed leave and accommodation processes still need employer oversight.
1
What Happened
• Employee requested intermittent leave for cancer treatment and recovery.
• Request was routed to a third-party benefits administrator.
• Leave was not granted; absences counted under attendance policy.
2
What the Court Entered
• Case resolved through a signed two-year consent decree.
• $230,000 plus ADA process changes, liaison role, training, reports.
• Important note: not a litigated merits ruling.
3
Why Employers Should Care
• An employer cannot delegate its ADA compliance obligation.
• Same vendor-risk logic can arise with FMLA, PWFA, leave, and attendance administration.
• Audit handoffs before discipline or termination.
ACTION STEP
When a vendor handles leave or accommodation paperwork, keep an internal owner who confirms: request received, interactive process completed, protected absences coded correctly, and discipline paused until compliance review is complete.
KEY TAKEAWAY:
Vendor can administer the process. Employer owns the compliance decision.
PWFA in Action: What Recent Cases Mean
POLARIS INDUSTRIES
Pregnant employee alleged attendance points and overtime limits tied to pregnancy-related absences.
Attendance and productivity rules still need exceptions when a pregnancy-related limitation triggers the PWFA.
LAGO MAR BEACH RESORT
Employee alleged she was denied a six-week leave accommodation following a stillbirth and then terminated.
Pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions can require leave; do not treat the request as ordinary attendance.
PERMIACARE
Arbitrator found the employer failed to accommodate pregnancy-related limits involving travel and work location.
Consider temporary changes to travel, schedule or location when they are effective and do not create undue hardship.
FAMILY DOLLAR
EEOC alleges a pregnant employee was fired after requesting urgent medical leave and could not immediately provide a doctor’s note.
Avoid rigid documentation rules. Some PWFA requests require prompt action before paperwork is available.
AMAZON - NEW
Proposed nationwide class action alleges Amazon delayed or denied basic accommodations and penalized pregnancy-related breaks or absences.
Speed matters. Respond promptly, consider interim accommodations, and do not let attendance systems penalize protected needs while a request is pending.
CASE / ISSUE
WHAT IT INVOLVED
WHAT IT MEANS FOR EMPLOYERS
THE BOTTOM LINE:
Treat pregnancy-related accommodation requests as an active process - respond promptly, individualize the solution, and make sure attendance, leave and documentation systems do not undermine the accommodation.
FEDERAL
Wage & Hour Watch: Two FLSA Proposals to Track
Introduced in September 2026; neither is current law unless enacted.
1
Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act
H.R. 10323 | Sept. 8, 2026
PROPOSAL - NOT CURRENT LAW
• Would reduce the FLSA overtime threshold for nonexempt employees from 40 to 32 hours/week.
• Phased in: 38, 36, 34, then 32 hours.
• Adds daily overtime: over 8 hours at 1.5x; over 12 hours at 2x.
• Reintroduced proposal; currently no bipartisan cosponsors.
2
Protecting Workers' Wages from Medical Debt Act
H.R. 10373 | Sept. 14, 2026
PROPOSAL - NOT CURRENT LAW
• Would amend the FLSA to prohibit wage garnishment for medical debt.
• Eliminates current federal allowance for garnishing wages for this debt type.
• Bars courts and states from making, executing, or enforcing conflicting orders.
• Effective date would be 6 months after enactment.
EMPLOYER TAKEAWAY:
No action required yet, but these proposals signal continued scrutiny of pay practices, schedules, and payroll deductions.
21
FEDERAL
N.C. Detective Agency: Religious Leave Is Not Just Scheduling Preference
Religious accommodation requests require an interactive process - not just ordinary PTO or scheduling review.
1
What Happened
• Employee requested to be excused from work for a Muslim religious holiday.
• Request was denied; employer was aware of the religious need.
• EEOC said the company did not engage in the required interactive process.
2
EEOC Resolution
• Conciliation agreement: $65,231 in back pay and compensatory damages.
• Requires written policies, procedures for accommodation requests, training, and workplace notice.
• Resolution was without admission of liability.
3
Standard to Remember
• Title VII requires reasonable religious accommodation unless undue hardship applies.
• After Groff, undue hardship means substantial increased costs in relation to the business.
• No longer rely on the old more-than-de-minimis shorthand.
ACTION STEP
Train supervisors not to deny religious holiday or Sabbath-related schedule requests as routine preference conflicts. Pause discipline until HR confirms the interactive process and undue-hardship analysis are complete.
KEY TAKEAWAY:
A religious scheduling request is a Title VII accommodation issue - not just a staffing preference.