1 of 19

COVID Surveillance Proposal

Belmont School Committee Meeting

September 22, 2020

Jamal Saeh, Kate Jeffrey, Larry Schmidt

2 of 19

What is surveillance testing?

  • Diagnostic testing looks for occurrence of COVID-19 at the individual level when there is a reason to believe an individual may be infected

i.e symptomatic

  • Surveillance testing looks for infection within a population or community, and can be used for making health management decisions at the population level

i.e asymptomatic

3 of 19

BPS has effective risk mitigation strategies in place to support hybrid

  • DESE metrics support opening Belmont schools in Hybrid mode now
    • In the past 14 days, 1 new case was registered in Belmont

  • Experts agree for BPS-like hybrid model the risk is very low for students (0.4%) and teachers 0.6% (Glanz et al., Cohen et al)

  • Proactive COVID-19 surveillance reduces risk and provides opportunity to expedite and increase in-person learning

4 of 19

Detection of SARS-CoV-2 with PCR

3 viral genes in parallel and requires 2 of 3 to be positive

false positive rate <3%

5 of 19

Surveillance a tool to enhance/increase in-person learning

Covid testing costs are decreasing

Examples of affordable testing options to support surveillance

    • Urgent Care PCR $160/person (nasal swab, available to individuals)
    • Broad PCR $50/person (nasal swab, used by area private schools and Universities)
    • Mirimus labs ~$15 per person (pooled saliva, proposed for Belmont)

Emerging technologies:

    • BINAXnow 15-min $5/subject (EUA; limited to symptomatic subjects, limited availability until Oct), 3M & other $1-5/subject by Oct/Nov (?)

6 of 19

Mirimus SalivaDetect Rapid Test implemented in school setting

Self collection of saliva via a straw. 2 lay people/250 samples to help with logistics/barcodes

7 of 19

Draft Surveillance Testing Plan and Next Steps

All ~4500 BPS students and staff (prior to start of hybrid). Saliva pooled per class

~10% students

~100% teachers

(e.g. Cohort A end of day on Friday)

~10% students

~100% teachers

(e.g. Cohort B end of day on Friday)

Week 1

~$12K

Week 2

~$12K

Week 0 (Baseline)

~$80k

Next Steps:

  • Individuals/parents in the pool are informed of a suspected positive case
  • Mirimus identifies positive pool down to 2 subjects in ~24 hours (also will likely eliminate a false positive)
  • Individual confirms positivity through PCP and informs school
  • School identifies cohort, initiate contact tracing, and informs individuals to initiate further testing and quarantining if necessary

...

...

8 of 19

Indicative budget for surveillance scenarios

Scenarios

Frequency

Budget ($M)^

Comment

1

Once Weekly

~$2.8

Testing 100% of BPS population:

  • Logistically challenging
  • Brute Force. Random sampling a scientifically established alternative.

2

Twice weekly

~$5.5

3

Once Weekly

~$0.08*

Boston Public Schools (random 5% teachers)

4

Once weekly

~$0.4

Belmont Hill: 15% students at random & teachers can opt in

5

Once weekly

~$0.5

Baseline testing (all BPS), then 10% of students at random and 100% teachers weekly. Provides infrastructure for more parents to opt in.

^Assumes BPS population ~4542 K-12, cost of test is $15 through academic year, includes cost of deconvolution at $760 per pool, assumption for # deconvolution are scaled for DESE yellow metric (calc in backup).

*Assumes a $160 per test; e.g. Urgent Care to minimize infrastructure build up

9 of 19

Surveillance Proposal

  • We recommend daily symptom reporting/temperature checks & surveillance scenario option 5

  • We recommend a two-stage approach: Use current available lab-based technology, and switch to cheaper Point of Care (PoC) solution once available (Oct/Nov?)

  • The budget can be significantly reduced/offset by
    • Funding from CARES act or future COVID relief for K-12
    • Fundraising drive (some already committed)
    • Availability of cheaper PoC tests before year’s end
    • Utilizing existing State and health care infrastructure

10 of 19

Request School Committee

  1. Adopt proposed Option 5 to make hybrid sustainable

  • With robust surveillance implemented, accelerate timetable for hybrid

  • Revisit hybrid model to include more in-person learning

11 of 19

Backup

12 of 19

COVID testing aligns with BPS strategy

BPS Strategic Pillars

Background and comments

Safety

•Need a plan should safe and effective vaccine not be available for 2020/21 academic year

Testing=Vaccine

•Multiple K-12 schools have initiated an surveillance/tests (e.g. Wellesley, Belmont Hill, Boston Public Schools, NH, UN Int/NYC)

Social/Emotional

•Enabling sustained in school learning key to social emotional and academic success

Equity

•Adverse effects of remote learning widen the equity gap

•Exit from BPS is on the rise; defunds schools, and negatively impacts the mission of public education

Education

•Impossible to maintain the rigor of in-person learning without sacrificing quality and content

•Kids have fallen behind and will likely continue to fall behind

Belmont schools & students will become less competitive relative to school districts already in more comprehensive hybrid in MA and around the country

13 of 19

Statistical justification for 7.5+% threshold

Input Parameter

Criteria

Rationale

BPS Population

~4500

Teachers and Students

Target Prevalence

0.11%

Yellow DESE

Confidence in prevalence

>90%

Belmont and neighbouring towns Green or better for ~3 months

Assay Sensitivity

>96%

Prob of infection in between testing

<1%

Meyers’ et al risk 1/1000

Desired Confidence Interval (CI) for Prev.

>90%

90% 1 sided 5% acceptable to ensure Prev <0.11%

95% 2-sided, conservative

Sample calculation using online Epitool

Sample size: estimates based on

  1. A. Fodai et al, One Health, 2020

n~700 (95% CI), or 170 (90% CI)

  • J. Cohen et al white paper suggest testing 70/1000 students, or ~350 tests per week for BPS (~7.5%)

Frequency: Authors suggest surveillance over 14 day period is acceptable; provides flexibility to test each BPS cohort at different days over a 2-week period.

14 of 19

15 of 19

Maximizing education while minimizing COVID risk

In person with countermeasure presents low CUMULATIVE risk

Cohen et al, Institute for Disease Modeling, Seattle, Washington, Aug 13, 2020

BPS-like

Enhanced Hybrid

16 of 19

Maximizing education while minimizing COVID risk

In person with countermeasure presents low CUMULATIVE risk

Cohen et al, Institute for Disease Modeling, Seattle, Washington, Aug 13, 2020

BPS-like

Enhanced Hybrid

17 of 19

Summary of positivity rate

Saeh et al Belmontonian

Town

Risk based on average daily cases per 100,000

Positive cases last 14 days

% positive last 14 days

% Trend

Belmont

Green

9

0.66

No change

Watertown

Green

15

0.8

Lower

Cambridge

Green

34

0.88

No change

Waltham

Green

34

0.88

No change

Arlington

White

5

0.21

No change

Lexington

White

3

0.24

No change

Table 1: Avg. daily COVID-19 case rate per 100K over past two weeks (WCVB accessed 1Sep20)

18 of 19

Comparison of COVID-19 tests

Past infection

Current infection

19 of 19