Dignity, Engagement
& Individualization
A renewed framework for greater equity in our schools
NJ Association of Educational Leaders
March 13, 2024
Ken Greene
Retired Superintendent, Newton Public Schools
Past President, NJ Association of School Administrators
Educational Consultant focused on Equity, Leadership & Policy
Adjunct Associate Professor, Department of Education Policy and Social Analysis, Teachers College, Columbia University
Regional Coordinator, NJ Consortium for Excellence through Equity
Today’s Objectives
Managing for Equality and Equity (N.J.A.C. 6A:7)
Managing for Equality and Equity (N.J.A.C. 6A:7)
Boards of Education must:
Ongoing District Requirements
Ongoing District Requirements
The Process *
* Also, complete the statement of assurance, obtain board resolutions, and submit the package to the county office for review and approval. To be done once every three years; last one was for 2019-22, put on hold since.
How can we move beyond
state requirements?
Move from a conceptual approach to equity
to an operational one
Equity
A central goal and our north star … excellence through equity
It can be defined as creating the conditions in schools and classrooms where children can develop their own uniqueness
It can be measured by the reduction of achievement gaps academically, socially, emotionally, spiritually, and/or physically
It can be activated by reducing or eliminating barriers as much or even more than providing supports
How are we setting up our school systems
for all of our children
so they can develop their own uniqueness?
Equity is not about fixing kids,
it’s about fixing their environment
EQUALITY
ENHANCING EQUITY by PROVIDING SUPPORTS
ENHANCING EQUITY by REDUCING BARRIERS
Breakout
How are you defining equity in your school district?
How does equity fit into your teams, your assessments, and/or your plans?
What barriers might we be able to consider reducing or eliminating?
The Traditional Concepts of DEI
Diversity
Equity
Inclusion
Questions About the Traditional DEI
Diversity is not really a goal: it is our reality.
How can we appreciate and honor it?
Equity is a central goal, our north star.
How can we elevate and promote it?
Inclusion has been an objective for over 40 years.
How can we move closer to realizing it?
An Action-Focused DEI toward
a Goal of Greater Equity for Every Student
Diversity
Equity
Inclusion
Dignity
Engagement
Individualization
from concept to operation
Dignity
Dignity can be defined as the equal value and worth of each human in all our diversity
Unlike respect, it is neither given nor earned, it cannot be lost or taken
We can choose to honor each student’s dignity through appreciation, validation, acceptance, and fair treatment.
Engagement
Student engagement refers to the degree of attention, curiosity, interest, optimism, and passion that students show when they are learning or being taught. *
Disengaged students exhibit lower grades and test scores, less involvement in student activities, chronic absenteeism, and higher behavioral incidents. Often, the longer students stay in school, the less engaged they become.
Engagement can be improved with effective classroom practices based on neuroscience and modern psychology.
Individualization
Identify the essential force that drives each of us
Construct a deep understanding of each person’s unique and distinctive qualities
Support the development of their innate talents into functional strengths through skill and knowledge building in inclusive environments
EQUITY
Individualization
Engagement
Dignity
Increased Access, Sense of Belonging & Social Justice
Breakout
Dignity, Engagement & Individualization
Resources on Dignity
Hicks (2011) defines dignity as “an internal state of peace that comes with the recognition and acceptance of the value and vulnerability of all living things.” The author moves through the psychological and evolutionary foundations that implore us to honor the dignity of others as their birthright, as a key to developing strong relationships, and as a basis of conflict resolution. Its application is essential to developing just cultures in schools and classrooms.
Cobb and Krownapple (2019) argue that educators must consider the foundational elements upon which educational equity is based: belonging and dignity. Once these fundamental human needs are understood, educators can gain clarity on the barriers to meaningful student relationships, especially across dimensions of difference such as race, class, and culture.
Resources on Engagement
Hammond (2015) grounds her work in the latest neuroscience discoveries. “When the brain encounters information, especially during the act of reading and learning, it’s searching for and making connections to what is personally relevant and meaningful … based on his or her cultural frame of reference.” The text goes on to show educators how using culturally responsive teaching leads to authentically engaging students in rigorous curricula.
Shirley & Hargreaves (2021) integrate sociological and psychological perspectives to show why active student engagement is the new frontier of getting more students to higher levels of achievement. Identifying research-based strategies, common misconceptions, and typical obstructions lead the authors to their five paths to student engagement: intrinsic value, importance, association, empowerment, and mastery.
Resources on Individualization
Liesveld, Miller, and Robison (2005) apply decades of research and psychology behind the CliftonStrengths assessment to demonstrate how great teachers make the most of their natural talents. We need to help educators understand their individual themes of talent and how to develop them, so they can guide students as they uncover and grow theirs. This book provides an introduction to the strengths-based approach, and the assessment results are supported by individualized action planning guides.
Pate (2020) traces the roots of low expectations, disconnection, and other barriers to success back to pervasive negative stereotypes of which children are made aware before they even walk through the school door. The cumulative weight of these eventually takes shape as “guilt”, which inhibits students' engagement, learning, and relationships and hurts their prospects for the future. The solution is to create an innocent classroom, liberated from bias and negative narratives where all children believe they can thrive and achieve. To do this, we must get to know the essence of what drives each child.
Dignity
Engagement
Individualization
Mission Statements
Policy Reviews
Book Studies
Survey Questions
Learning Communities
Equity Audits
Book Study
Learning Community
Mission Statement
Policy Review
Survey Questions
Insert some questions into existing assessments (e.g., school climate surveys) that get at whether dignity, engagement or individualization is:
Equity Audit
Breakout
How might these be useful starting point(s)
for cohorts of interested leaders or for individual districts/clusters?
Considering Next Steps (even small ones can be important)
Other ideas ??
Consider building a professional learning series
on dignity, engagement, individualization
through one or more of these activities:
Again, any of these could be designed
for cohorts of interested leaders or for individual districts/clusters.
Additional Resources
Questions?
Discussion?
Email: kennedygreene.edu@gmail.com
Website: https://sites.google.com/view/kennedygreene
Presentation: http://tinyurl.com/yc353md8