1 of 63

What is Patterns?

Presenters: Kristen Harrison & Susan Holveck

1

A Multi-District and STEM Hub Collaboration

Link to Powerpoint - https://tinyurl.com/26mh7b86

2 of 63

Oregon Residents Get Paid $50/hour for Attending this Webinar

  • This project is funded by the Oregon Well Rounded Access Program (WRAP) Grant to PSU and EOU.
  • Attendance will be taken using a google form that you will be asked to complete during the webinar - link - https://tinyurl.com/Attendance-Sem1
  • PSU issues the stipend payments. Receiving a stipend is a two step process:
    • First - Register in Payment Works & receive a vendor ID.
    • Second - A stipend form will be emailed to you to sign via DropBox Sign.
  • Payment occurs once per semester:
    • Payment #1 for webinars attended: August - January
    • Payment #2 for webinars attended: February - June
  • You must be registered for the webinar you are attending in Wild Apricot for payment to happen
  • The registration link for this webinar is: https://pmsp.wildapricot.org/event-5348643

2

@

3 of 63

Please be sure your Full Name is in the Participant List

3

3

First Name Last Name, School District

1

2

4 of 63

Please put into the Idea Capture Tool:

4

  1. What drew you here today?
  2. What do you hope to learn?

As the webinar progresses, please add any additional questions that arise.

5 of 63

Goals for the Sessions

5

Participants will learn about:

  1. Why a common sequence?
  2. Why Patterns?
  3. Key features of Patterns
  4. District, teacher and student impacts
  5. Open source resources

6 of 63

Why a Common Sequence?

6

7 of 63

Curricular Rigor

7

The decision to withhold rigor from some students is one of the most important reasons why schools fail.”

Strong, Silver, & Perini, 2001

8 of 63

Pathway Madness

8

9 of 63

Analyze Science Pathways

9

  1. Can you predict which pathways students are taking using demographic variables (Race, gender, socio-economic standing, ELP, etc.) Courses are not aligned to NGSS
  2. Do some pathways provide better preparation for students - post high school than others?
  3. Who is enrolling in advanced and dual credit courses?
  4. If you have multiple high schools, are the course offerings similar?
  5. What happens if you are a mobile student?
  6. Do state assessment scores show large variances by race?

10 of 63

Curricular Coherence

10

A systemic failure to teach all children the knowledge they need in order to understand what the next grade has to offer is the major source of avoidable injustice in our schools”

E.D. Hirsch, Jr., renowned American educator

11 of 63

Research Tells Us We Should

11

  • Disaggregate data to determine the extent to which students are completing the requirements of a solid academic core
  • Compare course taking paths to ACT and other data indicators of college readiness
  • Determine course sequences that lead to greater success
  • Require students to take those sequences

12 of 63

Why Patterns?

12

13 of 63

It started in the Beaverton School District in 2011

13

  • We looked at our data. Teachers involved in decision.
    • Course taking patterns
    • State Assessment data
    • Pass/fail rates
    • ACT data
    • AP/IB Enrollment data
    • Student mobility data
  • Needed to do something different for equity reasons
  • Wanted a common sequence that all students take
  • Looked at the new NGSS Performance Expectations and tried to fit them into courses
  • Saw that Biology needed to be the culminating course
  • Saw that the concept of energy that is introduced in Physics could be expanded on in Chemistry and again in Biology
  • Looked at the math progressions and needs
  • Saw that Physics could introduce key science concepts of error, level of confidence, provided many opportunities for hands-on learning and engineering.
  • Developed an Action Plan

14 of 63

Process Overview

14

Looked at Data

Common Sequence

Order of Courses

Expand Patterns Beyond Physics

NGSS Alignment

Ongoing revision based on feedback

15 of 63

NGSS Alignment

15

NGSS PE’s

Course

PS

ES

LS

ETS

Physics

13

5

4

Chemistry

11

6

4

Biology

8

28

4

16 of 63

16

PHYSICS

CHEMISTRY

BIOLOGY

Climate Change and Earth Science are integrated into each course

Integrated Engineering and Computational Thinking

17 of 63

Core Ideas of Patterns were laid out in a NSTA article in March 2013

A narrow focus on content alone has the unfortunate consequence of leaving students with naive conceptions of the nature of scienti!c inquiry and the impression that science is simply a body of isolated facts. —NRC 2012, p. 41

Link to Article

Link to Article

17

18 of 63

Our Essential Question is….

18

How do we find and use patterns in nature to predict the future, make data-informed decisions in the present, and understand the past?

19 of 63

Patterns Approach Steps

  1. Guess a reasonable answer to teacher’s prompt.
  2. Create focused research question and hypothesis.
  3. Design method for data collection.
  4. Collect and process data into multiple representations.
  5. Find the line of best fit.
  6. Build consensus around a pattern’s meaning.
  7. Craft an evidence-based line of reasoning.
  8. Communicate a reasoned data-informed prediction with confidence assessment.
  9. Testing initial prompt and reflecting on the process of science.

19

20 of 63

Each Course Builds on the Previous Course

20

  • 4 Patterns
    • Linear
    • Quadratic
    • Inverse
    • Inverse SQ
  • Observable systems
  • Cause-Effect
  • Concrete
  • Hands-on, Active
  • Lay foundation for future courses - Science Works!
  • Math integration
  • Add Patterns
    • Exponential
    • Logarithmic
    • Limits
    • Periodic Table Trends
  • Macroscopic observation of microscopic interactions
  • Labs/activities more complex
  • Builds foundation for Modern Biology

  • Add Patterns
    • Standard Deviation
    • Predator-Prey
    • Complex Interaction Curves
    • Inheritance
    • Limits
  • Causality established through statistics
  • Use Big Data
  • Open Inquiry Project

PHYSICS

CHEMISTRY

BIOLOGY

21 of 63

Key Features of Patterns

21

22 of 63

22

  1. Using the big ideas of science (including the recurring mathematical patterns in nature) to explain phenomenon and create solutions as the spiraling element.

23 of 63

2. Student talk in the role of scientists and engineers drives the instruction.

23

24 of 63

3. Storylines create a coherent framework for more rigorous three dimensional learning.

24

25 of 63

4. Students explicitly compare and contrast low-evidence to high-evidence predictions to see the value of evidence based reasoning.

25

26 of 63

Design Principles

26

27 of 63

1. Student-Centered Learning: Student scientists are placed at the center of each course, continually immersed in opportunities to explain phenomena and solve problems.

  • Three-dimensional learning
  • Leverage student assets
  • Hands-on, minds-on
  • Teacher as facilitator
  • Cultivation of STEM identity

27

28 of 63

2. Collaboration: Student scientists make sense of the world through a systematic, collaborative process.

  • Science as a collaborative process
  • Group accountability
  • Class accountability
  • Building leadership skills

28

29 of 63

3. The Patterns Approach to Inquiry: Student scientists observe, understand, and use patterns and trends in physical and natural systems at multiple scales in order to predict the future, make data-informed decisions in the present, and understand the past. Inquiry activities are designed to take students through a repeated process of the following steps:

  • Guess based on observation
  • Inquiry to determine the pattern
    • Mathematical patterns
    • Trends
  • Making sense of the pattern through consensus
  • Data-informed prediction based on the pattern

29

30 of 63

4. The Patterns Approach to Engineering: Student engineers apply and deepen their knowledge of disciplinary core ideas and crosscutting concepts by investigating problems and designing solutions.

  • Design Methodologies
    • Rapid Prototyping
    • Collaborative Data-Informed Design
    • Research-Informed Design
  • Design Process
    • Problem Definition
    • Design Development
    • Design Optimization
    • Design Evaluation & Communication

30

31 of 63

Engineering Projects

31

  • Physics: wind turbines, bungee jump, guitars, designing shoes, texting & driving app, 50 year energy plan
  • Chemistry: thermometers, candy engineering, chapstick, hot and cold packs, batteries, water quality, ice cream, popcorn
  • Biology: algae biofuel, yogurt, habitat corridors, aquaponics

32 of 63

5. Culturally Responsive: Phenomena and design challenges are selected so that student scientists find relevance in the connection between their identities and lives and what is studied in the classroom.

    • Caring relationships
    • Valuing student capital
    • Relevance
    • Place-based
    • Taking action for social and environmental justice
    • Career connections

32

33 of 63

6. Differentiation: Every student scientist succeeds on differentiated, rigorous tasks.

  • Multiple entry points
  • Challenge
  • Developing confidence in doing science

33

34 of 63

7. Language Rich: Science is taught in conjunction with language. Curriculum and instruction emphasize speaking, writing, interacting, reading, and listening, thereby increasing the academic language capacity of all students, and in particular Multilingual Learners.

  • Language supports
  • Organizational resources
  • Regular opportunities for facilitated discussion

34

35 of 63

8. Three-Dimensional Assessment: A balanced system of formative and summative assessment, that builds towards the performance expectations of the NGSS, provide frequent opportunities for teachers to monitor learning, make instructional adjustments, and assess learning. Assessment opportunities are clearly linked to the standards, and rubrics provide feedback, allowing students to track their progress.

    • Three-Dimensional Assessment .
    • Clear objectives/learning targets
    • Formative assessment

35

36 of 63

District, Teacher and Student Impacts

36

37 of 63

Impact of Sequence on Teachers

37

  • A common sequence allowed teachers to collaborate at a deep level
  • Each teacher does not having to solve common problems alone
  • Reduction of prep load
  • Greater efficiencies allows more time to differentiate instruction
  • Class sizes are more balanced across teachers

38 of 63

Impact of Sequence on Districts

38

  • Common Sequence across District helped students who are migratory to reduce gaps and redundancies in their science education
  • Common targeted PD
  • Common material purchases could come from district level to ensure equity across schools
  • Common curriculum and training helps new teachers to the district- helps recruit high quality teachers

39 of 63

39

Oregon Districts Implementing Patterns

40 of 63

40

Oregon Schools

PD Participants

41 of 63

41

NW Schools

PD Participants

42 of 63

42

Year 1 WRAP Grant

43 of 63

Portland Public Student Data

43

44 of 63

44

Pilot Year

1st year of Implementation

45 of 63

Impact of Sequence on Students

45

1st year of Implementation

46 of 63

46

1st year of Implementation

47 of 63

47

48 of 63

48

49 of 63

49

50 of 63

50

51 of 63

51

52 of 63

52

53 of 63

53

54 of 63

The role of the STEM Hubs

Portland Metro STEM Partnership &

GO STEM (Greater Oregon STEM)

Connect with your local STEM Hub!

https://www.oregon-stem.org/regional-hubs

54

55 of 63

55

STEM Hubs:

  • Funding from ODE & grants
  • Paid PD opportunities for teachers
  • Content Councils (Physics, Chemistry, & Biology) to inform iteration
  • Coordinating Council to support vertical articulation and alignment to district goals
  • Ongoing curriculum & resource development
  • Connecting to STE(A) M Professionals

56 of 63

Role of Collaboration in this Process

56

  • Physics, Chemistry, and Biology Content Councils represent multiple districts.
  • Coordinating Council is focused on the sequence and common needs/challenges.
  • Ex. of Covid CDL - We provided a full year of CDL curriculum for Physics, Chemistry, and Biology.
  • Partnerships with industry to identify and highlight career connections to core curriculum.
  • Partnership of PMSP & GO STEM on Equity Reviews. Teacher input from across Oregon invited to inform future.
  • Partnership across STEM Hubs on CCL connections.

57 of 63

Role

Role

57

  • New Partner to HS Science!
  • Equity Reviews and focused support for
    • Rural teachers & students
    • Digital access for students and improvements

GO STEM is housed at EOU

  • Primary organizer of PD
  • Pay stipends to educator participants
  • Equity Reviews and focused support for
    • BIPOC students
    • Emerging bilingual students
    • Students with disabilities

PMSP is housed at PSU

58 of 63

Open Source Curriculum

58

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Biology

59 of 63

Upcoming Webinars

59

* HS Science teachers from Oregon are paid $50/hour to attend.

  • Workshop Part 1 - Unit 1: Inquiry & Patterns. The Part 1 Workshop is a deeper dive than the webinar into key moments with equipment and teacher pedagogical practices. You will engage in Patterns 1 & 2 activities both as a student and as a teacher reflecting on your experience. Participants need to attend this session if they plan on attending the Part 2 Workshop on September 14.
    • Date: September 7, 2023
    • Time: 4:00 - 6:00 PM
    • Registration Link: https://pmsp.wildapricot.org/event-5351509
    • Facilitators: Bradford Hill & Matt McCollum
  • Webinar - Unit 1: Kinetic Molecular Theory & Climate Change- This webinar session will give you an overview of Chemistry Unit 1. It is designed to go over all key parts of the unit, lesson by lesson, so you will have a better understanding of the scope and sequence for the unit.
    • Date: September 13, 2023
    • TIme: 4:00 - 6:00 PM
    • Registration Link: https://pmsp.wildapricot.org/event-5351747
    • Facilitators: Jomae Sica & Andrea Leech

60 of 63

More courses

Webinar - Student Discourse - This is a 2-part webinar held on Wednesdays, September 25 (Part 1) & October 25 (Part 2) from 4:00 - 5:30 pm. Participants should plan on attending both sessions to receive the maximum benefit.

  • Part 1 Webinar (Sept 25). In this hands-on webinar, participants will learn several talk strategies and protocols that will help them support student discourse in their classroom. We will look at specific places where these can be used in the Patterns curriculum. Teachers will be asked to practice one of the protocols in their classroom between the Part 1 and Part 2 Webinars.
    • Date: September 25, 2023
    • Time: 4:00 - 5:30 PM
    • Registration Link: https://pmsp.wildapricot.org/event-5348645
    • Facilitator: Susan Holveck & Bradford Hill

PLC - Equitable Grading - This is for teachers who want to either begin or deepen their equitable grading practices. This is an all year PLC. It is meant to provide the opportunity for learning and implementation for the topics that will be discussed in the PLC. Each topic will have 2 sessions, so teachers will have the opportunity to dive deeply.

    • Topics
      • Topic 1 (Sept 27, Oct 26) - The purpose of grades
      • Topic 2 (Nov 16, Dec 13) - The foundations of equitable grading
      • Topic 3 (Jan 17, Feb TBD)- Using rubrics for patterns science
      • Topic 4 (March TBD, April TBD) - Motivating students
      • Topic 5 (May TBD, June TBD) - Multiple opportunities
    • What to expect
      • ~45 minutes of theory, practices, and ideas
      • ~30 minutes of group work on problems of practice around the topic
      • ~15 minute report out so everyone gains ideas
    • Dates: Semester 1: Sept 27, Oct 26, Nov 22, Dec 13, & Jan 17.
    • Time: 4:30 - 6:00 PM
    • Registration Link (Semester 1): https://pmsp.wildapricot.org/event-5348679
    • Facilitators: Andrea Leech & Kristi Miller

60

61 of 63

61

62 of 63

Ticket Out the Door

Before you go, please complete this Exit Survey

62

63 of 63

Questions?

63

Please contact us:

Kristen Harrison - kristen.harrison@pdxstem.org

Susan Holveck - susan.holveck@pdxstem.org