1 of 21

Expanding Your “Us”: �Strengthening Police & SUD Provider Partnerships to Build RESILIENCE

Jennifer Holm, LMSW – PSWC, Traverse City Police Department

Paula Lipinski, MSW - CEO, Addiction Treatment Services

Presented at American Society of Addiction Medicine �57th Annual Conference, April 23-26, 2026

2 of 21

Disclosure Information

  • Presenter 1: Jennifer Holm, LMSW
    • No Disclosures
  • Presenter 2: Paula Lipinski, LMSW
    • No Disclosures

3 of 21

Learning Objectives

  • 1. Participants will critique ways in which their current practices further separates “us” vs. “them”

  • 2. The audience will analyze sectors of greatest divide in their communities and for their clients, and calculate the imminence and magnitude of such system separation

  • 3. Session attendees will be challenged to formulate a needed partnership discussion in their communities�

4 of 21

Level Setting

  • In this room, can we all agree to:
    • Have honest discussions & hard conversations
    • Be willing to try to understand
    • Talk about actionable, tangible solutions

    • Ground Rules of our Program – Discussed Every Meeting
      • Quality & Action
      • No Pointing Fingers
      • Facts not Accusations
      • Not Pushing Individual Agendas
      • Time Considerations

5 of 21

Part 1: What’s Not Working?

  • Objective: 1. Participants will critique ways in which their current practices further separates “us” vs. “them”

  1. What barriers and obstacles exist in your work?
  2. What is happening that is hindering the treatment of Substance Use Disorder (SUD)?
  3. Honestly -- Who is your “us”? Who is your “them”?

  • Discuss in small groups

6 of 21

Paula’s Story

  • Then and Now
  • Getting past your own internal thoughts
  • Building, and re-building, relationships
  • Capitalizing on support to re-build
  • The importance of honest conversations

7 of 21

Part 2: �Developing the TCPD/ATS Partnership

  • Why?
    • Individuals with co-occurring substance use disorder and serious mental illness are overrepresented in every part of the criminal justice system (Hancq, South & Vencel, 2021)
    • Repeat arrestees are disproportionately homeless and have co-occurring mental health and substance use disorder diagnoses (Magee et al., 2021)
    • Several barriers exist between law enforcement and substance use disorder (SUD) providers, including sharing information, differing goals, and departmental/provider commitment (Mountain Plains ATTCN, 2020)
    • Effective collaboration solutions have included connecting systems, building trust, sharing data, and developing programs that support regular meetings across systems (Lindenfeld et al., 2024).

8 of 21

Developing the TCPD/ATS Partnership

  • Collaboration pre-PSW: Addiction Treatment Services (ATS) and the Traverse City Police Department (TCPD)
    • Breaking barriers and initiating conversations
    • Treatment entrance for justice-involved people wanting treatment

  • Police Social Worker (PSW) Interview & Program Building
    • Establishing a Quick Response Team… but different
    • Confidentiality & Shared Release
    • Primary and Secondary Partnerships
    • Philosophies: “Everyone is a little bit right,” “Both/And”

9 of 21

Eligibility. To meet the criteria for the RESILIENCE Program, an individual must have experienced a recent overdose �OR have at least two of three:

  • Substance Use Disorder
  • Mental Health Crisis
  • Homelessness

The RESILIENCE Program is a voluntary program

Role. The Police Social Workers and Police Support Services Workers (PSWs) function as coordinators/brokers of services, rather than case managers

10 of 21

Part 3: Changes Over Time

  • Objective #2: The audience will analyze sectors of greatest divide in their communities and for their clients, and calculate the imminence and magnitude of such system separation

  • The evolution of partnership
    • Prioritizing RESILIENCE Program referrals
    • Transitional Beds
    • Withdrawal management entrance procedures and priority
    • Wins & Challenges

11 of 21

Is It Working?

  • RESILIENCE Program Participant #1:
    • Criteria – Substance Use Disorder & Homelessness
    • Police Referral, 11/4/2022
    • 119 pre-referral local law enforcement contacts
      • Post contacts: 2022 – 18 ; 2023 – 8 ; 2024 – 0 ; 2025 – 1
    • History of 20 year prison sentence and 10+ years homeless
    • Post-Referral Journey: Inpatient treatment, recovery housing (x3)
    • Most recently long-term recovery housing with employment
    • “Pothole” task group to discuss permanent post-recovery housing in process

  • **Due to the cyclical nature of vulnerability and trauma, the QRT acknowledges that success stories for our population may come in big, small, short- and long-term achievements. We celebrate the strides participants make toward improving their life in ways that are meaningful to them, and recognize success may not be linear.

12 of 21

December 2025 Data

Unique Referrals

485

# Screened Out

83

Eligible Referrals

402

# Elected Out

70 (17%)

# Participants

286 (71%)

# Inactive

99

# Closed

197

Active Caseload

117

Needs Met Locally

43

Safely Relocated

37

Total LE Contacts Pre-Referral

13,884

Total Overdose Responses

64

# People Engaged

62

# Now Participants

31 (48%)

Unable to Locate

2

Total Overdose Contacts

251

Total PSW Contacts

1,525

Total Participant Discussions in 2025

715

Eligibility Criteria

Homelessness

87.1%

Substance Use or OD

76.4%

Substance Use, No OD

69.2%

Overdose

12.7%

Mental Health

68.5%

% Experiencing All 3

37.7%

16.4% POC

13 of 21

Measuring Effectiveness: The University of Michigan evaluated the effectiveness of the TCPD QRT Program and found a statistically significant reduction in law enforcement contacts for QRT Participants. Preliminary report available; detailed report in 2026.

QRT Overdoses: Michigan State Police reported an 8% statewide overdose increase in July vs. June 2025. Grand Traverse County had 8 overdoses this month (double that in June), but only 2 were in the city, with 1 QRT-eligible — resulting in a decrease in QRT overdoses in July.

Community Services Engagement

# People Engaging in Community Services (Housing/MH/SUD)

230 (57%)

# Engaged in 2025

128

Entered Substance �Use Services

124

Still Engaging - SUD

49 (40%)

Entered Inpatient �Mental Health

50

Still Inpatient MH

17 (34%)

Entered Housing

128

Still Housed

103 (80%)

MH/SUD Engagements (Not double counted)

158 (39%)

Total Services Accessed

300

Transitional Bed Usage

Total T-Bed Use Instances

21

Average Length of Stay

3.2 Days

Total Length of Stay (All)

64 Days

% Successful Exit

15 (71%)

14 of 21

Not Always Rosy

  • Participant Snapshot:
    • Participant #46 has been re-housed twice and has �entered homelessness again both times, is struggling �with substance use and possible dementia
    • Participant #40 was in recovery for 205 days before �relapse, ultimately dying of an overdose.
    • Participant #372 – coordinated jail exit to treatment & housing, now in jail again
  • Potholes to Fill:
    • Return to homelessness following treatment/recovery housing
    • Insurance changes & recovery funding availability, especially for transportation!
    • Housing availability & Shelter capacity
    • Disproportionate number of overdoses for people of Native American descent
  • Other Challenges:
    • Partner relations – changes in funding, insurance changes, �revolving doors of staff, competing priorities for a small puddle of money

15 of 21

Now Back to You

  • Throughout this presentation, we have asked you to consider partners with whom you can work together better

  • NOW: In what ways can you and/or your agency find common ground and expand your “us”? 

  • Discuss in small groups

16 of 21

Now Back to You

  • TIPS that have helped us with difficult partners/problems:
    • “Without an agenda” – Impartiality
      • Whole person, for the good of the person
    • Choosing a partnership to strengthen
      • 2 perspectives – those where you already have a foundation, or finding common ground those who are the most challenging
      • Compromise, reaching out and relationships
    • Everyone is struggling with the same problems
      • Think of three people who you and law enforcement know.
      • What would it take to make this person more successful?
    • “Selling” the partnership: Using what people (staff, agencies) care about
      • SUD staff – not being able to see the full picture
      • LE – Not social workers and shouldn’t have to be!
      • Recovery requires a resource pool

17 of 21

Part 4: Something to Take Home

  • Our Program’s Future: (Because you can ALWAYS do better!)
    • RESILIENCE Program build out – clearer goals, intentional follow up, acuity variation, measuring wins, not stealing wins from other sectors
    • Passport Initiative – whole-person progress across providers
    • Open to replication

  • Your Program’s Future…

18 of 21

Something to Take Home

  • Objective #3: Session attendees will be challenged to formulate a needed partnership discussion in their communities. 

  • So… What Isn’t Working?
    • Making problems into action-packed solutions

      • What needs to happen?
      • Outside-the-box solutions (high overlap of needs)
      • What are YOU willing to change?
      • How can that be changed?

      • Discuss in small groups / Mock Conversation

19 of 21

Final Takeaways/Summary

  • The Asks:
    • Consider partners (especially Law Enforcement) that you can work with better
    • In what ways can you and/or your agency find common ground and expand your “us”?
  • The Challenge: Start the Conversation
    • Stop saying “Well, that group isn’t important” or “we don’t have to”
    • The people who exacerbate stigma are vital to the conversation, too
    • It is making it harder for the person we serve if we don’t work together
    • It is harder for all the agencies working with someone who is struggling
    • Have the uncomfortable conversations

20 of 21

Questions & Further Information

  • Questions and Answers

  • For more information:

    • RESILIENCE Program – Contact Jenn�(231) 631-9263�jholm@traversecitymi.gov

    • Addiction Treatment Services – Contact Paula�(231) 345-5216�paulal@addictiontreatmentservices.org

21 of 21

References

  1. Hancq, E. S., South, K., & Vencel, M. (2021). Dual diagnosis: Serious mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders. Treatment Advocacy Center Office of Research and Public Affairs. https://www.tac.org/reports_publications/dual-diagnosis-serious-mental-illness-and-co-occurring-substance-use-disorders/
  2. Magee, L. A., Fortenberry, J. D., Rosenman, M., Aalsma, M. C., Gharbi, S., & Wiehe, S. E. (2021). Two-year prevalence rates of mental health and substance use disorder diagnoses among repeat arrestees. Health & Justice 9(2). https://healthandjusticejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40352-020-00126-2
  3. Mountain Plains Addiction Technology Transfer Center Network (ATTCN) (2020). SUD collaborations that work: Findings from providers in region 8. https://attcnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/SUD-Service-Report.pdf.
  4. Lindenfeld, Z., Franz, B., Lai, A. Y., Pagan, J. A., Fenstemaker, C., Cronin, C. E., & Chang, J. E. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to establishing partnerships for substance use disorder care transitions between safety-net hospitals and community-based organizations. Journal of General Internal Medicine 39(12): 2150-2159. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-08883-8
  5. U.S. Census Bureau (2024). Population Estimates, July 1, 2024 – Traverse City city, Michigan. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/traversecitycitymichigan/PST045223